American College of Surgeons and Surgical Infection Society: Surgical Site Infection Guidelines, 2016 Update

Journal of the American College of Surgeons

Volumn 224, Issue 1, 2017, Pages 59-74

  Ban, Kristen A ^a,b   Minei, Joseph P ^d   Laronga, Christine ^f   Harbrecht, Brian G ^g   Jensen, Eric H ^h   Fry, Donald E ^c   Itani, Kamal M F ⁱ   Dellinger, E Patchen ^j   Ko, Clifford Y ^a,k   Duane, Therese M ^e  

^a AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS   (United States)

^b LOYOLA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^e John Peter Smith Health Network   (United States)

^f H LEE MOFFITT CANCER CENTER AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^g University of Louisville School of Medicine   (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

ⁱ BOSTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^j UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^k UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTIBIOTIC AGENT; CHLORHEXIDINE; GLUCOSE; IODINE; OXYGEN; PLACEBO;

ANTIBIOTIC PROPHYLAXIS; ANTIBIOTIC THERAPY; BACTERIAL COLONIZATION; BATH; BLOOD GLUCOSE MONITORING; BODY TEMPERATURE; CONFERENCE PAPER; EMERGENCY WARD; GLOVE; HAIR REMOVAL; HEALTH CARE COST; HOSPITAL READMISSION; HUMAN; INTESTINE PREPARATION; LENGTH OF STAY; MEDICAL SOCIETY; METHICILLIN RESISTANT STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK FACTOR; RISK REDUCTION; SCRUB; SMOKING CESSATION; SURGICAL ATTIRE; SURGICAL INFECTION; SUTURE; WOUND ASSESSMENT; WOUND CLOSURE;

HUMANS; SURGICAL WOUND INFECTION;

EID: 85006762236     PISSN: 10727515     EISSN: 18791190     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.10.029     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (139)

1. 1 Anderson, D.J., Podgorny, K., Berrios-Torres, S.I., et al. Strategies to prevent surgical site infections in acute care hospitals: 2014 update. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 35 (2014), 605–627.
2. 2 Bratzler, D.W., Dellinger, E.P., Olsen, K.M., et al. Clinical practice guidelines for antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery. Am J Health Syst Pharm 70 (2013), 195–283.
3. 3 Mangram, A.J., Horan, T.C., Pearson, M.L., et al. Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 20 (1999), 247–278.
4. 4 Magill, S.S., Edwards, J.R., Bamberg, W., et al. Multistate point-prevalence survey of health care-associated infections. N Engl J Med 370 (2014), 1198–1208.
5. 5 National Healthcare Safety Network, Surgical Site Infection (SSI) Event. 2013, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
6. 6 Neumayer, L., Hosokawa, P., Itani, K., et al. Multivariable predictors of postoperative surgical site infection after general and vascular surgery: results from the patient safety in surgery study. J Am Coll Surg 204 (2007), 1178–1187.
7. 7 Campbell, D.A. Jr., Henderson, W.G., Englesbe, M.J., et al. Surgical site infection prevention: the importance of operative duration and blood transfusion—results of the first American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Best Practices Initiative. J Am Coll Surg 207 (2008), 810–820.
8. 8 Kaul, A.F., Jewett, J.F., Agents and techniques for disinfection of the skin. Surg Gynecol Obstet 152 (1981), 677–685.
9. 9 Webster, J., Osborne, S., Preoperative bathing or showering with skin antiseptics to prevent surgical site infection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2, 2015, CD004985.
10. 10 Edmiston, C.E. Jr., Lee, C.J., Krepel, C.J., et al. Evidence for a standardized preadmission showering regimen to achieve maximal antiseptic skin surface concentrations of chlorhexidine gluconate, 4%, in surgical patients. JAMA Surg 150 (2015), 1027–1033.
11. 11 Edmiston, C.E. Jr., Krepel, C.J., Seabrook, G.R., et al. Preoperative shower revisited: can high topical antiseptic levels be achieved on the skin surface before surgical admission?. J Am Coll Surg 207 (2008), 233–239.
12. 12 Cima, R., Dankbar, E., Lovely, J., et al. Colorectal surgery surgical site infection reduction program: a National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-driven multidisciplinary single-institution experience. J Am Coll Surg 216 (2013), 23–33.
13. 13 Pofahl, W.E., Goettler, C.E., Ramsey, K.M., et al. Active surveillance screening of MRSA and eradication of the carrier state decreases surgical-site infections caused by MRSA. J Am Coll Surg 208 (2009), 981–986 discussion 986–988.
14. 14 Awad, S.S., Palacio, C.H., Subramanian, A., et al. Implementation of a methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) prevention bundle results in decreased MRSA surgical site infections. Am J Surg 198 (2009), 607–610.
15. 15 Schweizer, M.L., Chiang, H.Y., Septimus, E., et al. Association of a bundled intervention with surgical site infections among patients undergoing cardiac, hip, or knee surgery. JAMA 313 (2015), 2162–2171.
16. 16 Walsh, E.E., Greene, L., Kirshner, R., Sustained reduction in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus wound infections after cardiothoracic surgery. Arch Intern Med 171 (2011), 68–73.
17. 17 Durand, F., Berthelot, P., Cazorla, C., et al. Smoking is a risk factor of organ/space surgical site infection in orthopaedic surgery with implant materials. Int Orthopaed 37 (2013), 723–727.
18. 18 Hawn, M.T., Houston, T.K., Campagna, E.J., et al. The attributable risk of smoking on surgical complications. Ann Surg 254 (2011), 914–920.
19. 19 Sharma, A., Deeb, A.P., Iannuzzi, J.C., et al. Tobacco smoking and postoperative outcomes after colorectal surgery. Ann Surg 258 (2013), 296–300.
20. 20 Moller, A.M., Villebro, N., Pedersen, T., Tonnesen, H., Effect of preoperative smoking intervention on postoperative complications: a randomised clinical trial. Lancet 359:9301 (2002), 114–117.
21. 21 Reichman, D.E., Greenberg, J.A., Reducing surgical site infections: a review. Rev Obstet Gynecol 2 (2009), 212–221.
22. 22 Born, H., Persky, M., Kraus, D.H., et al. Electronic cigarettes: a primer for clinicians. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 153 (2015), 5–14.
23. 23 Bhatnagar, A., Whitsel, L.P., Ribisl, K.M., et al. Electronic cigarettes: a policy statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 130 (2014), 1418–1436.
24. 24 American College of Surgeons Patient Education Committee. Quit smoking before your operation. Available at: https://www.facs.org/∼/media/files/education/patient%20ed/quitsmoking.ashx. Revised 2015. Accessed October 29, 2016.
25. 25 Dronge, A.S., Perkal, M.F., Kancir, S., et al. Long-term glycemic control and postoperative infectious complications. Arch Surg 141 (2006), 375–380 discussion 380.
26. 26 Maradit Kremers, H., Lewallen, L.W., Mabry, T.M., et al. Diabetes mellitus, hyperglycemia, hemoglobin A1C and the risk of prosthetic joint infections in total hip and knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 30 (2015), 439–443.
27. 27 Acott, A.A., Theus, S.A., Kim, L.T., Long-term glucose control and risk of perioperative complications. Am J Surg 198 (2009), 596–599.
28. 28 Perna, M., Romagnuolo, J., Morgan, K., et al. Preoperative hemoglobin A1c and postoperative glucose control in outcomes after gastric bypass for obesity. Surg Obes Relat Dis 8 (2012), 685–690.
29. 29 Wang, R., Panizales, M.T., Hudson, M.S., et al. Preoperative glucose as a screening tool in patients without diabetes. J Surg Res 186 (2014), 371–378.
30. 30 Kwon, S., Thompson, R., Dellinger, P., et al. Importance of perioperative glycemic control in general surgery: a report from the Surgical Care and Outcomes Assessment Program. Ann Surg 257 (2013), 8–14.
31. 31 Kotagal, M., Symons, R.G., Hirsch, I.B., et al. Perioperative hyperglycemia and risk of adverse events among patients with and without diabetes. Ann Surg 261 (2015), 97–103.
32. 32 Kiran, R.P., Turina, M., Hammel, J., Fazio, V., The clinical significance of an elevated postoperative glucose value in nondiabetic patients after colorectal surgery: evidence for the need for tight glucose control?. Ann Surg 258 (2013), 599–604 discussion 604–605.
33. 33 Gupta, K., Strymish, J., Abi-Haidar, Y., et al. Preoperative nasal methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus status, surgical prophylaxis, and risk-adjusted postoperative outcomes in veterans. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 32 (2011), 791–796.
34. 34 Allareddy, V., Das, A., Lee, M.K., et al. Prevalence, predictors, and outcomes of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in patients undergoing major surgical procedures in the United States: a population-based study. Am J Surg 210 (2015), 59–67.
35. 35 Kalra, L., Camacho, F., Whitener, C.J., et al. Risk of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus surgical site infection in patients with nasal MRSA colonization. Am J Infect Cont 41 (2013), 1253–1257.
36. 36 Murphy, E., Spencer, S.J., Young, D., et al. MRSA colonisation and subsequent risk of infection despite effective eradication in orthopaedic elective surgery. J Bone Joint Surg 93 (2011), 548–551.
37. 37 Bode, L.G., Kluytmans, J.A., Wertheim, H.F., et al. Preventing surgical-site infections in nasal carriers of Staphylococcus aureus. N Engl J Med 362 (2010), 9–17.
38. 38 van Rijen, M., Bonten, M., Wenzel, R., Kluytmans, J., Mupirocin ointment for preventing Staphylococcus aureus infections in nasal carriers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev(4), 2008, CD006216.
39. 39 Miller, M.A., Dascal, A., Portnoy, J., Mendelson, J., Development of mupirocin resistance among methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus after widespread use of nasal mupirocin ointment. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 17 (1996), 811–813.
40. 40 Bull, A.L., Worth, L.J., Richards, M.J., Impact of vancomycin surgical antibiotic prophylaxis on the development of methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus surgical site infections: report from Australian Surveillance Data (VICNISS). Ann Surg 256 (2012), 1089–1092.
41. 41 Abi-Haidar, Y., Gupta, K., Strymish, J., et al. Factors associated with post-operative conversion to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus positivity or infection in initially MRSA-negative patients. Surg Infect 12 (2011), 435–442.
42. 42 Fry, D.E., Antimicrobial bowel preparation for elective colon surgery. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 17 (2016), 269–274.
43. 43 Guenaga, K.F., Matos, D., Wille-Jorgensen, P., Mechanical bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev(9), 2011, CD001544.
44. 44 Fry, D.E., Colon preparation and surgical site infection. Am J Surg 202 (2011), 225–232.
45. 45 Kiran, R.P., Murray, A.C., Chiuzan, C., et al. Combined preoperative mechanical bowel preparation with oral antibiotics significantly reduces surgical site infection, anastomotic leak, and ileus after colorectal surgery. Ann Surg 262 (2015), 416–425.
46. 46 Chen, M., Song, X., Chen, L.Z., et al. Comparing mechanical bowel preparation with both oral and systemic antibiotics versus mechanical bowel preparation and systemic antibiotics alone for the prevention of surgical site infection after elective colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials. Dis Colon Rectum 59 (2016), 70–78.
47. 47 Hata, H., Yamaguchi, T., Hasegawa, S., et al. Oral and parenteral versus parenteral antibiotic prophylaxis in elective laparoscopic colorectal surgery (JMTO PREV 07-01): a phase 3, multicenter, open-label, randomized trial. Ann Surg 263 (2016), 1085–1091.
48. 48 Kim, E.K., Sheetz, K.H., Bonn, J., et al. A statewide colectomy experience: the role of full bowel preparation in preventing surgical site infection. Ann Surg 259 (2014), 310–314.
49. 49 Nelson, R.L., Gladman, E., Barbateskovic, M., Antimicrobial prophylaxis for colorectal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 5, 2014, CD001181.
50. 50 Morris, M.S., Graham, L.A., Chu, D.I., et al. Oral antibiotic bowel preparation significantly reduces surgical site infection rates and readmission rates in elective colorectal surgery. Ann Surg 261 (2015), 1034–1040.
51. 51 Itani, K.M., Care bundles and prevention of surgical site infection in colorectal surgery. JAMA 314 (2015), 289–290.
52. 52 Keenan, J.E., Speicher, P.J., Thacker, J.K., et al. The preventive surgical site infection bundle in colorectal surgery: an effective approach to surgical site infection reduction and health care cost savings. JAMA Surg 149 (2014), 1045–1052.
53. 53 Anthony, T., Murray, B.W., Sum-Ping, J.T., et al. Evaluating an evidence-based bundle for preventing surgical site infection: a randomized trial. Arch Surg 146 (2011), 263–269.
54. 54 Ata, A., Lee, J., Bestle, S.L., et al. Postoperative hyperglycemia and surgical site infection in general surgery patients. Arch Surg 145 (2010), 858–864.
55. 55 Vriesendorp, T.M., Morelis, Q.J., Devries, J.H., et al. Early post-operative glucose levels are an independent risk factor for infection after peripheral vascular surgery. A retrospective study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 28 (2004), 520–525.
56. 56 Bratzler, D.W., Hunt, D.R., The surgical infection prevention and surgical care improvement projects: national initiatives to improve outcomes for patients having surgery. Clin Infect Dis 43 (2006), 322–330.
57. 57 Chan, R.P., Galas, F.R., Hajjar, L.A., et al. Intensive perioperative glucose control does not improve outcomes of patients submitted to open-heart surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Clinics 64 (2009), 51–60.
58. 58 Bilotta, F., Spinelli, A., Giovannini, F., et al. The effect of intensive insulin therapy on infection rate, vasospasm, neurologic outcome, and mortality in neurointensive care unit after intracranial aneurysm clipping in patients with acute subarachnoid hemorrhage: a randomized prospective pilot trial. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 19 (2007), 156–160.
59. 59 Desai, S.P., Henry, L.L., Holmes, S.D., et al. Strict versus liberal target range for perioperative glucose in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting: a prospective randomized controlled trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 143 (2012), 318–325.
60. 60 Emam, I.A., Allan, A., Eskander, K., et al. Our experience of controlling diabetes in the peri-operative period of patients who underwent cardiac surgery. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 88 (2010), 242–246.
61. 61 Grey, N.J., Perdrizet, G.A., Reduction of nosocomial infections in the surgical intensive-care unit by strict glycemic control. Endocr Pract 10:Suppl 2 (2004), 46–52.
62. 62 Kirdemir, P., Yildirim, V., Kiris, I., et al. Does continuous insulin therapy reduce postoperative supraventricular tachycardia incidence after coronary artery bypass operations in diabetic patients?. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 22 (2008), 383–387.
63. 63 Lazar, H.L., McDonnell, M.M., Chipkin, S., et al. Effects of aggressive versus moderate glycemic control on clinical outcomes in diabetic coronary artery bypass graft patients. Ann Surg 254 (2011), 458–463 discussion 463–464.
64. 64 Sidhwa, F., Itani, K.M., Skin preparation before surgery: options and evidence. Surg Infect 16 (2015), 14–23.
65. 65 Maiwald, M., Chan, E.S., The forgotten role of alcohol: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical efficacy and perceived role of chlorhexidine in skin antisepsis. PLoS One, 7(9), 2012, e44277.
66. 66 Dumville, J.C., McFarlane, E., Edwards, P., et al. Preoperative skin antiseptics for preventing surgical wound infections after clean surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 4, 2015, CD003949.
67. 67 Chen, C.F., Han, C.L., Kan, C.P., et al. Effect of surgical site infections with waterless and traditional hand scrubbing protocols on bacterial growth. Am J Infect Cont 40:4 (2012), e15–e17.
68. 68 Tanner, J., Dumville, J.C., Norman, G., Fortnam, M., Surgical hand antisepsis to reduce surgical site infection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 1, 2016, CD004288.
69. 69 Board of Regents of the American College of Surgeons. Statement on operating room attire. Bull Am Coll Surg 2016;October:47.
70. 70 Association of Perioperative Registered Nurses, Recommended practices for surgical attire. Perioperative Standards and Recommended Practices, 2011, Association of Perioperative Registered Nurses, Denver, CO, 57–72.
71. 71 Spruce, L., Back to basics: preventing surgical site infections. AORN J 99 (2014), 600–608 quiz 609–611.
72. 72 Belkin, N.L., Home laundering of soiled surgical scrubs: surgical site infections and the home environment. Am J Infect Control 29 (2001), 58–64.
73. 73 Wright, S.N., Gerry, J.S., Busowski, M.T., et al. Gordonia bronchialis sternal wound infection in 3 patients following open heart surgery: intraoperative transmission from a healthcare worker. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 33 (2012), 1238–1241.
74. 74 Owers, K.L., James, E., Bannister, G.C., Source of bacterial shedding in laminar flow theatres. J Hosp Infect 58 (2004), 230–232.
75. 75 Munday, G.S., Deveaux, P., Roberts, H., et al. Impact of implementation of the Surgical Care Improvement Project and future strategies for improving quality in surgery. Am J Surg 208 (2014), 835–840.
76. 76 Berenguer, C.M., Ochsner, M.G. Jr., Lord, S.A., Senkowski, C.K., Improving surgical site infections: using National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data to institute Surgical Care Improvement Project protocols in improving surgical outcomes. J Am Coll Surg 210 (2010), 737–741 741–743.
77. 77 Ingraham, A.M., Cohen, M.E., Bilimoria, K.Y., et al. Association of surgical Care Improvement Project infection-related process measure compliance with risk-adjusted outcomes: implications for quality measurement. J Am Coll Surg 211 (2010), 705–714.
78. 78 Cataife, G., Weinberg, D.A., Wong, H.H., Kahn, K.L., The effect of Surgical Care Improvement Project (SCIP) compliance on surgical site infections (SSI). Med Care 52:Suppl 1 (2014), S66–S73.
79. 79 Dellinger, E.P., Adherence to Surgical Care Improvement Project measures: the whole is greater than the parts. Future Microbiol 5 (2010), 1781–1785.
80. 80 Koch, C.G., Li, L., Hixson, E., et al. Is it time to refine? An exploration and simulation of optimal antibiotic timing in general surgery. J Am Coll Surg 217 (2013), 628–635.
81. 81 Steinberg, J.P., Braun, B.I., Hellinger, W.C., et al. Timing of antimicrobial prophylaxis and the risk of surgical site infections: results from the Trial to Reduce Antimicrobial Prophylaxis Errors. Ann Surg 250 (2009), 10–16.
82. 82 Hawn, M.T., Richman, J.S., Vick, C.C., et al. Timing of surgical antibiotic prophylaxis and the risk of surgical site infection. JAMA Surg 148 (2013), 649–657.
83. 83 Forse, R.A., Karam, B., MacLean, L.D., Christou, N.V., Antibiotic prophylaxis for surgery in morbidly obese patients. Surgery 106 (1989), 750–756 discussion 756–757.
84. 84 Owens, C.D., Stoessel, K., Surgical site infections: epidemiology, microbiology and prevention. J Hosp Infect 70:Suppl 2 (2008), 3–10.
85. 85 Yoshida, J., Oyama, M., Furugaki, K., et al. Does antimicrobial homogeneity index influence surgical site infection? A 10-year study in lung, breast, and general surgery. J Infect Chemother 17 (2011), 825–830.
86. 86 Deierhoi, R.J., Dawes, L.G., Vick, C., et al. Choice of intravenous antibiotic prophylaxis for colorectal surgery does matter. J Am Coll Surg 217 (2013), 763–769.
87. 87 Cannon, J.A., Altom, L.K., Deierhoi, R.J., et al. Preoperative oral antibiotics reduce surgical site infection following elective colorectal resections. Dis Colon Rectum 55 (2012), 1160–1166.
88. 88 Nelson, R.L., Glenny, A.M., Song, F., Antimicrobial prophylaxis for colorectal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev(1), 2009, CD001181.
89. 89 McDonald, M., Grabsch, E., Marshall, C., Forbes, A., Single- versus multiple-dose antimicrobial prophylaxis for major surgery: a systematic review. Aust N Z J Surg 68 (1998), 388–396.
90. 90 Khan, U.D., Breast augmentation, antibiotic prophylaxis, and infection: comparative analysis of 1,628 primary augmentation mammoplasties assessing the role and efficacy of antibiotics prophylaxis duration. Aesthetic Plast Surg 34 (2010), 42–47.
91. 91 Clayton, J.L., Bazakas, A., Lee, C.N., et al. Once is not enough: withholding postoperative prophylactic antibiotics in prosthetic breast reconstruction is associated with an increased risk of infection. Plast Reconstr Surg 130 (2012), 495–502.
92. 92 Avashia, Y.J., Mohan, R., Berhane, C., Oeltjen, J.C., Postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis for implant-based breast reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix. Plast Reconstr Surg 131 (2013), 453–461.
93. 93 Phillips, B.T., Bishawi, M., Dagum, A.B., et al. A systematic review of antibiotic use and infection in breast reconstruction: what is the evidence?. Plast Reconstr Surg 131 (2013), 1–13.
94. 94 Townley, W.A., Baluch, N., Bagher, S., et al. A single pre-operative antibiotic dose is as effective as continued antibiotic prophylaxis in implant-based breast reconstruction: a matched cohort study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 68 (2015), 673–678.
95. 95 Phillips, B.T., Fourman, M.S., Bishawi, M., et al. Are prophylactic postoperative antibiotics necessary for immediate breast reconstruction? results of a prospective randomized clinical trial. J Am Coll Surg 222 (2016), 1116–1124.
96. 96 Thornley, P., Evaniew, N., Riediger, M., et al. Postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis in total hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. CMAJ Open 3 (2015), E338–E343.
97. 97 Kurz, A., Sessler, D.I., Lenhardt, R., Perioperative normothermia to reduce the incidence of surgical-wound infection and shorten hospitalization. Study of Wound Infection and Temperature Group. N Engl J Med 334 (1996), 1209–1215.
98. 98 Sessler, D.I., Complications and treatment of mild hypothermia. Anesthesiology 95 (2001), 531–543.
99. 99 Seamon, M.J., Wobb, J., Gaughan, J.P., et al. The effects of intraoperative hypothermia on surgical site infection: an analysis of 524 trauma laparotomies. Ann Surg 255 (2012), 789–795.
100. 100 Melling, A.C., Ali, B., Scott, E.M., Leaper, D.J., Effects of preoperative warming on the incidence of wound infection after clean surgery: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 358:9285 (2001), 876–880.
101. 101 Wong, P.F., Kumar, S., Bohra, A., et al. Randomized clinical trial of perioperative systemic warming in major elective abdominal surgery. Br J Surg 94 (2007), 421–426.
102. 102 Reid, K., Pockney, P., Draganic, B., Smith, S.R., Barrier wound protection decreases surgical site infection in open elective colorectal surgery: a randomized clinical trial. Dis Colon Rectum 53 (2010), 1374–1380.
103. 103 Gheorghe, A., Calvert, M., Pinkney, T.D., et al. Systematic review of the clinical effectiveness of wound-edge protection devices in reducing surgical site infection in patients undergoing open abdominal surgery. Ann Surg 255 (2012), 1017–1029.
104. 104 Mihaljevic, A.L., Schirren, R., Ozer, M., et al. Multicenter double-blinded randomized controlled trial of standard abdominal wound edge protection with surgical dressings versus coverage with a sterile circular polyethylene drape for prevention of surgical site infections: a CHIR-Net trial (BaFO; NCT01181206). Ann Surg 260 (2014), 730–737 discussion 737–739.
105. 105 Pinkney, T.D., Calvert, M., Bartlett, D.C., et al. Impact of wound edge protection devices on surgical site infection after laparotomy: multicentre randomised controlled trial (ROSSINI Trial). BMJ, 347, 2013, f4305.
106. 106 Nakamura, T., Kashimura, N., Noji, T., et al. Triclosan-coated sutures reduce the incidence of wound infections and the costs after colorectal surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Surgery 153 (2013), 576–583.
107. 107 Wang, Z.X., Jiang, C.P., Cao, Y., Ding, Y.T., Systematic review and meta-analysis of triclosan-coated sutures for the prevention of surgical-site infection. Br J Surg 100 (2013), 465–473.
108. 108 Guo, J., Pan, L.H., Li, Y.X., et al. Efficacy of triclosan-coated sutures for reducing risk of surgical site infection in adults: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. J Surg Res 201 (2016), 105–117.
109. 109 Tanner, J., Parkinson, H., Double gloving to reduce surgical cross-infection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev(3), 2006, CD003087.
110. 110 Ortiz, H., Armendariz, P., Kreisler, E., et al. Influence of rescrubbing before laparotomy closure on abdominal wound infection after colorectal cancer surgery: results of a multicenter randomized clinical trial. Arch Surg 147 (2012), 614–620.
111. 111 Ghuman, A., Chan, T., Karimuddin, A.A., et al. Surgical site infection rates following implementation of a colorectal closure bundle in elective colorectal surgeries. Dis Colon Rectum 58 (2015), 1078–1082.
112. 112 Cohn, S.M., Giannotti, G., Ong, A.W., et al. Prospective randomized trial of two wound management strategies for dirty abdominal wounds. Ann Surg 233 (2001), 409–413.
113. 113 Bhangu, A., Singh, P., Lundy, J., Bowley, D.M., Systemic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing primary vs delayed primary skin closure in contaminated and dirty abdominal incisions. JAMA Surg 148 (2013), 779–786.
114. 114 Pommerening, M.J., Kao, L.S., Sowards, K.J., et al. Primary skin closure after damage control laparotomy. Br J Surg 102 (2015), 67–75.
115. 115 Lee, J.T., Marquez, T.T., Clerc, D., et al. Pursestring closure of the stoma site leads to fewer wound infections: results from a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum 57 (2014), 1282–1289.
116. 116 O'Neal, P.B., Itani, K.M., Antimicrobial formulation and delivery in the prevention of surgical site infection. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 17 (2016), 275–285.
117. 117 Bennett-Guerrero, E., Pappas, T.N., Koltun, W.A., et al. Gentamicin-collagen sponge for infection prophylaxis in colorectal surgery. N Engl J Med 363 (2010), 1038–1049.
118. 118 McHugh, S.M., Collins, C.J., Corrigan, M.A., et al. The role of topical antibiotics used as prophylaxis in surgical site infection prevention. J Antimicrob Chemother 66 (2011), 693–701.
119. 119 Bakhsheshian, J., Dahdaleh, N.S., Lam, S.K., et al. The use of vancomycin powder in modern spine surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical evidence. World Neurosurg 83 (2015), 816–823.
120. 120 Qadan, M., Akca, O., Mahid, S.S., et al. Perioperative supplemental oxygen therapy and surgical site infection: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Surg 144 (2009), 359–366 discussion 366–367.
121. 121 Meyhoff, C.S., Wetterslev, J., Jorgensen, L.N., et al. Effect of high perioperative oxygen fraction on surgical site infection and pulmonary complications after abdominal surgery: the PROXI randomized clinical trial. JAMA 302 (2009), 1543–1550.
122. 122 Belda, F.J., Aguilera, L., Garcia de la Asuncion, J., et al. Supplemental perioperative oxygen and the risk of surgical wound infection: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 294 (2005), 2035–2042.
123. 123 Ando, M., Tamaki, T., Yoshida, M., et al. Surgical site infection in spinal surgery: a comparative study between 2-octyl-cyanoacrylate and staples for wound closure. Eur Spine J 23 (2014), 854–862.
124. 124 Quinn, J., Maw, J., Ramotar, K., et al. Octylcyanoacrylate tissue adhesive versus suture wound repair in a contaminated wound model. Surgery 122 (1997), 69–72.
125. 125 Dumville, J.C., Coulthard, P., Worthington, H.V., et al. Tissue adhesives for closure of surgical incisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 11, 2014, CD004287.
126. 126 Bonds, A.M., Novick, T.K., Dietert, J.B., et al. Incisional negative pressure wound therapy significantly reduces surgical site infection in open colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 56 (2013), 1403–1408.
127. 127 Soares, K.C., Baltodano, P.A., Hicks, C.W., et al. Novel wound management system reduction of surgical site morbidity after ventral hernia repairs: a critical analysis. Am J Surg 209 (2015), 324–332.
128. 128 Matatov, T., Reddy, K.N., Doucet, L.D., et al. Experience with a new negative pressure incision management system in prevention of groin wound infection in vascular surgery patients. J Vasc Surg 57 (2013), 791–795.
129. 129 Dickinson Jennings, C., Culver Clark, R., Baker, J.W., A prospective, randomized controlled trial comparing 3 dressing types following sternotomy. Ostomy Wound Manage 61 (2015), 42–49.
130. 130 Krieger, B.R., Davis, D.M., Sanchez, J.E., et al. The use of silver nylon in preventing surgical site infections following colon and rectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 54 (2011), 1014–1019.
131. 131 Abboud, E.C., Settle, J.C., Legare, T.B., et al. Silver-based dressings for the reduction of surgical site infection: review of current experience and recommendation for future studies. Burns 40:Suppl 1 (2014), S30–S39.
132. 132 Toon, C.D., Ramamoorthy, R., Davidson, B.R., Gurusamy, K.S., Early versus delayed dressing removal after primary closure of clean and clean-contaminated surgical wounds. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 9, 2013, CD010259.
133. 133 Toon, C.D., Lusuku, C., Ramamoorthy, R., et al. Early versus delayed dressing removal after primary closure of clean and clean-contaminated surgical wounds. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 9, 2015, CD010259.
134. 134 Towfigh, S., Clarke, T., Yacoub, W., et al. Significant reduction of wound infections with daily probing of contaminated wounds: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Arch Surg 146 (2011), 448–452.
135. 135 Toon, C.D., Sinha, S., Davidson, B.R., Gurusamy, K.S., Early versus delayed post-operative bathing or showering to prevent wound complications. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 7, 2015, CD010075.
136. 136 Mannien, J., Wille, J.C., Snoeren, R.L., van den Hof, S., Impact of postdischarge surveillance on surgical site infection rates for several surgical procedures: results from the nosocomial surveillance network in The Netherlands. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 27 (2006), 809–816.
137. 137 Ju, M.H., Ko, C.Y., Hall, B.L., et al. A comparison of 2 surgical site infection monitoring systems. JAMA Surg 150 (2015), 51–57.
138. 138 Sanger, P.C., Hartzler, A., Han, S.M., et al. Patient perspectives on post-discharge surgical site infections: towards a patient-centered mobile health solution. PLoS One, 9, 2014, e114016.
139. 139 Ming, D.Y., Chen, L.F., Miller, B.A., Anderson, D.J., The impact of depth of infection and postdischarge surveillance on rate of surgical-site infections in a network of community hospitals. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 33 (2012), 276–282.