Reporting systems in gastrointestinal endoscopy: Requirements and standards facilitating quality improvement: European society of gastrointestinal endoscopy position statement

United European Gastroenterology Journal

Volumn 4, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 172-176

  Bretthauer, Michael ^a,b   Aabakken, Lars ^b   Dekker, Evelien ^c   Kaminski, Michal F ^a,d   Rösch, Thomas ^e   Hultcrantz, Rolf ^f   Suchanek, Stepan ^g   Jover, Rodrigo ^h   Kuipers, Ernst J ⁱ   Bisschops, Raf ^j   Spada, Cristiano ^k   Valori, Roland ^l   Domagk, Dirk ^m   Rees, Colin ^n,o   Rutter, Matthew D ^n,o  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

^b OSLO UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

^c UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^d MEDICAL CENTER FOR POSTGRADUATE EDUCATION   (Poland)

^e UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER HAMBURG EPPENDORF   (Germany)

^f KAROLINSKA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^g CHARLES UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

^h HOSPITAL GENERAL UNIVERSITARIO DE ALICANTE   (Spain)

ⁱ ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^j UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^k CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

^l GLOUCESTERSHIRE ROYAL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^m Josephs Hospital   (Germany)

ⁿ UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF NORTH TEES   (United Kingdom)

^o DURHAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

more..

Author keywords

Colonoscopy; Electronic patient files; Guideline; Quality; Reporting systems

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL RESEARCH; CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); ENDOSCOPIST; GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY; HOSPITAL PATIENT; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; MEDICAL SOCIETY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; REVIEW; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT;

EID: 85006208730     PISSN: 20506406     EISSN: 20506414     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/2050640616629079     Document Type: Review

References (12)

1. Groenen MJ, Hirs W, Becker H, et al. Gastrointestinal endoscopic terminology coding (GET-C): A WHOapproved extension of the ICD-10. Dig Dis Sci 2007; 52: 1004-1008.
2. Delvaux M, Crespi M, Armengol-Miro JR, et al. Minimal standard terminology for digestive endoscopy: Results of prospective testing and validation in the GASTER project. Endoscopy 2000; 32: 345-355.
3. Aabakken L, Rembacken B, LeMoine O, et al. Minimal standard terminology for gastrointestinal endoscopy - MST 3.0. Endoscopy 2009; 41: 727-728.
4. Aabakken L, Barkun AN, Cotton PB, et al. Standardized endoscopic reporting. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014; 29: 234-240.
5. van Doorn SC, van Vliet J, Fockens P, et al. A novel colonoscopy reporting system enabling quality assurance. Endoscopy 2014; 46: 181-187.
6. Groenen MJ, Ajodhia S, Wynstra JY, et al. A cost-benefit analysis of endoscopy reporting methods: Handwritten, dictated and computerized. Endoscopy 2009; 41: 603-609.
7. Moorman PW, van Ginneken AM, van der Lei J, et al. The contents of free-text endoscopy reports: An inventory and evaluation by peers. Endoscopy 1994; 26: 531-538.
8. de Lange T, Moum BA, Tholfsen JK, et al. Standardization and quality of endoscopy text reports in ulcerative colitis. Endoscopy 2003; 35: 835-840.
9. Aabakken L. Quality reporting - finally achievable? Endoscopy 2014; 46: 188-189.
10. Hoff G, Ottestad PM, Skafløtten SR, et al. Quality assurance as an integrated part of the electronic medical record - a prototype applied for colonoscopy. Scand J Gastroenterol 2009; 44: 1259-1265.
11. Lieberman D, Nadel M, Smith RA, et al. Standardize dcolonoscopy reporting and data system: Report of the Quality Assurance Task Group of the National Colorectal Cancer Roundtable. Gastrointest Endosc 2007; 65: 757-766.
12. Gotfried J, Bernstein M, Ehrlich AC, et al. Administrative database research overestimates the rate of interval colon cancer. J Clin Gastroenterol 2015; 49: 483-490.