One day in the life of a “purist”

International Journal of Bilingualism

Volumn 6, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 147-203

  li, David C S ^a   Elly, C Y ^b  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

^b Leung Shek Chee College   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

codealternation; codemixing; codeswitching

Indexed keywords

EID: 84996187475     PISSN: 13670069     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/13670069020060020301     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Auer, P. (1 9 8 4 ). Bilingual conversation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
2. Auer, P. (1988). A conversation analysis approach to codeswitching and transfer. In M. Heller (Ed), Codeswitching: anthropological and sociolinguistic perspectives (pp.187-213). New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
3. Auer, P. (1992). Introduction: John Gumperz’ approachto contextualization. In P. Auer & A. di Luzio (Eds.), The contextualization of language (pp.1-37). Amsterdam, John Benjamins.
4. Auer, P. (1995). The pragmatics of codeswitching: A sequential approach. In L. Milroy & P. Muysken (Eds.), One speaker, two languages (pp.115-135). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Auer, P. (Ed.). (1998). Codeswitching in conversation: Language, interaction and identity. London and New York: Routledge.
6. Chan, B.H.S. (1998). How does Cantonese-English codemixing work? In M.C. Pennington (Ed.), Language in Hong Kong at centuary’s end (pp.191-216). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
7. Clyne, M. (1991). Community languages: The Australian experience. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
8. Collins, R., & Makowsky, M. (1998). The discovery of society. 6th ed. Boston, MA: McGraw Hill.
9. Fan, G., Lee, T., Lun, C., Luke, K.K., Tung, P., & Cheung, K.H. (1997). Yueyu pinyin zibiao, ‘Cantonese romanization and character list’.) Hong Kong: Linguistic Society of Hong Kong.
10. Gal, S. (1979). Language shift: Social determinants of linguistic change in bilingual Austria. New York: Academic Press.
11. Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
12. Gibbons, J. (1987). Codemixing and code choice: A Hong Kong case study. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
13. Gumperz, J. (1982). Discourse strategies. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
14. Heller, M. (Ed.). (1988). Codeswitching: Anthropological and sociolinguistic perspectives. Berlin: Moutonde Gruyter.
15. Lee, M. (2000). Code-switching in media texts: Its implications on society and culture in post-colonial Hong Kong. In D. Li, A. Lin & W.K. Tsang (Eds.), Language in education in postcolonial Hong Kong (pp.95-127). Hong Kong: Linguistic society of Hong Kong.
16. Lee, S. (2000). The tones they ai-yaah a-changing. South China Morning Post, October 24, 2000.
17. Li, D.C.S. (1996). Issues in bilingualism and biculturalism: A Hong Kong case study. New York: Lang.
18. Li, D.C.S. (1997). Borrowed identity: Signaling involvement with a Western name. Journal of Pragmatics, 28, 489-513.
19. Li, D.C.S. (1998). The plight of the purist. In M.C. Pennington (Ed.), Language in Hong Kong at century’s end (pp.161-190). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
20. Li, D.C.S. (1999a). Linguistic onvergence: Impact of English on Hong Kong Cantonese. Asian Englishes, 2 (1), 5-36.
21. Li, D.C.S. (1999b). The functions and status of English in Hong Kong: A post-1997 update. English World-Wide, 20 (1), 67-110.
22. Li, D.C.S. (2000a). Cantonese-English codeswitching research in Hong Kong: A Y2K review. World Englishes, 19 (3), 305-322.
23. Li, D.C.S. (2000b). “Hong Kong English”: New variety of English or Interlanguage? English Australia EA Journal, 18 (1), 50-59.
24. Li, D.C.S. (2000c). Phonetic borrowing: Key to the vitality of written Cantonese in Hong Kong. Written Language and Literacy, 3 (2), 199-233.
25. Li, D.C.S. (2001). L2 lexis in L1: Reluctance to translate out of concern for referential meaning. Multilingua, 20 (1), 1-26.
26. Li, D.C. S., Lin, A.M.Y., & Tsang, W.K. (Eds.) (2000). Language and education in postcolonial Hong Kong. Hong Kong Linguistic Society of Hong Kong.
27. Li, W. (1994). Three generations, two languages, one family: Language choice and language shift in a Chinese community in Britain. Clevedon and Philadelphia: Multilingual Matters.
28. Li, W. (1998). The “why” and “how” question in the analysis of conversational codeswitching. In P. Auer (Ed.), Codeswitching in conversation: language interaction and identity (pp.156-176). London: Routledge.
29. Li, W., & Milroy, L. (1995). Conversational codeswitching in a Chinese community in Britain: A sequential analysis. Journal of Pragmatics, 23, 281-299.
30. Lin, A.M.Y. (1997). Hong Kong children’s rights to a culturally compatible English education. Hong Kong Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2 (2), 23-48.
31. Lin, A.M.Y. (1999a). Doing-English-lessons in the reproduction or transformation of social worlds? TESOL Quarterly, 33 (3), 393-412.
32. Lin, A.M.Y. (1999b). Resistance andcreativity in English reading lessons in Hong Kong. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 12 (3), 285-296.
33. Lin, A.M.Y. (2000). Deconstructing ‘mixed code’. In D. Li, A. Lin, & W.K. Tsang (Eds.), Language and education in post-colonial Hong Kong (pp.179-194). Hong Kong: Linguistic Society of Hong Kong.
34. Luke, K.K. (1998). Why two languages might be better than one: Motivations of language mixing in Hong Kong. In M.C. Pennington (Ed.), (pp.145-159). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
35. Lunt, P.,& Livingstone, S. (1996). Rethinking the focus group in media and communications research. Journal of Communication, 46 (2), 79-98.
36. Meeuwis, M., & Blommaert, J. (1994). The “markedness model” and the absence of society. Multilingua, 13, 387-423.
37. Meeuwis, M., & Blommaert, J. (1998). A monolectal view of code-switching: Layered codeswitching among Zairians in Belgium. In P. Auer (Ed.), Code-switching in Conversation: Language interaction and identity (pp.76-98). London and New York: Routledge.
38. Milroy, L., & Li, W. (1995). A social network approach to codeswitching: The example of a bilingual community in Britain. In L. Milroy & P. Muysken (Eds.), One speaker, two languages (pp.136-157). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39. Milroy, J., & Milroy, L. (1992).Social network and social class: Toward an integrated sociolinguistic model. Language in Society, 21, 1-26.
40. Milroy, L., & Muysken, P. (Eds.). (1995). One speaker, two languages: Cross-disciplinary perspectives on codeswitching. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
41. Morgan, D. (1988). Focus groups as qualitative research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
42. Mühlhäusler, P. (1996). Linguistic ecology: Language change and linguistic imperialism in the Pacific Region. London and New York: Routledge.
43. Myers-Scotton, C. (1988). Codeswitching as indexical of social negotiations. In M. Heller (Ed.), Codeswitching: anthropological and sociolinguistic perspectives (pp.151-186). New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
44. Myers-Scotton, C. (1993). Social motivations for codeswitching: Evidence from Africa. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
45. Myers-Scotton, C. (Ed.). (1998). Codes and consequences. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.
46. Pennington, M.C. (Ed.). (1998). Language in Hong Kong at century’s end. Hong Kong Hong Kong University Press.
47. Shin, S.J., & Milroy, L. (2000). Conversational codeswitching among Korean-English Bilingual children. International Journal of Bilingualism, 4 (3), 351-383.
48. Snell-Hornby, M. (1988). Translation studies: An integrated approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
49. So, D. (2000). Achieving biliteracy and trilingualism without MOI-based bifurcation of the schools: A plea for third-alternatives. In D. Li, A. Lin, & W.K. Tsang (Eds.), Language and education in post-colonial Hong Kong (pp.9-33). Hong Kong: Linguistic Society of Hong Kong.
50. Stewart, D.W., & Shamdasani, P.N. (1990). Focus groups: Theory and practice. Newbury Park: Sage.
51. Stroud, C. (1992). The problem of intention and meaning in codeswitching. Text, 12, 127-155.
52. Weinreich, U. (1953). Languages in contact: Findings and problems. The Hague: Mouton.