A complex endeavour: An ethnographic study of the implementation of the Sepsis Six clinical care bundle

Implementation Science

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2016, Pages

  Tarrant, Carolyn ^a   O'Donnell, Barbara ^b   Martin, Graham ^a   Bion, Julian ^c   Hunter, Alison ^d   Rooney, Kevin D ^b,e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEICESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF THE WEST OF SCOTLAND   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^d HEALTHCARE IMPROVEMENT SCOTLAND   (United Kingdom)

^e ROYAL ALEXANDRA HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARE BUNDLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; GROUNDED THEORY; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; MEDICAL STAFF; MULTICENTER STUDY; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; SCOTLAND; SEPSIS; STANDARDS; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT;

DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE; GROUNDED THEORY; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMANS; MEDICAL STAFF, HOSPITAL; PATIENT CARE BUNDLES; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; QUALITY IMPROVEMENT; SCOTLAND; SEPSIS;

EID: 84997542950     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17485908     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s13012-016-0518-z     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M, et al. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016;315(8):801-10.
2. Fleischmann C, Scherag A, Adhikari NK, Hartog CS, Tsaganos T, Schlattmann P, et al. Assessment of Global Incidence and Mortality of Hospital-treated Sepsis-Current Estimates and Limitations. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015;93(3):259-72.
3. McPherson D, Griffiths C, Williams M, Baker A, Klodawski E, Jacobson B, et al. Sepsis-associated mortality in England: an analysis of multiple cause of death data from 2001 to 2010. BMJ Open. 2013;3:e002586.
4. Gaieski DF, Edwards JM, Kallan MJ, Carr BG. Benchmarking the incidence and mortality of severe sepsis in the United States. Crit Care Med. 2013;41(5):1167-74.
5. Morelli A, Ertmer C, Westphal M, Rehberg S, Kampmeier T, Ligges S, et al. Effect of heart rate control with esmolol on hemodynamic and clinical outcomes in patients with septic shock: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2013;310(16):1683-91.
6. Padkin A, Goldfrad C, Brady AR, Young D, Black N, Rowan K. Epidemiology of severe sepsis occurring in the first 24 hrs in intensive care units in England, Wales, and Northern Ireland. Crit Care Med. 2003;31(9):2332-8.
7. Seymour CW, Rea TD, Kahn JM, Walkey AJ, Yealy DM, Angus DC. Severe sepsis in pre-hospital emergency care: analysis of incidence, care, and outcome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012;186(12):1264-71.
8. Knight M, Kenyon S, Brocklehurst P, Neilson J. Judy Shakespeare, JJE Kurinczuk. Saving Lives, Improving Mothers' Care Lessons learned to inform future maternity care from the UK and Ireland Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths and Morbidity 2009-2012. Oxford: National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford; 2014.
9. Cuthbertson BH, Elders A, Hall S, Taylor J, MacLennan G, Mackirdy F, et al. Mortality and quality of life in the five years after severe sepsis. Crit Care. 2013;17(2):1-8.
10. Rivers E, Nguyen B, Havstad S, Ressler J, Muzzin A, Knoblich B, et al. Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2001;345(19):1368-77.
11. Kumar A, Roberts D, Wood KE, Light B, Parrillo JE, Sharma S, et al. Duration of hypotension before initiation of effective antimicrobial therapy is the critical determinant of survival in human septic shock. Crit Care Med. 2006;34(6):1589-96.
12. Gaieski DF, Mikkelsen ME, Band RA, Pines JM, Massone R, Furia FF, et al. Impact of time to antibiotics on survival in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock in whom early goal-directed therapy was initiated in the emergency department. Crit Care Med. 2010;38(4):1045-53.
13. Ferrer R, Martin-Loeches I, Phillips G, Osborn TM, Townsend S, Dellinger RP, et al. Empiric antibiotic treatment reduces mortality in severe sepsis and septic shock from the first hour: results from a guideline-based performance improvement program. Crit Care Med. 2014;42(8):1749-55.
14. Paul M, Shani V, Muchtar E, Kariv G, Robenshtok E, Leibovici L. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy of appropriate empiric antibiotic therapy for sepsis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010;54(11):4851-63.
15. Health Service Ombudsman for England. Time to act-severe sepsis: rapid diagnosis and treatment saves lives. London: Parliamentary and Health Service Ombusdman; 2013.
16. Goodwin APL, Srivastava V, Shotton H, Protopapa K, Butt A, Mason M. Just Say Sepsis! A review of the process of care received by patients with sepsis. London: National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death; 2015.
17. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Sepsis: the recognition, diagnosis and management of sepsis. Draft for consultation. London: National Clinical Guideline Centre; 2016.
18. NHS England. Commissioning for Quality and Innovation (CQUIN) Guidance for 2015/16. Leeds: Department of Health; 2015.
19. Levy MM, Pronovost PJ, Dellinger RP, Townsend S, Resar RK, Clemmer TP, et al. Sepsis change bundles: converting guidelines into meaningful change in behavior and clinical outcome. Crit Care Med. 2004;32(11):S595-7.
20. Surviving Sepsis Campaign. Bundles ( http://www.survivingsepsis.org/Bundles/Pages/default.aspx ). Accessed 31 Aug 2016
21. Daniels R, Nutbeam T, McNamara G, Galvin C. The sepsis six and the severe sepsis resuscitation bundle: a prospective observational cohort study. Emerg Med J. 2011;28(6):507-12.
22. Damiani E, Donati A, Serafini G, Rinaldi L, Adrario E, Pelaia P, et al. Effect of performance improvement programs on compliance with sepsis bundles and mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. PLoS One. 2015;10(5):e0125827.
23. Levy MM, Dellinger RP, Townsend SR, Linde-Zwirble WT, Marshall JC, Bion J, et al. The Surviving Sepsis Campaign: results of an international guideline-based performance improvement program targeting severe sepsis. Intensive Care Med. 2010;36(2):222-31.
24. Rhodes A, Phillips G, Beale R, Cecconi M, Chiche JD, De Backer D, et al. The Surviving Sepsis Campaign bundles and outcome: results from the International Multicentre Prevalence Study on Sepsis (the IMPreSS study). Intensive Care Med. 2015;41(9):1620-8.
25. Surviving Sepsis Campaign ( http://www.survivingsepsis.org/About-SSC/Pages/default.aspx ). Accessed 20 Sept 2016.
26. Robson WP, Daniels R. The Sepsis Six: helping patients to survive sepsis. Br J Nurs. 2008;17(1):16-21.
27. Cronshaw HL, Daniels R, Bleetman A, Joynes E, Sheils M. Impact of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign on the recognition and management of severe sepsis in the emergency department: are we failing? Emerg Med J. 2011;28(8):670-5.
28. Grol R, Grimshaw J. From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients' care. Lancet. 2003;362(9391):1225-30.
29. Dixon-Woods M, Leslie M, Tarrant C, Bion J. Explaining Matching Michigan: an ethnographic study of a patient safety program. Implement Sci. 2013;8(1):70.
30. Weiss C. Nothing as practical as a good theory: exploring theory-based evaluation for comprehensive community initiatives for children and families. In: Connell J, Kuchisch A, Schorr LB, Weiss C, editors. New approaches to evaluating community initiatives: Concepts, methods and contexts. 1st ed. New York: Aspen Institute; 1995. p. 65-92.
31. Steinmo SH, Michie S, Fuller C, Stanley S, Stapleton C, Stone SP. Bridging the gap between pragmatic intervention design and theory: using behavioural science tools to modify an existing quality improvement programme to implement "Sepsis Six". Implement Sci. 2016;11(1):1.
32. Steinmo S, Fuller C, Stone SP, Michie S. Characterising an implementation intervention in terms of behaviour change techniques and theory: the 'Sepsis Six' clinical care bundle. Implement Sci. 2015;10:111-015-0300-7.
33. Morgan R, Williams F, Wright M. An early warning scoring system for detecting developing critical illness. Clin Intensive Care. 1997;8(2):100.
34. Charmaz K. Constructing grounded theory: a practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage; 2006.
35. Strauss A, Fagerhaugh S, Suczek B, Weiner C. Social organization of medical work. Chicago: Chicago University Press; 1985.
36. Tucker AL, Spear SJ. Operational failures and interruptions in hospital nursing. Health Serv Res. 2006;41(3p1):643-62.
37. Grundgeiger T, Sanderson P. Interruptions in healthcare: theoretical views. Int J Med Inf. 2009;78(5):293-307.
38. Weigl M, Muller A, Zupanc A, Glaser J, Angerer P. Hospital doctors' workflow interruptions and activities: an observation study. BMJ Qual Saf. 2011;20(6):491-7.
39. The Scottish Government. HEAT standard: 4 hour Accident and Emergency (A&E) ( http://www.gov.scot/About/Performance/scotPerforms/partnerstories/NHSScotlandperformance/4hrAEStandard ). Accessed 20 Sept 2016
40. Ren Y, Kiesler S, Fussell SR. Multiple group coordination in complex and dynamic task environments: interruptions, coping mechanisms, and technology recommendations. J Manage Inf Syst. 2008;25(1):105-30.
41. Tucker AL. The impact of operational failures on hospital nurses and their patients. J Oper Manage. 2004;22(2):151-69.
42. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Patient Group Directions: NICE Guideline (MPG2). 2013.
43. Ostrom E, Walker J. Trust and reciprocity: interdisciplinary lessons for experimental research. New York: Russell Sage; 2003.
44. Davidoff F, Dixon-Woods M, Leviton L, Michie S. Demystifying theory and its use in improvement. BMJ Qual Saf. 2015;24(3):228-38.
45. Lipsey M. Theory as method: small theories of treatments. In: Sechrest P, Perrin E, Bunker J, editors. Research methodology: strengthening causal interpretations of non-experimental data. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services; 1990. p. 33-52.
46. Michie S, Johnston M, Abraham C, Lawton R, Parker D, Walker A, et al. Making psychological theory useful for implementing evidence based practice: a consensus approach. Qual Saf Health Care. 2005;14(1):26-33.
47. Ostrom E. Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1990.
48. Leonard M, Graham S, Bonacum D. The human factor: the critical importance of effective teamwork and communication in providing safe care. Qual Safety Health Care. 2004;13 Suppl 1:i85-90.
49. Ivers NM, Grimshaw JM, Jamtvedt G, Flottorp S, O'Brien MA, French SD, et al. Growing literature, stagnant science? Systematic review, meta-regression and cumulative analysis of audit and feedback interventions in health care. J Gen Intern Med. 2014;29:1534-41.
50. Foy R, Francis JJ, Johnston M, Eccles M, Lecouturier J, Bamford C, et al. The development of a theory-based intervention to promote appropriate disclosure of a diagnosis of dementia. BMC Health Serv Res. 2001;7(1):1.
51. Damschroder LJ, Aron DC, Keith RE, Kirsh SR, Alexander JA, Lowery JC. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci. 2009;4:50.
52. English M. Designing a theory-informed, contextually appropriate intervention strategy to improve delivery of paediatric services in Kenyan hospitals. Impl Sci. 2013;8(1):1-13.
53. Bradley EH, Curry LA, Ramanadhan S, Rowe L, Nembhard IM, Krumholz HM. Research in action: using positive deviance to improve quality of health care. Implement Sci. 2009;4:25-5908-4-25.