The Effects of Rater Sex and Ratee Sex on Managerial Performance Evaluation

Australian Journal of Management

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 147-161

  Chung, Janne ^a  

^a YORK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

BIAS AGAINST WOMEN; MENTAL ACCOUNTS; PERCEIVED BENEFIT; SEX STEREOTYPES; SUCCESSFUL AND UNSUCCESSFUL PERFORMANCE

Indexed keywords

EID: 84996264672     PISSN: 03128962     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/031289620102600204     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Aimer, E.D., Hopper, J.R. & Kaplan, S.E. 1998, ‘The effect of diversity-related attributes on hiring, advancement and voluntary turnover judgments’, Accounting Horizons, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1-17.
2. Bem, S.L. 1993, The Lenses of Gender: Transforming the Debate on Sexual Inequality, Yale University Press, London.
3. Brown, V. & Geis, F.L. 1984, ‘Turning lead into gold: Evaluations of men and women leaders and the alchemy of social consensus’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 46, pp. 811-824.
4. Cejka, M.A. & Eagly, A.H. 1999, ‘Gender-stereotypic images of occupations correspond to the sex segregation of employment’, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 413-423.
5. Choudhury, N. 1986, ‘Responsibility accounting and controllability’, Accounting and Business Research, Summer, pp. 189-198.
6. Deaux, K. & Emswiller, T. 1974, ‘Explanation of successful performance on sexlinked tasks: What is skill for the male is luck for the female’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 29, pp. 80-85.
7. Decker, W.H. 1987. ‘Attributions based on managers’ self-presentation, sex, and weight’, Psychological Reports, vol. 61, pp. 175-181.
8. Dubno, P. 1985, ‘Attitudes toward women executives: A longitudinal approach’, Academy of Management Journal, vol. 1, pp. 235-239.
9. Eagly, A.H., Makhijani, M.G. & Klonsky, B.G. 1992, ‘Gender and the evaluation of leaders: A meta-analysis’, Psychological Bulletin, vol. 11, pp. 3-22.
10. Foddy, M. & Smithson, M. 1989, ‘Fuzzy sets and double standards: Modeling the process of ability inference’, in Sociological Theories in Progress: New Formulations, ed. J. Berger, M. Zelditch Jr., & B. Anderson, Sage, Newbury Park, CA, pp. 73-99.
11. Foschi, M. 1989, ‘Status characteristics, standards, and attributions’, in Sociological Theories in Progress: New Formulations, ed. J. Berger, M. Zelditch Jr., & B. Anderson, Sage, Newbury Park, CA, pp. 58-72.
12. Garland, H. & Price, K.H. 1977, ‘Attitudes toward women in management and attributions for their success and failure in a managerial position’, Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 29-33.
13. Glick, P. 1991, ‘Trait-based and sex-based discrimination in occupational prestige, occupational salary, and hiring’, Sex Roles, vol. 25, pp. 351-378.
14. Hull, R.P. & Hicks, D.W. 1993, ‘Language and gender: The pervasiveness of sexism in accounting and business publications’, Advances in Public Interest Accounting, vol. 5, pp. 121-113.
15. Hull, R.P. & Umansky, P.H. 1997, ‘An examination of gender stereotyping as an explanation for vertical job segregation in public accounting’, Accounting, Organizations and Society, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 507-528.
16. Johnson, E.N., Kaplan, S.E. & Reckers, P.M.J. 1998, ‘An examination of potential gender-based differences in audit managers’ performance evaluation judgments’, Behavioral Research in Accounting, vol. 10, pp. 47-75.
17. Judge, T.A. & Ferris, G.R. 1993, ‘Social context of performance evaluation decisions’, Academy of Management Journal, vol. 36, pp. 80-105.
18. Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. 1979, ‘Prospect theory: An analysis of decisions under risk’, Econometrica, vol. 47, pp. 262-291.
19. Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. 1984, ‘Choices, values and frames’, American Psychologist, vol. 30, pp. 341-350.
20. Lipe, M.G. 1993, ‘Analyzing the variance investigation decision: The effects of outcomes, mental accounting, and framing’. The Accounting Review, vol. 68, no. 4, pp. 748-764.
21. Morrison, A. & Von Clinow, M. 1990, ‘Woman and minorities in management’, American Psychologist. February, pp. 200-208.
22. Nielsen, R.P. & Bartunek, J.M. 1996, ‘Opening narrow, routinized schemata to ethical stakeholder consciousness and action’, Business & Society, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 483-519.
23. Paludi, M.A. & Strayer, L.A., 1985, ‘What's in a name? Differential evaluations of performance as a function of author's name’, Sex Roles, vol. 12, pp. 353-361.
24. Park, J.J., Hayes, R.S. & Foster S.F. 1994, ‘Men and women: Equal in accounting?’, Journal of Education for Business, vol. 69, no. 6, pp. 349-354.
25. Ridgeway, C.L., 1993, ‘Gender, status and the social psychology of expectations’, in Theory on Gender/Feminism on Theory, ed. P. England, Aldine, New York, pp. 175-197.
26. Ridgeway, C.L. & Johnson, B. 1990, ‘Expectations, legitimation, and dominance behavior in task groups’, American Sociological Review, vol. 51, pp. 603-617.
27. Rosch, E. 1978, ‘Principles of categorization’, in Cognition and Categorization, ed. E. Rosch & B.B. Lloyd, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 27-48.
28. Schein, V.E. 1973, ‘Relationships between sex roles stereotypes and requisite management characteristics among female managers’, Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 340-344.
29. Schweitzer, M.E. 1999, ‘The construction of mental accounts in benefits decision making’, Benefits Quarterly (First Quarterly), pp 52-55.
30. Shore, T.H. 1992, ‘Subtle gender bias in the assessment of managerial potential’, Sex Roles, vol. 27, no. 9/10, pp. 499-515.
31. Steinke, J. 1998, ‘Connecting theory and practice: Women scientist role models in television programming’, Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 142-151.
32. St. Pierre, R.N.M., Herendeen, D.S., Moore & Nagle, A.M. 1994, ‘Does occupational stereotyping still exist?’ The Journal of Psychology, vol. 128, no. 5, pp. 589-598.
33. Swim, J. 1993, ‘In search of gender bias in evaluations and trait inferences: The role of diagnosticity and gender stereotypicality of behavioral information’, Sex Roles, vol. 29, no. 3/4, pp. 213-237.
34. Todor, M.L. 1980, ‘The effect of sexual composition of a group on discrimination against women and sex-role attitudes’, Psychology of Women Quarterly, vol. 5, pp. 292-310.
35. Tversky, A. & Kahneman. 1981, ‘The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice’, Science, vol. 211, January, pp. 453-458.