Likeableness and meaningfulness ratings of 555 (+487) person-descriptive words

Journal of Research in Personality

Volumn 72, Issue , 2018, Pages 50-57

  Chandler, Jesse ^a  

^a MATHEMATICA POLICY RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

Impression formation; Lexical hypothesis; Negativity bias

Indexed keywords

EID: 84995903901     PISSN: 00926566     EISSN: 10957251     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jrp.2016.07.005     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Adolphs, R., Tranel, D., Damasio, A.R., The human amygdala in social judgment. Nature, 393, 1998, 471.
2. Allport, G.W., Odbert, H.S., Trait-names: A psycho-lexical study. Psychological Monographs, 47(1), 1936.
3. Anderson, N.H., Averaging versus adding as a stimulus-combination rule in impression formation. Journal of Experimental Psychology 70:4 (1965), 394–400.
4. Anderson, N.H., Likableness ratings of 555 personality-trait words. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 9:3 (1968), 272–279.
5. Ashton, M.C., Lee, K., Goldberg, L.R., de Vries, R.E., Higher order factors of personality: Do they exist?. Personality and Social Psychology Review 13:2 (2009), 79–91.
6. Averill, J.R., A semantic atlas of emotional concepts. JSAS: Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 5, 1975, 330 (Ms. No. 421).
7. Averill, J.R., On the paucity of positive emotions. Blankstein, K.R., Pliner, P., Polivy, J., (eds.) Assessment and modification of emotional behavior, 1980, Plenum Press, New York, NY, 7–45.
8. Baumeister, R.F., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., Vohs, K.D., Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology 5:4 (2001), 323–370.
9. Bem, D.J., Self-perception theory. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 6 (1972), 1–62.
10. Benoit, K., Conway, D., Lauderdale, B.E., Laver, M., & Mikhaylov, S. (in press). Crowd-sourced text analysis: Reproducible and agile production of political data. American Political Science Review.
11. Block, J., A contrarian view of the five-factor approach to personality description. Psychological Bulletin 117:2 (1995), 187–215.
12. Byun, T.M., Halpin, P.F., Szeredi, D., Online crowdsourcing for efficient rating of speech: A validation study. Journal of Communication Disorders 53 (2015), 70–83.
13. Campbell, W.K., Sedikides, C., Self-threat magnifies the self-serving bias: A meta-analytic integration. Review of General Psychology 3:1 (1999), 23–43.
14. Carlson, E.R., The affective tone of psychology. Journal of General Psychology 75 (1966), 65–78.
15. Carvalho, A., Dimitrov, S., Larson, K., How many crowdsourced workers should a requester hire?. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, 2016, 10.1007/s10472-015-9492-4.
16. Chandler, J., Paolacci, G., Mueller, P., Risks and rewards of crowdsourcing marketplaces. Michelucci, P., (eds.) Handbook of human computation, 2013, Springer, New York, 377–392.
17. Collins, H.M., The TEA set: Tacit knowledge and scientific networks. Science Studies 4:2 (1974), 165–185.
18. Conolley, E.S., Knight, G.P., Anderson's personality-trait words: Has their likableness changed?. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2:3 (1976), 303–306.
19. Diener, E., Lucas, R.E., Scollon, C.N., Beyond the hedonic treadmill: Revising the adaptation theory of well-being. American Psychologist 61:4 (2006), 305–314.
20. Dumas, J.E., Johnson, M., Lynch, A.M., Likableness, familiarity, and frequency of 844 person-descriptive words. Personality and Individual Differences 32:3 (2002), 523–531.
21. Forgas, J.P., On being happy and mistaken: Mood effects on the fundamental attribution error. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 75:2 (1998), 318–331.
22. Foster, E.K., Research on gossip: Taxonomy, methods, and future directions. Review of General Psychology, 8(2), 2004, 78.
23. Hartigan, J.A., Hartigan, P.M., The dip test of unimodality. The Annals of Statistics 13:1 (1985), 70–84.
24. Higgins, E.T., Rholes, W.S., Jones, C.R., Category accessibility and impression formation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 13:2 (1977), 141–154.
25. Holm, S., A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 6:2 (1979), 65–70.
26. John, O.P., Angleitner, A., Ostendorf, F., The lexical approach to personality: A historical review of trait taxonomic research. European Journal of Personality 2:3 (1988), 171–203.
27. John, O.P., Srivastava, S., The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research 2:1999 (1999), 102–138.
28. Kelly, G.A., A brief introduction to personal construct theory. Fransella, F., (eds.) International handbook of personal construct psychology, 2003, John Wiley & Sons Ltd, New York, 3–20.
29. Kloumann, I.M., Danforth, C.M., Harris, K.D., Bliss, C.A., Dodds, P.S., Positivity of the English language. PLoS ONE, 7(1), 2012, e29484.
30. Larrick, Debiasing. Koehler, D.J., Harvey, N., (eds.) Blackwell handbook of judgment and decision making, 2004, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 316–338.
31. Leising, D., Ostrovski, O., Borkenau, P., Vocabulary for describing disliked persons is more differentiated than vocabulary for describing liked persons. Journal of Research in Personality 46:4 (2012), 393–396.
32. Leising, D., Scharloth, J., Lohse, O., Wood, D., What types of terms do people use when describing an individual's personality?. Psychological Science 25:9 (2014), 1787–1794.
33. Markus, H., Self-schemata and processing information about the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 35:2 (1977), 63–78.
34. McKillip, J., Comment on “Anderson's personality trait words: Has their meaning changed?”. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 4:2 (1978), 289–291.
35. Moretti, M.M., Higgins, E.T., Relating self-discrepancy to self-esteem: The contribution of discrepancy beyond actual-self ratings. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 26:2 (1990), 108–123.
36. Murphy, S.T., Zajonc, R.B., Affect, cognition, and awareness: Affective priming with optimal and suboptimal stimulus exposures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 64:5 (1993), 723–739.
37. Peterson, C., A primer in positive psychology. 2006, Oxford University Press.
38. Pizarro, D., Uhlmann, E., Salovey, P., Asymmetry in judgments of moral blame and praise the role of perceived metadesires. Psychological Science 14:3 (2003), 267–272.
39. Rosenthal, R., Rosnow, R.L., Rubin, D.B., Contrasts and effect sizes in behavioral research: A correlational approach. 2000, Cambridge University Press, New York.
40. Rosnow, R.L., Rosenthal, R., Statistical procedures and the justification of knowledge in psychological science. American Psychologist 44 (1989), 1276–1284.
41. Rozin, P., Royzman, E.B., Negativity bias, negativity dominance, and contagion. Personality and Social Psychology Review 5:4 (2001), 296–320.
42. Schmidt, S., Shall we really do it again? The powerful concept of replication is neglected in the social sciences. Review of General Psychology, 13(2), 2009, 90.
43. Schwarz, N., Situated cognition and the wisdom of feelings: Cognitive tuning. Feldman Barrett, L., Salovey, P., (eds.) The wisdom in feelings, 2002, Guilford, New York, 144–166.
44. Seligman, M.E., Csikszentmihalyi, M., Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist 55:1 (2000), 5–14.
45. Silberzahn, R., Uhlmann, E.L., Crowdsourced research: Many hands make tight work. Nature, 526(7572), 2015, 189.
46. Stroebe, W., Strack, F., The alleged crisis and the illusion of exact replication. Perspectives on Psychological Science 9:1 (2014), 59–71.
47. Twenge, J.M., Changes in masculine and feminine traits over time: A meta-analysis. Sex Roles 36 (1997), 305–325.
48. Unkelbach, C., Fiedler, K., Bayer, M., Stegmüller, M., Danner, D., Why positive information is processed faster: The density hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 95 (2008), 36–49.