Decision quality instrument for treatment of hip and knee osteoarthritis: A psychometric evaluation

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

Volumn 12, Issue , 2011, Pages

  Sepucha, Karen R ^a   Stacey, Dawn ^b   Clay, Catharine F ^c   Chang, Yuchiao ^d   Cosenza, Carol ^e   Dervin, Geoffrey ^f   Dorrwachter, Janet ^a   Feibelmann, Sandra ^a   Katz, Jeffrey N ^g   Kearing, Stephen A ^h   Malchau, Henrik ^d   Taljaard, Monica ^b   Tomek, Ivan ⁱ   Tugwell, Peter ^b   Levin, Carrie A ^j  

^a MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b OTTAWA HOSPITAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

^c DARTMOUTH HITCHCOCK MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^d HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS BOSTON   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

^g BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^h DARTMOUTH INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH POLICY AND CLINICAL PRACTICE   (United States)

ⁱ Department of Orthopedic Surgery   (United States)

^j Foundation for Informed Medical Decision Making   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

decision quality; osteoarthritis; patient centered care; quality measurement; shared decision making; total joint replacement

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; CONTENT VALIDITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DISCRIMINANT VALIDITY; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HIP KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS DECISION QUALITY INSTRUMENT; HIP OSTEOARTHRITIS; HUMAN; JOINT PROSTHESIS; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; KNOWLEDGE; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NAMED INVENTORIES, QUESTIONNAIRES AND RATING SCALES; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT DECISION MAKING; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PSYCHOMETRY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REPRODUCIBILITY; TEST RETEST RELIABILITY; TREATMENT INDICATION; AGED; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH CARE SURVEY; INFORMED CONSENT; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT EDUCATION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE; SELF EVALUATION; STANDARD; VALIDATION STUDY;

AGED; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; DIAGNOSTIC SELF EVALUATION; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE SURVEYS; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, HIP; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; PATIENT EDUCATION AS TOPIC; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 79959827652     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712474     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-12-149     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Geography and the debate over Medicare reform. J Wennberg E Fisher J Skinner, Health Affairs 2002 Suppl Web Exclusives 94 114
2. Policy support for patient-centered care: The need for measurable improvements in decision quality. K Sepucha FJ Fowler AG Mulley, Health Affairs 2004 Suppl Web Exclusive 62
3. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Comparative Effectiveness Research Position Statement, 2011 http://www.aaos.org/about/papers/position/ 1178.asp Accessed May 17, 2011
4. Institute of Medicine, Crossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the 21st century Washington D.C.: National Academy Press 2001
5. Informed patient choice: Patient-centered valuing of surgical risks and benefits. JNC Weinstein K Clay TS Morgan, Health Affairs 2007 26 726 30 10.1377/hlthaff.26.3.726 17485750
6. Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: Online international delphi consensus process. G Elwyn A O'Connor D Stacey R Volk A Edwards A Coulter R Thomson A Barratt M Barry S Bernstein P Butow A Clarke V Entwistle D Feldman-Stewart M Holmes-Rovner H Llewellyn-Thomas N Moumjid A Mulley C Ruland K Sepucha A Sykes T Whelan, BMJ 2006 333 417 10.1136/bmj.38926.629329.AE 16908462
7. Management of chronic pain: Improving shared decision making in osteoarthritis. D Stacey G Hawker G Dervin I Tomek N Cochran P Tugwell AM O'Connor, BMJ 2008 336 954 5 10.1136/bmj.39520.699190.94 18397945
8. Patient knowledge and misconceptions of osteoarthritis assessed by a validated self-completed knowledge questionnaire (PKQ-OA). J Hill H Bird, Rheumatology (Oxford) 2007 46 796,800 Epub 2006 Dec 18
9. Evaluating patient-based outcome measures for use in clinical trials. R Fitzpatrick C Davey MJ Buxton DR Jones, Health Technol Assess 1998 2 14,iv 1-74
10. Developing instruments to measure the quality of decisions: Early results for a set of symptom-driven decisions. KR Sepucha CA Levin EE Uzogara MJ Barry AM O'Connor AG Mulley, Patient Educ Couns 2008 73 504 10 10.1016/j.pec.2008.07. 009 18718734
11. Survey Research Methods. F Fowler, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc 1993 1
12. NIH Consensus Statement on total knee replacement December 8-10, 2003. NIH Consensus Panel, J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004 86 6 1328 1335 15173310
13. Validation study of WOMAC: A health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. N Bellamy WW Buchanan CH Goldsmith J Campbell LW Stitt, J Rheumatol 1988 15 1833 40 3068365 (Pubitemid 19037656)
14. Patient reactions to a program designed to facilitate patient participation in treatment decisions for benign prostatic hyperplasia. M Barry FJ Fowler AJ Mulley JJ Henderson J Wennberg, Med Care 1995 33 771 82 10.1097/00005650-199508000-00003 7543639
15. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. AM O'Connor CL Bennett D Stacey M Barry NF Col KB Eden VA Entwistle V Fiset M Holmes-Rovner S Khangura H Llewellyn-Thomas D Rovner, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2009 3 rt. No.: CD001431
16. A prospective population-based study of the predictors of undergoing total joint arthroplasty. G Hawker J Guan R Croxford P Coyte R Glazier B Harvey JG Wright JI Williams EM Badley, Arthritis Rheum 2006 54 3212 3220 10.1002/art.22146 17009255 (Pubitemid 44622092)
17. Assessing patients' utilities: Can the ends justify the means? AG Mulley, Med Care 1989 27 Suppl 3 269 281 2646492
18. Understanding patients' decisions: Cognitive and emotional perspectives. D Redelmeier P Rozin D Kahneman, JAMA 1993 270 72 76 10.1001/jama.270.1.72 8510300 (Pubitemid 23202655)
19. Unstable preferences: A shift in valuation or an effect of the elicitation procedure? S Jansen A Stiggelbout P Wakker M Nooij E Noordijk J Kievit, Med Decis Making 2000 20 1 62 71 10.1177/0272989X0002000108 10638538 (Pubitemid 30036264)
20. Decision-making regarding total knee replacement surgery: A qualitative meta-synthesis. T O'Neill C Jinks BN Ong, BMC Health Serv Res 2007 7 52 10.1186/1472-6963-7-52 17425793
21. Racial/ethnic differences in preferences for total knee replacement surgery. MM Byrne J Souchek M Richardson M Suarez-Almazor, J Clin Epidemiol 2006 59 1078 86 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.01.010 16980148 (Pubitemid 44389819)
22. Older patients' unexpressed concerns about orthopaedic surgery. PL Hudak K Armstrong C Braddock RM Frankel W Levinson, J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008 90 1427 35 10.2106/JBJS.G.01077 18594089 (Pubitemid 351947582)
23. Patients' knowledge about 9 common health conditions: Data from a national representative sample. A Fagerlin KR Sepucha MP Couper CA Levin P Ubel E Singer BJ Zikmund-Fisher, Med Decis Making 2010 30 Suppl 5 35S 52S 20881153
24. Toward the 'tipping point': Decision aids and informed patient choice. AM O'Connor JE Wennberg F Legare HA Llewellyn-Thomas BW Moulton KR Sepucha AG Sodano JS King, Health Affairs 2007 26 716 25 10.1377/hlthaff.26.3.716 17485749
25. Fulfillment of patients' expectations for total hip arthroplasty. C Mancuso J Jout EA Salvati TP Sculco, J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009 91 2073 8 10.2106/JBJS.H.01802 19723982
26. Informed consent to promote patient-centered care. HM Krumholz, JAMA 2010 303 1190 1 10.1001/jama.2010.309 20332406
27. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, H.R. 3590, 111th Cong., 2nd Sess, 2010