On the relationship between partial occlusion drawing, M capacity and field independence

British Journal of Developmental Psychology

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 421-438

  Morra, Sergio ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GENOA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036042866     PISSN: 0261510X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1348/026151002320620244     Document Type: Review

References (48)

1. Arrowsmith, C. J., Cox, M., & Eames, K. (1994). Eliciting partial occlusions in the drawing of 4-and 5-year-olds. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 12, 577-584.
2. Barrett, M., & Eames K. (1996). Sequential developments in children's human figure drawing. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 14, 219-236.
3. Berti, A. E., & Freeman, N. H. (1997). Representational change in resources for pictorial innovation: A three-component analysis. Cognitive Development, 12, 501-522.
4. Caron-Pargue, J. (1992). A functional analysis of decomposition and integration in children's cylinder drawing. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 10, 51-69.
5. Case, R. (1985). Intellectual development: Birth to adulthood. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
6. Case, R. (1995). Capacity-based explanations of working memory growth: A brief history and reevaluation. In F. E. Weinert & W. Schneider (Eds.), Memory performance and competencies: Issues in growth and development (pp. 23-44). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
7. Case, R., & Globerson, T. (1974). Field independence and central computing space. Child Development, 45, 772-778.
8. Case, R., Stephenson, K. M., Bleiker, C., & Okamoto, Y. (1996). Central spatial structures and their development. In R. Case & Y. Okamoto (Eds.), The role of central conceptual structures in the development of children's thought, in Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development (No. 246, pp. 103-130). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
9. Cox, M. V. (1985). One object behind another: Young children's use of array-specific or view-specific representations. In N. H. Freeman & M. V. Cox (Eds.), Visual order (pp. 188-201). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. Cox, M. V. (1991). The child's point of view: The development of cognition and language (2nd ed.) London: Harvester Press.
11. Davis, A. (1983). Contextual sensitivity in young children's drawings. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 35, 478-486.
12. Davis, A. (1985). Conflict between canonicality and array specificity in young children's drawings. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 3, 363-372.
13. Dennis, S. (1992). Stage and structure in the development of children's spatial representations. In R. Case (Ed.), The mind's staircase (pp. 229-245). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
14. de Ribaupierre, A. (1989). Cognitive style and operational development: A review of French literature and a neo-Piagetian reinterpretation. In T. Globerson & T. Zelniker (Eds.), Cognitive style and cognitive development (pp. 86-115). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
15. de Ribaupierre, A., & Bailleux, C. (1994). Developmental change in a spatial task of attentional capacity: An essay toward an integration of two working memory models. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 17, 5-35.
16. Dreyer, A. S., Dreyer, C. A., & Nebelkopf, E. (1971). The portable rod-and-frame test as a measure of cognitive style in kindergarten children. Perceptual and motor skills, 33, 775-781.
17. Foley, E. J., & Berch, D. B. (1997). Capacity limitations of a classic M-power measure: A modified dual-task approach. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 66, 129-143.
18. Freeman, N. H., Eiser, C., & Sayers, J. (1977). Children's strategies in producing three-dimensional relationships on a two-dimensional surface. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 23, 305-314.
19. Goodnow, J. (1978). Visible thinking: Cognitive aspects of change in drawings. Child Development, 49, 637-641.
20. Hildebrand, D. K., Laing, J. D., & Rosenthal, H. (1977). Prediction analysis of cross classifications. New York: Wiley.
21. Hitch, G. J., Halliday, S., Schaafstal, A. M., & Schraagen, J. M. C. (1988). Visual working memory in young children. Memory & Cognition, 16, 120-132.
22. Johnson, J., Prior, S., & Artuso, M. (2000). Field dependence as a factor in second language communicative production. Language Learning, 50, 529-567.
23. Kanizsa, G. (1979). Organization in vision: Essays on Gestalt perception. New York: Praeger.
24. Karp, S. A., & Konstadt, N. (1963). Children's Embedded Figure Test. New York: Cognitive Tests.
25. Kogan, N., & Block, J. (1991). Field dependence-independence from early childhood through adolescence: Personality and socialization aspects. In S. Wapner & J. Demick (Eds.), Field dependence-independence: Cognitive styles across the life span (pp. 177-208). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
26. Lange-Küttner, C. (2000). The role of object violation in the development of visual analysis. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 90, 3-24.
27. McKenna, F. P. (1984). Measures of field dependence: Cognitive style or cognitive ability? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 593-603.
28. Messick, S. (1994). The matter of style: Manifestations of personality in cognition, learning, and teaching. Educational Psychologist, 29, 121-136.
29. Morra, S. (1994). Issues in working memory measurement: Testing for M capacity. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 17, 143-159.
30. Morra, S. (1995). A neo-Piagetian approach to children's drawings. In C. Lange-Kuettner & G. V. Thomas (Eds.), Drawing and looking: Theoretical approaches to pictorial representation in children (pp. 93-106). London: Harvester.
31. Morra, S., Angi, A., & Tomat, L. (1996). Planning, encoding, and overcoming conflict in partial occlusion drawing: A neo-Piagetian model and an experimental analysis. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 61, 276-301.
32. Morra, S., Caloni, B., d'Amico, M. R. (1994). Working memory and the intentional depiction of emotions. Archives de Psychologie, 62, 71-87.
33. Morra, S., & Scopesi, A. (1997). Issues in testing for processing capacity: A portrait of Convergent Validity, with oblique rotations in the background. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 20, 739-742.
34. Morra, S., Vigliocco, G., & Penello, B. (2001). M capacity as a lifespan construct: A study of its decrease in ageing subjects. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 25, 78-87.
35. Oitman, P. K. (1968). A portable rod-and-frame apparatus. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 26, 503-506.
36. Pascual-Leone, J. (1970). A mathematical model for the transition rule in Piaget's developmental stages. Acta Psychologica, 63, 301-345.
37. Pascual-Leone, J. (1987). Organismic processes for neo-Piagetian theories: A dialectical causal account of cognitive development. International Journal of Psychology, 22, 531-570.
38. Pascual-Leone, J. (1989). An organismic process model of Witkin's field dependence-independence. In T. Globerson & T. Zelniker (Eds.), Cognitive style and cognitive development (pp. 36-70). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
39. Pascual-Leone, J., & Baillargeon, R. (1994). Developmental measurement of mental attention. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 17, 161-200.
40. Pizzo Russo, L. (1974). La trasparenza nel disegno infantile [Transparency in childrens' drawings]. Il Pisani: Giornale di Patologia Nervosa e Mentale, 98, 179-226.
41. Pulos, S. (1997). Divergent validity and the measurement of processing capacity. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 20, 731-734.
42. Tada, W. L., & Stiles, J. (1996). Developmental change in children's analysis of spatial patterns. Developmental Psychology, 32, 951-970.
43. Thomas, G. V., & Silk, A. M. J. (1990). An introduction to the psychology of children's drawings. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester.
44. van Sommers, P. (1984). Drawing and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
45. Witkin, H. A., & Dyk, R. B., Faterson, H. F., Goodenough, D. R., & Karp, S. A. (1962). Psychological differentiation. New York: Wiley.
46. Witkin, H. A., & Goodenough, D. R. (1981). Cognitive styles: Essence and origin. New York: International University Press.
47. Witkin, H. A., Goodenough, D. R., & Oitman, P. K. (1979). Psychological differentiation: Current status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1127-1145.
48. Zhi, Z., Thomas, G. V., & Robinson, E. J. (1997). Constraints on representational change: Drawing a man with two heads. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 15, 275-290.