Pre-schoolers’ feature placement on own and others’ person drawings

International Journal of Early Years Education

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 231-243

  Coté, Carol A ^a   Golbeck, Susan ^a  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85002447425     PISSN: 09669760     EISSN: 14698463     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09669760701516868     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Adi-Japha, E., Levin, I., and Solomon, S., 1998. Emergence of representation in drawing: the relation between kinematic and referential aspects. Cognitive Development, 13: 25–51.
2. Arnheim, R., 1974. Art and visual perception: a psychology of the creative eye, Berkeley: University of California Press.
3. Barlow, C. M., Jolley, R. P., White, D. G., and Galbraith, D., 2003. Rigidity in children’s drawings and its relation with representational change. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 86: 124–152.
4. Bloom, P., and Markson, L., 1998. Intention and analogy in children’s naming of pictorial representations. Psychological Science, 9: 200–204.
5. Boyatzis, C. J., Michaelson, P., and Lyle, E., 1995. Symbolic immunity and flexibility in preschoolers’ human figure drawings. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 156: 293–302.
6. Brittain, W. L., and Chien, Y.-C., 1983. Relationship between preschool children’s ability to name body parts and their ability to construct a man. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 57: 19–24.
7. Coates, E., 2002. ‘I forgot the sky!’ children’s stories contained within their drawings. International Journal of Early Years Education, 10: 21–35.
8. Cox, M. V., and Hodsoll, J., 2000. Children’s diachronic thinking in relation to developmental changes in their drawings of the human figure. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 18: 13–24.
9. Cox, M. V., and Mason, S., 1998. The young child’s pictorial representation of the human figure. International Journal of Early Years Education, 6: 31–38.
10. Cox, S., 2005. Intention and meaning in young children’s drawing. Journal of Art & Design Education, 24: 115–125.
11. Flavell, J. H., Miller, P. H., and Miller, S. A., 2002. Cognitive development, (4th edn), Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
12. Freeman, N. H., 1993. “ Drawing: public instruments of representation ”. In Systems of representation in children: development and use, Edited by: Pratt, C., and Garton, A. F., 113–130. New York: Wiley.
13. Golomb, C., 2003. Child’s creation of a pictorial world, Portland, OR: Book News.
14. Gross, J., and Hayne, H., 1999. Young children’s recognition and description of their own and others’ drawings. Developmental Science, 2: 476–489.
15. Hart, L. M., and Goldin-Meadow, S., 1984. The child as a nonegocentric art critic. Child Development, 55: 2122–2129.
16. Jolley, R. P., Knox, E. L., and Foster, S. G., 2000. The relationship between children’s production and comprehension of realism in drawing. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 18: 557–582.
17. Karmiloff-Smith, A., 1990. Constraints on representational change: evidence from children’s drawings. Cognition, 34: 57–83.
18. Luquet, G.-H., 1927/2001. Children’s drawings, London: Free Association Books. (A. Costall Trans.)
19. Morra, S., 2002. On the relationship between partial occlusion drawing, M capacity and field independence. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 20: 421–438.
20. Picard, D., and Vinter, A., 1999. Representational flexibility in children’s drawings: effects of age and verbal instructions. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 17: 605–622.
21. Robinson, E. J., Riggs, K. J., and Samuel, J., 1996. Children’s memory for drawings based on a false belief. Developmental Psychology, 32: 1056–1064.
22. Spensley, F., and Taylor, J., 1999. The development of cognitive flexibility: evidence from children’s drawings. Human Development, 42: 300–324.
23. Taylor, M., and Bacharach, V. R., 1981. The development of drawing rules: metaknowledge about drawing influences performance on nondrawing task. Child Development, 52: 373–375.