Measuring forest and wild product contributions to household welfare: Testing a scalable household survey instrument in Indonesia

Forest Policy and Economics

Volumn 84, Issue , 2017, Pages 20-28

  Bakkegaard, Riyong Kim ^a   Hogarth, Nicholas J ^b   Bong, Indah Waty ^c   Bosselmann, Aske S ^d   Wunder, Sven ^c  

^a Department of Forest Sciences ^*  (Denmark)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^c CENTER FOR INTERNATIONAL FORESTRY RESEARCH   (Indonesia)

^d UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Forest based livelihoods; Household income; Methodology; Socioeconomic survey; West Kalimantan

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURE; INSTRUMENT TESTING; RURAL AREAS; SURVEYS; TIMBER;

FOREST-BASED LIVELIHOODS; HOUSEHOLD INCOME; KALIMANTAN; METHODOLOGY; SOCIOECONOMIC SURVEYS;

FORESTRY;

FORESTS; INDONESIA; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL;

EID: 85001955855     PISSN: 13899341     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2016.10.005     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Angelsen, A., Larsen, H.O., Lund, J.F., Smith-Hall, C., Wunder, S., Measuring Livelihoods and Environmental Dependence: Methods for Research and Field Work. 2011, Earthscan, Edinburgh (UK) (240 pp).
2. Angelsen, A., Jagger, P., Babigumira, R., Belcher, B., Hogarth, N.J., Bauch, S., Börner, J., Smith-Hall, C., Wunder, S., Environmental income and rural livelihoods: a global-comparative analysis. World Dev. 64:1 (2014), S12–S28.
3. Appiah, M., Blay, D., Damnyag, L., Dwomoh, F.K., Pappinene, A., Luukkanene, O., Dependence on forest resources and tropical deforestation in Ghana. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 11 (2009), 471–487.
4. Bakkegaard, R.K., CIFOR PEN Survey Analysis Consultancy Report. 2013 (December 2013).
5. Bakkegaard, R.K., Agrawal, A., Animon, I., Bosselmann, A., Hogarth, N.J., Miller, D., Persha, L., Rametsteiner, E., Wunder, S., Zezza, A., National Socioeconomic Surveys: Guidance and Survey Modules for Measuring Multiple Roles of Forests in Household Welfare and Livelihoods. 2016, FAO, World Bank, CIFOR, IFRI, Rome (2016).
6. Bakkegaard, R.K., Nielsen, M.R., Thorsen, B.J., Household determinants of harvesting of bushmeat and eru (Gnetum africanum) for cash in the Democratic Republic of Congo. Environ. Dev. Sustain., 2016, 10.1007/s10668-016-9812-9.
7. BPS (Badan Pusat Statistik), Rata-rata Jumlah Pendapatan perkapita Menurut Golongan Rumah Tangga (ribu rupiah), 2000, 2005, 2008. 2016 (Online at: http://www.bps.go.id/linkTabelStatis/view/id/953. Accessed April 2016).
8. BPS Kalimantan Barat, Berita Resmi Statistik Provinsi Kalimantan Barat No. 05/01/61/Th. XVIII, 2015 (2 Januari 2015). (Online at: http://kalbar.bps.go.id/website/brs_ind/brsInd-20150115094925.pdf. Accessed April 2016).
9. Byron, N., Arnold, M., What futures for the people of the tropical forests?. World Dev. 27:5 (1999), 789–805.
10. Cavendish, W., Empirical regularities in the poverty-environment relationship of rural households: evidence from Zimbabwe. World Dev., 28(11), 2000, 25.
11. Chao, S., Forest Peoples: Numbers Across the World. 2012, Forest Peoples Programme, Moreton-in-Marsh, U.K.
12. CIFOR, PEN Prototype Questionnaire. 2008 (Online at: http://www.cifor.org/pen/research-tools/the-pen-prototype-questionnaire.html. Accessed February 2016).
13. CIFOR, PEN Prototype Questionnaire. 2008 (available online at http://www.cifor.org/pen/research-tools/the-pen-prototype-questionnaire.html).
14. FAO, Global Forest Resources Assessment 2005. 2006 (Rome).
15. FAO, Links between national forest programmes and poverty reduction strategies. Forestry Policy and Institutions Working Paper No. 22, 2008, Forestry Department, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.
16. Fisher, M., Household welfare and forest dependence in Southern Malawi. Environ. Dev. Econ. 9 (2004), 135–154.
17. GTZ, National Monitoring of Strategies for Sustainable Poverty Reduction/PRSPs. vol. 1: Main Report. 2004, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ), Bonn, Germany.
18. Statistics Indonesia, Census of agriculture 2013. National Figures of Households around Forest Areas, 2014. Results of ST2013 Survey, XVIII, 2014, BPS-Statistics Indonesia, 248 (2 Januari 2015 http://kalbar.bps.go.id/website/brs_ind/brsInd-20150115094925.pdf).
19. Mamo, G., Sjaastad, E., Vedeld, P., Economic dependence on forest resources: a case from Dendi District, Ethiopia. Forest Policy Econ. 9 (2007), 916–927.
20. McSweeney, K., Forest product sale as natural insurance: the effects of household characteristics and the nature of shock in eastern Honduras. Soc. Nat. Resour. 17:1 (2004), 39–56.
21. Nielsen, M.R., Pouliot, M., Bakkegaard, R.K., Combining income and assets measures to include the transitory nature of poverty in assessments of forest dependence: evidence from the Democratic Republic of Congo. Ecol. Econ. 78 (2012), 37–46.
22. Pouliot, M., Treue, T., Rural people's reliance on forests and the non-forest environment in West Africa: evidence from Ghana and Burkina Faso. World Dev. 43 (2013), 180–193.
23. PROFOR, Poverty and Forests Linkages – A Synthesis and Six Case Studies. 2008, World Bank, Washington, DC.
24. Rayamajhi, S., Smith-Hall, C., Helles, F., Empirical evidence of the economic importance of Central Himalayan forests to rural households. Forest Policy Econ. 20 (2012), 25–35.
25. Riggott, M., Micro-data analysis of selected socioeconomic surveys. FAO Consultancy Report, 2014.
26. Russo, L., Review of the coverage of forest-related socio-economic issues in selected surveys. Consultancy Report, 2014 (March 2014).
27. Shepherd, G., Rethinking forest reliance. Findings about Poverty, Livelihood Resilience and Forests from IUCN's “Livelihoods and Landscapes” Strategy, 2012, International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources, Gland, Switzerland.
28. SPP, Analisis Sosial Ekonomi Petani di Kalimantan Barat: Hasil Survei Pendapatan Rumah Tangga Usaha Pertanian Sensus Pertanian 2013. 2013, Badan Pusat Statistik Provinsi Kalimantan Barat (Online at: http://kalbar.bps.go.id/website/pdf_publikasi/Analisis-Sosial-Ekonomi-Petani-Di-Kalimantan-Barat-Hasil-Survei-Pendapatan-Rumah-Tangga-Usaha-Pertanian-Sensus-Pertanian-2013-.pdf. Accessed April 2016).
29. Sunderlin, W.D., Angelsen, A., Belcher, B., Burgers, P., Nasi, R., Santoso, L., Wunder, S., Livelihoods, forests, and conservation in developing countries: an overview. World Dev. 33:9 (2005), 1383–1402.
30. Vedeld, P., Angelsen, A., Bojӧ, J., Sjaastad, E., Berg, G.K., Forest environmental incomes and the rural poor. Forest Policy Econ. 9:7 (2007), 869–879.
31. World Bank, Forests Sourcebook: Practical Guidance for Sustaining Forests in Development Cooperation. 2008, World Bank, Washington, D.C.
32. World Bank, National panel survey 2010–2011. Agricultural Questionnaire Tanzania, 2015 (Online at: http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTLSMS/Resources/3358986-1233781970982/5800988-1286190918867/NPS_Agriculture_Qx_English_(Year2)_v2.pdf. Accessed March 2016).
33. World Bank, National panel survey 2010–2011. Fisheries Questionnaire Tanzania, 2015 (Online at: http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTSURAGRI/Resources/7420178-1294154345427/NPS_Fishery_Qx_English_Year_2.pdf. Accessed March 2016).
34. Wunder, S., Luckert, M., Smith-Hall, C., Valuing the priceless: what are non-marketed products worth?. Angelsen, A., Larsen, H.O., Lund, J.F., Smith-Hall, C., Wunder, S., (eds.) Measuring Livelihoods and Environmental Dependence: Methods for Research and Fieldwork, 2011, Earthscan, London, 127–145.
35. Wunder, S., Börner, J., Shively, G., Wyman, M., Safety nets, gap filling and forests: a global-comparative perspective. World Dev. 64:1 (2014), S12–S28.