Indications for use of damage control surgery in civilian trauma patients. A content analysis and expert appropriateness rating study

Annals of Surgery

Volumn 263, Issue 5, 2016, Pages 1018-1027

  Roberts, Derek J ^a   Bobrovitz, Niklas ^b   Zygun, David A ^a,c   Ball, Chad G ^a   Kirkpatrick, Andrew W ^a   Faris, Peter D ^a   Brohi, Karim ^d   D'Amours, Scott ^e   Fabian, Timothy C ^f   Inaba, Kenji ^g   Leppäniemi, Ari K ^h   Moore, Ernest E ⁱ   Navsaria, Pradeep H ^j   Nicol, Andrew J ^j   Parry, Neil ^k   Stelfox, Henry T ^a,l  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^d QUEEN MARY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^e UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

^f UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^h HELSINKI UNIVERSITY CENTRAL HOSPITAL   (Finland)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^j UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN   (South Africa)

^k WESTERN UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^l UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

more..

Author keywords

Content analysis; Damage control surgery; Expert appropriateness rating study; Indications; Wounds and injuries

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL COMPARTMENT SYNDROME; ABDOMINAL WALL CLOSURE; ACIDOSIS; ADULT; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; BLOOD CLOTTING DISORDER; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CONTENT ANALYSIS; DAMAGE CONTROL SURGERY; ERYTHROCYTE TRANSFUSION; EXPERT APPROPRIATENESS RATING STUDY; GROUNDED THEORY; HEART VENTRICLE ARRHYTHMIA; HUMAN; HYPOTHERMIA; INJURY; INJURY SEVERITY; INTESTINE FUNCTION; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREVALENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS; SHOCK; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TRAUMATOLOGY; TREATMENT INDICATION; CONSENSUS; INTENSIVE CARE; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; PROCEDURES; SURGERY; WOUNDS AND INJURIES;

CONSENSUS; CRITICAL CARE; HUMANS; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, OPERATIVE; WOUNDS AND INJURIES;

EID: 84944338949     PISSN: 00034932     EISSN: 15281140     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001347     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Roberts DJ, Bobrovitz N, Zygun DA, et al. Indications for use of damage control surgery and damage control interventions in civilian trauma patients: a scoping review. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015;78:1187-1196.
2. Hirshberg A, Mattox KL. The 3-D trauma surgeon. In: Allen MK, editor. Top Knife: The Art & Craft of Trauma Surgery. Harley, Nr Shrewsbury, UK: tfm Publishing Ltd; 2005:5-17.
3. Kashuk JL, Moore EE, Millikan JS, et al. Major abdominal vascular trauma: a unified approach. J Trauma. 1982;22:672-679.
4. Moore EE, Thomas G. Orr Memorial Lecture. Staged laparotomy for the hypothermia, acidosis, and coagulopathy syndrome. Am J Surg. 1996;172: 405-410.
5. Cosgriff N, Moore EE, Sauaia A, et al. Predicting life-threatening coagulopathy in the massively transfused trauma patient: hypothermia and acidoses revisited. J Trauma. 1997;42:857-861; discussion 861-862.
6. Stone HH, Strom PR, Mullins RJ. Management of the major coagulopathy with onset during laparotomy. Ann Surg. 1983;197:532-535.
7. Rotondo MF, Schwab CW, McGonigal MD, et al. "Damage control": an approach for improved survival in exsanguinating penetrating abdominal injury. J Trauma. 1993;35:375-382; discussion 382-383.
8. Hanif F, Mirza SM, Chaudhry AM. Lung sparing damage control surgery for major thoracic trauma: a 5-year experience. Eur J Trauma. 2006;32: 185-189.
9. Rice TW, Morris S, Tortella BJ, et al. Deviations from evidence-based clinical management guidelines increase mortality in critically injured trauma patients. Crit Care Med. 2012;40:778-786.
10. Miller RS, Morris Jr JA, Diaz Jr JJ, et al. Complications after 344 damagecontrol open celiotomies. J Trauma. 2005;59:1365-1371. discussion 1371-1374.
11. Cheatham ML, Safcsak K, Llerena LE, et al. Long-term physical, mental, and functional consequences of abdominal decompression. J Trauma. 2004;56:237-241; discussion 241-242.
12. Dubose JJ, Scalea TM, Holcomb JB, et al. Open abdominal management after damage-control laparotomy for trauma: a prospective observational American Association for the Surgery of Traumamulticenter study. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013;74:113-120; discussion 1120-1122.
13. Cheatham ML, Safcsak K. Longterm impact of abdominal decompression: a prospective comparative analysis. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;207:573-579.
14. Montalvo JA, Acosta JA, Rodriguez P, et al. Surgical complications and causes of death in trauma patients that require temporary abdominal closure. Am Surg. 2005;71:219-224.
15. Sutton E, Bochicchio GV, Bochicchio K, et al. Long term impact of damage control surgery: a preliminary prospective study. J Trauma. 2006;61:831-834. discussion 835-836.
16. Flin R, Youngson G, Yule S. How do surgeons make intraoperative decisions? Qual Saf Health Care. 2007;16:235-239.
17. Higa G, Friese R, O'Keeffe T, et al. Damage control laparotomy: a vital tool once overused. J Trauma. 2010;69:53-59.
18. Hatch QM, Osterhout LM, Podbielski J, et al. Impact of closure at the first take back: complication burden and potential overutilization of damage control laparotomy. J Trauma. 2011;71:1503-1511.
19. Martin MJ, Hatch Q, Cotton B, et al. The use of temporary abdominal closure in low-risk trauma patients: helpful or harmful? J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;72:601-606; discussion 606-608.
20. Neuendorf KA. The Content Analysis Guidebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc; 2002.
21. Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15:1277-1288.
22. Elo S, Kyngas H. The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs. 2008;62:107-115.
23. Neuman WL. Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. 5th ed. Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc; 2003.
24. Roberts DJ, Zygun DA, Kirkpatrick AW, et al. A protocol for a scoping and qualitative study to identify and evaluate indications for damage control surgery and damage control interventions in civilian trauma patients. BMJ Open. 2014;4:e005634.
25. Willig C. Part 2: doing research - grounded theory methodology. In:Willig C, editor. Introducing Qualitative Research in Psychology. 3rd ed., London, UK: Open University Press; 2013:69-82.
26. Barbour RS. Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: a case of the tail wagging the dog? BMJ. 2001;322:1115-1117.
27. The RAND/UCLA appropriateness method user's manual. Available at: http://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph-reports/MR1269.html. Accessed January 1, 2014.
28. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159-174.
29. Carrillo EH, Spain DA, Wilson MA, et al. Alternatives in the management of penetrating injuries to the iliac vessels. J Trauma. 1998;44:1024-1029; discussion 1029-1030.
30. Ball CG. Damage control resuscitation: history, theory and technique. Can J Surg. 2014;57:55-60.
31. Cushman JG, Feliciano DV, Renz BM, et al. Iliac vessel injury: operative physiology related to outcome. J Trauma. 1997;42:1033-1040.
32. Loveland JA, Boffard KD. Damage control in the abdomen and beyond. Br J Surg. 2004;91:1095-1101.
33. Keel M, Labler L, Trentz O. "Damage control" in severely injured patients. Eur J Trauma. 2005;31:212-221.
34. Godat L, Kobayashi L, Costantini T, et al. Abdominal damage control surgery and reconstruction: world society of emergency surgery position paper. World J Emerg Surg. 2013;8:53.
35. Trauma. China: McGraw-Hill Companies Inc.; 2013:1224.
36. Asensio JA, Petrone P, Roldan G, et al. Pancreaticoduodenectomy: a rare procedure for the management of complex pancreaticoduodenal injuries. J Am Coll Surg. 2003;197:937-942.
37. van derWilden GM, Yeh D, Hwabejire JO, et al. TraumaWhipple: do or don't after severe pancreaticoduodenal injuries? An analysis of the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB). World J Surg. 2014;38:335-340.
38. Krige JE, Nicol AJ, Navsaria PH. Emergency pancreatoduodenectomy for complex injuries of the pancreas and duodenum. HPB (Oxford). 2014; 16:1043-1049.
39. Duchesne JC, McSwain Jr NE, Cotton BA, et al. Damage control resuscitation: the new face of damage control. J Trauma. 2010;69:976-990.
40. Shaz BH, Winkler AM, James AB, et al. Pathophysiology of early traumainduced coagulopathy: emerging evidence for hemodilution and coagulation factor depletion. J Trauma. 2011;70:1401-1407.
41. Holodinsky JK, Roberts DJ, Ball CG, et al. Risk factors for intra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome among adult intensive care unit patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2013;17:R249.
42. Kirkpatrick AW, Roberts DJ, De Waele J, et al. Intra-abdominal hypertension and the abdominal compartment syndrome: updated consensus definitions and clinical practice guidelines from theWorld Society of the Abdominal Compartment Syndrome. Intensive Care Med. 2013;39:1190-1206.
43. Ertel W, Oberholzer A, Platz A, et al. Incidence and clinical pattern of the abdominal compartment syndrome after "damage-control" laparotomy in 311 patients with severe abdominal and/or pelvic trauma. Crit Care Med. 2000;28:1747-1753.
44. Winslow CM, Kosecoff JB, Chassin M, et al. The appropriateness of performing coronary artery bypass surgery. JAMA. 1988;260:505-509.
45. Ayanian JZ, Landrum MB, Normand SL, et al. Rating the appropriateness of coronary angiography - do practicing physicians agree with an expert panel and with each other? N Engl J Med. 1998;338:1896-1904.
46. Da Luz LT, Nascimento B, Shankarakutty AK, et al. Effect of thromboelastography (TEG(R)) and rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM(R)) on diagnosis of coagulopathy, transfusion guidance and mortality in trauma: descriptive systematic review. Crit Care. 2014;18:518.
47. Rajasekhar A, Gowing R, Zarychanski R, et al. Survival of trauma patients after massive red blood cell transfusion using a high or low red blood cell to plasma transfusion ratio. Crit Care Med. 2011;39:1507-1513.
48. Ho AM, Dion PW, Yeung JH, et al. Prevalence of survivor bias in observational studies on fresh frozen plasma: erythrocyte ratios in trauma requiring massive transfusion. Anesthesiology. 2012;116:716-728.
49. Khan S, Brohi K, Chana M, et al. Hemostatic resuscitation is neither hemostatic nor resuscitative in trauma hemorrhage. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014;76:561-567. discussion 567-568.
50. Khan S, Davenport R, Raza I, et al. Damage control resuscitation using blood component therapy in standard doses has a limited effect on coagulopathy during trauma hemorrhage. Intensive Care Med. 2015;41:239-247.
51. Holcomb JB, Tilley BC, Baraniuk S, et al. Transfusion of plasma, platelets, and red blood cells in a 1:1:1 vs a 1:1:2 ratio and mortality in patients with severe trauma: the PROPPR randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2015;313: 471-482.