Using interactive patient engagement technology in clinical practice: A qualitative assessment of nurses' perceptions

Journal of Medical Internet Research

Volumn 18, Issue 11, 2016, Pages

  Patmon, Frances L ^a,b   Gee, Perry M ^a,b,c   Rylee, Tina L ^a,d   Readdy, Noriann L ^e  

^a Nursing Research   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

^d CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e Patient Care Services   (United States)

Author keywords

Educational technology; Health information technology; Patient education; Patient engagement; Patient experience; Primary care nursing; Qualitative research

Indexed keywords

CALIFORNIA; CASE REPORT; CLINICAL PRACTICE; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY; HUMAN; MEDICAL INFORMATION; NURSING PRACTICE; PATIENT EDUCATION; PERCEPTION; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; FEMALE; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; MALE; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; NURSE; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOLOGY;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; NURSES; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PERCEPTION; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH;

EID: 84996938022     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14388871     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2196/jmir.5667     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Institute of Medicine. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; Mar 2001.
2. Prey JE, Woollen J, Wilcox L, Sackeim AD, Hripcsak G, Bakken S, et al. Patient engagement in the inpatient setting: A systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2014;21(4):742-750 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-002141] [Medline: 24272163]
3. Dalal AK, Dykes PC, Collins S, Lehmann LS, Ohashi K, Rozenblum R, et al. A Web-based, patient-centered toolkit to engage patients and caregivers in the acute care setting: A preliminary evaluation. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2015 Aug 2:1-9. [doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv093] [Medline: 26239859]
4. Dentzer S. Rx for the 'blockbuster drug' of patient engagement. Health Aff (Millwood) 2013 Feb;32(2):202 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2013.0037] [Medline: 23381509]
5. Bright FA, Kayes NM, Worrall L, McPherson KM. A conceptual review of engagement in healthcare and rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil 2015 Jun;37(8):643-654. [doi: 10.3109/09638288.2014.933899] [Medline: 24969698]
6. Hibbard JH, Greene J. What the evidence shows about patient activation: better health outcomes and care experiences; fewer data on costs. Health Aff (Millwood) 2013 Feb;32(2):207-214. [doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1061] [Medline: 23381511]
7. Sawesi S, Rashrash M, Phalakornkule K, Carpenter JS, Jones JF. The impact of information technology on patient engagement and health behavior change: A systematic review of the literature. JMIR Med Inform 2016;4(1):e1 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/medinform.4514] [Medline: 26795082]
8. Gee PM, Greenwood DA, Paterniti DA, Ward D, Miller Lisa M Soederberg. The eHealth Enhanced Chronic Care Model: A theory derivation approach. J Med Internet Res 2015;17(4):e86 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.4067] [Medline: 25842005]
9. Lee C, Lin S, Yang S, Tsou M, Chang K. Evaluating the influence of perceived organizational learning capability on user acceptance of information technology among operating room nurse staff. Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan 2013 Mar;51(1):22-27 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1016/j.aat.2013.03.013] [Medline: 23711602]
10. Davis FD. Percieved usefulness, percieved ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q 1989 Sep:319-340.
11. Galinato J, Montie M, Patak L, Titler M. Perspectives of nurses and patients on call light technology. Comput Inform Nurs 2015 Aug;33(8):359-367. [doi: 10.1097/CIN.0000000000000177] [Medline: 26176639]
12. Heath C, Knoblauch H, Luff P. Technology and social interaction: The emergence of 'workplace studies'. Brit J Sociol 2000;51(2):299-320. [doi: 10.1111/j.1468-4446.2000.oo299.x]
13. Millen D. Rapid ethnography: time deepening strategies for HCI field research. In: Proceedings of the 3rd conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques. 2000 Aug 17 Presented at: DIS '00 Designing Interactive Systems 2000; Aug 17-19, 2000; New York p. 17-19. [doi: 10.1145/347642.347763]
14. Knoblauch H. Focused ethnography. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum Qualitative Soc Res 2005;6(3):44.
15. Cruz EV, Higginbottom G. The use of focused ethnography in nursing research. Nurse Res 2013 Mar;20(4):36-43. [Medline: 23520711]
16. Higginbottom G, Pillay J, Boadu N. Guidance on performing focused ethnographies with an emphasis on healthcare research. Qual Rep 2013;18(9):1-6.
17. Isaacs E. The value of rapid ethnography: three case studies. In: Jordan B, editor. Advancing Ethnography in Corporate Environments: Challenges and Emerging Opportunities. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press; 2012:92-107.
18. Baines D, Cunningham I. Using comparative perspective rapid ethnography in international case studies: strengths and challenges. Qual Socl Work 2011 Sep 21;12(1):73-88. [doi: 10.1177/1473325011419053]
19. Handwerker W. Quick Ethnography. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press; 2001.
20. Melas CD, Zampetakis LA, Dimopoulou A, Moustakis V. Modeling the acceptance of clinical information systems among hospital medical staff: an extended TAM model. J Biomed Inform 2011 Aug;44(4):553-564 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2011.01.009] [Medline: 21292029]
21. Glasnapp J, Isaacs E. No more circling around the block: evolving a rapid ethnography and podcasting method to guide innovation in parking systems. 2011 Presented at: Ethnographic Praxis in Industry Conference (EPIC); Sep 18-21, 2011; Boulder, CO.
22. Lofland J, Snow D, Anderson L, Lofland L. Analyzing Social Settings: A Guide to Qualitative Observation and Analysis. 4th edition. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
23. Guest G. How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods 2006 Feb 01;18(1):59-82. [doi: 10.1177/1525822X05279903]
24. Corbin J, Strauss A. Basics of Qualitative Research: Technology and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. 3rd edition. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications; 2008.
25. Lincoln V, Guba E. Naturalistic Inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publications; 1985.
26. Koller D, Goldman RD. Distraction techniques for children undergoing procedures: A critical review of pediatric research. J Pediatr Nurs 2012 Dec;27(6):652-681. [doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2011.08.001] [Medline: 21925588]
27. O'Leary KJ, Lohman ME, Culver E, Killarney A, Randy SG, Liebovitz DM. The effect of tablet computers with a mobile patient portal application on hospitalized patients' knowledge and activation. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2015 Jun 15:1-7. [doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv058] [Medline: 26078412]
28. Tang C, Lorenzi N, Harle CA, Zhou X, Chen Y. Interactive systems for patient-centered care to enhance patient engagement. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2016 Jan 14;23(1):2-4. [doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv198]
29. O'Leary KJ, Kulkarni N, Landler MP, Jeon J, Hahn KJ, Englert KM, et al. Hospitalized patients' understanding of their plan of care. Mayo Clin Proc 2010 Jan;85(1):47-52 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.4065/mcp.2009.0232] [Medline: 20042561]
30. Masterson CR, Prey J, Ryan B, Alarcon I, Qian M, Bakken S, et al. Engaging hospitalized patients in clinical care: study protocol for a pragmatic randomized controlled trial. Contemp Clin Trials 2016 Jan 18;47:165-171. [doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2016.01.005] [Medline: 26795675]