Physiological and functional characteristics of Propionibacterium strains of the poultry microbiota and relevance for the development of probiotic products

Anaerobe

Volumn 23, Issue , 2013, Pages 27-37

  Argañaraz Martínez, Eloy ^a,b   Babot, Jaime D ^a   Apella, María C ^a,b   Perez Chaia, Adriana ^a,b  

^a CENTRO DE REFERENCIA PARA LACTOBACILOS CERELA CONICET   (Argentina)

^b UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE TUCUMÁN   (Argentina)

Author keywords

Poultry; Probiotic properties; Propionibacterium acidipropionici; Propionibacterium avidum

Indexed keywords

PROBIOTIC AGENT; RNA 16S; SHORT CHAIN FATTY ACID;

ARTICLE; BACTERIAL GROWTH; BACTERIAL METABOLISM; BACTERIAL STRAIN; BACTERIUM ADHERENCE; BACTERIUM IDENTIFICATION; BACTERIUM ISOLATION; CECUM; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORYNEBACTERIUM AVIDUM; DIGESTION; EX VIVO STUDY; GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT; GENETIC DATABASE; IN VITRO STUDY; INTESTINE; INTESTINE MUCOSA; INTRASPECIFIC COMPETITION; MICROFLORA; NONHUMAN; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; POULTRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROPIONIBACTERIUM; PROPIONIBACTERIUM ACIDIPROPIONICI; SALMONELLA ENTERICA; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY; SPECIES DIVERSITY; STRAIN DIFFERENCE;

POULTRY; PROBIOTIC PROPERTIES; PROPIONIBACTERIUM ACIDIPROPIONICI; PROPIONIBACTERIUM AVIDUM;

ANIMALS; ANTI-BACTERIAL AGENTS; BACTERIAL ADHESION; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; FATTY ACIDS, VOLATILE; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PHYLOGENY; POULTRY; PROBIOTICS; PROPIONIBACTERIUM; RNA, RIBOSOMAL, 16S; SALMONELLA ENTERITIDIS; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA;

EID: 84883704761     PISSN: 10759964     EISSN: 10958274     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2013.08.001     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Schneitz C. Competitive exclusion in poultry - 30 years of research. Food Control 2005, 16:657-667.
2. Callaway T.R., Dowd S.E., Wolcott R.D., Sun Y., McReynolds J.L., Edrington T.S., et al. Evaluation of the bacterial diversity in cecal contents of laying hens fed various molting diets by using bacterial tag-encoded FLX amplicon pyrosequencing. Poult Sci 2009, 88:298-302.
3. Feighner S.D., Dashkevicz M.P. Subtherapeutic levels of antibiotics in poultry feeds and their effects on weight gain, feed efficiency, and bacterial cholyltaurine hydrolase activity. Appl Environ Microbiol 1987, 53:331-336.
4. Kabir S.M.L. The role of probiotics in the poultry industry. Int J Mol Sci 2009, 10:3531-3546.
5. Tellez G., Pixley C., Wolfenden R.E., Layton S.L., Hargis B.M. Probiotics/direct fed microbials for Salmonella control in poultry. Food Res Int 2012, 45:628-633.
6. Van Immerseel F., Fievez V., de Buck J., Pasmans F., Martel A., Haesebrouck F., et al. Microencapsulated short-chain fatty acids in feed modify colonization and invasion early after infection with Salmonella enteritidis in young chickens. Poult Sci 2004, 83:69-74.
7. Huyghebaert G., Ducatelle R., Van Immerseel F. An update on alternatives to antimicrobial growth promoters for broilers. Vet J 2011, 187:182-188.
8. Stackebrandt E., Cummins C.S., Johnson J.L. Family Propionibacteriacea: the genus Propionibacterium. The prokaryotes: a handbook on the biology of bacteria 2006, 400-418. Springer, Singapore. M. Dworkin, S. Falkow, E. Rosemberg, K.H. Schleifer, E. Stackebrandt (Eds.).
9. Jan G., Leverrier P., Proudy I., Roland N. Survival and beneficial effects of propionibacteria in the human gut: invivo and invitro investigations. Lait 2002, 82:131-144.
10. Zárate G., Babot J., Argañaraz-Martínez E., Lorenzo-Pisarello M.J., Perez Chaia A. Dairy propionibacteria: technological importance and probiotic potential for application on human and animal nutrition. Multidisciplinary approaches on food science and nutrition for the XXI century 2010, 175-213. Editorial Research Signpost, India. R. Filip (Ed.).
11. Barnes E.M. The intestinal microflora of poultry and game birds during life and after storage. Address of the president of the Society for Applied Bacteriology delivered at a meeting of the society on 10 January 1979. JAppl Bacteriol 1979, 46:407-419.
12. Salanitro J.P., Fairchilds I.G., Zgornicki Y.D. Isolation, culture characteristics, and identification of anaerobic bacteria from the chicken cecum. Appl Microbiol 1974, 27:678-687.
13. Salanitro J.P., Blake I.G., Muirehead P.A., Maglio M., Goodman J.R. Bacteria isolated from the duodenum, ileum, and cecum of young chicks. Appl Environ Microbiol 1978, 35:782-790.
14. Apajalahti J.H., Sarkilahti L.K., Maki B.R., Heikkinen J.P., Nurminen P.H., Holben W.E. Effective recovery of bacterial DNA and percent-guanine-plus-cytosine-based analysis of community structure in the gastrointestinal tract of broiler chickens. Appl Environ Microbiol 1998, 64:4084-4088.
15. Corrier D.E., Nisbet D.J., Scanlan C.M., Hollister A.G., Caldwell D.J., Thomas L.A., et al. Treatment of commercial broiler chickens with a characterized culture of cecal bacteria to reduce salmonellae colonization. Poult Sci 1995, 74:1093-1101.
16. Waters S.M., Murphy R.A., Power R.F. Characterisation of prototype Nurmi cultures using culture-based microbiological techniques and PCR-DGGE. Int J Food Microbiol 2006, 110:268-277.
17. Wagner R.D., Paine D.D., Cerniglia C.E. Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of competitive exclusion products for use in poultry. JAppl Microbiol 2003, 94:1098-1107.
18. Malik A.C., Reinbold G.W., Vedamuthu E.R. An evaluation of the taxonomy of Propionibacterium. Can J Microbiol 1968, 14:1185-1191.
19. Raibaud P., Caulet M., Galpin J.V., Mocquot G. Studies on the bacterial flora of the alimentary tract of pigs II. Streptococci: selective enumeration and differentiation of the dominant group. JAppl Bacteriol 1961, 24:285-291.
20. Cummins C.S., Johnson J.L. Genus Propionibacterium. Bergey's manual of systematic bacteriology 1986, 1346-1353. The Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore. P.H. Sneath, M.E. Mair, M.E. Sharpe, J.G. Holt (Eds.).
21. Holdeman L.V., Cato E.P., Moore W.E.C. Anaerobe laboratory manual 1977, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA.
22. Charfreitag O., Collins M.D., Stackebrandt E. Reclassification of Arachnia propionica as Propionibacterium propionicus comb. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1988, 38:354-357.
23. Gerhardt P., Murray R.G.E., Costilow R.N., Nester E.W., Wood W.A., Krieg N.R., et al. Manual of methods for general bacteriology 1981, American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC.
24. Pospiech A., Neumann B. Aversatile quick-prep of genomic DNA from gram-positive bacteria. Trends Genet 1995, 11:217-218.
25. Rossi F., Torriani S., Dellaglio F. Genus- and species-specific PCR-based detection of dairy propionibacteria in environmental samples by using primers targeted to the genes encoding 16S rRNA. Appl Environ Microbiol 1999, 65:4241-4244.
26. Lane D.J. 16S/23S rRNA sequencing. Nucleic acid techniques in bacterial systematics 1991, 115-175. John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY. M.G.E. Stackebrandt (Ed.).
27. Tamura K., Peterson D., Peterson N., Stecher G., Nei M., Kumar S. MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol 2011, 28:2731-2739.
28. Zárate G., Chaia A.P., Gonzalez S., Oliver G. Viability and beta-galactosidase activity of dairy propionibacteria subjected to digestion by artificial gastric and intestinal fluids. JFood Prot 2000, 63:1214-1221.
29. Denbow D.M. Gastrointestinal anatomy and physiology. Sturkie's avian physiology 2000, 299-325. Academic Press, New York. G.C. Whittow (Ed.).
30. Lorenzo-Pisarello M.J., Gultemirian M.L., Nieto-Penalver C., Perez Chaia A. Propionibacterium acidipropionici CRL1198 influences the production of acids and the growth of bacterial genera stimulated by inulin in a murine model of cecal slurries. Anaerobe 2010, 16:345-354.
31. Borruel N., Carol M., Casellas F., Antolín M., de Lara F., Espín E., et al. Increased mucosal tumour necrosis factor a production in Crohn's disease can be downregulated exvivo by probiotic bacteria. Gut 2002, 51:659-664.
32. Deborde C., Boyaval P. Interactions between pyruvate and lactate metabolism in Propionibacterium freudenreichii subsp. shermanii: invivo (13)C nuclear magnetic resonance studies. Appl Environ Microbiol 2000, 66:2012-2020.
33. Collado M.C., Sanz Y. Quantification of mucosa-adhered microbiota of lambs and calves by the use of culture methods and fluorescent in situ hybridization coupled with flow cytometry techniques. Vet Microbiol 2007, 121:299-306.
34. Davidson C.A. The isolation, characterization and utilization of propionibacterium as a direct-fed microbial for beef cattle 1998, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater.
35. Oshio S., Tahata I., Minato H. Effects of diets differing in ratios of roughage to concentrate on microfl{ligature}ora in the rumen of heifers. JGen Appl Microbiol 1987, 33:99-100.
36. Perez Chaia A., Nader de Macias M.E., Oliver G. Propionibacteria in the gut: effect on some metabolic activities of the host. Lait 1995, 75:435-445.
37. Adams M.C., Luo J., Rayward D., King S., Gibson R., Moghaddam G.H. Selection of a novel direct-fed microbial to enhance weight gain in intensively reared calves. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2008, 145:41-52.
38. Luo J., King S., Adams M.C. Effect of probiotic Propionibacterium jensenii 702 supplementation on layer chicken performance. Benef Microbes 2010, 1:53-60.
39. Lapierre L., Undeland P., Cox L.J. Lithium chloride-sodium propionate agar for the enumeration of bifidobacteria in fermented dairy products. JDairy Sci 1992, 75:1192-1196.
40. Gong J., Forster R.J., Yu H., Chambers J.R., Wheatcroft R., Sabour P.M., et al. Molecular analysis of bacterial populations in the ileum of broiler chickens and comparison with bacteria in the cecum. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 2002, 41:171-179.
41. Muyzer G., de Waal E.C., Uitterlinden A.G. Profiling of complex microbial populations by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis of polymerase chain reaction-amplified genes coding for 16S rRNA. Appl Environ Microbiol 1993, 59:695-700.
42. EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ); Scientific Opinion on the maintenance of the list of QPS biological agents intentionally added to food and feed (2011 update). EFSA J 2011, 9(12):2497. 10.2903/j.efsa.2011.2497.
43. van Der Wielen P.W., Biesterveld S., Notermans S., Hofstra H., Urlings B.A., van Knapen F. Role of volatile fatty acids in development of the cecal microflora in broiler chickens during growth. Appl Environ Microbiol 2000, 66:2536-2540.
44. Van Immerseel F., De Buck J., Pasmans F., Velge P., Bottreau E., Fievez V., et al. Invasion of Salmonella enteritidis in avian intestinal epithelial cells invitro is influenced by short-chain fatty acids. Int J Food Microbiol 2003, 85:237-248.
45. Cousin F., Deutsch S.M., Perez Chaia A., Foligne B., Jan G. Interactions between probiotic dairy propionibacteria and the intestinal epithelium. Curr Immunol Rev 2012, 8:216-226.