Continuous Positive Airway Pressure: To Bubble or Not to Bubble?

Clinics in Perinatology

Volumn 43, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 647-659

  Gupta, Samir ^a   Donn, Steven M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF NORTH TEES   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

Bubble CPAP; Continuous positive airway pressure, CPAP; Respiratory support; Ventilation

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL VENTILATION; ASSISTED VENTILATION; BREATHING RATE; BUBBLE CONTINUOUS POSITIVE AIRWAY PRESSURE; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CPAP DEVICE; DISEASE CONTROL; EXTUBATION; HUMAN; NASAL INTERFERENCE; NOSE INJURY; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT MONITORING; PHYSICAL PARAMETERS; POSITIVE END EXPIRATORY PRESSURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; REVIEW; VENTILATOR WEANING; NEONATAL RESPIRATORY DISTRESS SYNDROME; NEWBORN; PREMATURITY; PROCEDURES;

CONTINUOUS POSITIVE AIRWAY PRESSURE; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; INFANT, PREMATURE; RESPIRATORY DISTRESS SYNDROME, NEWBORN;

EID: 84995701613     PISSN: 00955108     EISSN: 15579840     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.clp.2016.07.003     Document Type: Review

References (41)

1. 1 Gregory, G.A., Kitterman, J.A., Phibbs, R.H., et al. Treatment of the idiopathic respiratory-distress syndrome with continuous positive airway pressure. N Engl J Med 284 (1971), 1333–1340.
2. 2 Gupta, S., Donn, S.M., Continuous positive airway pressure: physiology and comparison of devices. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 21:3 (2016), 204–211.
3. 3 De Paoli, A.G., Morley, C., Davis, P.G., Nasal CPAP for neonates: what do we know in 2003?. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 88 (2003), F168–F172.
4. 4 Martin, S., Duke, T., Davis, P., Efficacy and safety of bubble CPAP in neonatal care in low and middle income countries: a systematic review. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 99 (2014), F495–F504.
5. 5 Poli, J.A., Richardson, C.P., DiBlasi, R.M., Volume oscillations delivered to a lung model using 4 different bubble CPAP systems. Respir Care 60 (2015), 371–381.
6. 6 Lee, K.S., Dunn, M.S., Fenwick, M., et al. A comparison of underwater bubble continuous positive airway pressure with ventilator-derived continuous positive airway pressure in premature neonates ready for extubation. Biol Neonate 73 (1998), 69–75.
7. 7 Morley, C.J., Lau, R., De Paoli, A., et al. Nasal continuous positive airway pressure: does bubbling improve gas exchange?. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 90 (2005), F343–F344.
8. 8 Pillow, J.J., Travadi, J.N., Bubble CPAP: is the noise important? An in vitro study. Pediatr Res 57 (2005), 826–830.
9. 9 Pillow, J.J., Hillman, N., Moss, T.J., et al. Bubble continuous positive airway pressure enhances lung volume and gas exchange in preterm lambs. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 176 (2007), 63–69.
10. 10 Wu, C.S., Chou, H.C., Huang, L.T., et al. Bubble CPAP support after discontinuation of mechanical ventilation protects rat lungs with ventilator-induced lung injury. Respiration 91 (2016), 171–179.
11. 11 Bailes, S.A., Firestone, K.S., Dunn, D.K., et al. Evaluating the effect of flow and interface type on pressures delivered with bubble CPAP in a simulated model. Respir Care 61 (2016), 333–339.
12. 12 Murki, S., Das, R.K., Sharma, D., et al. A fixed flow is more effective than titrated flow during bubble nasal CPAP for respiratory distress in preterm neonates. Front Pediatr, 3, 2015, 81.
13. 13 Roberts, C.T., Kortekaas, R., Dawson, J.A., et al. The effects of non-invasive respiratory support on oropharyngeal temperature and humidity: a neonatal manikin study. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 101 (2016), F248–F252.
14. 14 Tyagi, P., Gupta, N., Jain, A., et al. Intra-gastric pressures in neonates receiving bubble CPAP. Indian J Pediatr 82 (2015), 131–135.
15. 15 Davis, P., Davies, M., Faber, B., A randomised controlled trial of two methods of delivering nasal continuous positive airway pressure after extubation to infants weighing less than 1000 g: binasal (Hudson) versus single nasal prongs. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 85 (2001), F82–F85.
16. 16 Bushell, T., McHugh, C., Meyer, M.P., A comparison of two nasal continuous positive airway pressure interfaces–a randomized crossover study. J Neonatal Perinatal Med 6 (2013), 53–59.
17. 17 Kieran, E.A., Twomey, A.R., Molloy, E.J., et al. Randomized trial of prongs or mask for nasal continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants. Pediatrics, 130, 2012 e1170–6.
18. 18 Youngquist, T.M., Richardson, C.P., Diblasi, R.M., Effects of condensate in the exhalation limb of neonatal circuits on airway pressure during bubble CPAP. Respir Care 58 (2013), 1840–1846.
19. 19 Wu, C.S., Lee, C.M., Yuh, Y.S., et al. Influence of changing the diameter of the bubble generator bottle and expiratory limb on bubble CPAP: an in vitro study. Pediatr Neonatol 53 (2012), 359–365.
20. 20 Diblasi, R.M., Zignego, J.C., Smith, C.V., et al. Effective gas exchange in paralyzed juvenile rabbits using simple, inexpensive respiratory support devices. Pediatr Res 68 (2010), 526–530.
21. 21 Diblasi, R.M., Zignego, J.C., Tang, D.M., et al. Noninvasive respiratory support of juvenile rabbits by high-amplitude bubble continuous positive airway pressure. Pediatr Res 67 (2010), 624–629.
22. 22 De Paoli, A.G., Lau, R., Davis, P.G., et al. Pharyngeal pressure in preterm infants receiving nasal continuous positive airway pressure. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 90 (2005), F79–F81.
23. 23 Todd, D.A., Wright, A., Broom, M., et al. Methods of weaning preterm babies <30 weeks gestation off CPAP: a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 97 (2012), F236–F240.
24. 24 Davis, P.G., Morley, C.J., Owen, L.S., Non-invasive respiratory support of preterm neonates with respiratory distress: continuous positive airway pressure and nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 14 (2009), 14–20.
25. 25 Sandri, F., Plavka, R., Simeoni, U., The CURPAP study: an international randomized controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of combining prophylactic surfactant and early nasal continuous positive airway pressure in very preterm infants. Neonatology 94 (2008), 60–62.
26. 26 Narendran, V., Donovan, E.F., Hoath, S.B., et al. Early bubble CPAP and outcomes in ELBW preterm infants. J Perinatol 23 (2003), 195–199.
27. 27 Pelligra, P., Abdellatif, M., Lee, S.K., Comparison of clinical outcomes between two modes of CPAP delivery: underwater bubble versus conventional ventilator-derived. E-PAS, 59, 2006, 475.
28. 28 Massaro, A.N., Abdel-Haq, I., Aly, H.Z., Underwater seal bubble CPAP versus ventilator-derived CPAP: does mode of delivery make a difference in clinical outcome?. PAS, 57, 2005, 2053.
29. 29 Mazzella, M., Bellini, C., Calevo, M.G., et al. A randomised control study comparing the Infant Flow Driver with nasal continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 85 (2001), F86–F90.
30. 30 McEvoy, C.T., Colaizy, T., Crichton, C., et al. Randomized trial of early bubble continuous positive airway pressure (BCPAP) versus conventional CPAP (CCPAP): effect on pulmonary function in preterm infants. PAS, 55, 2004, 2988.
31. 31 Tagare, A., Kadam, S., Vaidya, U., et al. Bubble CPAP versus ventilator CPAP in preterm neonates with early onset respiratory distress–a randomized controlled trial. J Trop Pediatr 59 (2013), 113–119.
32. 32 Hosseini, M.B., Heidarzadeh, M., Balila, M., et al. Randomized controlled trial of two methods of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (N-CPAP) in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome: underwater bubbly CPAP vs. Medijet system device. Turk J Pediatr 54 (2012), 632–640.
33. 33 Yagui, A.C., Vale, L.A., Haddad, L.B., et al. Bubble CPAP versus CPAP with variable flow in newborns with respiratory distress: a randomized controlled trial. J Pediatr (Rio J) 87 (2011), 499–504.
34. 34 Mazmanyan, P., Mellor, K., Dore, C.J., et al. A randomised controlled trial of flow driver and bubble continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants in a resource-limited setting. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 101 (2016), F16–F20.
35. 35 Bhatti, A., Khan, J., Murki, S., et al. Nasal Jet-CPAP (variable flow) versus Bubble-CPAP in preterm infants with respiratory distress: an open label, randomized controlled trial. J Perinatol 35 (2015), 935–940.
36. 36 Sadeghnia, A., Barekateyn, B., Badiei, Z., et al. Analysis and comparison of the effects of N-BiPAP and Bubble-CPAP in treatment of preterm newborns with the weight of below 1500 grams affiliated with respiratory distress syndrome: a randomised clinical trial. Adv Biomed Res, 5, 2016, 3.
37. 37 Sun, S.C., Tien, H.C., Banabas, S., Randomise controlled trial of two methods of nasal CPAP (NCPAP): flow driver vs onventional CPAP [abstract 1898]. Pediatr Res, 45, 1999, 322A 1999.vvbb.
38. 38 Stefanescu, B.M., Murphy, W.P., Hansell, B.J., et al. A randomized, controlled trial comparing two different continuous positive airway pressure systems for the successful extubation of extremely low birth weight infants. Pediatrics 112 (2003), 1031–1038.
39. 39 De Paoli, A.G., Davis, P.G., Faber, B., et al. Devices and pressure sources for administration of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) in preterm neonates. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 23, 2008 CD002977.
40. 40 Gupta, S., Sinha, S.K., Tin, W., et al. A randomized controlled trial of post-extubation bubble continuous positive airway pressure versus Infant Flow Driver continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome. J Pediatr 154:5 (2009), 645–650.
41. 41 Wilson, B.J. Jr., Becker, M.A., Linton, M.E., et al. Spontaneous minute ventilation predicts readiness for extubation in mechanically ventilated preterm infants. Journal of Perinatology 18:6 (1998), 436–439.