Solving Environmental Problems: Knowledge and Coordination in Collaborative Search

Long Range Planning

Volumn 50, Issue 6, 2017, Pages 726-740

  Olsen, Anders Ørding ^a   Sofka, Wolfgang ^a   Grimpe, Christoph ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PLANNING; FINANCE;

COLLABORATIVE SEARCHES; ENVIRONMENTAL PROBLEMS; EXTERNAL KNOWLEDGE; FRAMEWORK PROGRAM; INNOVATION PERFORMANCE; RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT; SEARCH STRATEGIES; STRATEGY RESEARCH;

SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGY; INNOVATION; KNOWLEDGE; RESEARCH METHOD;

EID: 84997418967     PISSN: 00246301     EISSN: 18731872     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.lrp.2016.05.003     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Agrawal, A., Engaging the inventor: exploring licensing strategies for university inventions and the role of latent knowledge. Strategic Management Journal 27:1 (2006), 63–79.
2. Belsley, D.A., Kuh, E., Welsh, R.E., Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity. New York, 1980.
3. Chesbrough, H.W., Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. 2003, Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation, Boston.
4. Cohen, W.M., Levinthal, D.A., Innovation and learning: the two faces of R&D. The Economic Journal 99 (1989), 569–596.
5. Cohen, W.M., Levinthal, D.A., Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 35:1 (1990), 128–153.
6. Cohen, W.M., Levinthal, D.A., Fortune favors the prepared firm. Management Science 40:2 (1994), 227–251.
7. Devinney, T.M., Is the socially responsible corporation a myth? The good, bad and ugly of corporate social responsibility. The Academy of Management Perspectives 23:2 (2009), 44–56.
8. Encaoua, D., Guellec, D., Martinez, C., Patent systems for encouraging innovation: lessons from economic analysis. Research Policy 35:9 (2006), 1423–1440.
9. Felin, T., Zenger, T.R., Closed or open innovation? Problem solving and the governance choice. Research Policy 43:5 (2014), 914–925.
10. Fleming, L., Sorenson, O., Science as a map in technology search. Strategic Management Journal 25:8–9 (2004), 909–928.
11. Garriga, H., von Krogh, G., Spaeth, S., How constraints and knowledge impact open innovation. Strategic Management Journal 34:9 (2013), 1134–1144.
12. Grant, R.M., Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal 17 (1996), 109–122.
13. Grimpe, C., Kaiser, U., Balancing internal and external knowledge acquisition: the gains and pains from R&D outsourcing. Journal of Management Studies 47:8 (2010), 1483–1509.
14. Grimpe, C., Sofka, W., Search patterns and absorptive capacity: low- and high-technology sectors in European countries. Research Policy 38:3 (2009), 495–506.
15. Hall, B.H., Jaffe, A.B., Trajtenberg, M., Market value and patent citations. The Rand Journal of Economics(Spring), 2005, 16–38.
16. Hall, J., Vredenburg, H., The challenges of innovating for sustainable development. MIT Sloan Management Review 45:1 (2003), 61–68.
17. Katila, R., Ahuja, G., Something old, something new: a longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Academy of Management Journal 45:6 (2002), 1183–1194.
18. Ketata, I., Sofka, W., Grimpe, C., The role of internal capabilities and firms’ environment for sustainable innovation: evidence for Germany. R&D Management 45:1 (2015), 60–75.
19. Kijkuit, B., van den Ende, J., With a little help from our colleagues: a longitudinal study of social networks for innovation. Organization Studies 31:4 (2010), 451–479.
20. Knudsen, T., Srikanth, K., Coordinated exploration: organizing joint search by multiple specialists to overcome mutual confusion and joint myopia. Administrative Science Quarterly 59:3 (2014), 409–441.
21. Laursen, K., Keep searching and you'll find: what do we know about variety creation through firms’ search activities for innovation?. Industrial and Corporate Change 21:5 (2012), 1175–1180.
22. Laursen, K., Salter, A., Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal 27 (2006), 131–150.
23. Leiponen, A., Helfat, C.E., Innovation objectives, knowledge sources, and the benefits of breadth. Strategic Management Journal 31:2 (2010), 224–236.
24. Liebeskind, J.P., Knowledge, strategy, and the theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal 17 (1996), 93–107.
25. Love, J.H., Roper, S., Vahter, P., Learning from openness: the dynamics of breadth in external innovation linkages. Strategic Management Journal 35:11 (2014), 1703–1716.
26. Ocasio, W., Towards an attention-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal 18 (1997), 187–206.
27. Powell, W.W., Koput, K.W., Smith-Doerr, L., Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly 41:1 (1996), 116–145.
28. Rosenkopf, L., Almeida, P., Overcoming local search through alliances and mobility. Management Science 49:6 (2003), 751–766.
29. Rosenkopf, L., Nerkar, A., Beyond local search: boundary-spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disc industry. Strategic Management Journal 22:4 (2001), 287–306.
30. Salter, A., Ter Wal, A.L.J., Criscuolo, P., Alexy, O., Open for ideation: individual-level openness and idea generation in R&D. The Journal of Product Innovation Management 32:4 (2015), 488–504.
31. Siegel, D.S., Green management matters only if it yields more green: an economic/strategic perspective. The Academy of Management Perspectives 23:3 (2009), 5–16.
32. Szulanski, G., Exploring internal stickiness: impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management Journal 17 (1996), 27–43.
33. Todorova, G., Durisin, B., Absorptive capacity: valuing a reconceptualization. Academy of Management Review 32:3 (2007), 774–786.
34. Zahra, S.A., George, G., Absorptive capacity: a review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review 27:2 (2002), 185–203.