From rotten grapes to industrial exploitation: Komagataeibacter europaeus SGP37, a micro-factory for macroscale production of bacterial nanocellulose

International Journal of Biological Macromolecules

Volumn 96, Issue , 2017, Pages 52-60

  Dubey, Swati ^a   Sharma, Raj Kumar ^b   Agarwal, Pragati ^a   Singh, Jyoti ^a   Sinha, Neeraj ^b   Singh, R P ^a  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY ROORKEE   (India)

^b SANJAY GANDHI POSTGRADUATE INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (India)

Author keywords

Bacterial nanocellulose; Conversion yield; Komagataeibacter europaeus; Rotten grapes

Indexed keywords

BACTERIAL CELL; GRAPE; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; ACETOBACTERACEAE; BIOSYNTHESIS; BIOTECHNOLOGY; CHEMICAL PHENOMENA; CHEMISTRY; ECONOMICS; INDUSTRY; METABOLISM; PROCEDURES; VITIS;

CELLULOSE; NANOMATERIAL;

ACETOBACTERACEAE; BIOTECHNOLOGY; CELLULOSE; CHEMICAL PHENOMENA; INDUSTRY; NANOSTRUCTURES; VITIS;

EID: 85006257519     PISSN: 01418130     EISSN: 18790003     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.12.016     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. [1] Cacicedo, M.L., Castro, M.C., Servetas, I., Bosnea, L., Boura, K., Tsafrakidou, P., Dima, A., Terpou, A., Koutinas, A., Castro, G.R., Progress in bacterial cellulose matrices for biotechnological applications. Bioresour. Technol. 213 (2016), 172–180.
2. [2] Jozala, A.F., Lencastre-Novaes, L.C., Lopes, A.M., Santos-Ebinuma, V.C., Mazzola, P.G., Pessoa-Jr, A., Grotto, D., Gerenutti, M., Chaud, M.V., Bacterial nanocellulose production and application: a 10-year overview. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 100 (2016), 2063–2072.
3. [3] Zang, S., Zhang, R., Chen, H., Lu, Y., Zhou, J., Chang, X., Qiu, G., Wu, Z., Yang, G., Investigation on artificial blood vessels prepared from bacterial cellulose. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 46 (2015), 111–117.
4. [4] Sheykhnazari, S., Tabarsa, T., Ashori, A., Shakeri, A., Golalipour, M., Bacterial synthesized cellulose nanofibers; Effects of growth times and culture mediums on the structural characteristics. Carbohydr. Polym. 86 (2011), 1187–1191.
5. [5] Dubey, S., Saroj, S., Agarwal, P., Singh, R.P., Bacterial cellulose: an innovative nanobiopolymer for drug delivery. Singh, B., Singh, K.K., Rekhi, G.S., (eds.) NanoBioMedicine Vol. 2: Nanopharmaceuticals, 2015, Studium Press LLC, Houston, USA, 185–200.
6. [6] Wang, X., Kong, D., Zhang, Y., Wang, B., Li, X., Qiu, T., Song, Q., Ning, J., Song, Y., Zhi, L., All-biomaterial supercapacitor derived from bacterial cellulose. Nanoscale 8 (2016), 9146–9150.
7. [7] Kiziltas, E.E., Kiziltas, A., Gardner, D.J., Synthesis of bacterial cellulose using hot water extracted wood sugars. Carbohydr. Polym. 124 (2015), 131–138.
8. [8] Mohammadkazemi, F., Azin, M., Ashori, A., Production of bacterial cellulose using different carbon sources and culture media. Carbohydr. Polym. 117 (2015), 518–523.
9. [9] Castro, C., Zuluaga, R., Alvarez, C., Putaux, J.L., Caro, G., Rojas, O.J., Mondragon, I., Ganan, P., Bacterial cellulose produced by a new acid-resistant strain of Gluconacetobacter Genus. Carbohydr. Polym. 89 (2012), 1033–1037.
10. [10] Hestrin, S., Schramm, M., Synthesis of cellulose by Acetobacter xylinum. Biochem. J. 58 (1954), 345–352.
11. [11] Tamura, K., Stecher, G., Peterson, D., Filipski, A., Kumar, S., MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30 (2013), 2725–2729.
12. [12] Hyun, J.Y., Mahanty, B., Kim, C.G., Utilization of Makgeolli Sludge Filtrate (MSF) as low-cost substrate for bacterial cellulose production by Gluconacetobacter xylinus. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 172 (2014), 3748–3760.
13. [13] Miller, G.L., Use of dinitrosaIicyIic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar. Anal. Chem. 31 (1959), 426–428.
14. [14] Schneider, C.A., Rasband, W.S., Eliceiri, K.W., NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat. Methods 9 (2012), 671–675.
15. [15] Segal, L., Creely, J.J., Martin, A.E. Jr., Conrad, C.M., An empirical method for estimating the degree of crystallinity of native cellulose using the X-Ray diffractometer. Text. Res. J. 29 (1959), 786–794.
16. [16] Wada, M., Okano, T., Sugiyama, J., AIIomorphs of native crystalline cellulose I evaluated by two equatorial d-spacings. J. Wood Sci. 47 (2001), 124–128.
17. [17] Oh, S.Y., Yoo, D., Shin, Y., Kim, H.C., Kim, H.Y., Chung, Y.S., Park, W.H., Youk, J.H., Crystalline structure analysis of cellulose treated with sodium hydroxide and carbon dioxide by means of X-ray diffraction and FTIR spectroscopy. Carbohydr. Res. 340 (2005), 2376–2391.
18. [18] Lojewska, J., Miskowiec, P., Lojewski, T., Proniewicz, L.M., Cellulose oxidative and hydrolytic degradation: in situ FTIR approach. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 88 (2005), 512–520.
19. [19] Yassine, F., Bassil, N., Flouty, R., Chokr, A., El Samrani, A., Boiteux, G., El Tahchi, M., Culture medium pH influence on Gluconacetobacter physiology: cellulose production rate and yield enhancement in presence of multiple carbon sources. Carbohydr. Polym. 146 (2016), 282–291.
20. [20] Colom, X., Carrillo, F., Crystallinity changes in lyocell and viscose-type fibres by caustic treatment. Eur. Polym. J. 38 (2002), 2225–2230.
21. [21] Shao, W., Liu, H., Liu, X., Wang, S., Zhang, R., Anti-bacterial performances and biocompatibility of bacterial cellulose/graphene oxide composites. RSC Adv. 5 (2015), 4795–4803.
22. [22] Movasaghi, Z., Rehman, S., Rehman, I.U., Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy of biological tissues. Appl. Spectrosc. Rev. 43 (2008), 134–179.
23. [23] Atalla, R.H., Vanderhart, D.L., Native cellulose: a composite of two distinct-crystalline forms. Science 223 (1984), 283–285.
24. [24] Park, S., Baker, J.O., Himmel, M.E., Parilla, P.A., Johnson, D.K., Cellulose crystallinity index: measurement techniques and their impact on interpreting cellulase performance. Biotechnol. Biofuels, 3, 2010, 10, 10.1186/1754-6834-3-10.
25. [25] Huang, C., Yang, X.Y., Xiong, L., Guo, H.J., Luo, J., Wang, B., Zhang, H.R., Lin, X.Q., Chen, X.D., Evaluating the possibility of using acetone-butanol-ethanol (ABE) fermentation wastewater for bacterial cellulose production by Gluconacetobacter xylinus. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 60 (2015), 491–496.
26. [26] Kuo, C.H., Chen, J.H., Liou, B.K., Lee, C.K., Utilization of acetate buffer to improve bacterial cellulose production by Gluconacetobacter xylinus. Food Hydrocoll. 53 (2016), 98–103.
27. [27] Ross, P., Mayer, R., Benziman, M., Cellulose biosynthesis and function in bacteria. Microbiol. Rev. 55 (1991), 35–38.
28. [28] Velasco-Bedran, H., Lopez-Isunza, F., The unified metabolism of Gluconacetobacter entanii in continuous and batch processes. Process Biochem. 42 (2007), 1180–1190.
29. [29] Li, Y., Tian, C., Tian, H., Zhang, J., He, X., Ping, W., Lei, H., Improvement of bacterial cellulose production by manipulating the metabolic pathways in which ethanol and sodium citrate involved. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 96 (2012), 1479–1487.
30. [30] Eckert, C.A., Trinh, C.T., Biotechnology for Biofuel Production and Optimization. first ed., 2016, Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
31. [31] Wu, J.M., Liu, R.H., Thin stillage supplementation greatly enhances bacterial cellulose production by Gluconacetobacter xylinus. Carbohydr. Polym. 90 (2012), 116–121.
32. [32] Zhang, S., Winestrand, S., Guo, X., Chen, L., Hong, F., Jonsson, L.J., Effects of aromatic compounds on the production of bacterial nanocellulose by Gluconacetobacter xylinus, Microb. Cell Fact., 13, 2014, 62, 10.1186/1475-2859-13-62.
33. [33] Tsouko, E., Kourmentza, C., Ladakis, D., Kopsahelis, N., Mandala, I., Papanikolaou, S., Paloukis, F., Alves, V., Koutinas, A., Bacterial cellulose production from industrial waste and by-product streams. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 16 (2015), 14832–14849.
34. [34] Carreira, P., Mendes, J.A.S., Trovatti, E., Serafim, L.S., Freire, C.S.R., Silvestre, A.J.D., Neto, C.P., Utilization of residues from agro-forest industries in the production of high value bacterial cellulose. Bioresour. Technol. 102 (2011), 7354–7360.
35. [35] El-Saied, H., El-Diwany, A.I., Basta, A.H., Atwa, N.A., El-Ghwas, D.E., Production and characterization of economical bacterial cellulose. BioResources 3 (2008), 1196–1217.
36. [36] Tyagi, N., Suresh, S., Production of cellulose from sugarcane molasses using Gluconacetobacter intermedius SNT-1: optimization & characterization. J. Cleaner Prod. 112 (2016), 71–80.