Performance of recidivism risk assessment instruments in U.S. correctional settings

Psychological Services

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 206-222

  Desmarais, Sarah L ^a   Johnson, Kiersten L ^a   Singh, Jay P ^b  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Global Institute of Forensic Research   (United States)

Author keywords

Adult offenders; Predictive validity; Recidivism; Risk assessment; Systematic review

Indexed keywords

ADULT; FORENSIC PSYCHIATRY; HUMAN; LEGISLATION AND JURISPRUDENCE; OFFENDER; PREVENTION AND CONTROL; PRISONER; PSYCHOLOGIC TEST; PSYCHOLOGY; PSYCHOMETRY; RECURRENT DISEASE; REPRODUCIBILITY; RISK ASSESSMENT; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; UNITED STATES; VIOLENCE;

ADULT; COMMITMENT OF MENTALLY ILL; CRIMINALS; HUMANS; PRISONERS; PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PSYCHOMETRICS; RECURRENCE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RISK ASSESSMENT; UNITED STATES; VIOLENCE;

EID: 85000982067     PISSN: 15411559     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/ser0000075     Document Type: Article

References (136)

1. American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association
2. Andrews, D. A. (1982). Level of Service Inventory. Toronto, Canada: Ontario Ministry of Correctional Services
3. Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (1995). Level of Service Inventory-Revised. North Tonawanda, NY: Multi-Health Systems
4. Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. L. (1998). Level of Service Inventory-Revised: Screening Version (MI-R:SV): User's manual. Toronto, Canada: Multi-Health Systems
5. Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (2010). Rehabilitating criminal justice policy and practice. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 16, 39-55. http://dx .doi.orgl10.l037/a0018362
6. Andrews, D. A., Bonta, J., & Wormith, S. J. (2004). The Level of Service/ Case Management Inventory (LS/CMI). Toronto, Canada: Multi-Health Systems
7. Andrews, D. A., Bonta, J., & Wormith, S. J. (2008). The Level of Service/ Risk-Need-Responsivity (LS/RNR). Toronto, Canada: Multi-Health Systems
8. Baird, C., Heinz, R., & Bemus, B. (1979). The Wisconsin Case Class@-carion/Staff Deployment Project. Madison, WI: Wisconsin Department of Corrections
9. Bakker, L., Riley, D., & O'Malley, J.' (1999). Risk of reconviction: Statistical models predicting four types of re-offending. Wellington, New Zealand: Department of Corrections Psychological Service
10. Barnoski, R., & Aos, S. (2003). Washington's Offender Accountability Act: An analysis of the Department of Corrections' risk assessment. Olympia, WA: Washington State Institute for Public Policy
11. Barnoski, R., & Drake, E. K. (2007). Washington's Offender Accountability Act: Department of Corrections' static risk assessment. Olympia, WA: Washington State Institute for Public Policy
12. Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Carbin, M. G. (1988). Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory: Twentydive years of evaluation. Clinical Psychology Review, 8, 77-100. http://dx.doi.org/10. 101610272-7358(88)90050-5
13. Blomberg, T., Bales, W., Mann, K., Meldrum, R., & Nedelec, J. (2010). Validation of the COMPAS risk assessment classification instrument. Tallahassee, FL: Center for Criminology and Public Policy Research
14. Brennan, T., Dieterich, W., & Ehret, B. (2009). Evaluating the predictive validity of the COMPAS risk and needs assessment system. Criminal Justjce and Behavior, 36, 21-40. http://dx.doi.orgI10. 11771 0093854808326545
15. Brown, S. L., & Motiuk, L. L. (2005). The Dynamic Factor Identification, and Analysis (DFIA) component of the Offender Intake Assessment (OIA) process: A meta-analytic, psychometric, and consultative review (Research Report No. R-164). Ottawa, Canada: Correctional Service Canada
16. Carson, E. A., & Sabol, W. J. (2012, December). Prisoners in 2011 (NCJ 239808). Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics. Retrieved from http://www.bjs.govlcontent/pub/pdf/p11 . pdf
17. Casey, P. M., Warren, R. K., & Elek, J. K. (201 1). Using offender risk and . needs assessment information at sentencing: Guidance for courts from a national working group. Williamsburg, VA: National Center for State Courts. Retrieved from http://ncsc.contentdm.oclc.org/cgi-bin/showfile .exe?CISOROOT=/criminal&CISOPTR1=9 6
18. Castillo, E. D., & Alarid, L. F. (201 1). Factors associated with recidivism among offenders with mental illness. Intemtional Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 55, 98-1 17, http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1 177/0306624X09359502
19. Chenane, J. L., Brennan, P. K., Steiner, B., &Ellison, J. M. (2015). Racial and ethnic differences in the predictive validity of the Level of Service Inventory-Revised among prison inmates. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 42, 286-303. http://dx.doi.org/l0.1177/0093854814548195
20. Connolly, M. M. (2003). A critical examination of actuarial offenderbased prediction assessments: Guidance for the next generation of assessments. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX
21. Copas, J., & Marshall, P. (1998). The Offender Group Reconviction Scale: The statistical reconviction score for use by probation officers. Journal of the Royal Statistical Sociery. 47C. 159-171. http://dx.doi.org/10 11 1111467-9876.00104
22. Davidson, C. (2012). 2012 Iowa Board of Parole risk assessment validation. Des Moines, IA: Department of Human Rights, Division of Criminal and Juvenile Justice Planning
23. Davidson, J. (2007). Risky business: What standard assessments mean for female offenders. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Hawaii at Manoa, Manoa, HI
24. de Ruiter, C., & Nicholls, T. L. (2011). Protective factors in forensic mental health: A new frontier. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 10, 160-170. http://dx.doi.org/l0.1080/14999013.2011.600602
25. Desmarais, S. L., Sellers. B. G., Viljoen, J. L., Cruise, K. R., Nicholls, T. L., & Dvoskin, J. A. (2012). Pilot implementation and preliminary evaluation of START:AV assessments in secure juvenile correctional facilities. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 11, 150-164. http://dx.doi.org/10. 1080/1499901 3.201 2.737405
26. Desmarais, S. L., Van Dom, R. A., Telford, R. P., Petrila. J., & 'Coffey, T. (2012). Characteristics of START assessments completed in mental health jail diversion programs. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 30, 448-469. http://dx.doi.org/l0.100Ubs1.2022
27. Douglas, K. S., Otto, R., Desmarais, S. L., & Borum, R. (2012). Clinical forensic psychology. In I. B. Weiner, J. A. Schinka, & W. F. Veicer (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Vol. 2. Research methods in psychology (pp. 213-244). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley
28. Douglas, K. S., & Skeem, J. (2005). Violence risk assessment: Getting specific about being dynamic. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 11, 347-383. http://dx.doi.org/l0.1037/1076-8971.11.3.347
29. Douglas, K. S., Skeem, J. L., & Nicholson, E. (201 1). Research methods in violence risk assessment. In B. Rosenfeld & S. D. Penrod (Eds.), Research methods in forensic psychology (pp. 325-346). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley
30. Dow, E., Jones, C., & Mott. J. (2005). An empirical modeling approach to recidivism classification. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 32, 223-247. http://dx.doi.org/l0.1177/0093854804272892
31. Eaglin, J., & Lombard, P. (1982). A validation and comparative evaluation of four predictive devices for classifying federal probation caseloads. Washington, DC: Federal Judicial Center
32. Eisenberg, M., Bryl, J., & Fabelo, T. (2009). Validation of the Wisconsin Department of Corrections risk assessment instrument. New York, NY: Council of State Governments Justice Center
33. Evans, S. E. (2009). Gender disparity in the prediction of recidivism: The accuracy of LSI-R modijied. (Master's thesis). University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL
34. Farabee, D., & Zhang, S. (2007). COMPAS validation study: First annual report. Los Angeles, CA: Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
35. Farabee, D., Zhang, S., Roberts, R. E. L., & Yang, J. (2010). COMPAS validation study: Final report. Los Angeles, CA: Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
36. Fass, T. L., Heilbrun, K., DeMatteo, D., & Fretz, R. (2008). The LSI-R and the COMPAS: Validation data on two risk-needs tools. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35, 1095-1 108. http://dx.doi.org/l0.1177/ 0093854808320497
37. Fazel, S., Singh, J. P., Doll, H., & Grann, M. (2012). Use of risk assessment instruments in to predict of violence and antisocial behaviour: systematic review and meta-analysis. British Medical Jouml, 345, e4692. http:// dx.doi.org/10.l136/bmj.e4692
38. Flores, A. W., Lowenkamp, C. T., Smith, P., & Latessa, E. J. (2006). Validating the Level of Service Inventory-Revised on a sample of federal probationers. Federal Probation, 70, 44-48
39. Gendreau, P., Goggin, C., & Little, T. (1996). Predicting adult offender recidivism: What works! (Catalog No. JS4-111996-7E). Ottawa, Canada: Public Works and Government Services Canada
40. Glaze, L. E., & Kaeble, D. (2014, December). Correctional population in the United States, 2013 (NCJ 248479). Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics
41. Gottfredson, D. S., & Moriarty. L. J. (2006). Statistical risk assessment: Old problems and new applications. Crime and Delinquency, 52, 178-200. http://dx.doi.org/l0.1177/0011128705281748
42. Gould, L. (1991): A comparison of models of parole outcome. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA
43. Grove, W. M., Zald, D. H., Lebow, B. S., Snitz, B. E., &Nelson, C. (2000). Clinical versus mechanical prediction: A meta-analysis. Psychological Assessment, 12, 19-30. http://dx.doi.org/l0.1037/1040-3590.12.1.19
44. Guy, L. S., Edens, J. F., Anthony, C., & Douglas, K. S. (2005). Does psychopathy predict institutional misconduct among adults? A metaanalytic investigation. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 1056-1064. http://dx.doi.org/l0.1037/0022-006X.73.6.1056
45. Guy, L. S., Packer, I. K., & Warnken, W. (2012). Assessing risk of violence using structured professional judgment guidelines. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 12, 270-283. http://dx.doi.org/l0.1080/, 15228932.2012.674471
46. Hamilton, M. (2015). Risk-needs assessment: Constitutional and ethical challenges. The American Criminal Law Review, 52, 231-291
47. Hanson, R. K., & Morton-Bourgon, K. E. (2009). The accuracy of recidivism risk assessments for sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of 118 prediction studies. Psychological Assessment, 21, 1-21. http://dx.doi .org/10.l037/a0014421
48. Hare, R. D. (2003). The Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (2nd ed.). Toronto, Canada: Multi-Health Systems
49. Harer, M. (1994). Recidivism among federal prison releasees in 1987: A preliminary report. Washington, DC: Federal Bureau of Prisons Office of Research and Evaluation
50. Henderson, H. M. (2006). The predictive utility of the Wisconsin Risk Needs Assessment in a sample of Texas probationers. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Sam Houston State University, Huntsville, TX
51. Hilton, N., Hanis, G. T., & Rice, M. E. (2006). Sixty-six years of research on the clinical versus actuarial prediction of violence. The Counseling Psychologist, 34, 400-409. http://dx.doi.org/l0.1177/0011000005285877
52. HM Prison Service and National Probation Directorate. (2001). The Offender Assessment System: User manual. London, England: Home Office
53. Hoffman, P. (1983). Screening for risk: A revised Salient Factor Score (SFS 81). Journal of Criminal Justice, 11, 539-547. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.l016/0047-2352(83)90006-5
54. Hoffman, P. (1994). Twenty years of operational use of a risk prediction instrument: The United States Parole Commission's Salient Factor Score. Journal of Criminal Justice, 22. 477-494. http://dx.doi.org/10 .1016/0047-2352(94)90090-6
55. Hoffman, P., & Adelberg, S. (1980). The Salient Factor Score: A nontechnical overview. Federal Probation, 44, 44-52
56. Hoffman, P., & Beck, J. (1974). Parole decision-making: A Salient Factor Score. Journal of Criminal Justice, 2, 195-206. http://dx.doi.org/10 .101 610047-2352(74)9003 1-2
57. Hoffman, P., & Beck, J. (1980). Revalidating the Salient Factor Score: A research note. Journal of Criminal Justice, 8, 185-1 88. http://dx.doi.org/ l0.1016/0047-2352(80)90025-2
58. Hoffman, P., & Beck J. (1985). Recidivism among released federal prisoners: Salient Factor Score and five-year follow-up. Criminal Justi'ce and Behavior, 12, 501-507. httpJ/dx.doi.orgll0.1177/00938548850120
59. Holder, E. H. (2014, August 1). Attorney General Eric Holder speaks at the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers 57th Annual Meeting and the 13th State Criminal Justice Network conference. Available at http://www.justice.gov/opa/speech/attomey-general-eric-holder-spe&snational-association-criminal-defense-lawyers-57th
60. Holland, T. R., Holt, N., Levi, M., & Beckett, G. E. (1983). Comparison and combination of clinical and statistical predictions of recidivism among adult offenders. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68, 203-21 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.68.2.203
61. Holsinger, A. M., Lowenkamp, C. T., & Latessa, E. J. (2004). Validating the LSI-R on a sample of jail inmates. Journal of Offexder Monitoring, 17, 8-9
62. Holtfreter, K., & Cupp, R. (2007). Gender and risk assessment: The empirical status of the LSI-R for women. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 23, 363-382. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1043986207309436
63. Howard, B. (2007). Examining predictive validity of the Salient Factor Score and HCR-20 among behavior health court clientele: Comparing static and dynamic variables. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Palo Alto University, Palo Alto, CA
64. Johnson, J. L., Lowenkamp, C. T., VanBenschoten, S. W., & Robinson, C. R. (2011). The construction and validation of the Federal Post, Conviction Risk Assessment (PCRA). Federal Probation, 75, 16-29
65. Jung, S., Brown, K., Ennis, L., & Ledi, D. (2015). The association between presentence risk evaluations and sentencing outcome. Applied Psychology in Criminal Justice, 11; 11 1-125
66. Kelly, B. (2009). A validation study of Risk Management System. (Master's thesis). University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV
67. Kelly, C. E., & Welsh, W. N. (2008). The predictive validity of the Level of Service Inventory-Revised for drug-involved offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35. 819-831. http://dx.doi.org/l0.1177/ 00938548083 16642
68. Kim, H. (2010). Prisoner classification re-visited: Afurther test of the Level of Service Inventory-Revised (LSI-R) intake assessment. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
69. Knight, K., Gamer, B. R., Simpson, D. D., Morey, J. T., & Flynn, P. M. (2006). An assessment for criminal thinking. Crime and Delinquency, 52, 159-177. hnp://dx.doi.org/l0.1177/0011128705281749
70. Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometries, 33, 159-174. http://dx.doi .org/10.2307/25293 10
71. Langan, P. A., & Levin, D. J. (2002, June). Recidivism of prisoners released in 1994 (NCJ 193427). Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics
72. Latessa, E., Smith, P., Lemke, R., Makarios, M., & Lowenkamp, C. (2009). Creation and validation of the Ohio Risk Assessment System: Final report. Cincinnati, OH: Author
73. Leistico, A. M., Salekin, R. T., DeCoster, J., & Rogers, R. (2008). A large-scale meta-analysis relating the hare measures of psychopathy to antisocial conduct. Law and Human Behavior, 32. 28-45. http://dx.doi .org/10. 1007/s10979-007-9096-6
74. Listwan, S., Piquero, N., & Van Voorhis, P. (2010). Recidivism among a white-collar sample: Does personality matter? Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 43, 156-174. http://dx.doi.org/l0.1375/ acri.43.1.156
75. Lowenkamp, C. T., & Bechtel, K. (2007). The predictive validity of the LSI-R on a sample of offenders drawn from the records of the Iowa Department of Corrections Management System. Federal Probation, 71, 25-29
76. Lowenkamp, C. T., Holsinger, A. M., & Cohen, T. H. (2015). PCRA revisited: Testing the validity of the Federal Post Conviction Risk Assessment (PCRA). Psychological Services, 12, 149-157. http://dx.doi .org/10.1037/se10000024
77. Lowenkamp, C. T., Holsinger, A. M., & Latessa, E. J. (2001). Risklneed assessment, offender classification, and the role of childhood abuse. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 28, 543-563, http://dx.doi.orgll0.1177/ OW385480102800501
78. Lowenkamp, C. T., Johnson, J. L., Holsinger, A. M., Vanbenschoten, S. W., & Robinson, C. R. (2013). The federal Post Conviction Risk Assessment (PCRA): A construction and validation study. Psychological Services, 10, 87-96. http://dx.doi.org/l0.1037/a0030343
79. Lowenkamp, C. T., & Latessa, E. J. (2004). Validating the Level of Service Inventory-Revised in Ohio's community based correctional facilities. Cincinnati, OH: Center for Criminal Justice Research
80. Lowenkamp, C. T., Lemke, R., & Latessa, E. (2008). The development and validation of a pretrial screening tool. Federal Probation, 72, 2-9
81. Lowenkamp, C. T., Lovins, B., & Latessa, E. J. (2009). Validating the Level of Service Inventory-Revised and the Level of Service Inventory: Screening Version with a sample of probationers. The Prison Jhurnal, 89, 192-204. http:/ldx.doi.org/l0.ll77/0032885509334755
82. Loza, W. (2005). The SelfAppraisal Questionnaire (SAQ): A tool for assessing violent and non-violent recidivism. Toronto, Canada: Mental Health Systems
83. Mamalian, C. A. (201 1). State of the science of pretrial risk assessment. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Assistance
84. Meaden, C. (2012). The utility of the Level of service Inventory-Revised versus the Service Planning Instrument for Women in predicting program completion in female offenders. (Master's thesis). Central Connecticut State University, New Britain, CT
85. Miller, H. A. (2006a). A dynamic assessment of offender risk, needs, and strengths in a sample of pre-release general offenders. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 24, 767-782. http://dx.doi.org/l0.100/bs1.728
86. Miller, H. A. (2006b). Manual of the Inventory of Offender Risk, Needs, and Strengths (IORNS). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources
87. Miller, J. & Maloney, C. (2013). Practitioner compliance with risklneeds assessment tools: A theoretical and empirical assessment. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 40, 7 16-736. http://dx.doi.org/10. 1 1771 0093854812468883
88. Millson, B., Robinson, D., & Van Dieten, M. (2010). Women offender case management model. Wethersfield, CT: Court Support Services Division
89. Mitchell, O., Caudy, M., & Mackenzie, D. (2013). A reanalysis of the Self-Appraisal Questionnaire: Psychometric properties and predictive validity. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 57, 445-459
90. *Mitchell,O., & Mackenzie. D. (2006). Disconfirmation of the predictive validity Of the Self-Appraisal Questionnaire in a sample of high-risk drug offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 33, 449-466. http://dx, . .doi.org/10. 117710093854806287421
91. Moher. D. Liberati, A. Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & The PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6, e1000097. http://dx.doi.org/l0.137l /journal.pmed. 1000097
92. Monahan, J., & Skeem. J. (2014). Risk redux: The resurgence of risk assessment in criminal sanctioning. Federal Sentencing Reporter, 26, 158-166, http://dx.doi.org/l0.1525/fsr.2014.26.3.l58
93. Monahan, J., & Skeem. J. (2016). Risk assessment in criminal sentencing. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 12. Advance online publication. http://dx.doi.org/10. 1 146/annurev-clinpsy-02 18 15-092945
94. Morey, L. C. (1991). The Personality Assessment Inventory professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources
95. Motiuk, L. L., & Porporino, F. J. (1989). Field test of the Communiry RisWNeeds Management scale: A study of offenders on caseload. Ottawa, Canada; Correctional Service Canada, Research Branch
96. National Council on Crime and Delinquency. (2006). Correctional assessment and intervention system. Oakland, CA: Author
97. Novaco, R. W. (1994). Anger as a risk factor for violence among the mentally disordered. In J. Monahan & H. Steadman (Eds.), Violence and mental disorder Developments in risk assessment (pp. 21-59). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
98. Nuffield, J. (1982). Parole decision making in Canada: Research towards decision guidelines. Ottawa, Canada: Solicitor General of Canada
99. Obama, B. (2015, July 14). President Obama remarks on the criminal justice system. Retrieved from http://www.c-span.org/video/327099-41 president-obama-remarks-naacp
100. O'Keefe, M. L., Klebe, K., & Hromas, S. (1998). Validation of the Level of Supervision Inventory (LSI) for community-based offenders in Colorado: Phase 11. Model, CO: Department of Corrections
101. Pew Center on the States. (2009). One in 31: The long reach of American corrections. Washington, DC: The Pew Charitable Trusts
102. Quimsey, V. L., Hanis. G. T., Rice, M. E., & Coder. C. A. (2006). Violenf offenders: Appraising and managing risk (2nd 4.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. ht@J/dx.doi.org/10. 103711 1367-000
103. Robuck, B. (1976). A study of inmate outcome in Kentucky. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Kentucky. Lexington, KY
104. Rubin, M., Rocque, M., & Ethridge. W. (2010). An analysis of probation violations and revocations in Maine probation entrants in 2005-2006. Portland, ME: Justice Research and Statistics Association
105. Schlager, M. D. (2005). Assessing the reliability and validity of the Level of Service Inventory-Revised (LSI-R) on a communiry corrections ample: lmplicationr for corrections and parole policy. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Rutgers University, Newark, NJ
106. Scurich, N., & Monahan, J. (2016). Evidence-based sentencing: Public openness and opposition to using gender, age, and race as risk factors for recidivism. Law and Human Behavior, 40, 36-41
107. Shaffer, D. K. Kelly, B., & Lieberman, J. D. (201 1). An exemplar-based approach to risk assessment: Validating the Risk Management systems instrument. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 22, 167-186. http://dx.doi .org/10. 1177/0887403410372989
108. Simourd, D. (2006). Validation of needs assessments in the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections: Final report. Hainpden Township, PA: Department of Corrections
109. Singh, J. P. (2013). Predictive validity performance indicators in violence risk assessment: A methodological primer. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 31, 8-22. http://dx.doi.org/l0.1002/bs1.2052
110. Singh, J. P., Desmarais, S. L., Hurducas, C., Arbach-Lucioni, K, Condemarin, C., de Ruiter, C., . . . Otto, R. K (2014). Use and perceived utility of shuctured violence risk assessment tools in 44 countries: Findings from the IRiS Project International Journal of Forensic Mental Health Services, 13, 193-206. http://dx.doi.org/l0.1080/14999013.2014.922141
111. Singh, J. P., Desmarais, S. L., & Van Dorn, R. A. (2013). Measurement of predictive validity in violence risk assessment studies: A second-order systematic review. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 31, 55-73. http://dx .doi.org/10.1002ibs1.2053
112. Singh, J. P., Grann, M., & Fazel, S. (2011). A comparative study of violence risk assessment tools: A systematic review and metaregression analysis of 68 studies involving 25,980 participants. Clinical Psychology Review, 31, 499-5 13. http://dx.doi.org/10, 10 I6Ij.cpr.2010.11.009
113. Skeem, J. L., Winter, E., Kennealy, P. J., Louden. J. E., & Tatar, J. R., (2014). Offenders with mental illness have criminogenic needs, too: Toward recidivism reduction. taw and Human Behavior, 38, 212-224. http://dx.doi.org/l0. 1037Ahb0000054
114. Smith, P., Cullen, F., & Latessa, E. (2009). Can 14,737 women be wrong? A meta-analysis of the LSI-R and recidivism for female offenders. Criminology & Public Policy, 8, 183-208, http://dx.doi.orgl10.1111/j .1745-9133.2009.0055 1 .X
115. Starr. S. B. (2014). Evidence-based sentencing and the scientific rationalization of discrimination. Stanford Law Review, 66, 803-872
116. Tillyer, M. S., & Vose, B. (2011). Social ecology, individual risk, and recidivism: A multilevel examination of main and moderating influences. Journal of Criminal Justice, 39, 452-459. http://dx.doi.org/10 .1016/j.jcrirnjus.2011.08.003
117. Tully, R. J., Chou, S., & Browne, K. D. (2013). A systematic review on the effectiveness of sex offender risk assessment tools in predicting sexual recidivism of adult male sex offenders. Clinical Psychology Review, 33, 287-316. http://dx.doi.org/l0.1016/j.cpr.2012.12.002
118. United States Parole Commission. (2003). Rules and procedures manual. Chevy Chase, MD: Author
119. Van der Knaap, L. M., & Alberda, D. L. (2009). De predictieve validiteit van de Recidive Inschattingsschalen (RISc) [Predictive validity of the Recidivism Risk Assessment Scales (RISc)]. Den Haag, the Netherlands: Ministerie van Justitie, WODC
120. Van Dieten, M., & Robinson, D. (2007). The Service Planning Instrument (SPln). Ottawa, Canada: Orbis Partners
121. Van Voorhis, P., Wright, E. M., Salisbury, E., & Bauman, A. (2010). Women's risk factors and their contributions to existing riswneeds assessment: The current status of gender responsive assessment. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, 261-288. http://dx.doi.org/l0.1177/ 0093854809357442
122. Viljoen, J. L., McLachlan, K., & Vincent, G. M. (2010). Assessing violence risk and psychopathy in juvenile and adult offenders: A survey of clinical practices. Assessment, 17, 377-395. http://dx.doi.org/l0.1177/ 1073191 109359587
123. Vincent, G. M., Guy, L. S., Fusco, S. L., & Gershenson, B. G. (2012). Field reliability of the SAVRY with juvenile probation officers: Implications for training. 'Law and Human Behavior, 36, 225-236. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1037/h0093974
124. Vose, B., Lowenkamp, C. T., Smith, P., & Cullen, F. T. (2009). Gender and the predictive validity of the LSI-R: A study of parolees and probationers. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 25, 49-47 1. http://dx.doi.org/10. 117711 043986209344797
125. Walmsley, R. (2012). World female imprisonment list (2nd ed.). London, England: International Centre for Prison Studies
126. Walmsley, R. (2013). World prison population list (10th ed.). London, England: International Centre for Prison Studies
127. Walten, G. D. (2003). Outcomes with the Psychopathy Checklist and Lifestyle Criminality Screening Form: A meta-analytic comparison. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 21, 89-102. http://dx.doi.org/l0.1002./ bs1.519
128. Walters, G. D. (1995). The Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles: Part I. Reliability and preliminary validity. Criminal Justice and Behavior. 22. 307-325. http/dx.doi.org/l0.1177/0093854895022003008
129. Walten, G. D. (201 1). Predicting recidivism with the psychological inventory of criminal thinking styles and Level of Service Inventory-Revised: Screening Version. Law and Human Behavior, 35, 211-220. http://dx .doi.org/l0. 10071/s10979-010-9213-7
130. Walters, G. D. (2012). Criminal thinking and recidivism: Meta-analytic evidence on the predictive and incremental validity of the Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles (PICTS). Aggression and Violent Behavior, 17, 272-278. http://dx.doi.org/l0.1016lj.avb .2012.02.010
131. Walters, G. D., White, T. W., & Denney, D. (1991). The Lifestyle Criminality Screening Form: Preliminary data. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 18, 406-418
132. Webster, C. D., Douglas, K. S., Eaves, D., & Hart, S. D. (1997). HCR-20: Assessing risk for violence (Version 2). Vancouver, Canada: Mental Health, Law, & Policy Institute, Simon Fraser University
133. Wright, E. M., Van Voorhis, P., Bauman, A., & Salisbury, E. (2007). Gender-responsive riskheeds assessment: Final report. St. Paul, MN: Department of Corrections
134. Yacus. G. M. (1998). Validation of the risk and needs assessment used in the classification for parole and probation of Virginia's adult criminal offenders. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Old Dominion University, Norfolk. VA
135. Yang, M., Wong, S. C, & Coid, J. (2010). The efficacy of violence prediction: A meta-analytic comparison of nine risk assessment tools. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 740-767. http://dx.doi.argll0.1037/a0020473
136. Egisdnir, S., White, M. J., Spengler, P. M., Maugherman. A. S., Anderson, L. A., Cook, R. S., . . . Walker, B. S. (2006). The meta-analysis of clinical judgement project: Fifty-six years of accumulated research on clinical versus statistical prediction. The Counseling Psychologist, 34, 341-382. http:/ldx.doi.org/l0.1177/0011000005285875