The effects of non-invasive respiratory support on oropharyngeal temperature and humidity: A neonatal manikin study

Archives of Disease in Childhood: Fetal and Neonatal Edition

Volumn 101, Issue 3, 2016, Pages F248-F252

  Roberts, Calum T ^a,b   Kortekaas, Rebecca ^a,c   Dawson, Jennifer A ^a,b,d   Manley, Brett J ^a,d   Owen, Louise S ^a,b,d   Davis, Peter G ^a,b,d  

^a ROYAL WOMEN'S HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^c LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^d MURDOCH CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREATHING CIRCUIT; CPAP DEVICE; HUMIDITY; MANIKIN; NEONATAL INCUBATOR; NON INVASIVE PROCEDURE; OROPHARYNGEAL HUMIDITY; OROPHARYNGEAL TEMPERATURE; OROPHARYNX; POSITIVE END EXPIRATORY PRESSURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPIRATORY GAS HUMIDIFIER; STEADY STATE; TEMPERATURE; TEMPERATURE MEASUREMENT; BODY TEMPERATURE; DEVICES; HUMAN; NEWBORN; NONINVASIVE VENTILATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES;

BODY TEMPERATURE; CONTINUOUS POSITIVE AIRWAY PRESSURE; HUMANS; HUMIDITY; INFANT, NEWBORN; MANIKINS; NONINVASIVE VENTILATION; OROPHARYNX;

EID: 84941695924     PISSN: 13592998     EISSN: 14682052     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2015-308991     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Dawson JA, Owen LS, Middleburgh R, et al. Quantifying temperature and relative humidity of medical gases used for newborn resuscitation. J Paediatr Child Health 2014;50:24-6.
2. Sleigh MA, Blake JR, Liron N. The propulsion of mucus by cilia. Am Rev Respir Dis 1988;137:726-41.
3. Konrad F, Schiener R, Marx T, et al. Ultrastructure and mucociliary transport of bronchial respiratory epithelium in intubated patients. Intensive Care Med 1995;21:482-9.
4. Hirsch JA, Tokayer JL, Robinson MJ, et al. Effects of dry air and subsequent humidification on tracheal mucous velocity in dogs. J Appl Physiol 1975;39:242-6.
5. Noguchi H, Takumi Y, Aochi O. A study of humidification in tracheostomized dogs. Br J Anaesth 1973;45:844-8.
6. Sottiaux TM. Consequences of under- and over-humidification. Respir Care Clin N Am 2006;12:233-52.
7. Stone DR, Downs JB, Paul WL, et al. Adult body temperature and heated humidification of anesthetic gases during general anesthesia. Anesth Analg 1981;60:736-41.
8. Bickler PE, Sessler DI. Efficiency of airway heat and moisture exchangers in anesthetized humans. Anesth Analg 1990;71:415-18.
9. Bissonnette B, Sessler DI. Passive or active inspired gas humidification increases thermal steady-state temperatures in anesthetized infants. Anesth Analg 1989;69:783-7.
10. Massie CA, Hart RW, Peralez K, et al. Effects of humidification on nasal symptoms and compliance in sleep apnea patients using continuous positive airway pressure. Chest 1999;116:403-8.
11. Martins De Araujo MT, Vieira SB, Vasquez EC, et al. Heated humidification or face mask to prevent upper airway dryness during continuous positive airway pressure therapy. Chest 2000;117:142-7.
12. te Pas AB, Lopriore E, Dito I, et al. Humidified and heated air during stabilization at birth improves temperature in preterm infants. Pediatrics 2010;125:e1427-32.
13. Chow SSW. Report of the Australian and New Zealand Neonatal Network 2012. Sydney: ANZNN, 2014.
14. Ingelstedt S. Studies on the conditioning of air in the respiratory tract. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 1956;131:1-80.
15. McFadden ER Jr. Heat and water exchange in human airways. Am Rev Respir Dis 1992;146:S8-10.
16. Instruction manual Testo 625. Testo AG, Lenzkirch, Germany. 2006. Available from: https://www.testo.com/product/0563+6251/testo-625-Thermohygrometer
17. International Organization for Standardization. International Organization for Standardization: Respiratory tract humidifiers for medical use. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO Central Secretariat, 1 ch de la Vole-Creuse, CP 56, CH-1211, 2007.
18. Dysart K, Miller TL, Wolfson MR, et al. Research in high flow therapy: mechanisms of action. Respir Med 2009;103:1400-5.
19. Waugh JB, Granger WM. An evaluation of 2 new devices for nasal high-flow gas therapy. Respir Care 2004;49:902-6.