Utilizing Web Tools for Computer-Mediated Communication to Enhance Team-Based Learning

International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies (IJWLTT)

Volumn 2, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 21-37

  Gomez, Elizabeth Avery ^a   wu, Dezhi ^b   Passerini, Katia ^a   Bieber, Michael ^a  

^a NEW JERSEY INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b SOUTHERN UTAH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

ALN; asynchronous learning networks; collaborative learning; computer mediated communications (CMC); learning outcomes; peer assessment; team based learning

Indexed keywords

LEARNING SYSTEMS; TEACHING; WEBSITES;

ALN; ASYNCHRONOUS LEARNING NETWORKS; COLLABORATIVE LEARNING; COMPUTER-MEDIATED COMMUNICATION; FACE TO FACE; LEARNING OUTCOME; PEER ASSESSMENT; TEAM-BASED LEARNING; WEB-BASED COMPUTER;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

EID: 85001728391     PISSN: 15481093     EISSN: 15481107     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4018/jwltt.2007040102     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Bloom, B.S., Englehart, M.D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W.H., & Krathwohl, D.R. (1956). A taxonomy of education objectives: Handbook I. The cognitive domain. New York: McKay.
2. Coppola, N., Hiltz, S.R., & Rotter, N. (2004). Building trust in virtual teams, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 47(2) 95–104.
3. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1992). Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22,1111–1132.
4. Gomez, E.A., & Bieber, M. (2005). Towards active team-based learning: An instructional strategy. In Proceedings of the Eleventh Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS)(pp. 728–734). Omaha.
5. Gomez, E.A., Wu, D., Passerini, K., & Bieber, M. (2006, April 19–21). Computer-supported learning strategies: An implementation and assessment framework for team-based learning. Paper presented at ISOneWorld Conference, Las Vegas, NV.
6. Gomez, E. A., Wu, D., Passerini, K., & Bieber, M. (2006). Introducing computer-supported team-based learning: preliminary outcomes and learning impacts. In M. Khosrow-Pour (Ed.), Emerging trends and challenges in information technology management: Proceedings of the 2006 Information Resources Management Association Conference, (pp. 603–606). Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.
7. Isabella, L., & Waddock, S. (1994). Top management team certainty: environmental assessments, teamwork, and performance implications. Journal of Management, Winter.
8. Johnson, D., & Johnson, R. (1999). What makes cooperative learning work. Japan Association for Language Teaching, pp. 23–36.
9. Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R.T., & Smith, K.A. (1991). Cooperative learning: increasing college faculty instructional productivity. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No.
10. Leidner, D., & Jarvenpaa S.L. (1995). The use of information technology to enhance management school education: A theoretical view. MIS Quarterly, September, 265–291.
11. Leidner, D., & Fuller, M. (1996). Improving student processing and assimilation of conceptual information: GSS-supported collaborative learning vs. individual constructive learning. In Proceedings of the 29th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-29), Big Island, Hawaii, pp. 293–302.
12. Malhotra, Y., & Galletta, D. (2003, January 6–9). Role of commitment and motivation in knowledge management systems implementation: Theory, conceptualization, and measurement of antecedents of success. In Proceedings of 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences, pp. 1–10. IEEE.
13. Michaelsen, L., Fink, D., & Knight, A. (2002). Team-based learning: A transformative use of small groups in college teaching. Sterling VA: Stylus Publishing.
14. Passerini, K., & Granger, M.J. (2000). Information technology-based instructional strategies. Journal of Informatics Education & Research, 2(3).
15. Phillips, G. M., & Santoro, G. M. (1989). Teaching group discussions via computer-mediated communication. Communication Education, 39, 151–161.
16. Schlechter, T. M. (1990). The relative instructional effciency of small group computer-based training. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 6(3), 329–341.
17. Shen, J, Cheng, K., Bieber, M., & Hiltz, S. R. (2004). Traditional in-class examination vs. collaborative online examination in asynchronous learning networks: feld evaluation results. In Proceedings of AMCIS 2004.
18. Thorndike, E. L. (1932). Fundamentals of learning. New York: Teachers College Press.
19. Wu, D., & Hiltz, S. R. (2004). Predicting learning from asynchronous online discussions. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks (JALN), 8(2), 139–152.
20. Wu, D., Bieber, M., Hiltz, S. R., & Han, H. (2004, January). Constructivist learning with participatory examinations, In Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences (HICSS-37), Big Island, CD-ROM.