Responsiveness of a Brief Measure of Lung Cancer Screening Knowledge

Journal of Cancer Education

Volumn 33, Issue 4, 2018, Pages 842-846

  Housten, Ashley J ^a   Lowenstein, Lisa M ^a   Leal, Viola B ^a   Volk, Robert J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Knowledge measure; Lung cancer screening; Shared decision making; Smoking

Indexed keywords

ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; EARLY CANCER DIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; LUNG TUMOR; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PSYCHOLOGY; QUESTIONNAIRE;

DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FEMALE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; LUNG NEOPLASMS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 85004045164     PISSN: 08858195     EISSN: 15430154     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s13187-016-1153-8     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Wender R et al (2013) American Cancer Society lung cancer screening guidelines. CA Cancer J Clin 63(2):106–117
2. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A (2016) Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin 66(1):7–30
3. Aberle DR et al (2011) Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med 365(5):395–409
4. Bach PB et al (2012) Benefits and harms of CT screening for lung cancer: a systematic review. J Am Med Assoc 307(22):2418–2429
5. Moyer VA (2014) Screening for lung cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 160(5):330–338
6. Decision memo for screening for lung cancer with low dose computed tomography (LDCT) (CAG-00439 N). 2015 [cited 2016 August 15]; Available from: https://www.cms.gov/medicare-coverage-database/details/nca-decision-memo.aspx?NCAId = 274
7. Volk RJ, Hawk E, Bevers TB (2014) Should CMS cover lung cancer screening for the fully informed patient? J Am Med Assoc 312(12):1193–1194
8. Sepucha K et al (2007) An approach to measuring the quality of breast cancer decisions. Patient Educ Couns 65(2):261–269
9. Sepucha KR et al (2013) Establishing the effectiveness of patient decision aids: key constructs and measurement instruments. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 13(2):1–11
10. Sepucha KR et al (2014) Development and evaluation of a new survey instrument to measure the quality of colorectal cancer screening decisions. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 14(1):1–9
11. Sepucha KR et al (2008) Developing instruments to measure the quality of decisions: early results for a set of symptom-driven decisions. Patient Educ Couns 73(3):504–510
12. Sepucha KR et al (2011) Decision quality instrument for treatment of hip and knee osteoarthritis: a psychometric evaluation. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 12(1):1–12
13. Stacey D et al (2014) Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub4
14. Volk RJ et al (2013) Ten years of the International Patient Decision Aid Standards Collaboration: evolution of the core dimensions for assessing the quality of patient decision aids. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 13(2):1–7
15. Elwyn G et al (2006) Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: online international Delphi consensus process. BMJ 333. doi:10.1136/bmj.38926.629329.AE
16. Lowenstein LM et al (2016) A brief measure of Smokers’ knowledge of lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography. Preventive Medicine Reports 4:351–356
17. Harris PA et al (2009) Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 42(2):377–381
18. Guyatt G, Walter S, Norman G (1987) Measuring change over time: assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments. J Chronic Dis 40(2):171–178
19. Hays RD, Hadorn D (1992) Responsiveness to change: an aspect of validity, not a separate dimension. Qual Life Res 1(1):73–75
20. Husted JA et al (2000) Methods for assessing responsiveness: a critical review and recommendations. J Clin Epidemiol 53(5):459–468
21. Cohen J (1977) Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. Academic Press, New York
22. Beaton DE, Hogg-Johnson S, Bombardier C (1997) Evaluating changes in health status: reliability and responsiveness of five generic health status measures in workers with musculoskeletal disorders. J Clin Epidemiol 50(1):79–93
23. Fitzpatrick R et al (1993) A comparison of the sensitivity to change of several health status instruments in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 20(3):429–436
24. Liang MH, Fossel AH, Larson MG (1990) Comparisons of five health status instruments for orthopedic evaluation. Med Care 28(7):632–642
25. Garratt AM et al (1994) SF 36 health survey questionnaire: II. Responsiveness to changes in health status in four common clinical conditions. Quality in Health Care 3(4):186–192
26. Trikalinos, T.A., et al. 2014 Decision Aids for Cancer Screening and Treatment. AHRQ Publication No. 15-EHC002-EF [Text] 2014/12; Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/