Toward Personalized Targeted Therapeutics: An Overview

Neurotherapeutics

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2017, Pages 256-264

  Weathers, Shiao Pei S ^a   Gilbert, Mark R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER   (United States)

^b NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Glioblastoma; Glioma; Personalized medicine; Targeted therapy

Indexed keywords

ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENT; MOLECULAR THERAPY AGENT;

BRAIN TUMOR; CANCER PATIENT; CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); DRUG EFFICACY; GLIOBLASTOMA; GLIOMA; HUMAN; MOLECULARLY TARGETED THERAPY; PERSONALIZED MEDICINE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; METABOLISM; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENTS; BRAIN NEOPLASMS; CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC; GLIOBLASTOMA; HUMANS; MOLECULAR TARGETED THERAPY; PRECISION MEDICINE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 85006508339     PISSN: 19337213     EISSN: 18787479     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s13311-016-0496-5     Document Type: Review

References (46)

1. Druker, B.J., et al., Activity of a specific inhibitor of the BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase in the blast crisis of chronic myeloid leukemia and acute lymphoblastic leukemia with the Philadelphia chromosome. N Engl J Med, 2001. 344(14): p. 1038-1042.
2. Stupp, R., et al., Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N Engl J Med, 2005. 352(10): p. 987-996.
3. Gilbert, M.R., et al., Dose-dense temozolomide for newly diagnosed glioblastoma: a randomized phase III clinical trial. J Clin Oncol, 2013. 31(32): p. 4085-4091.
4. Wong, E.T., et al., Outcomes and prognostic factors in recurrent glioma patients enrolled onto phase II clinical trials. J Clin Oncol, 1999. 17(8): p. 2572.
5. Lamborn, K.R., et al., Progression-free survival: an important end point in evaluating therapy for recurrent high-grade gliomas. Neuro Oncol, 2008. 10(2): p. 162-170.
6. Norden, A., et al., Bevacizumab for recurrent malignant gliomas: efficacy, toxicity, and patterns of recurrence. Neurology, 2008. 70(10): p. 779-787.
7. Yung, W.K., et al., A phase II study of temozolomide vs. procarbazine in patients with glioblastoma multiforme at first relapse. Br J Cancer, 2000. 83(5): p. 588-593.
8. Gilbert, M.R., et al., A randomized trial of bevacizumab for newly diagnosed glioblastoma. N Engl J Med, 2014. 370(8): p. 699-708.
9. Chinot, O.L., et al., Bevacizumab plus radiotherapy-temozolomide for newly diagnosed glioblastoma. N Engl J Med, 2014. 370(8): p. 709-722.
10. Stupp, R., et al., Cilengitide combined with standard treatment for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma with methylated MGMT promoter (CENTRIC EORTC 26071-22072 study): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol, 2014. 15(10): p. 1100-1108.
11. Comprehensive genomic characterization defines human glioblastoma genes and core pathways. Nature, 2008. 455(7216): p. 1061-1068.
12. Kim, J., et al., Spatiotemporal evolution of the primary glioblastoma genome. Cancer Cell, 2015. 28(3): p. 318-328.
13. Bonavia, R., et al., Heterogeneity maintenance in glioblastoma: a social network. Cancer Res, 2011. 71(12): p. 4055-4060.
14. Sottoriva, A., et al., Intratumor heterogeneity in human glioblastoma reflects cancer evolutionary dynamics. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2013. 110(10): p. 4009-4014.
15. Verhaak, R.G., et al., Integrated genomic analysis identifies clinically relevant subtypes of glioblastoma characterized by abnormalities in PDGFRA, IDH1, EGFR, and NF1. Cancer Cell, 2010. 17(1): p. 98-110.
16. Furnari, F.B., et al., Malignant astrocytic glioma: genetics, biology, and paths to treatment. Genes Dev, 2007. 21(21): p. 2683-2710.
17. Phillips, H.S., et al., Molecular subclasses of high-grade glioma predict prognosis, delineate a pattern of disease progression, and resemble stages in neurogenesis. Cancer Cell, 2006. 9(3): p. 157-173.
18. Brennan, C.W., et al., The somatic genomic landscape of glioblastoma. Cell, 2013. 155(2): p. 462-477.
19. Goodenberger, M.L. and R.B. Jenkins, Genetics of adult glioma. Cancer Genet, 2012. 205(12): p. 613-621.
20. Bedard, P.L., et al., Tumour heterogeneity in the clinic. Nature, 2013. 501(7467): p. 355-364.
21. Patel, A.P., et al., Single-cell RNA-seq highlights intratumoral heterogeneity in primary glioblastoma. Science, 2014. 344(6190): p. 1396-1401.
22. Zhou, B.B., et al., Tumour-initiating cells: challenges and opportunities for anticancer drug discovery. Nat Rev Drug Discov, 2009. 8(10): p. 806-823.
23. Liu, J., et al., Glioblastoma tumor initiating cells: therapeutic strategies targeting apoptosis and microRNA pathways. Curr Mol Med, 2013. 13(3): p. 352-357.
24. Kim, H., et al., Whole-genome and multisector exome sequencing of primary and post-treatment glioblastoma reveals patterns of tumor evolution. Genome Res, 2015. 25(3): p. 316-327.
25. Slamon, D., et al., Adjuvant trastuzumab in HER2-positive breast cancer. N Engl J Med, 2011. 365(14): p. 1273-1283.
26. Iyer, L., et al., Genetic predisposition to the metabolism of irinotecan (CPT-11). Role of uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase isoform 1A1 in the glucuronidation of its active metabolite (SN-38) in human liver microsomes. J Clin Invest, 1998. 101(4): p. 847-854.
27. Lu, C.Y., et al., Clinical implication of UGT1A1 promoter polymorphism for irinotecan dose escalation in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with bevacizumab combined with FOLFIRI in the first-line setting. Transl Oncol, 2015. 8(6): p. 474-479.
28. Armstrong, T.S., et al., Risk analysis of severe myelotoxicity with temozolomide: the effects of clinical and genetic factors. Neuro Oncol, 2009. 11(6): p. 825-832.
29. Hegi, M.E., et al., MGMT gene silencing and benefit from temozolomide in glioblastoma. N Engl J Med, 2005. 352(10): p. 997-1003.
30. Rapkins, R.W., et al., The MGMT promoter SNP rs16906252 is a risk factor for MGMT methylation in glioblastoma and is predictive of response to temozolomide. Neuro Oncol, 2015. 17(12): p. 1589-1598.
31. Nathanson, D.A., et al., Targeted therapy resistance mediated by dynamic regulation of extrachromosomal mutant EGFR DNA. Science, 2014. 343(6166): p. 72-76.
32. Stommel, J.M., et al., Coactivation of receptor tyrosine kinases affects the response of tumor cells to targeted therapies. Science, 2007. 318(5848): p. 287-290.
33. Pao, W. and J. Chmielecki, Rational, biologically based treatment of EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer. Nat Rev Cancer, 2010. 10(11): p. 760-774.
34. Brandes, A.A., et al., Epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors in neuro-oncology: hopes and disappointments. Clin Cancer Res, 2008. 14(4): p. 957-960.
35. Inda, M.M., et al., Tumor heterogeneity is an active process maintained by a mutant EGFR-induced cytokine circuit in glioblastoma. Genes Dev, 2010. 24(16): p. 1731-1745.
36. Vivanco, I., et al., Differential sensitivity of glioma- versus lung cancer-specific EGFR mutations to EGFR kinase inhibitors. Cancer Discov, 2012. 2(5): p. 458-471.
37. Wood, E.R., et al., A unique structure for epidermal growth factor receptor bound to GW572016 (Lapatinib): relationships among protein conformation, inhibitor off-rate, and receptor activity in tumor cells. Cancer Res, 2004. 64(18): p. 6652-6659.
38. Karaman, M.W., et al., A quantitative analysis of kinase inhibitor selectivity. Nat Biotechnol, 2008. 26(1): p. 127-132.
39. Reardon, D.A., et al., A phase I/II trial of pazopanib in combination with lapatinib in adult patients with relapsed malignant glioma. Clin Cancer Res, 2013. 19(4): p. 900-908.
40. DiMasi, J.A. and H.G. Grabowski, Economics of new oncology drug development. J Clin Oncol, 2007. 25(2): p. 209-216.
41. Murgo, A.J., et al., Designing phase 0 cancer clinical trials. Clin Cancer Res, 2008. 14(12): p. 3675-3682.
42. Herbst, R.S., et al., Lung Master Protocol (Lung-MAP)-a biomarker-driven protocol for accelerating development of therapies for squamous cell lung cancer: SWOG S1400. Clin Cancer Res, 2015. 21(7): p. 1514-1524.
43. Kim, E.S., et al., The BATTLE trial: personalizing therapy for lung cancer. Cancer Discov, 2011. 1(1): p. 44-53.
44. Barker, A.D., et al., I-SPY 2: an adaptive breast cancer trial design in the setting of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Clin Pharmacol Ther, 2009. 86(1): p. 97-100.
45. Kaplan, R., et al., Evaluating many treatments and biomarkers in oncology: a new design. J Clin Oncol, 2013. 31(36): p. 4562-4568.
46. Conley, B.A. and J.H. Doroshow, Molecular analysis for therapy choice: NCI MATCH. Semin Oncol, 2014. 41(3): p. 297-299.