Passive-Aggressive Sequence Labeling with Discriminative Post-Editing for Recognising Person Entities in Tweets

EACL 2014 - 14th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Proceedings of the Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 69-73

  Derczynski, Leon ^a   Bontcheva, Kalina ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHARACTER RECOGNITION; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

CONVENTIONALLY CASTS; DISFLUENCIES; NOISE TOLERANTS; PERSON RECOGNITION; POST-EDITING; SEQUENCE LABELING; SOCIAL MEDIA; STATE-OF-THE-ART PERFORMANCE;

SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE);

EID: 84999995264     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. T. Baldwin, P. Cook, M. Lui, A. MacKinlay, and L. Wang. 2013. How noisy social media text, how diffrnt social media sources. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, pages 356-364. ACL.
2. A. E. C. Basave, A. Varga, M. Rowe, M. Stankovic, and A.-S. Dadzie. 2013. Making Sense of Microposts (# MSM2013) Concept Extraction Challenge. In Proceedings of the Concept Extraction Challenge at the Workshop on'Making Sense of Microposts', volume 1019. CEUR-WS.
3. K. Crammer, O. Dekel, J. Keshet, S. Shalev-Shwartz, and Y. Singer. 2006. Online passive-aggressive algorithms. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 7:551-585.
4. H. Cunningham, D. Maynard, K. Bontcheva, and V. Tablan. 2002. GATE: an Architecture for Development of Robust HLT Applications. In Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 168-175.
5. H. Daumé III. 2004. Notes on CG and LMBFGS optimization of logistic regression. Paper available at http://pub.hal3.name# daume04cg-bfgs, implementation available at http://hal3.name/megam/, August.
6. L. Derczynski, D. Maynard, N. Aswani, and K. Bontcheva. 2013. Microblog-Genre Noise and Impact on Semantic Annotation Accuracy. In Proceedings of the 24th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media. ACM.
7. J. Eisenstein. 2013. What to do about bad language on the internet. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pages 359-369. Association for Computational Linguistics.
8. T. Finin, W. Murnane, A. Karandikar, N. Keller, J. Martineau, and M. Dredze. 2010. Annotating named entities in Twitter data with crowdsourcing. In Proceedings of the NAACL HLT 2010 Workshop on Creating Speech and Language Data with Amazon's Mechanical Turk, pages 80-88.
9. J. Finkel, T. Grenager, and C. Manning. 2005. Incorporating non-local information into information extraction systems by Gibbs sampling. In Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 363-370. Association for Computational Linguistics.
10. P. Gadde, L. Subramaniam, and T. A. Faruquie. 2011. Adapting a WSJ trained part-of-speech tagger to noisy text: preliminary results. In Proceedings of the 2011 Joint Workshop on Multilingual OCR and Analytics for Noisy Unstructured Text Data. ACM.
11. S. Green, J. Heer, and C. D. Manning. 2013. The efficacy of human post-editing for language translation. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 439-448. ACM.
12. T. Joachims. 1999. Svmlight: Support vector machine. SVM-Light Support Vector Machine http://svmlight. joachims. org/, University of Dortmund, 19(4).
13. J. Lafferty, A. McCallum, and F. Pereira. 2001. Conditional Random Fields: Probabilistic Models for Segmenting and Labeling Sequence Data. In Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 282-289, San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.
14. Y. Li, K. Bontcheva, and H. Cunningham. 2009. Adapting SVM for Data Sparseness and Imbalance: A Case Study on Information Extraction. Natural Language Engineering, 15(2):241-271.
15. C. Li, J. Weng, Q. He, Y. Yao, A. Datta, A. Sun, and B.-S. Lee. 2012. Twiner: named entity recognition in targeted twitter stream. In Proceedings of the 35th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, pages 721-730. ACM.
16. X. Liu, S. Zhang, F. Wei, and M. Zhou. 2011. Recognizing named entities in tweets. In Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pages 359-367.
17. K. Morik, P. Brockhausen, and T. Joachims. 1999. Combining statistical learning with a knowledge-based approach-a case study in intensive care monitoring. In ICML, volume 99, pages 268-277.
18. D. Nadeau and S. Sekine. 2007. A survey of named entity recognition and classification. Lingvisticae Investigationes, 30(1):3-26.
19. N. Okazaki. 2007. CRFsuite: a fast implementation of Conditional Random Fields (CRFs).
20. L. Ratinov and D. Roth. 2009. Design challenges and misconceptions in named entity recognition. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning, pages 147-155. Association for Computational Linguistics.
21. A. Ritter, S. Clark, Mausam, and O. Etzioni. 2011. Named entity recognition in tweets: An experimental study. In Proc. of Empirical Methods for Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), Edinburgh, UK.
22. E. F. T. K. Sang and F. D. Meulder. 2003. Introduction to the CoNLL-2003 Shared Task: Language-Independent Named Entity Recognition. In Proceedings of CoNLL-2003, pages 142-147. Edmonton, Canada.