메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 234-240

Standardized endoscopic reporting

Author keywords

Gastrointestinal endoscopy; Imaging; Quality; Standardization; Terminology

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CAPSULE ENDOSCOPY; CODING; COLONOSCOPY; ENDOSCOPIC ECHOGRAPHY; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; ENDOSCOPY; GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; INTESTINE ENDOSCOPY; MEDICAL DOCUMENTATION; MEDICAL RECORD; MINIMAL STANDARD TERMINOLOGY; NOMENCLATURE; PATIENT INFORMATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; STANDARDIZATION; VIDEORECORDING; CLASSIFICATION; IMAGING; QUALITY; STANDARD;

EID: 84895927246     PISSN: 08159319     EISSN: 14401746     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/jgh.12489     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (36)

References (15)
  • 1
    • 0021692966 scopus 로고
    • Terminology, definitions and diagnostic criteria in digestive endoscopy. With the collaboration of the members of the Terminology Committee of the World Society of Digestive Endoscopy/OMED
    • Maratka Z. Terminology, definitions and diagnostic criteria in digestive endoscopy. With the collaboration of the members of the Terminology Committee of the World Society of Digestive Endoscopy/OMED. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. Suppl. 1984; 103: 1-74.
    • (1984) Scand. J. Gastroenterol. Suppl. , vol.103 , pp. 1-74
    • Maratka, Z.1
  • 2
    • 0030064349 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Working Party Report by the Committee for Minimal Standards of Terminology and Documentation in Digestive Endoscopy of the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Minimal standard terminology for a computerized endoscopic database. Ad hoc Task Force of the Committee
    • Crespi M, Delvaux M, Schaprio M, Venables C, Zwiebel F. Working Party Report by the Committee for Minimal Standards of Terminology and Documentation in Digestive Endoscopy of the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Minimal standard terminology for a computerized endoscopic database. Ad hoc Task Force of the Committee. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 1996; 91: 191-216.
    • (1996) Am. J. Gastroenterol. , vol.91 , pp. 191-216
    • Crespi, M.1    Delvaux, M.2    Schaprio, M.3    Venables, C.4    Zwiebel, F.5
  • 3
    • 0034103333 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Minimal standard terminology for digestive endoscopy: results of prospective testing and validation in the GASTER project
    • Delvaux M, Crespi M, Armengol-Miro JR etal. Minimal standard terminology for digestive endoscopy: results of prospective testing and validation in the GASTER project. Endoscopy 2000; 32: 345-355.
    • (2000) Endoscopy , vol.32 , pp. 345-355
    • Delvaux, M.1    Crespi, M.2    Armengol-Miro, J.R.3
  • 4
    • 70349579118 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Minimal standard terminology for gastrointestinal endoscopy-MST 3.0
    • Aabakken L, Rembacken B, LeMoine O etal. Minimal standard terminology for gastrointestinal endoscopy-MST 3.0. Endoscopy 2009; 41: 727-728.
    • (2009) Endoscopy , vol.41 , pp. 727-728
    • Aabakken, L.1    Rembacken, B.2    LeMoine, O.3
  • 5
    • 34247364083 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Standardized colonoscopy reporting and data system: report of the Quality Assurance Task Group of the National Colorectal Cancer Roundtable
    • Lieberman D, Nadel M, Smith RA etal. Standardized colonoscopy reporting and data system: report of the Quality Assurance Task Group of the National Colorectal Cancer Roundtable. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2007; 65: 757-766.
    • (2007) Gastrointest. Endosc. , vol.65 , pp. 757-766
    • Lieberman, D.1    Nadel, M.2    Smith, R.A.3
  • 6
    • 84907116235 scopus 로고
    • The role of terminology in medical education and training
    • Maratka Z. The role of terminology in medical education and training. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. Suppl. 1991; 189: 30-31.
    • (1991) Scand. J. Gastroenterol. Suppl. , vol.189 , pp. 30-31
    • Maratka, Z.1
  • 8
    • 67649408019 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Appropriateness of colonoscopy in Europe (EPAGE II). Presentation of methodology, general results, and analysis of complications
    • Juillerat P, Peytremann-Bridevaux I, Vader JP etal. Appropriateness of colonoscopy in Europe (EPAGE II). Presentation of methodology, general results, and analysis of complications. Endoscopy 2009; 41: 240-246.
    • (2009) Endoscopy , vol.41 , pp. 240-246
    • Juillerat, P.1    Peytremann-Bridevaux, I.2    Vader, J.P.3
  • 9
    • 84455208129 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Clinical validation of the European Panel on the Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (EPAGE) II criteria in an open-access unit: a prospective study
    • Gimeno Garcia AZ, Gonzalez Y, Quintero E etal. Clinical validation of the European Panel on the Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (EPAGE) II criteria in an open-access unit: a prospective study. Endoscopy 2012; 44: 32-37.
    • (2012) Endoscopy , vol.44 , pp. 32-37
    • Gimeno Garcia, A.Z.1    Gonzalez, Y.2    Quintero, E.3
  • 10
    • 8744310156 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Comparison between the two systems to evaluate the appropriateness of endoscopy of the upper digestive tract
    • Bersani G, Rossi A, Suzzi A, Ricci G, De Fabritiis G, Alvisi V. Comparison between the two systems to evaluate the appropriateness of endoscopy of the upper digestive tract. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2004; 99: 2128-2135.
    • (2004) Am. J. Gastroenterol. , vol.99 , pp. 2128-2135
    • Bersani, G.1    Rossi, A.2    Suzzi, A.3    Ricci, G.4    De Fabritiis, G.5    Alvisi, V.6
  • 11
    • 61549094968 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The Boston bowel preparation scale: a valid and reliable instrument for colonoscopy-oriented research
    • Lai EJ, Calderwood AH, Doros G, Fix OK, Jacobson BC. The Boston bowel preparation scale: a valid and reliable instrument for colonoscopy-oriented research. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2009; 69 (s): 620-625.
    • (2009) Gastrointest. Endosc. , vol.69 , Issue.3 , pp. 620-625
    • Lai, E.J.1    Calderwood, A.H.2    Doros, G.3    Fix, O.K.4    Jacobson, B.C.5
  • 12
    • 10444267194 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Inter-observer agreement in the assessment of endoscopic findings in ulcerative colitis
    • de Lange T, Larsen S, Aabakken L. Inter-observer agreement in the assessment of endoscopic findings in ulcerative colitis. BMC Gastroenterol. 2004; 4: 9.
    • (2004) BMC Gastroenterol. , vol.4 , pp. 9
    • de Lange, T.1    Larsen, S.2    Aabakken, L.3
  • 13
    • 0028936304 scopus 로고
    • Observer variation and reproducibility of endoscopic ultrasonography
    • Catalano MF, Sivak MV Jr, Bedford RA etal. Observer variation and reproducibility of endoscopic ultrasonography. Gastrointest. Endosc. 1995; 41: 115-120.
    • (1995) Gastrointest. Endosc. , vol.41 , pp. 115-120
    • Catalano, M.F.1    Sivak Jr, M.V.2    Bedford, R.A.3
  • 14
    • 0034803974 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • ESGE recommendations for quality control in gastrointestinal endoscopy: guidelines for image documentation in upper and lower GI endoscopy
    • Rey JF, Lambert R. ESGE recommendations for quality control in gastrointestinal endoscopy: guidelines for image documentation in upper and lower GI endoscopy. Endoscopy 2001; 33: 901-903.
    • (2001) Endoscopy , vol.33 , pp. 901-903
    • Rey, J.F.1    Lambert, R.2
  • 15
    • 0034075251 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Still photography versus videotaping for documentation of cecal intubation: a prospective study
    • Rex DK. Still photography versus videotaping for documentation of cecal intubation: a prospective study. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2000; 51 (4 Pt 1): 451-459.
    • (2000) Gastrointest. Endosc. , vol.51 , Issue.4 , pp. 451-459
    • Rex, D.K.1


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.