Nasal Jet-CPAP (variable flow) versus Bubble-CPAP in preterm infants with respiratory distress: An open label, randomized controlled trial

Journal of Perinatology

Volumn 35, Issue 11, 2015, Pages 935-940

  Bhatti, A ^a   Khan, J ^b   Murki, S ^b   Sundaram, V ^a   Saini, S S ^a   Kumar, P ^a  

^a POSTGRADUATE INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL EDUCATION AND RESEARCH   (India)

^b Fernandez Hospital   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL LUNG SURFACTANT; OXYGEN;

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CPAP DEVICE; FEMALE; HUMAN; LUNG DYSPLASIA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; NECROTIZING ENTEROCOLITIS; NEWBORN; NEWBORN DEATH; NEWBORN SEPSIS; OPEN STUDY; POSITIVE END EXPIRATORY PRESSURE; PREMATURITY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RESPIRATORY DISTRESS; TREATMENT DURATION; TREATMENT FAILURE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; DEVICES; FOLLOW UP; GESTATIONAL AGE; HOSPITAL MORTALITY; INDIA; LUNG FUNCTION TEST; MORTALITY; NEWBORN INTENSIVE CARE; PREGNANCY; PROCEDURES; RESPIRATORY DISTRESS SYNDROME, NEWBORN; RISK ASSESSMENT; SURVIVAL RATE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; CONTINUOUS POSITIVE AIRWAY PRESSURE; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GESTATIONAL AGE; HOSPITAL MORTALITY; HUMANS; INDIA; INFANT, NEWBORN; INFANT, PREMATURE; INTENSIVE CARE UNITS, NEONATAL; OXYGEN; PREGNANCY; RESPIRATORY DISTRESS SYNDROME, NEWBORN; RESPIRATORY FUNCTION TESTS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SURVIVAL RATE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84945463207     PISSN: 07438346     EISSN: 14765543     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/jp.2015.98     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Gregory GA, Kitterman JA, Phibbs RH, Tooley WH, Hamilton WK. Treatment of the idiopathic respiratory-distress syndrome with continuous positive airway pressure. N Engl J Med. 1971; 284(24): 1333-1340.
2. Finer NN, Carlo WA, Walsh MC, Rich W, Gantz MG, Laptook AR., et al. Early CPAP versus surfactant in extremely preterm infants. N Engl J Med. 2010; 362(21): 1970-1979.
3. Dunn MS, Kaempf J, de Klerk A, de Klerk R, Reilly M, Howard D., et al. Randomized trial comparing 3 approaches to the initial respiratory management of preterm neonates. Pediatrics. 2011; 128(5): e1069-e1076.
4. De Paoli AG, Davis PG, Faber B, Morley CJ. Devices and pressure sources for administration of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) in preterm neonates. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008, Issue 1. Art No.: CD002977. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002977.pub2.
5. Benveniste D, Pedersen JE. A valve substitute with no moving parts, for artificial ventilation in newborn and small infants. Br J Anaesth. 1968; 40(6): 464-470.
6. Theilade D. Nasal CPAP employing a jet device for creating positive pressure. Intensive Care Med. 1978; 4(3): 145-148.
7. Klausner JF, Lee AY, Hutchison AA. Decreased imposed work with a new nasal continuous positive airway pressure device. Pediatr Pulmonol. 1996; 22(3): 188-194.
8. Pandit PB, Courtney SE, Pyon KH, Saslow JG, Habib RH. Work of breathing during constant- And variable-flow nasal continuous positive airway pressure in preterm neonates. Pediatrics. 2001; 108(3): 682-685.
9. Mazzella M, Bellini C, Calevo MG, Campone F, Massocco D, Mezzano P., et al. A randomised control study comparing the Infant Flow Driver with nasal continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2001; 85(2): F86-F90.
10. Liptsen E, Aghai ZH, Pyon KH, Saslow JG, Nakhla T, Long J., et al. Work of breathing during nasal continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants: a comparison of bubble vs variable-flow devices. J Perinatol. 2005; 25(7): 453-458.
11. Ahluwalia JS, White DK, Morley CJ. Infant Flow Driver or single prong nasal continuous positive airway pressure: short-Term physiological effects. Acta Paediatr. 1998; 87(3): 325-327.
12. Wald M, Kribs A, Jeitler V, Lirsch D, Pollak A, Kirchner L. Variety of expiratory resistance between different continuous positive airway pressure devices for preterm infants. Artif Organs. 2011; 35(1): 22-28.
13. Bober K, Swietlinski J, Zejda J, Kornacka K, Pawlik D, Behrendt J., et al. A multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing effectiveness of two nasal continuous positive airway pressure devices in very low birth weight infants. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2012; 13: 191-196.
14. Jaile JC, Levin T, Wung JT, Abramson SJ, Ruzal-Shapiro C, Berdon WE. Benign gaseous distension of the bowel in premature infants treated with nasal continuous airway pressure: a study of contributing factors. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1992; 158(1): 125-127.
15. Richardson DK, Corcoran JD, Escobar GJ, Lee SK. SNAP-II and SNAPPE-II: simplified newborn illness severity and mortality risk scores. J Pediatr. 2001; 138 (1): 92-100.
16. Downes JJ, Vidyasagar D, Boggs TR Jr, Morrow GM 3rd. Respiratory distress syndrome of newborn infants. I. New clinical scoring system (RDS score) with acid-base and blood-gas correlations. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 1970; 9: 325-331.
17. Gupta S, Sinha SK, Tin W, Donn SM. A randomized controlled trial of post-extubation bubble continuous positive airway pressure versus Infant Flow Driver continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome. J Pediatr. 2009; 154(5): 645-650.
18. Koti J, Murki S, Gaddam P, Reddy A, Reddy MD. Bubble CPAP for respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants. Indian Pediatr. 2010; 47(2): 139-143.
19. Yagui AC, Vale LA, Haddad LB, Prado C, Rossi FS, Deutsch AD., et al. Bubble CPAP versus CPAP with variable flow in newborns with respiratory distress: a randomized controlled trial. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2011; 87(6): 499-504.
20. Stefanescu B, Murphy WP, Hansell BJ, Fuloria M, Morgan TM, Aschner JL. A randomized, controlled trial comparing two different continuous positive airway pressure systems for the successful extubation of extremely low birth weight infants. Pediatrics. 2003; 112: 1031-1038.
21. Pillow JJ, Travadi JN. Bubble CPAP: is the noise important? An in vitro study. Pediatr Res. 2005; 57(6): 826-830.