Opinions of Practicing Surgeons on the Appropriateness of Published Indications for Use of Damage Control Surgery in Trauma Patients: An International Cross-Sectional Survey

Journal of the American College of Surgeons

Volumn 223, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 515-529

  Roberts, Derek J ^a,c   Zygun, David A ^a,d   Faris, Peter D ^c   Ball, Chad G ^a,c   Kirkpatrick, Andrew W ^a,c   Stelfox, Henry T ^a,b   Brohi, Karim ^e   D'Amours, Scott ^e   Fabian, Timothy C ^e   Inaba, Kenji ^e   Leppäniemi, Ari K ^e   Moore, Ernest E ^e   Navsaria, Pradeep H ^e   Nicol, Andrew J ^e   Parry, Neil ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^c FOOTHILLS HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^e NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTERIAL PH; BLOOD CLOTTING DISORDER; CONFERENCE PAPER; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DAMAGE CONTROL SURGERY; EMERGENCY HEALTH SERVICE; EMERGENCY WARD; ERYTHROCYTE TRANSFUSION; HUMAN; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; LIVER INJURY; PARTIAL THROMBOPLASTIN TIME; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGRAM APPROPRIATENESS; PROTHROMBIN TIME; RESUSCITATION; SURGEON; SURGERY; SURGICAL TRAINING; THORACOTOMY; VEIN INJURY; WORK EXPERIENCE; ADULT; AUSTRALIA AND NEW ZEALAND; CANADA; COMPLICATION; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; PATIENT SELECTION; UNITED STATES; WOUNDS AND INJURIES;

ADULT; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; AUSTRALASIA; CANADA; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; HUMANS; PATIENT SELECTION; RESUSCITATION; TRAUMA CENTERS; UNITED STATES; WOUNDS AND INJURIES;

EID: 84997284734     PISSN: 10727515     EISSN: 18791190     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.06.002     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (32)

1. 1 Kauvar, D.S., Lefering, R., Wade, C.E., Impact of hemorrhage on trauma outcome: an overview of epidemiology, clinical presentations, and therapeutic considerations. J Trauma 60:6 Suppl (2006), S3–S11.
2. 2 Elerding, S.C., Aragon, G.E., Moore, E.E., Fatal hepatic hemorrhage after trauma. Am J Surg 138 (1979), 883–888.
3. 3 Roberts, D.J., Ball, C.G., Feliciano, D.V., et al. History of the innovation of damage control for management of trauma patients: 1902-2016. Ann Surg, 2016 (In press).
4. 4 Roberts, D.J., Bobrovitz, N., Zygun, D.A., et al. Indications for use of damage control surgery in civilian trauma patients: a content analysis and expert appropriateness rating study. Ann Surg 263 (2016), 1018–1027.
5. 5 Miller, R.S., Morris, J.A. Jr., Diaz, J.J. Jr., et al. Complications after 344 damage-control open celiotomies. J Trauma 59 (2005), 1365–1371 discussion 1371–1374.
6. 6 Sutton, E., Bochicchio, G.V., Bochicchio, K., et al. Long term impact of damage control surgery: a preliminary prospective study. J Trauma 61 (2006), 831–834 discussion 835–836.
7. 7 Codner, P.A., Brasel, K.J., Deroon-Cassini, T.A., Staged abdominal repairs reduce long-term quality of life. Injury 43 (2012), 1513–1516.
8. 8 Higa, G., Friese, R., O'Keeffe, T., et al. Damage control laparotomy: a vital tool once overused. J Trauma 69 (2010), 53–59.
9. 9 Martin, M.J., Hatch, Q., Cotton, B., et al. The use of temporary abdominal closure in low-risk trauma patients: helpful or harmful?. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 72 (2012), 601–606 discussion 606–608.
10. 10 Harvin, J.A., Wray, C.J., Steward, J., et al. Control the damage: morbidity and mortality after emergent trauma laparotomy. Am J Surg 212 (2016), 34–39.
11. 11 Birkmeyer, J.D., Reames, B.N., McCulloch, P., et al. Understanding of regional variation in the use of surgery. Lancet 382 (2013), 1121–1129.
12. 12 Roberts, D.J., Zygun, D.A., Kirkpatrick, A.W., et al. A protocol for a scoping and qualitative study to identify and evaluate indications for damage control surgery and damage control interventions in civilian trauma patients. BMJ Open, 4, 2014, e005634.
13. 13 Roberts, D.J., Bobrovitz, N., Zygun, D.A., et al. Indications for use of damage control surgery and damage control interventions in civilian trauma patients: A scoping review. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 78 (2015), 1187–1196.
14. 14 Arnold, J.L., International emergency medicine and the recent development of emergency medicine worldwide. Ann Emerg Med 33 (1999), 97–103.
15. 15 Burns, K.E., Duffett, M., Kho, M.E., et al. A guide for the design and conduct of self-administered surveys of clinicians. CMAJ 179 (2008), 245–252.
16. 16 Bennett, C., Khangura, S., Brehaut, J.C., et al. Reporting guidelines for survey research: an analysis of published guidance and reporting practices. PLoS Med, 8, 2010, e1001069.
17. 17 American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma, Verified trauma centers 2013. 2013, American College of Surgeons, Chicago, IL, USA Available at: https://www.facs.org/search/trauma-centers?country=United States&distance=any Accessed August 29, 2013.
18. 18 Canadian Institute for Health Information, National Trauma Registry Report 2013: hospitalizations for major injury in Canada, 2010-2011 Data 2013. 2013, Canadian Institute for Health Information, Ottawa, ON, Canada Available at: https://secure.cihi.ca/free_products/NTR_Annual_Report_2013_EN.xls Accessed August 22, 2013, 2013.
19. 19 Health, A., Caring for the Severely Injured in Australia: Inaugural Report of the Australian Trauma Registry 2010 to 2012. 2014, Alfred Health.
20. 20 Stelfox, H.T., Straus, S.E., Nathens, A., et al. Trauma center quality improvement programs in the United States, Canada, and Australasia. Ann Surg 256 (2012), 163–169.
21. 21 Roberts, D.J., Bobrovitz, N., Zygun, D.A., et al. Indications for use of thoracic, abdominal, pelvic, and vascular damage control interventions in trauma patients: A content analysis and expert appropriateness rating study. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 79 (2015), 568–579.
22. 22 Dillman, D.A., Smyth, J.D., Christian, L.M., Internet, Mail, and Mixed-Mode Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. 3 ed., 2009, John Wiley & Sons, Inc, Hoboken, NJ, USA.
23. 23 Edwards, P.J., Roberts, I., Clarke, M.J., et al. Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires. Cochrane Database Syst Rev(3), 2009, MR000008.
24. 24 The RAND/UCLA appropriateness method user's manual. Available at: http://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR1269.html. Accessed January 1, 2014.
25. 25 Nathens, A.B., Jurkovich, G.J., Maier, R.V., et al. Relationship between trauma center volume and outcomes. JAMA 285 (2001), 1164–1171.
26. 26 Breiman, L., Friedman, J.H., Olshen, R.A., et al. Classification and Regression Trees. 1984, Wadsworth International, Belmont, CA.
27. 27 Morgan, J., Technical Report No. 1. Classification and regression tree analysis. 2014, Boston University School of Public Health, Department of Health Policy & Management Available at: http://www.bu.edu/sph/files/2014/05/MorganCART.pdf Accessed March 17, 2015.
28. 28 Therneau, T.M., Atkinson, E.J., Mayo Foundation, An introduction to recursive partitioning using the RPART routines. 2015, Mayo Foundation Available at: http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/rpart/vignettes/longintro.pdf Accessed March 15, 2015.
29. 29 Asensio, J.A., McDuffie, L., Petrone, P., et al. Reliable variables in the exsanguinated patient which indicate damage control and predict outcome. Am J Surg 182 (2001), 743–751.
30. 30 Buckman, R.F. Jr., Miraliakbari, R., Badellino, M.M., Juxtahepatic venous injuries: a critical review of reported management strategies. J Trauma 48 (2000), 978–984.
31. 31 Asensio, J.A., Britt, L.D., Borzotta, A., et al. Multiinstitutional experience with the management of superior mesenteric artery injuries. J Am Coll Surg 193 (2001), 354–365 discussion 365–366.
32. 32 Asensio, J.A., Petrone, P., Roldan, G., et al. Pancreaticoduodenectomy: a rare procedure for the management of complex pancreaticoduodenal injuries. J Am Coll Surg 197 (2003), 937–942.