Narrowing the Breach: Can Disability Culture and Full Educational Inclusion Be Reconciled?

Journal of Disability Policy Studies

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 144-152

  Hall, Jean P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84996154598     PISSN: 10442073     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/10442073020130030201     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Bard, J.F. (1995). Pennsylvania inclusion policy (State Basic Education Circular BEC-2-95). Retrieved October 4, 1999, from www.kidstogether.org/ed_policy.html
2. Barnartt, S.N. (1996). Disability culture or disability consciousness? Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 79(2), 1—19.
3. Block, M.E. (1999). Did we jump on the wrong bandwagon? Problems with inclusion in physical education. Palaestra, 15(3), 30—36.
4. Boulding, K. (1967). The boundaries of social policy. Social Work, 12, 3—11.
5. Braddock, D., Hemp, R., Parish, S., Westrich, J., & Park, H. (1998). The state of the states in developmental disabilities: Summary of the study. In D. Braddock (Ed.), The state of the states in developmental disabilities (pp. 22—53). Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Retardation.
6. Carver, R. (1994, December). Inclusion or illusion? DCS Newsletter, November/December 1994. Retrieved October 6, 1999, from http://dww.deafworldweb.org/pub/c/rjc/inclusion.html
7. Chambers, D.E. (1993). Social policy and social programs: A method for the practical public policy analyst (2nd ed.). New York: Macmillan.
8. Charlton, J.I. (1998). Nothing about us without us: Disability oppression and empowerment. Berkeley: University of California Press.
9. Council for Exceptional Children. (1993, April). Statement on inclusive schools and communities. Reston, VA: Author.
10. Clyde K. V. Puyallup School District No. 3, 35 F.3d 1396 (9th Cir. 1994).
11. Downing, J.E. (1996). Including students with severe and multiple disabilities in typical classrooms. Baltimore: Brookes
12. Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq.
13. Foster, S. (1987). Life in the mainstream: Reflections of deaf college freshmen on their experiences in the mainstreamed high school. Rochester, NY: National Technical Institute for the Deaf.
14. Gill, C. (1995). A psychological view of disability culture. Disability Studies Quarterly, 15(4), 16—19.
15. Gill, C. (1997). Four types of integration in disability identity development. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 9, 39—46.
16. Gill, C. (1999). Disability culture: A framework for understanding disability, family and community. The Disability Messenger, 11.
17. Gilson, S.F., Tusler, A., & Gill, C. (1997). Ethnographic research in disability identity: Self-determination and community. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 9, 7—17.
18. Groch, S.A. (1994). Oppositional consciousness: Its manifestations and development. The case of people with disabilities. Sociological Inquiry, 64, 369—395.
19. Gwin, L. (2000). Incoming! Watch out! Retrieved March 19, 2001, from http://www.mouthmag.com/number60/number60.htm
20. Hall, L.J., & McGregor, J.A. (2000). A follow-up study of the peer relationships of children with disabilities in an inclusive school. The Journal of Special Education, 34, 114—126, 153.
21. Harris & Associates. (1986). The ICD survey of disabled Americans: Bringing disabled Americans into the mainstream. New York: Author.
22. Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Amendments of 1997, 20 U.S.C. § 1401.
23. Kemp, J. (1999, May). Keynote address. Presentation at the ADA Symposium, Kansas City, MO.
24. Learning Disabilities Association. (1993, January). Position paper on full inclusion of all students with learning disabilities in the regular education classroom. Pittsburgh, PA: Author.
25. Lipsky, D.K., & Gartner, A. (1996). Inclusion, school restructuring, and the remaking of American society. Harvard Educational Review, 66, 762—796.
26. Moroney, R.M. (1981). Policy analysis within a value theoretical framework. In R. Haskins & J. J. Gallagher (Eds.), Models for analysis of social policy: An introduction (pp. 78—101). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
27. National Center on Educational Restructuring and Inclusion. (1995). National study of inclusive education. New York: City University of New York.
28. National Council on Disability. (1996). Achieving independence: The challenge for the 21st century. Washington, DC: Author.
29. National Education Association. (1999). Policy statement on appropriate inclusion. Retrieved October 4, 1999,from http://helpfrom.nea.org/publiced/idea/ideaplcy.html
30. National Information Center for Children and Youth with Disabilities. (1996, October). The education of children and youth with special needs: What do the laws say? [Electronic version]. NICHY News Digest, 15.
31. Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services. (1999). Notice Inviting Applications for Fiscal Year (FY) 2000. 64 Fed. Reg. 167, 47310—47330.
32. Ohlson, K. (2001, April 5). Faith in the baby. Retrieved April 6, 2001, from http://www.salon.com/mwt/feature/2001/04/05/faith/index.html
33. Paradis, L. (1998, December). Beyond fear and pity. Mainstream, 15—19.
34. Pierce, B. (1994). Are specialized educational settings for children with disabilities immoral? The Braille Monitor, February 1994. Retrieved November 1, 1999, from http://www.nfb.org/brlm9411.htm
35. Pfeiffer, D. (1993). Overview of the disability movement: History, legislative record, and policy implications. Policy Studies Journal, 21, 724—734.
36. Schroeder, F. (1993, July). Mainstreaming, schools for the blind, and full inclusion: What shall the future of education for blind children be? Presentation at the 1993 National Federation for the Blind National Convention, Dallas, TX.
37. Scotch, R.K. (1984) From good will to civil rights: Transforming federal disability policy. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
38. Shapiro, J. (1993). No pity. New York: Random House.
39. Skrtic, T.M., Sailor, W., & Gee, K. (1996). Voice, collaboration, and inclusion: Democratic themes in educational and social reform initiatives. Remedial and Special Education, 17, 142—157.
40. Stainback, S., & Stainback, W. (1984). A rationale for the merger of special and regular education. Exceptional Children, 51, 102—111.
41. Thomas, S.B., & Rapport, M.J.K. (1998). Least restrictive environment: Understanding the direction of the courts. The Journal of Special Education, 32, 66—78.
42. Topeka Independent Living Resource Center. ( 2000). TILRC news. Retrieved July 12, 2001, from http://www.tilrc.org/docs/national2.html
43. Wentzel, K.R., & Ascher, S.R. (1995). The academic lives of neglected, rejected, popular, and controversial children. Child Development, 66, 754— 763.
44. Wolfberg, P.J., Zercher, C., Lieber, J., Capell, K., Matias, S., et al. (1999). “Can I play with you?” Peer culture in inclusive preschool programs. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 24(2), 69—84.