Feed supplementation with avian Propionibacterium acidipropionici contributes to mucosa development in early stages of rearing broiler chickens

Beneficial Microbes

Volumn 7, Issue 5, 2016, Pages 687-698

  Arganaraz Martinez E ^a,b   Babot, J D ^b   Lorenzo Pisarello, M J ^a   Apella, M C ^a,c   Perez Chaia, A ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE TUCUMÁN   (Argentina)

^b Facultad de Ciencias Naturales e Instituto M Lillo   (Argentina)

^c CENTRO DE REFERENCIA PARA LACTOBACILOS CERELA CONICET   (Argentina)

Author keywords

Chicken; Dairy propionibacteria; Gut; Microbiota; Probiotic

Indexed keywords

ACETIC ACID; ALCOHOL; BUTYRIC ACID; DRINKING WATER; LACTIC ACID; MUCIN; N ACETYLGLUCOSAMINE; PROBIOTIC AGENT; PROPIONIC ACID; SHORT CHAIN FATTY ACID; BUTYRIC ACID DERIVATIVE; VOLATILE FATTY ACID;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ANTIMICROBIAL ACTIVITY; ARTICLE; BACTERIAL STRAIN; BACTERIAL TRANSLOCATION; BACTEROIDES; BIFIDOBACTERIUM; CECUM; CELL COUNT; CHICK; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); CONTROLLED STUDY; DIET SUPPLEMENTATION; FLUID INTAKE; FOOD INTAKE; GLYCOSYLATION; GOBLET CELL; INTESTINE FLORA; INTESTINE MUCOSA; LACTIC ACID BACTERIUM; LECTIN BINDING; MICROBIAL COLONIZATION; MONOCULTURE; MUCUS SECRETION; NONHUMAN; ORGANOGENESIS; POULTRY; PROPIONIBACTERIUM; PROPIONIBACTERIUM ACIDIPROPIONICI; RISK ASSESSMENT; WEIGHT GAIN; ANIMAL; ANIMAL FOOD; CHICKEN; DIET; DRUG EFFECTS; FEMALE; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; IMMUNOLOGY; INTESTINE; METABOLISM; MICROBIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; RANDOMIZATION; VETERINARY;

ANIMAL FEED; ANIMALS; BUTYRATES; CECUM; CHICKENS; DIET; FATTY ACIDS, VOLATILE; FEMALE; GASTROINTESTINAL MICROBIOME; INTESTINAL MUCOSA; INTESTINES; LACTIC ACID; PROBIOTICS; PROPIONIBACTERIUM; RANDOM ALLOCATION; WEIGHT GAIN;

EID: 85006743905     PISSN: 18762883     EISSN: 18762891     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3920/BM2016.0077     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Association of American Feed Control Officials (AAFCO), 1999. Official publication. Georgia Department of Agriculture, Plant Food., Feed and Grain Division, Capital Square, Atlanta, GA, USA.
2. Adams, M.C., Luo, J., Rayward, D., King, S., Gibson, R. and Moghaddam, G.H., 2008. Selection of a novel direct-fed microbial to enhance weight gain in intensively reared calves. Animal Feed Science and Technology 145: 41-52.
3. Amann, R.I., Binder, B.J., Olson, R.J., Chisholm, S.W., Devereux, R. and Stahl, D.A., 1990. Combination of 16S rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes with flow cytometry for analyzing mixed microbial populations. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 56: 1919-1925.
4. Apajalahti, J., Kettunen, A. and Graham, H., 2004. Characteristics of the gastrointestinal microbial communities, with special reference to the chicken. World's Poultry Science Journal 60: 223-232.
5. Argañaraz-Martínez, E., Babot, J.D., Apella, M.C. and Perez Chaia, A., 2013. Physiological and functional characteristics of Propionibacterium strains of the poultry microbiota and relevance for the development of probiotic products. Anaerobe 23: 27-37.
6. Awad, W.A., Ghareeb, K., Abdel-Raheem, S. and Bohm, J., 2009. Effects of dietary inclusion of probiotic and synbiotic on growth performance, organ weights, and intestinal histomorphology of broiler chickens. Poultry Science 88: 49-56.
7. Babot, J.D., Hidalgo, M., Argañaraz-Martínez, E., Apella, M.C. and Perez Chaia, A., 2011. Fluorescence in situ hybridization for detection of classical propionibacteria with specific 16S rRNAtargeted probes and its application to the enumeration in Gruyère cheese. International Journal of Food Microbiology 145: 221-228.
8. Chae, B., Ingale, S., Kim, J., Kim, K., Sen, S., Lee, S., Khong, C., Kim, E. and Kwon, I., 2012. Effect of dietary supplementation of probiotics on performance, caecal microbiology and small intestinal morphology of broiler chickens. Animal Nutrition and Feed Technology 12: 1-12.
9. Cousin, F.J., Foligne, B., Deutsch, S.M., Massart, S., Parayre, S., Le Loir, Y., Boudry, G. and Jan, G., 2012. Assessment of the probiotic potential of a dairy product fermented by Propionibacterium freudenreichii in piglets. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 60: 7917-7927.
10. Cummins, C.S. and Johnson, J.L., 1992. The genus Propionibacterium. In: Balows, E., Truper, H.G., Dworkin, M., Harder, W. and Schleifer, K.H. (ed.) The prokaryotes. Springer, Berlin, Germany.
11. Dean-Nystrom, E.A. and Samuel, J.E., 1994. Age-related resistance to 987P fimbria-mediated colonization correlates with specific glycolipid receptors in intestinal mucus in swine. Infection and Immunity 62: 4789-4794.
12. Depeint, F., Tzortzis, G., Vulevic, J., I'Anson, K. and Gibson, G.R., 2008. Prebiotic evaluation of a novel galactooligosaccharide mixture produced by the enzymatic activity of Bifidobacterium bifidum NCIMB 41171, in healthy humans: a randomized, double-blind, crossover, placebo-controlled intervention study. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 87: 785-791.
13. Deplancke, B. and Gaskins, H.R., 2001. Microbial modulation of innate defense: goblet cells and the intestinal mucus layer. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 73: 1131S-1141S.
14. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), 2012. Panel on biological hazards scientific opinion on the maintenance of the list of QPS biological agents intentionally added to food and feed. EFSA Journal 10(12): 3020.
15. Forder, R.E., Howarth, G.S., Tivey, D.R. and Hughes, R.J., 2007. Bacterial modulation of small intestinal goblet cells and mucin composition during early posthatch development of poultry. Poultry Science 86: 2396-2403.
16. Franks, A.H., Harmsen, H.J., Raangs, G.C., Jansen, G.J., Schut, F. and Welling, G.W., 1998. Variations of bacterial populations in human feces measured by fluorescent in situ hybridization with groupspecific 16S rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 64: 3336-3345.
17. Fukunaga, T., Sasaki, M., Araki, Y., Okamoto, T., Yasuoka, T., Tsujikawa, T., Fujiyama, Y. and Bamba, T., 2003. Effects of the soluble fibre pectin on intestinal cell proliferation, fecal short chain fatty acid production and microbial population. Digestion 67: 42-49.
18. Gheri, G., Russo, G., Cappugi, P., Sgambati, E. and Bryk, S.G., 1999. The oligosaccharidic component of the glycoconjugates in lichen planus, granuloma annulare, seborrheic keratosis and plamoplantar keratoderma: lectin histochemical study. Histology and Histopathology 14: 697-704.
19. Harmsen, H.J., Gibson, G.R., Elfferich, P., Raangs, G.C., Wildeboer-Veloo, A.C., Argaiz, A., Roberfroid, M.B. and Welling, G.W., 2000. Comparison of viable cell counts and fluorescence in situ hybridization using specific rRNA-based probes for the quantification of human fecal bacteria. FEMS Microbiology Letters 183: 125-129.
20. Jansen, G.J., Wildeboer-Veloo, A.C., Tonk, R.H., Franks, A.H. and Welling, G.W. 1999. Development and validation of an automated, microscopy-based method for enumeration of groups of intestinal bacteria. Journal Microbiological Methods 37: 215-221.
21. Józefiak, D., Rutkowski, A. and Martin, S.A., 2004. Carbohydrate fermentation in the avian ceca: a review. Animal Feed Science and Technology 113: 1-15.
22. Kripke, S.A., Fox, A.D., Berman, J.M., Settle, R.G. and Rombeau, J.L., 1989. Stimulation of intestinal mucosal growth with intracolonic infusion of short-chain fatty acids. Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition 13: 109-116.
23. Langendijk, P.S., Schut, F., Jansen, G.J., Raangs, G.C., Kamphuis, G.R., Wilkinson, M.H.F. and Welling, G.W., 1995. Quantitative fluorescence in situ hybridization of Bifidobacterium spp. with genus-specific 16S rRNA-targeted probes and its application in fecal samples. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 61: 3069-3075.
24. Lorenzo-Pisarello, M.J., Gultemirian, M.L., Nieto-Penalver, C. and Perez Chaia, A., 2010. Propionibacterium acidipropionici CRL1198 influences the production of acids and the growth of bacterial genera stimulated by inulin in a murine model of cecal slurries. Anaerobe 16: 345-354.
25. Lumpkins, B.S., Batal, A.B. and Lee, M.D., 2010. Evaluation of the bacterial community and intestinal development of different genetic lines of chickens. Poultry Science 89: 1614-1621.
26. Luo, J., King, S. and Adams, M.C., 2010. Effect of probiotic Propionibacterium jensenii 702 supplementation on layer chicken performance. Beneficial Microbes 1: 53-60.
27. Meile, L., Le Blay, G. and Thierry, A., 2008. Safety assessment of dairy microorganisms: Propionibacterium and Bifidobacterium. International Journal of Food Microbiology 126: 316-320.
28. Mountzouris, K.C., Tsitrsikos, P., Palamidi, I., Arvaniti, A., Mohnl, M., Schatzmayr, G. and Fegeros, K., 2010. Effects of probiotic inclusion levels in broiler nutrition on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, plasma immunoglobulins, and cecal microflora composition. Poultry Science 89: 58-67.
29. National Research Council (NRC), 1994. Nutrient requirements of poultry. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA.
30. Oyarzabal, O.A. and Conner, D.E., 1996. Application of direct-fed microbial bacteria and fructooligosaccharides for Salmonella control in broilers during feed withdrawal. Poultry Science 75: 186-190.
31. Pan, D. and Yu, Z., 2014. Intestinal microbiome of poultry and its interaction with host and diet. Gut Microbes 5: 108-119.
32. Peng, Q., Zeng, X.F., Zhu, J.L., Wang, S., Liu, X.T., Hou, C.L., Thacker, P.A. and Qiao, S.Y., 2016. Effects of dietary Lactobacillus plantarum B1 on growth performance, intestinal microbiota, and short chain fatty acid profiles in broiler chickens. Poultry Science 95: 893-900.
33. Pourabedin, M., Guan, L. and Zhao, X., 2015. Xylo-oligosaccharides and virginiamycin differentially modulate gut microbial composition in chickens. Microbiome 3: 15.
34. Raibaud, P., Caulet, M., Galpin, J.V. and Mocquot, G., 1961. Studies on the bacterial flora of the alimentary tract of pigs II. Streptococci: selective enumeration and differentiation of the dominant group. Journal of Applied Bacteriology 24: 285-291.
35. Rice, G.E. and Skadhauge, E., 1982. Caecal water and electrolyte absorption and the effects of acetate and glucose, in dehydrated, low-NaCl diet hens. Journal of Comparative Physiology B 147: 61-64.
36. Runnels, P.L., Moon, H.W. and Schneider, R.A., 1980. Development of resistance with host age to adhesion of K99+ Escherichia coli to isolated intestinal epithelial cells. Infection and Immunity 28: 298-300.
37. Saarela, M., Lahteenmaki, L., Crittenden, R., Salminen, S. and Mattila-Sandholm, T., 2002. Gut bacteria and health foods-the European perspective. International Journal of Food Microbiology 78: 99-117.
38. Smirnov, A., Perez, R., Amit-Romach, E., Sklan, D. and Uni, Z., 2005. Mucin dynamics and microbial populations in chicken small intestine are changed by dietary probiotic and antibiotic growth promoter supplementation. Journal of Nutrition 135: 187-192.
39. Steffen, E.K. and Berg, R.D., 1983. Relationship between cecal population levels of indigenous bacteria and translocation to the mesenteric lymph nodes. Infection and Immunity 39: 1252-1259.
40. Stein, D.R., Allen, D.T., Perry, E.B., Bruner, J.C., Gates, K.W., Rehberger, T.G., Mertz, K., Jones, D. and Spicer, L.J., 2006. Effects of feeding propionibacteria to dairy cows on milk yield, milk components, and reproduction. Journal of Dairy Science 89: 111-125.
41. Struwe, W.B., Gough, R., Gallagher, M.E., Kenny, D.T., Carrington, S.D., Karlsson, N.G. and Rudd, P.M., 2015. Identification of O-glycan structures from chicken intestinal mucins provides insight into Campylobactor jejuni pathogenicity. Molecular and Cell Proteomics 14: 1464-1477.
42. Tsirtsikos, P., Fegeros, K., Balaskas, C., Kominakis, A. and Mountzouris, K.C., 2012. Dietary probiotic inclusion level modulates intestinal mucin composition and mucosal morphology in broilers. Poultry Science 91: 1860-1868.
43. Uni, Z., Ganot, S. and Sklan, D., 1998. Posthatch development of mucosal function in the broiler small intestine. Poultry Science 77: 75-82.
44. Uni, Z., Smirnov, A. and Sklan, D., 2003. Pre-and posthatch development of goblet cells in the broiler small intestine: effect of delayed access to feed. Poultry Science 82: 320-327.
45. Van der Wielen, P.W., Biesterveld, S., Notermans, S., Hofstra, H., Urlings, B.A. and Van Knapen, F., 2000. Role of volatile fatty acids in development of the cecal microflora in broiler chickens during growth. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 66: 2536-2540.
46. Vasconcelos, J.T., Elam, N.A., Brashears, M.M. and Galyean, M.L., 2008. Effects of increasing dose of live cultures of Lactobacillus acidophilus (Strain NP 51) combined with a single dose of Propionibacterium freudenreichii (Strain NP 24) on performance and carcass characteristics of finishing beef steers. Journal of Animal Science 86: 756-762.
47. Von Freudenreich, E. and Orla-Jensen, S., 1906. über die im Emmentalerkase statfindene propionsauregarung. Zentralblatt für Bakteriologie Abt 2: 529-546.
48. Waititu, S.M., Yitbarek, A., Matini, E., Echeverry, H., Kiarie, E., Rodriguez-Lecompte, J.C. and Nyachoti, C.M., 2014. Effect of supplementing direct-fed microbials on broiler performance, nutrient digestibilities, and immune responses. Poultry Science 93: 625-635.
49. Wallner, G., Amann, R. and Beisker, W., 1993. Optimizing fluorescent in situ hybridization with rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes for flow cytometric identification of microorganisms. Cytometry 14: 136-143.
50. st century. Transworld Research Network, Kerala, India, pp. 175-213.
51. Zhou, J.S., Shu, Q., Rutherfurd, K.J., Prasad, J., Birtles, M.J., Gopal, P.K. and Gill, H.S., 2000. Safety assessment of potential probiotic lactic acid bacterial strains Lactobacillus rhamnosus HN001, Lb. acidophilus HN017, and Bifidobacterium lactis HN019 in BALB/c mice. International Journal of Food Microbiology 56: 87-96.