In-depth comparison of somatic point mutation callers based on different tumor next-generation sequencing depth data

Scientific Reports

Volumn 6, Issue , 2016, Pages

  Cai, Lei ^a,b   Yuan, Wei ^a   Zhang, Zhou ^a,c   He, Lin ^a,d   Chou, Kuo Chen ^b,e  

^a SHANGHAI MENTAL HEALTH CENTER   (China)

^b GORDON LIFE SCIENCE INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c SHANGHAI JIAO TONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^d Zhejiang University School of Medicine   (China)

^e KING ABDULAZIZ UNIVERSITY   (Saudi Arabia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALLELE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; GENE FREQUENCY; GENETICS; HIGH THROUGHPUT SEQUENCING; HUMAN; MALE; NEOPLASM; POINT MUTATION; PROCEDURES; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM;

ALLELES; FEMALE; GENE FREQUENCY; HIGH-THROUGHPUT NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCING; HUMANS; MALE; NEOPLASMS; POINT MUTATION; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE;

EID: 84996555374     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/srep36540     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Biankin, A. V. et al. Pancreatic cancer genomes reveal aberrations in axon guidance pathway genes. Nature 491, 399-405 (2012).
2. Cancer Genome Atlas, N. Comprehensive molecular characterization of human colon and rectal cancer. Nature 487, 330-337 (2012).
3. Cancer Genome Atlas, N. Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature 490, 61-70 (2012).
4. Stratton, M. R. et al. The cancer genome. Nature 458, 719-724 (2009).
5. Ding, L. et al. Expanding the computational toolbox for mining cancer genomes. Nature reviews. Genetics 15, 556-570 (2014).
6. Vandin, F. et al. De novo discovery of mutated driver pathways in cancer. Genome research 22, 375-385 (2012).
7. Youn, A., Simon, R. Identifying cancer driver genes in tumor genome sequencing studies. Bioinformatics 27, 175-181 (2011).
8. Chun, S., Fay, J. C. Identification of deleterious mutations within three human genomes. Genome research 19, 1553-1561 (2009).
9. Cai, L. et al. Meta-Analysis-Based Preliminary Exploration of the Connection between ATDILI and Schizophrenia by GSTM1/T1 Gene Polymorphisms. PLoS One 10, e0128643 (2015).
10. Cai, L. et al. Prostate cancer with variants in CYP17 and UGT2B17 genes: a meta-analysis. Protein and peptide letters 19, 62-69 (2012).
11. Boutros, P. C. et al. Global optimization of somatic variant identification in cancer genomes with a global community challenge. Nature genetics 46, 318-319 (2014).
12. Koboldt, D. C. et al. VarScan 2: somatic mutation and copy number alteration discovery in cancer by exome sequencing. Genome research 22, 568-576 (2012).
13. Saunders, C. T. et al. Strelka: accurate somatic small-variant calling from sequenced tumor-normal sample pairs. Bioinformatics 28, 1811-1817 (2012).
14. Larson, D. E. et al. SomaticSniper: identification of somatic point mutations in whole genome sequencing data. Bioinformatics 28, 311-317 (2012).
15. Cibulskis, K. et al. Sensitive detection of somatic point mutations in impure and heterogeneous cancer samples. Nature biotechnology 31, 213-219 (2013).
16. Shiraishi, et al. An empirical Bayesian framework for somatic mutation detection from cancer genome sequencing data. Nucleic acids research 41, e89 (2013).
17. Wang, Q. et al. Detecting somatic point mutations in cancer genome sequencing data: a comparison of mutation callers. Genome medicine 5, 91 (2013).
18. Goode, D. L. et al. A simple consensus approach improves somatic mutation prediction accuracy. Genome medicine 5, 90 (2013).
19. Roberts, N. D. et al. A comparative analysis of algorithms for somatic SNV detection in cancer. Bioinformatics 29, 2223-2230 (2013).
20. Xia, J. et al. NGS catalog: A database of next generation sequencing studies in humans. Human mutation 33, E2341-E2355 (2012).
21. Kim, S. Y., Speed, T. P. Comparing somatic mutation-callers: beyond Venn diagrams. BMC bioinformatics 14, 189 (2013).
22. Xu, H. et al. Comparison of somatic mutation calling methods in amplicon and whole exome sequence data. BMC genomics 15, 244 (2014).
23. Tsiatis, A. C. et al. Comparison of Sanger sequencing, pyrosequencing, and melting curve analysis for the detection of KRAS mutations: diagnostic and clinical implications. The Journal of molecular diagnostics: JMD 12, 425-432 (2010).
24. Li, M. et al. Whole-exome and targeted gene sequencing of gallbladder carcinoma identifies recurrent mutations in the ErbB pathway. Nature genetics 46, 872-876 (2014).
25. Talwalkar, A. et al. SMaSH: a benchmarking toolkit for human genome variant calling. Bioinformatics 30, 2787-2795 (2014).
26. Li, H. Toward better understanding of artifacts in variant calling from high-coverage samples. Bioinformatics 30, 2843-2851 (2014).
27. Rashid, M. et al. Cake: a bioinformatics pipeline for the integrated analysis of somatic variants in cancer genomes. Bioinformatics 29, 2208-2210 (2013).
28. Sherry, S. T. et al. dbSNP: the NCBI database of genetic variation. Nucleic acids research 29, 308-311 (2001).
29. Forbes, S. A. et al. COSMIC: exploring the world's knowledge of somatic mutations in human cancer. Nucleic acids research 43, D805-D811 (2015).
30. Roth, A. et al. JointSNVMix: a probabilistic model for accurate detection of somatic mutations in normal/tumour paired nextgeneration sequencing data. Bioinformatics 28, 907-913 (2012).
31. Wang, W. et al. FaSD-somatic: a fast and accurate somatic SNV detection algorithm for cancer genome sequencing data. Bioinformatics 30, 2498-2500 (2014).
32. Cantarel, B. L. et al. BAYSIC: a Bayesian method for combining sets of genome variants with improved specificity and sensitivity. BMC bioinformatics 15, 104 (2014).
33. Kim, S. Y. et al. Combining calls from multiple somatic mutation-callers. BMC bioinformatics 15, 154 (2014).
34. Schadt, E. E. et al. Computational solutions to large-scale data management and analysis. Nature reviews. Genetics 11, 647-657 (2010).
35. Kassahn, K. S. et al. Somatic point mutation calling in low cellularity tumors. PLoS One 8, e74380 (2013).
36. Bolger, A. M. et al. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30, 2114-2120 (2014).
37. McKenna et al. The Genome Analysis Toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome research 20, 1297-1303 (2010).
38. Li, H. et al. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25, 2078-2079 (2009).
39. Chen, W. et al. PseKNC: a flexible web-server for generating pseudo K-tuple nucleotide composition. Anal. Biochem. 456, 53-60 (2014).
40. Chen, W. et al. PseKNC-General: a cross-platform package for generating various modes of pseudo nucleotide compositions. Bioinformatics 31, 119-120 (2015).
41. Liu, B. et al. repDNA: a Python package to generate various modes of feature vectors for DNA sequences by incorporating userdefined physicochemical properties and sequence-order effects. Bioinformatics 31, 1307-1309 (2015).
42. Liu, B. et al. repRNA: a web server for generating various feature vectors of RNA sequences. Molecular Genetics and Genomics 291, 473-481 (2016).
43. Liu, B. et al. Pse-in-One: a web server for generating various modes of pseudo components of DNA, RNA, and protein sequences Nucleic Acids Res. 43, W65-W71 (2015).