Green DataPath for TCAM-Based Software-Defined Networks

IEEE Communications Magazine

Volumn 54, Issue 11, 2016, Pages 194-201

  Huang, Huawei ^a   Guo, Song ^a   Wu, Jinsong ^b   Li, Jie ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AIZU   (Japan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHILE   (Chile)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TSUKUBA   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DYNAMIC FREQUENCY SCALING; HIGHWAY ENGINEERING; NETWORK ARCHITECTURE; POWER MANAGEMENT (TELECOMMUNICATION); SOFTWARE DEFINED NETWORKING; VOLTAGE SCALING;

DATA-PATH ARCHITECTURE; DYNAMIC VOLTAGE AND FREQUENCY SCALING; ENERGY EFFICIENT ROUTING; EXTENSIVE SIMULATIONS; POWER MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES; PROPOSED ARCHITECTURES; TRAFFIC ENGINEERING; TRAFFIC SCHEDULING;

ENERGY EFFICIENCY;

EID: 84999286974     PISSN: 01636804     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/MCOM.2016.1600067CM     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. H. Yamanaka, et al., Openfl ow Networks with Limited l2 Functionality, Proc. 13th Int'l. Conf. Networks, 2014, pp. 221-29.
2. P. T. Congdon, et al., Simultaneously Reducing Latency, Power Consumption in Openfl ow Switches, IEEE/ACM Trans. Networking, vol. 22, no. 3, 2014, pp. 1007-20.
3. R. Panigrahy, S. Sharma, Reducing Tcam Power Consumption, Increasing Throughput, Proc. 10th Symp. High Performance Interconnects, 2002, pp. 107-12.
4. F. Zane, G. Narlikar, A. Basu, Coolcams: Power-Efficient tcams for Forwarding Engines, Proc. IEEE 22nd Annual Joint Conf. IEEE Computer, Commun., vol. 1, 2003, pp. 42-52.
5. Y. Ma And S. Banerjee, A Smart Pre-Classifi er to Reduce Power Consumption of Tcams for Multi-Dimensional Packet Classification, Proc. ACM SIGCOMM 2012 Conf. Applications, Technologies, Architectures, Protocols for Computer Commun., 2012, pp. 335-46.
6. V. Ravikumar, R. N. Mahapatra, L. N. Bhuyan, Easecam: An Energy, Storage Efficient Tcam-Based Router Architecture for IP Lookup, IEEE Trans. Comp., vol. 54, no. 5, 2005, pp. 521-33.
7. C. R. Meiners, A. X. Liu, E. Torng, Tcam Razor: A Systematic Approach Towards Minimizing Packet Classifi ers in Tcams, Proc. IEEE Int'l. Conf. Network Protocols, 2007, pp. 266-75.
8. Y. Sun, M. S. Kim, Tree-Based Minimization of Tcam Entries for Packet Classification, Proc. 7th IEEE Consumer Commun., Networking Conf., 2010, pp. 1-5.
9. K. Kannan, S. Banerjee, Compact Tcam: Flow Entry Compaction in Tcam for Power Aware SDN, Proc. Distrib. Comp., Networking, Springer, 2013, pp. 439-44.
10. H. Huang, et al., Joint Optimization of Rule Placement, Traffi c Engineering for Qos Provisioning in Software Defi ned Network, IEEE Trans. Computers, vol. 64, no. 12, 2015, pp. 3488-99.
11. N. McKeown, et al., Openflow: Enabling Innovation in Campus Networks, ACM SIGCOMM Comp. Commun. Rev., vol. 38, no. 2, 2008, pp. 69-74.
12. K. Pagiamtzis, A. Sheikholeslami, Content-Addressable Memory (Cam) Circuits And Architectures: A Tutorial And Survey, IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, vol. 41, no. 3, 2006, pp. 712-27.
13. S. Borkar, et al., Parameter Variations, Impact on Crcuits, Microarchitecture, Proc. 40th Annual Design Automation Conf., 2003, pp. 338-42.
14. D. C. Snowdon, S. Ruocco, G. Heiser, Power Management, Dynamic Voltage Scaling: Myths, Facts, Proc. 2005 Wksp. Power Aware Real-Time Computing, vol. 12, 2005.
15. A. L. Chiu, et al., Architectures, Protocols for Capacity Effi cient, Highly Dynamic, Highly Resilient Core Networks, IEEE/OSA J. Optical Commun. Net., vol. 4, no. 1, 2012, pp. 1-14.