Deceleration area and fetal acidemia

Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine

Volumn 30, Issue 21, 2017, Pages 2578-2584

  Gamboa, Sabina Martí ^a   Moros, Maria Lapresta ^a   Mancho, Jara Pascual ^a   Moros, Carlos Lapresta ^a   Mateo, Sergio Castán ^a  

^a HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO MIGUEL SERVET   (Spain)

Author keywords

Cardiotocography; Deceleration area; Fetal buffer system; Fetal heart rate decelerations; Neonatal acidemia

Indexed keywords

LACTIC ACID;

ACIDEMIA; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; BASE DEFICIT; BLOOD GAS PARAMETERS; CARDIOTOCOGRAPHY; CASE CONTROL STUDY; CLINICAL OUTCOME; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECELERATION; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; FEMALE; FETAL ACIDEMIA; FETUS HEART RATE; HUMAN; INTRAPARTUM CARE; LABOR; LACTATE BLOOD LEVEL; MALE; NATIONAL HEALTH ORGANIZATION; NEWBORN; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SPAIN; ACIDOSIS; ADULT; PREGNANCY; YOUNG ADULT;

ACIDOSIS; ADULT; CARDIOTOCOGRAPHY; DECELERATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; MALE; PREGNANCY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84997113474     PISSN: 14767058     EISSN: 14764954     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2016.1256993     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Chen HY, Chauhan SP, Ananth CV, et al. Electronic fetal heart rate monitoring and its relationship to neonatal and infant mortality in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011;204:491.e1-10.
2. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Technical bulletin 207: fetal heart rate patterns: monitoring, interpretation, and management. 1995.
3. Parer JT, Ikeda T. A framework for standardized management of intrapartum fetal heart rate patterns. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 197:26.e1.
4. Macones GA, Hankins GD, Spong CY, et al. The 2008 National Institute of Child Health and Human Development workshop report on electronic fetal monitoring: update on definitions, interpretation, and research guidelines. Obstet Gynecol 2008;112:661-6.
5. Gyamfi Bannerman C, Grobman WA, Antoniewicz L, et al. Assessment of the concordance among 2-tier, 3-tier, and 5-tier fetal heart rate classification systems. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011;205: 288.e1-4.
6. Coletta J, Murphy E, Rubeo Z, et al. The 5-tier system of assessing fetal heart rate tracings is superior to the 3-tier system in identifying fetal acidemia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012;206:226.e1-5.
7. Cahill AG, Roehl KA, Odibo AO, et al. Association and prediction of neonatal acidemia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012;207:206.e1-8.
8. Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, et al. For the STARD Group. STARD 2015: an update list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies. BMJ 2015;351:h5527.
9. Strachan BK, Sahota DS, Wijngaarden WJ, et al. Computerised analysis of the fetal heart rate and relation to acidaemia at delivery. BJOG 2001;108:848-52.
10. Tranquilli AL, Biagini A, Grecco P, et al. The correlation between fetal bradycardia area in the second stage of labor and acidemia at birth. J Matern Fetal Med 2013;26:1425-9.
11. Shelley T, Tipton RH. Dip area. A quantitative measure of fetal heart rate patterns. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Comnwlth 1971;78: 694-701.
12. Beguin F, Yeh SY, Forsythe A, Hon EH. A study of fetal heart rate deceleration areas. II. Correlation between deceleration areas and fetal pH during labor. Obstet Gynecol 1975;45:292-8.
13. Hamilton E, Warrick P, O’Keeffe D. Variable decelerations: do size and shape matter?. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2012;25: 648-53.
14. Graham EM, Adami RR, McKenney SL, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of fetal heart rate monitoring in the identification of neonatal encephalopathy. Obstet Gynecol 2014;124:507-513.
15. Jackson M, Holmgren CM, Esplin MS, et al. Frequency of fetal heart rate categories and short-term neonatal outcome. Obstet Gynecol 2011;118:803-8.
16. Sholapurkar SL. Critical evaluation of American categorization of fetal heart rate decelerations and three tier classification. Shortcomings, contradictions, remedies and need for debate. Ojog 2013;3:362-70.
17. Ayres-de-Campos D, Spong CY, Chandraharan E. FIGO Intrapartum Fetal Monitoring Expert Consensus Panel. FIGO consensus guidelines on intrapartum fetal heart monitoring: Cardiotocography. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2015;131:13-24.
18. Gamboa SM, Giménez OR, Mancho JP, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of the FIGO and the 5-tier fetal heart rate classification system in the detection of neonatal acidemia. Am J Perinatol 2016;1-7. [Epub ahead of Print]. DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1593810.
19. Parer JT, King T, Flanders S, et al. Fetal acidemia and electronic fetal heart rate patterns: is there evidence of an association? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2006;19:289-294.
20. Ugwumadu A. Understanding cardiotocographic patterns associated with intrapartum fetal hipoxia and neurologic injury. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2013;27:509-536.
21. Ugwumadu A. Are we (mis)guided by current guidelines on intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring? Case for a more physio-logical approach to interpretation. BJOG 2014;121:1063-1070.
22. Westgate JA, Wibbens B, Bennet L, et al. The intrapartum deceleration in center stage: a physiologic approach to the interpretation of fetal heart rate changes in labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007;197:236.e1-11.
23. Clark SL, Nageotte MP, Garite TJ, et al. Intrapartum management of category II fetal heart rate tracings: Towards standardization of care. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013;209:89-97.
24. Ikeda T, Murata Y, Quilligan EJ, et al. Fetal heart rate patterns in postasphyxiated fetal lambs with brain damage. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998;179:1329-37.
25. Ross MG, Jessie M, Amaya K, et al. Correlation of arterial fetal base deficit and lactate changes with severity of variable heart rate decelerations in the near-term ovine fetus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013;208:285.e1-6.
26. Martí GS, Pascual MJ, Rodrigo RM, et al. pH, base deficit or lactate. Which is better for predicting neonatal morbidity? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2016;1-5. [Epub ahead of print]. DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2016.1248936.
27. Odd DE, Lewis G, Whitelaw A, Gunnell D. Resuscitation at birth and cognition at 8 years of age: a cohort study. Lancet 2009;373: 1615-22.