Ratifying Maastricht: Parliamentary Votes on International Treaties and Theoretical Solution Concepts

European Union Politics

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 93-124

  König, Thomas ^a   Hug, Simon ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KONSTANZ   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GENEVA   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

comparative politics; Maastricht ratification; two level games; win set analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 84996243183     PISSN: 14651165     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1465116500001001005     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Arts, Dirk (1993) ‘Belgium’, European Law Review 18: 228-233.
2. Best, Edward (1994) ‘The United Kingdom and the Ratification of the Maastricht Treaty’, in Finn Laursen and Sophie Vanhoonacker (eds) Ratification of the Maastricht Treaty: Issues, Debate and Future Implications, pp. 245-278. Dordrecht: M. Nijhoff.
3. Beuter, Rita (1994) ‘Germany and the Ratification of the Maastricht Treaty’, in Finn Laursen and Sophie Vanhoonacker (eds) Ratification of the Maastricht Treaty: Issues, Debate and Future Implications, pp. 87-112. Dordrecht: M. Nijhoff.
4. Budge, Ian, David Robertson and Derek Hearl (eds) (1987) Ideology, Strategy and Party Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Carrubba, Cliff (1998) ‘The Electoral Connection in European Union’. Mimeo, paper prepared for presentation at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, 1-5 September 1999.
6. Cohen, Hélène (1993) ‘France’, European Law Review 18: 233-236.
7. Corbett, Richard (1993) The Treaty of Maastricht. From Conception to Ratification: A Comprehensive Reference Guide. Harlow: Longman.
8. Crossland, H. Gerald (1993) ‘Germany’, European Law Review 18: 236-239.
9. Daniele, Luigi (1993) ‘Italy’, European Law Review 18: 240-241.
10. De Haan, J. (1997) ‘The European Central Bank: Independence, Accountability and Strategy’, Public Choice 93: 395-426.
11. Den Hartog, Arthur (1994) ‘The Netherlands and the Ratification of the Maastricht Treaty’, in Finn Laursen and Sophie Vanhoonacker (eds) Ratification of the Maastricht Treaty: Issues, Debate and Future Implications, pp. 213-230. Dordrecht: M. Nijhoff.
12. Deschouwer, Kris (1998) ‘Falling Apart Together. The Changing Nature of Belgian Consociationalism, 1961-1998’. Mimeo, paper prepared for presentation at the conference ‘The Fate of Consociationalism in Western Europe, 1968-1998’, Harvard University, Center for European Studies, Cambridge, MA.
13. Evans, Peter B., Harold K. Jacobson and Robert D. Putnam (eds) (1993) Double-edged Diplomacy: International Bargaining and Domestic Politics. Berkeley: University of California Press.
14. Franzese, Robert J. and Peter A. Hall (1998) ‘Mixed Signals: Central Bank Independence, Coordinated Wage-Bargaining, and European Monetary Union’, International Organization 52: 505-574.
15. Friden, Georges (1993) ‘Luxembourg’, European Law Review 18: 241-242.
16. Gabel, Matthew J. and John D. Huber (2000, forthcoming) ‘Putting Parties in their Place: Inferring Party Left-Right Ideological Positions from Party Manifestos Data’, American Journal of Political Science.
17. Garrett, Geoffrey (1994) ‘The Politics of Maastricht’, in Barry Eichengreen and Jeffry Frieden (eds) The Political Economy of European Monetary Unification, pp. 47-65. Boulder, CO: Westview.
18. Giortler, Peter (1993) ‘Denmark. Ratifying the Treaty on European Union: An Interim Report’, European Law Review 18: 356-360.
19. Hix, Simon and Christopher Lord (1997) Political Parties in the European Union. New York: St Martin's Press.
20. Hug, Simon and Thomas König (1999) Ratifying Amsterdam. Mimeo, paper prepared for presentation at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Atlanta, 2-6 September 1999.
21. Hug, Simon and Pascal Sciarini (2000, forthcoming) ‘Referendums on European Integration. Do Institutions Matter in the Voter's Decision?’, Comparative Political Studies.
22. Ibanez, Alberto Gil (1994) ‘Spain and the Ratification of the Maastricht Treaty’, in Finn Laursen and Sophie Vanhoonacker (eds) Ratification of the Maastricht Treaty: Issues, Debate and Future Implications, pp. 129-146. Dordrecht: M. Nijhoff.
23. Iida, Keisuke (1996) ‘Involuntary Defection in Two-Level Games’, Public Choice 89: 283-303.
24. Interparliamentary Union (1986) Parliaments of the World. A Reference Compendium. London: Macmillan.
25. Ioannou, Krateros (1993) ‘Greece’, European Law Review 18: 239-240.
26. Keraudren, Philippe and Nicolas Dubois (1994) ‘France and the Ratification of the Maastricht Treaty’, in Finn Laursen and Sophie Vanhoonacker (eds) Ratification of the Maastricht Treaty: Issues, Debate and Future Implications, pp. 147-179. Dordrecht: M. Nijhoff.
27. Laursen, Finn (1994) ‘Denmark and the Ratification of the Maastricht Treaty’, in Finn Laursen and Sophie Vanhoonacker (eds) Ratification of the Maastricht Treaty: Issues, Debate and Future Implications, pp. 61-86. Dordrecht: M. Nijhoff.
28. Marinho, Clotilde Lopes (1994) ‘Portugal and the Ratification of the Maastricht Treaty’, in Finn Laursen and Sophie Vanhoonacker (eds) Ratification of the Maastricht Treaty: Issues, Debate and Future Implications, pp. 231-244. Dordrecht: M. Nijhoff.
29. Milner, Helen (1997) Interests, Institutions, and Information. Domestic Politics and International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30. Moravcsik, Andrew (1991) ‘Negotiating the Single European Act: National Interests and Conventional Statecraft in the European Community’, International Organization 45: 17-56.
31. Moravcsik, Andrew (1993) ‘Preferences and Power in the European Community: A Liberal Intergovernmentalist Approach’, Journal of Common Market Studies 31: 473-524.
32. Moravcsik, Andrew (1998) The Choice for Europe. Social Purpose and State Power from Messina to Maastricht. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
33. Pauly, Alexis (1994) ‘Luxembourg and the Ratification of the Maastricht’, in Finn Laursen and Sophie Vanhoonacker (eds) Ratification of the Maastricht Treaty: Issues, Debate and Future Implications, pp. 61-86. Dordrecht: M. Nijhoff.
34. Putnam, Robert D. (1988) ‘Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games’, International Studies Quarterly 42: 427-460.
35. Ratification of the Treaty on European Union (1996) Luxembourg: Office for Official Documents of the European Communities.
36. Ray, Leonard (1997) ‘Political Parties, Public Opinion and European Integration’. Mimeo, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
37. Sandholtz, Wayne (1993) ‘Choosing Union: Monetary Politics and Maastricht’, International Organization, 47: 1-40.
38. Santacruz, Marta Arpio (1993) ‘Spain’, European Law Review 18: 247-248.
39. Schneider, Gerald and Patricia A. Weitsman (1996) ‘The Punishment Trap: Integration Referendums as Popularity Contests’, Comparative Political Studies 28: 582-607.
40. Szyszczak, Erika (1993) ‘United Kingdom. Ratifying the Treaty on European Union: A Final Report’, European Law Review 18: 541-544.
41. Tsebelis, George and Geoffrey Garrett (1997) ‘Why Power Indices Cannot Explain Decisionmaking in the European Union’, in Dieter Schmidtchen and Robert Cooter (eds) Constitutional Law and Economics of the European Union, pp. 11-31. Cheltenham: Elgar.
42. Van Wijnbergen, Christa (1994) ‘Ireland and the Ratification of the Maastricht Treaty’, in Finn Laursen and Sophie Vanhoonacker (eds) Ratification of the Maastricht Treaty: Issues, Debate and Future Implications, pp. 181-194. Dordrecht: M. Nijhoff.
43. Weiler, Joseph H.H. (1997) The Constitution of Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
44. Wolf, Dieter and Bernhard Zangl (1996) ‘The European Economic and Monetary Union: “Two-level Games” and the Formation of International Legislatures’, European Journal of International Relations 2: 355-393.