-
1
-
-
4444273034
-
-
Hoboken (New Jersey), John Wiley & Sons, Inc
-
Groves RM, Fowler FJ, Couper MP, Lepkowski JM, Singer E, et al. (2004) Survey Methodology. Hoboken (New Jersey) John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
-
(2004)
Survey Methodology
-
-
Groves, R.M.1
Fowler, F.J.2
Couper, M.P.3
Lepkowski, J.M.4
Singer, E.5
-
3
-
-
18844477871
-
Design and use of questionnaires: a review of best practice applicable to surveys of health service staff and patients
-
McColl E, Jacoby A, Thomas L, Soutter J, Bamford C, et al. (2001) Design and use of questionnaires: a review of best practice applicable to surveys of health service staff and patients. Health Technol Assess 5: 1-256.
-
(2001)
Health Technol Assess
, vol.5
, pp. 1-256
-
-
McColl, E.1
Jacoby, A.2
Thomas, L.3
Soutter, J.4
Bamford, C.5
-
4
-
-
76949083246
-
Questionnaires in clinical trials: guidelines for optimal design and administration
-
Edwards P, (2010) Questionnaires in clinical trials: guidelines for optimal design and administration. Trials 11: 2.
-
(2010)
Trials
, vol.11
, pp. 2
-
-
Edwards, P.1
-
5
-
-
67349098148
-
The EQUATOR Network and reporting guidelines: Helping to achieve high standards in reporting health research studies
-
Simera I, Moher D, Hoey J, Schulz KF, Altman DG, (2009) The EQUATOR Network and reporting guidelines: Helping to achieve high standards in reporting health research studies. Maturitas 63: 4-6.
-
(2009)
Maturitas
, vol.63
, pp. 4-6
-
-
Simera, I.1
Moher, D.2
Hoey, J.3
Schulz, K.F.4
Altman, D.G.5
-
6
-
-
84880838097
-
-
EQUATOR Network, Available:. Accessed 23 November 2009
-
EQUATOR Network Introduction to Reporting Guidelines. Available: http://www.equator-network.org/resource-centre/library-of-health-research-reporting/reporting-guidelines/#what. Accessed 23 November 2009.
-
Introduction to Reporting Guidelines
-
-
-
7
-
-
77649093946
-
Guidance for developers of health research reporting guidelines
-
doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000217
-
Moher D, Schulz KF, Simera I, Altman DG, (2010) Guidance for developers of health research reporting guidelines. PLoS Med 7: e1000217 doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000217.
-
(2010)
PLoS Med
, vol.7
-
-
Moher, D.1
Schulz, K.F.2
Simera, I.3
Altman, D.G.4
-
8
-
-
33748678946
-
The quality of diagnostic accuracy studies since the STARD statement: has it improved?
-
Smidt N, Rutjes AW, van der Windt DA, Ostelo RW, Bossuyt PM, et al. (2006) The quality of diagnostic accuracy studies since the STARD statement: has it improved? Neurology 67: 792-797.
-
(2006)
Neurology
, vol.67
, pp. 792-797
-
-
Smidt, N.1
Rutjes, A.W.2
van der Windt, D.A.3
Ostelo, R.W.4
Bossuyt, P.M.5
-
9
-
-
33748671821
-
Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review
-
Plint AC, Moher D, Morrison A, Schulz K, Altman DG, et al. (2006) Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review. Med J Aust 185: 263-267.
-
(2006)
Med J Aust
, vol.185
, pp. 263-267
-
-
Plint, A.C.1
Moher, D.2
Morrison, A.3
Schulz, K.4
Altman, D.G.5
-
10
-
-
38349101308
-
Quality of reporting randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in the nursing literature: application of the consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT)
-
Smith BA, Lee HJ, Lee JH, Choi M, Jones DE, et al. (2008) Quality of reporting randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in the nursing literature: application of the consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT). Nurs Outlook 56: 31-37.
-
(2008)
Nurs Outlook
, vol.56
, pp. 31-37
-
-
Smith, B.A.1
Lee, H.J.2
Lee, J.H.3
Choi, M.4
Jones, D.E.5
-
11
-
-
45349092421
-
A systematic evaluation of the impact of STRICTA and CONSORT recommendations on quality of reporting for acupuncture trials
-
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0001577
-
Prady SL, Richmond SJ, Morton VM, Macpherson H, (2008) A systematic evaluation of the impact of STRICTA and CONSORT recommendations on quality of reporting for acupuncture trials. PLoS ONE 3: e1577 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0001577.
-
(2008)
PLoS ONE
, vol.3
-
-
Prady, S.L.1
Richmond, S.J.2
Morton, V.M.3
Macpherson, H.4
-
12
-
-
18444382649
-
Endorsement of the CONSORT statement by high impact medical journals: survey of instructions for authors
-
Altman DG, (2005) Endorsement of the CONSORT statement by high impact medical journals: survey of instructions for authors. BMJ 330: 1056-1057.
-
(2005)
BMJ
, vol.330
, pp. 1056-1057
-
-
Altman, D.G.1
-
13
-
-
0037806036
-
Good practice in the conduct and reporting of survey research
-
Kelley K, Clark B, Brown V, Sitzia J, (2003) Good practice in the conduct and reporting of survey research. Int J Qual Health Care 15: 261-266.
-
(2003)
Int J Qual Health Care
, vol.15
, pp. 261-266
-
-
Kelley, K.1
Clark, B.2
Brown, V.3
Sitzia, J.4
-
14
-
-
48349095136
-
A guide for the design and conduct of self-administered surveys of clinicians
-
Burns KE, Duffett M, Kho ME, Meade ME, Adhikari NK, et al. (2008) A guide for the design and conduct of self-administered surveys of clinicians. CMAJ 179: 245-252.
-
(2008)
CMAJ
, vol.179
, pp. 245-252
-
-
Burns, K.E.1
Duffett, M.2
Kho, M.E.3
Meade, M.E.4
Adhikari, N.K.5
-
15
-
-
39449084102
-
Best practices for survey research reports: a synopsis for authors and reviewers
-
Draugalis JR, Coons SJ, Plaza CM, (2008) Best practices for survey research reports: a synopsis for authors and reviewers. Am J Pharm Educ 72: 11.
-
(2008)
Am J Pharm Educ
, vol.72
, pp. 11
-
-
Draugalis, J.R.1
Coons, S.J.2
Plaza, C.M.3
-
16
-
-
5444220648
-
Improving the quality of Web surveys: the Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES)
-
Eysenbach G, (2004) Improving the quality of Web surveys: the Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES). J Med Internet Res 6: e34.
-
(2004)
J Med Internet Res
, vol.6
-
-
Eysenbach, G.1
-
17
-
-
0029940226
-
Reporting on surveys: information for authors and peer reviewers
-
Huston P, (1996) Reporting on surveys: information for authors and peer reviewers. CMAJ 154: 1695-1704.
-
(1996)
CMAJ
, vol.154
, pp. 1695-1704
-
-
Huston, P.1
-
19
-
-
23944463909
-
Room for improvement? Reporting response rates and recruitment in nursing research in the past decade
-
Badger F, Werrett J, (2005) Room for improvement? Reporting response rates and recruitment in nursing research in the past decade. J Adv Nurs 51: 502-510.
-
(2005)
J Adv Nurs
, vol.51
, pp. 502-510
-
-
Badger, F.1
Werrett, J.2
-
20
-
-
0030696977
-
Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journals
-
Asch DA, Jedrziewski MK, Christakis NA, (1007) Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journals. J Clin Epidemiol 50: 1129-1136.
-
(1007)
J Clin Epidemiol
, vol.50
, pp. 1129-1136
-
-
Asch, D.A.1
Jedrziewski, M.K.2
Christakis, N.A.3
-
21
-
-
0035113333
-
Reported response rates to mailed physician questionnaires
-
Cummings SM, Savitz LA, Konrad TR, (2001) Reported response rates to mailed physician questionnaires. Health Serv Res 35: 1347-1355.
-
(2001)
Health Serv Res
, vol.35
, pp. 1347-1355
-
-
Cummings, S.M.1
Savitz, L.A.2
Konrad, T.R.3
-
23
-
-
0036448362
-
Reporting Survey Nonresponse in Academic Journals
-
Smith TW, (2002) Reporting Survey Nonresponse in Academic Journals. Int J Public Opin Res 14: 469-474.
-
(2002)
Int J Public Opin Res
, vol.14
, pp. 469-474
-
-
Smith, T.W.1
-
25
-
-
33845617643
-
Inaccessible novel questionnaires in published medical research: hidden methods, hidden costs
-
Schilling LM, Kozak K, Lundahl K, Dellavalle RP, (2006) Inaccessible novel questionnaires in published medical research: hidden methods, hidden costs. Am J Epidemiol 164: 1141-1144.
-
(2006)
Am J Epidemiol
, vol.164
, pp. 1141-1144
-
-
Schilling, L.M.1
Kozak, K.2
Lundahl, K.3
Dellavalle, R.P.4
-
26
-
-
33845652679
-
Invited commentary: the art of making questionnaires better
-
Rosen T, Olsen J, (2006) Invited commentary: the art of making questionnaires better. Am J Epidemiol 164: 1145-1149.
-
(2006)
Am J Epidemiol
, vol.164
, pp. 1145-1149
-
-
Rosen, T.1
Olsen, J.2
-
28
-
-
34250369684
-
Responses to survey research: transparency and representativeness are key
-
Coons SJ, (2007) Responses to survey research: transparency and representativeness are key. Clin ther 29: 466-468.
-
(2007)
Clin Ther
, vol.29
, pp. 466-468
-
-
Coons, S.J.1
-
29
-
-
45849148522
-
Response rates and responsiveness for surveys, standards, and the Journal
-
Fincham JE, (2008) Response rates and responsiveness for surveys, standards, and the Journal. Am J Pharm Educ 72: 43.
-
(2008)
Am J Pharm Educ
, vol.72
, pp. 43
-
-
Fincham, J.E.1
-
30
-
-
0033551605
-
Editor's Preface. A word about manuscripts
-
[No author listed]
-
[No author listed] (1999) Editor's Preface. A word about manuscripts. CMAJ 161: 5.
-
(1999)
CMAJ
, vol.161
, pp. 5
-
-
-
31
-
-
70350435890
-
Response rates in postal surveys of healthcare professionals between 1996 and 2005: an observational study
-
Cook JV, Dickinson HO, Eccles MP, (2009) Response rates in postal surveys of healthcare professionals between 1996 and 2005: an observational study. BMC Health Serv Res 9: 160.
-
(2009)
BMC Health Serv Res
, vol.9
, pp. 160
-
-
Cook, J.V.1
Dickinson, H.O.2
Eccles, M.P.3
-
32
-
-
49249111971
-
Evidence-based approaches for the Ayurvedic traditional herbal formulations: toward an Ayurvedic CONSORT model
-
Narahari SR, Ryan TJ, Aggithaya MG, Bose KS, Prasanna KS, (2008) Evidence-based approaches for the Ayurvedic traditional herbal formulations: toward an Ayurvedic CONSORT model. J Altern Complement Med 14: 769-776.
-
(2008)
J Altern Complement Med
, vol.14
, pp. 769-776
-
-
Narahari, S.R.1
Ryan, T.J.2
Aggithaya, M.G.3
Bose, K.S.4
Prasanna, K.S.5
|