Super-Cooled Sports Dirt: Moral Contagion and Super Bowl Commercials in the Shadows of Janet Jackson

Television & New Media

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 131-154

  Wenner, Lawrence A ^a  

^a LOYOLA MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

communicative dirt; Janet Jackson; moral panic; Super Bowl; television commercials

Indexed keywords

EID: 84998086235     PISSN: 15274764     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1527476407306634     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Ahrens, F., and L. de Moraes. 2004. FCC is investigating Super Bowl show: Halftime performance faces indecency standard. Washington Post, February 3.
2. Allen, R.C. 1987. Reader-oriented criticism and television. In Channels of discourse: Television and contemporary criticism, 74—112. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
3. Allen, R.C. 1992. Audience-oriented criticism and television. In Channels of discourse, reassembled: Television and contemporary criticism, 2nd ed., 101—37. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
4. Arnold, T. 2005. Who's your daddy? The inside story of GoDaddy.com's Super Bowl fight with Fox. Adweek, February 21, 15, 30.
5. Atkinson, C., K. MacArthur, J. Halliday, A.Z. Cuneo, and M.M. Cardona. 2004. Upstaged advertisers riled by Bowl stunt. Advertising Age, February 9, 1—2.
6. Booth, W.C. 1988. The company we keep: An ethics of fiction. Berkeley: University of California Press.
7. Burcum, J. 2005. Warning: Super Bowl ads may cause blushing. Minneapolis (MN) Star Tribune, February 6, 1A.
8. Carroll, N. 1998. A philosophy of mass art. Oxford, UK: Clarendon.
9. Carroll, N. 2000. Art and ethical criticism: An overview of recent directions of research. Ethics 110: 350—87.
10. Carter, B. 2004. Bracing for fallout for super indignation. New York Times, February 5.
11. Collins, S., and M. James. 2005. After ‘04 fiasco, Super Bowl wants to avoid going offsides; “Wardrobe malfunction” fallout spurs an effort to strike a better balance between tawdry, tame. Los Angeles Times, February 4.
12. Costello, C., and J. Moos. 2004. Puns general from Super Bowl controversy. CNN Daybreak (Transcript 021012CN V73). February 10.
13. Cotey, J.C. 2005. Bland Super Bowl still offends some St. Petersburg (FL) Times, February 11.
14. Credibility malfunction. 2004. Advertising Age, February 9, 14.
15. Dayan, D., and E. Katz. 1992. Media events: The live broadcasting of history. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
16. Dawidziak, M. 2005. Network wants to play it safe after last year's fumble Cleveland (OH) Plain Dealer, February 5.
17. du Lac, J.F. 2005. As seen on Super Bowl TV, blame a conservative game plan: Fox played it straight, and maybe a bit too inside. Sacramento (CA) Bee, February 7.
18. Dufresne, C. 2005. Second thoughts; subtracting shock value, some ads don't add up. Los Angeles Times, February 7.
19. Elliott, S. 1999. At 1.6 million for 30 seconds, few commercials proved their Super Bowl spotlight. New York Times, February 2.
20. Elliott, S. 2004. Class and taste take a beating as the Adbowl dissolves into the “stupidity sweepstakes.” New York Times, February 3.
21. Elliott, S. 2005a. A Super Bowl spot meant to be provocative apparently succeeds after only one broadcast. New York Times, February 8.
22. Elliott, S. 2005b. This year, Super Bowl advertisers are hoping to stand out while not stepping over the line. New York Times, January 10.
23. Fish, S. 1980. Is there a text in this class? The authority of interpretive communities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
24. Geertz, C. 1973. Thick description: Toward an interpretive theory of culture. In The interpretation of cultures, 3—30. New York: Basic Books.
25. Goodman, T. 2005. Morality police threw wet blanket on broadcast; fearful of last year's Janet Jackson fiasco, entertainers and advertisers played it safe. San Francisco Chronicle, February 7.
26. Goudie, C. 2004. Oh say can you see… the real disgrace at the Super Bowl Chicago Daily Herald, February 9.
27. Gregory, M. 1998. Ethical criticism: What it is and why it matters. Style, 32: 194—220.
28. Griffiths, K. 2005. Fans will be spared risqué ads. The Independent (London), February 5.
29. Hartley, J. 1984. Encouraging signs: TV and the power of dirt, speech, and scandalous categories. In Interpreting television: Current research perspectives, ed. W. Rowland and B. Watkins, 119—41. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
30. Hilliard, D.C., and A.O. Hendley. 1994. Celebrity athletes and sports imagery in advertising during the NFL telecasts. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the North American Society for the Sociology of Sport, Tucson, AZ, November.
31. Jenkins, S. 2004. NFL exposed for what it is. Washington Post, February 3.
32. Johnson, S. 2005. “Get back”… to a g-rated game Knight Ridder Tribune Business News, February 7.
33. Kanner, B. 2004. The Super Bowl of advertising: How the commercials won the game. Princeton, NJ: Bloomberg.
34. Kearney, S., L. Berkowitz, L.B. Parks, and A. Guy. 2005. Commercial breakdown: Super Bowl advertisers still reeling from cooling effect of Janet's 38 special. Houston Chronicle, February 7.
35. Kelly, K., K. Clark, and L. Kulman. 2004. Trash TV. U.S News and World Report, February 16.
36. Kirk, J. 2005. Anheuser-Busch yanks its “wardrobe malfunction” commercial Knight Ridder Tribune Business News, February 4.
37. Leach, E. 1976. Culture and communication. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
38. Litterick, D. 2005. Super Bowl commercials fall foul of Janet Jackson factor. Daily Telegraph (London), February 4.
39. Los Angeles Times. 2005. A day of passes and pitches. February 3.
40. Luscombe, R. 2005. Gosh darn it! Super Bowl cleans up. Guardian (Manchester), February 5.
41. Madden, M. 2004. Halftime show illustrates NFL's contradictions Pittsburgh (PA) Post-Gazette, February 4.
42. McAlister, M.P. 2001. Super Bowl advertising as commercial celebration. Communication Review 3: 403—28.
43. McCarthy, M. 2005. Chesty ads built buzz, but also animosity. USA Today, May 2.
44. Miklasz, B. 2004. In the halftime fiasco, it's the NFL that is truly exposed St. Louis (MO) Post-Dispatch, February 5.
45. Murphy, P. 2005. Who really won the Super Bowl? Advertising Research News, February 10.
46. Nason, P. 2004. Analysis: Janet's Houston surprise. United Press International, February 3.
47. O'Toole, T. 1999. Game just incidental aspect of Super Bowl Eau Clarie (WI) Leader-Telegram, January 31.
48. Poniewozik, J. 2004. The hypocrisy bowl. Time, February 16.
49. Raine, G. 2005. The Super Bowl malfunction junction; Fox scrambles to explain why it pulled racy TV ad. San Francisco Chronicle, February 9.
50. Real, M.R. 1975. Super Bowl: Mythic spectacle. Journal of Communication 25 (Winter): 31—43.
51. Rich, F. 2005. The year of living indecently. New York Times, February 6.
52. Scannell, P. 1995. Media events. Media, Culture, & Society 17: 151—7.
53. Shales, T. 2005. At the Super Bowl, minimal offense and lot of safeties. Washington Post, February 7.
54. Shaw, D. 2005. Indecent? That sums up all of this moral posturing. Los Angeles Times, February 27.
55. Stanley, A. 2004. A flash of flesh: CBS is again in denial. New York Times, February 3.
56. Stanley, A. 2005. Country and consumer are stars of the show. New York Times, February 7.
57. Suleiman, S. 1980. Introduction: Varieties of audience-oriented criticism. In The reader in the text, ed. S. Suleiman and I. Crosman, 3—45. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
58. Tomkovick, C., R. Yelkur, and L. Christians. 2001. The USA's biggest marketing event keeps getting bigger: An in-depth look at Super Bowl advertising in the 1990s. Journal of Marketing Communications 7: 89—108.
59. Turner, R. 1997. The ad game. Newsweek, January 20.
60. USA Today. 2005. How commercials rated. February 7.
61. Vande Berg, L.R., L.A. Wenner, and B.E. Gronbeck. 2004. Critical approaches to television. 2nd ed. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
62. Vranica, S. 2005. Patriotism, P. Diddy shine in less-than-super ad bowl. Wall Street Journal, February 7.
63. Vranica, S., and B. Steinberg. 2005. Crotch jokes are out as Super Bowl ads tap into nostalgia Wall Street Journal, February 3.
64. Warchol, G. 2005. This year's Super Bowl commercials rated “D” for dull. Salt Lake (UT) Tribune, February 8.
65. Wenner, L.A. 1989. The Super Bowl pregame show: Cultural fantasies and political subtext. In Media, sports, and society, ed. L. A. Wenner, 157—79. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
66. Wenner, L.A. 1991. One part alcohol, one part sport, one part dirt, stir gently: Beer commercials and television sports. In Television criticism: Approaches and applications, ed. L. R. Vande Berg and L. A. Wenner, 388—407. New York: Longman.
67. Wenner, L.A. 1994. The dream team, communicative dirt, and the marketing of synergy: USA basketball and cross-merchandising in television commercials. Journal of Sport and Social Issues 18: 27—47.
68. Wenner, L.A. 2004. Recovering (from) Janet Jackson's breast: Ethics and the nexus of media, sports, and management. Journal of Sport Management 18: 315—34.
69. Wenner, L.A. 2006. Sports and media through the super glass mirror: Placing blame, breast-beating, and a gaze to the future. In Handbook of sports media, ed. J. Bryant and A. A. Raney, 45—60. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.