Towards localization of malignant sites of asymmetry across bilateral mammograms

Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine

Volumn 140, Issue , 2017, Pages 11-18

  Casti, P ^a   Mencattini, A ^a   Salmeri, M ^a   Ancona, A ^b   Lorusso, M ^b   Pepe, M L ^c   Natale, C Di ^a   Martinelli, E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROME TOR VERGATA   (Italy)

^b San Paolo Hospital of Bari   (Italy)

^c Ambulatorio di Dermatologia   (Italy)

Author keywords

Bilateral asymmetry; Breast cancer; Computer aided diagnosis; Correlation based structural similarity; Detection of malignant sites

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER AIDED DIAGNOSIS; DIAGNOSIS; DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; DISEASES; GABOR FILTERS; STATISTICAL TESTS; X RAY SCREENS;

AUTOMATIC LOCALIZATION; BILATERAL ASYMMETRIES; BREAST CANCER; FULL-FIELD DIGITAL MAMMOGRAMS; LIKELIHOOD OF MALIGNANCY; POSITIVE PREDICTIVE VALUES; QUADRATIC DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; STRUCTURAL SIMILARITY;

MAMMOGRAPHY;

ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER LOCALIZATION; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; HUMAN; MAMMOGRAPHY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES;

BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY;

EID: 84998813223     PISSN: 01692607     EISSN: 18727565     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2016.11.010     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. [1] Ferlay, J., Soerjomataram, I., Ervik, M., Dikshit, R., Eser, S., Mathers, C., Rebelo, M., Parkin, D.M., Forman, D., Bray, F., GLOBOCAN. v1.0, Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide: IARC CancerBase No. 11 [Internet]. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2013. Available from: http://globocan.iarc.fr, 2012 accessed on 17/11/2015.
2. [2] American College of Radiology. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. Reston, Va., (eds.) Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System, 2nd ed., 1995, (BI-RADS).
3. [3] Piccoli, C.W., Feig, S.A., Palazzo, J.P., Developing asymmetric breast tissue. Radiology 211:1 (1999), 111–117.
4. [4] Burrell, H.C., Evans, A.J., Wilson, A.R.M., Pinder, S.E., False negative breast screening assessment. What lessons can we learn?. Clin. Radiol. 56:5 (2001), 385–388.
5. [5] Venkatesan, A., Chu, P., Kerlikowske, K., Sickles, E.A., Smith-Bindman, R., Positive predictive value of specific mammographic findings according to reader and patient variables. Radiology 250:3 (2009), 648–657.
6. [6] Bria, A., Karssemeijer, N., Tortorella, F., Learning from unbalanced data: a cascade-based approach for detecting clustered Microcalcifications. Med. Image Anal. 18:2 (2013), 241–252.
7. [7] Yin, F.F., Giger, M.L., Doi, K., Vyborny, C.J., Schmidt, R.A., Computerized detection of masses in digital mammograms: automated alignment of breast images and its effect on bilateral subtraction technique. Med. Phys. 21:3 (1994), 445–452.
8. [8] Karssemeijer, N., Te Brake, G., Combining single view features and asymmetry for detection of mass lesions. Karssemeijer, N., Thijssen, M., Hendriks, J., Erning, L., (eds.) Digital Mammography, 13, 1998, Springer, Netherlands, 95–102 of Computational Imaging and Vision.
9. [9] Karnana, M., Thangavel, K., Automatic detection of the breast border and nipple position on digital mammograms using genetic algorithm for asymmetry approach to detection of microcalcifications. Comput. Methods Prog. Bio. 87:1 (2007), 12–20.
10. [10] Tzikopoulos, S.D., Mavroforakis, M.E., Georgiou, H.V., Dimitropoulos, N., Theodoridis, S., A fully automated scheme for mammographic segmentation and classification based on breast density and asymmetry, Comput. Meth. Prog. Bio. 102:1 (2011), 47–63.
11. [11] Wang, X., Li, L., Xu, W., Liu, W., Lederman, D., Zheng, B., Improving performance of computer-aided detection of masses by incorporating bilateral mammographic density asymmetry: an assessment. Acad. Radiol. 19:3 (2012), 303–310.
12. [12] Ericeira, D.R., Silva, A.C., de Paiva, A.C., Gattass, M., Detection of masses based on asymmetric regions of digital bilateral mammograms using spatial description with variogram and cross-variogram functions. Comput. Biol. Med. 43:8 (2013), 987–999.
13. [13] Harvey, J.A., Fajardo, L.L., Innis, C.A., Previous mammograms in patients with impalpable breast carcinoma: retrospective vs blinded interpretation. Am. J. Roentgenol. 161:6 (1993), 1167–1172.
14. [14] Scutt, D., Lancaster, G.A., Manning, J.T., Breast asymmetry and predisposition to breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res., 8, 2006, R14.
15. [15] Wang, X., Lederman, D., Tan, J., Wang, X.H., Zheng, B., Computerized detection of breast tissue asymmetry depicted on bilateral mammograms: a preliminary study of breast risk stratification,”. Acad. Radiol. 17:10 (2010), 1234–1241.
16. [16] Zheng, B., Sumkin, J.H., Zuley, M.L., Wang, X., Klym, A.H., Gur, D., Bilateral mammographic density asymmetry and breast cancer risk: a preliminary assessment. Eur. J. Radiol. 81:11 (2012), 3222–3228.
17. [17] Tan, M., Pu, J., Cheng, S., Liu, H., Zheng, B., Assessment of a four-view mammographic image feature based fusion model to predict near-term breast cancer risk. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 43:10 (2015), 2416–2428.
18. [18] Tan, M., Zheng, B., Ramalingam, P., Gur, D., Prediction of near-term breast cancer risk based on bilateral mammographic feature asymmetry. Acad. Radiol. 20:12 (2013), 1542–1550.
19. [19] Miller, P., Astley, S., Automated detection of mammographic asymmetry using anatomical features. Int. J. Pattern Recogn. Artif. Intell. 7:6 (1993), 1461–1476.
20. [20] Llobet, R., Pollán, M., Antón, J., Miranda-García, J., Casals, M., Martínez, I., Pérez-Cortés, J.C., Semi-automated and fully automated mammographic density measurement and breast cancer risk prediction. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 116:2 (2014), 105–115.
21. [21] Ferrari, R.J., Rangayyan, R.M., Desautels, J.E.L., Frère, A.F., Analysis of asymmetry in mammograms via directional filtering with Gabor wavelets. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 20:9 (2001), 953–964.
22. [22] Rangayyan, R.M., Ferrari, R.J., Frère, A.F., Analysis of bilateral asymmetry in mammograms using directional, morphological, and density features. J. Electron. Imaging, 16(1), 2007, 12 article number 013003.
23. [23] Casti, P., Mencattini, A., Salmeri, M., Rangayyan, R.M., Analysis of structural similarity in mammograms for detection of bilateral asymmetry. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 34:2 (2015), 662–671.
24. [24] Casti, P., Mencattini, A., Salmeri, M., Ancona, A., Mangieri, F., Rangayyan, R.M., Masking procedures and measures of angular similarity for detection of bilateral asymmetry in mammograms. Conference Proceedings IEEE e-Health and Bioengineering (EHB), Iasi, Romania, 2013.
25. [25] Casti, P., Mencattini, A., Salmeri, M., Characterization of the breast region for computer assisted Tabár masking of paired mammographic images. IEEE International Symposium On Computer-Based Medical Systems (CBMS), 2012, 1–6.
26. [26] Magna, G., Casti, P., Jayaraman, S.V., Salmeri, M., Mencattini, A., Martinelli, E., Di Natale, C., Identification of mammography anomalies for breast cancer detection by an ensemble of classification models based on artificial immune system. Knowl. Based Syst. 101 (2016), 60–70.
27. [27] Tabár, L., Tot, T., Dean, P.B., Breast Cancer, the Art and Science of Early Detection with Mammography: Perception, Interpretation, Histopathologic Correlation. 2005, George Thieme Verlag.
28. [28] Abdel-Nasser, M., Moreno, A., Puig, D., Temporal mammogram image registration using optimized curvilinear coordinates. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 127 (2016), 1–14.
29. [29] Heath, M., Bowyer, K., Kopans, D., Moore, R., Kegelmeyer, W.P., The digital database for screening mammography. Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Digital Mammography, 2001, Medical Physics Publishing, 212–218.
30. [30] Suckling, J., Parker, J., Dance, D.R., Astley, S., Hutt, I., Boggis, C.R.M., Ricketts, I., Stamakis, E., Cerneaz, N., Kok, S.L., Taylor, P., Betal, D., Savage, J., The Mammographic Image Analysis Society digital mammogram database. Exerpta Medica, International Congress Series, 1069, 1994, 242–248.
31. [31] Casti, P., Mencattini, A., Salmeri, M., Ancona, A., Mangieri, F.F., Pepe, M.L., Rangayyan, R.M., Estimation of the breast skin-line in mammograms using multidirectional Gabor filters. Comput. Biol. Med. 43:11 (2013), 1870–1881.
32. [32] Casti, P., Mencattini, A., Salmeri, M., Ancona, A., Mangieri, F.F., Pepe, M.L., Rangayyan, R.M., Automatic detection of the nipple in screen-film and full-field digital mammograms using a novel Hessian-based method. J. Digit. Imaging 26:5 (2013), 948–957.
33. [33] Ferrari, R.J., Rangayyan, R.M., Desautels, J.E.L., Borges, R.A., Frère, A.F., Automatic identification of the pectoral muscle in mammograms. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 23:2 (2004), 232–245.
34. [34] Ayres, F.J., Rangayyan, R.M., Design and performance analysis of oriented feature detectors. J. Electron. Imaging, 16(2), 2007 article n. 023007.
35. [35] Wang, Z., Bovik, A.C., Sheikh, H.R., Simoncelli, E.P., Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Trans. Image Process 13:4 (2004), 600–612.
36. [36] Ambroise, C., McLachlan, G.J., Selection bias in gene extraction on the basis of microarray gene-expression data. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99:10 (2002), 6562–6566.
37. [37] Theodoridis, S., and Koutroumbas, K., 1999. Pattern Recognition.
38. [38] Casti, P., Mencattini, A., Salmeri, M., Ancona, A., Mangeri, F., Pepe, M.L., Rangayyan, R.M., Contour-independent detection and classification of mammographic lesions. Biomed. Signal Process. Control 25 (2016), 165–177.
39. [39] Ericeira, D.R., Silva, A.C., De Paiva, A.C., Gattass, M., Detection of masses based on asymmetric regions of digital bilateral mammograms using spatial description with variogram and cross-variogram functions. Comput. Biol. Med. 43:8 (2013), 987–999.
40. [40] Efron, B., The Jackknife, The Bootstrap and Other Resampling Plans, 38, 1982.
41. [41] Davison, A.C., Hinkley, D.V., Bootstrap Methods and their Application (Vol. 1). 1997, Cambridge University Press.
42. [42] Efron, N., Intrator, N., The effect of noisy bootstrapping on the robustness of supervised classification of gene expression data. Machine Learning for Signal Processing, 2004.
43. [43] Timp, S., Karssemeijer, N., Interval change analysis to improve computer aided detection in mammography. Med. Image Anal. 10:1 (2006), 82–95.
44. [44] Velikova, M., Lucas, P.J.F., Samulski, M., Karssemeijer, N., A probabilistic framework for image information fusion with an application to mammographic analysis. Med. Image Anal. 16:4 (2012), 865–875.
45. [45] Tanner, C., van Schie, G., Lesniak, J.M., Karssemeijer, N., Székely, G., Improved location features for linkage of regions across ipsilateral mammograms. Med. Image Anal. 17:8 (2013), 1265–1272.
46. [46] Marco, S., The need for external validation in machine olfaction: emphasis on health-related applications. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 406:16 (2014), 3941–3956.
47. [47] Esbensen, K.H., Geladi, P., Principles of proper validation: use and abuse of re‐sampling for validation. J. Chemometr. 24:3‐4 (2010), 168–187.