Erratum: Mapping intracellular mechanics on micropatterned substrates (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (2016) 13 (E7159–E7168) DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1605112113);Mapping intracellular mechanics on micropatterned substrates

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 113, Issue 46, 2016, Pages E7159-E7168

  Mandal, Kalpana ^a,b,c   Asnacios, Atef ^d   Goud, Bruno ^a,c   Manneville, Jean Baptiste ^a,b  

^a INSTITUT CURIE   (France)

^b CNRS   (France)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DIDEROT   (France)

Author keywords

Cancer; Cytoskeleton; Microrheology; Optical tweezers; Viscoelasticity

Indexed keywords

ACTIN; ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE; BREFELDIN A; CYTOCHALASIN D; G ACTIN; LATRUNCULIN A;

ARTICLE; CANCER CELL; CANCER GROWTH; CELL NUCLEUS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTOPLASM; CYTOSKELETON; ENDOSOME; FLOW KINETICS; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; INTRACELLULAR MEMBRANE; LYSOSOME; MECHANICS; MICROENVIRONMENT; MICROTUBULE; OPTICAL TWEEZERS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VISCOELASTICITY; VISCOSITY; YOUNG MODULUS; CELL FUNCTION; CELL LINE; ELASTICITY; NEOPLASM; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; TUMOR CELL LINE;

ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE; CELL LINE; CELL LINE, TUMOR; CELL PHYSIOLOGICAL PHENOMENA; CYTOSKELETON; ELASTICITY; HUMANS; INTRACELLULAR MEMBRANES; NEOPLASMS; OPTICAL TWEEZERS; RHEOLOGY; VISCOSITY;

EID: 84995551032     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1809757115     Document Type: Erratum

References (65)

1. Guillot C, Lecuit T (2013) Mechanics of epithelial tissue homeostasis and morphogenesis. Science 340(6137):1185-1189.
2. Lange JR, Fabry B (2013) Cell and tissue mechanics in cell migration. Exp Cell Res 319(16):2418-2423.
3. Louveaux M, Hamant O (2013) The mechanics behind cell division. Curr Opin Plant Biol 16(6):774-779.
4. Vedula SRK, Ravasio A, Lim CT, Ladoux B (2013) Collective cell migration: A mechanistic perspective. Physiology (Bethesda) 28(6):370-379.
5. Asnacios A, Hamant O (2012) The mechanics behind cell polarity. Trends Cell Biol 22(11):584-591.
6. Li Y, Schnekenburger J, Duits MHG (2009) Intracellular particle tracking as a tool for tumor cell characterization. J Biomed Opt 14(6):064005.
7. Baker EL, Lu J, Yu D, Bonnecaze RT, Zaman MH (2010) Cancer cell stiffness: Integrated roles of three-dimensional matrix stiffness and transforming potential. Biophys J 99(7):2048-2057.
8. Guo M, et al. (2014) Probing the stochastic, motor-driven properties of the cytoplasm using force spectrum microscopy. Cell 158(4):822-832.
9. Agus DB, et al.; Physical Sciences-Oncology Centers Network (2013) A physical sciences network characterization of non-tumorigenic and metastatic cells. Sci Rep 3:1449.
10. Huber F, Boire A, López MP, Koenderink GH (2015) Cytoskeletal crosstalk: When three different personalities team up. Curr Opin Cell Biol 32:39-47.
11. Wen Q, Janmey PA (2011) Polymer physics of the cytoskeleton. Curr Opin Solid State Mater Sci 15(5):177-182.
12. Coughlin MF, Fredberg JJ (2013) Changes in cytoskeletal dynamics and nonlinear rheology with metastatic ability in cancer cell lines. Phys Biol 10(6):065001.
13. Laudadio RE, et al. (2005) Rat airway smooth muscle cell during actin modulation: Rheology and glassy dynamics. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 289(6):C1388-C1395.
14. Halaoui R, McCaffrey L (2015) Rewiring cell polarity signaling in cancer. Oncogene 34(8):939-950.
15. Goldenring JR (2013) A central role for vesicle trafficking in epithelial neoplasia: Intracellular highways to carcinogenesis. Nat Rev Cancer 13(11):813-820.
16. Zegers MM, Friedl P (2014) Rho GTPases in collective cell migration. Small GTPases 5:e28997.
17. Crocker JC, Hoffman BD (2007) Multiple-particle tracking and two-point microrheology in cells. Methods Cell Biol 83(07):141-178.
18. Weihs D, Mason TG, Teitell MA (2006) Bio-microrheology: A frontier in microrheology. Biophys J 91(11):4296-4305.
19. Bausch AR, Möller W, Sackmann E (1999) Measurement of local viscoelasticity and forces in living cells by magnetic tweezers. Biophys J 76(1 Pt 1):573-579.
20. Broedersz CP, et al. (2010) Measurement of nonlinear rheology of cross-linked biopolymer gels. Soft Matter 6(17):4120-4127.
21. Almonacid M, et al. (2015) Active diffusion positions the nucleus in mouse oocytes. Nat Cell Biol 17(4):470-479.
22. Berret J-F (2016) Local viscoelasticity of living cells measured by rotational magnetic spectroscopy. Nat Commun 7:10134.
23. Kasza KE, et al. (2007) The cell as a material. Curr Opin Cell Biol 19(1):101-107.
24. Stamenović D (2008) Rheological behavior of mammalian cells. Cell Mol Life Sci 65(22):3592-3605.
25. Lim CT, Zhou EH, Quek ST (2006) Mechanical models for living cells-a review. J Biomech 39(2):195-216.
26. Pritchard RH, Huang YYS, Terentjev EM (2014) Mechanics of biological networks: From the cell cytoskeleton to connective tissue. Soft Matter 10(12):1864-1884.
27. Fabry B, et al. (2001) Scaling the microrheology of living cells. Phys Rev Lett 87(14): 148102.
28. Cai P, et al. (2013) Quantifying cell-to-cell variation in power-law rheology. Biophys J 105(5):1093-1102.
29. Balland M, et al. (2006) Power laws in microrheology experiments on living cells: Comparative analysis and modeling. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys 74(2 Pt 1): 021911.
30. Durand-Smet P, et al. (2014) A comparative mechanical analysis of plant and animal cells reveals convergence across kingdoms. Biophys J 107(10):2237-2244.
31. Hoffman BD, Massiera G, Van Citters KM, Crocker JC (2006) The consensus mechanics of cultured mammalian cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103(27):10259-10264.
32. Guo M, et al. (2013) The role of vimentin intermediate filaments in cortical and cytoplasmic mechanics. Biophys J 105(7):1562-1568.
33. Tseng Y, Kole TP, Wirtz D (2002) Micromechanical mapping of live cells by multipleparticle-tracking microrheology. Biophys J 83(6):3162-3176.
34. Hecht FM, et al. (2015) Imaging viscoelastic properties of live cells by AFM: Power-law rheology on the nanoscale. Soft Matter 11(23):4584-4591.
35. Daniels BR, et al. (2010) Differences in the microrheology of human embryonic stem cells and human induced pluripotent stem cells. Biophys J 99(11):3563-3570.
36. Guet D, et al. (2014) Mechanical role of actin dynamics in the rheology of the Golgi complex and in Golgi-associated trafficking events. Curr Biol 24(15):1700-1711.
37. Rigato A, Rico F, Eghiaian F, Piel M, Scheuring S (2015) Atomic force microscopy mechanical mapping of micropatterned cells shows adhesion geometry-dependent mechanical response on local and global scales. ACS Nano 9(6):5846-5856.
38. Park CY, et al. (2010) Mapping the cytoskeletal prestress. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 298(5):C1245-C1252.
39. Mandal K, Wang I, Vitiello E, Orellana LAC, Balland M (2014) Cell dipole behaviour revealed by ECM sub-cellular geometry. Nat Commun 5:5749.
40. Schauer K, et al. (2010) Probabilistic density maps to study global endomembrane organization. Nat Methods 7(7):560-566.
41. Chan CJ, et al. (2015) Myosin II activity softens cells in suspension. Biophys J 108(8): 1856-1869.
42. Desprat N, Richert A, Simeon J, Asnacios A (2005) Creep function of a single living cell. Biophys J 88(3):2224-2233.
43. Théry M, et al. (2006) Anisotropy of cell adhesive microenvironment governs cell internal organization and orientation of polarity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103(52): 19771-19776.
44. Van Citters KM, Hoffman BD, Massiera G, Crocker JC (2006) The role of F-actin and myosin in epithelial cell rheology. Biophys J 91(10):3946-3956.
45. Bursac P, et al. (2005) Cytoskeletal remodelling and slow dynamics in the living cell. Nat Mater 4(7):557-561.
46. Wakatsuki T, Schwab B, Thompson NC, Elson EL (2001) Effects of cytochalasin D and latrunculin B on mechanical properties of cells. J Cell Sci 114(Pt 5):1025-1036.
47. Wilhelm C, Gazeau F, Bacri J-C (2003) Rotational magnetic endosome microrheology: Viscoelastic architecture inside living cells. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys 67(6 Pt 1):061908.
48. Cooper JA, Sept D (2008) New insights into mechanism and regulation of actin capping protein. Int Rev Cell Mol Biol 267:183-206.
49. Lippincott-Schwartz J, Yuan LC, Bonifacino JS, Klausner RD (1989) Rapid redistribution of Golgi proteins into the ER in cells treated with brefeldin A: Evidence for membrane cycling from Golgi to ER. Cell 56(5):801-813.
50. Lippincott-Schwartz J, et al. (1991) Brefeldin A's effects on endosomes, lysosomes, and the TGN suggest a general mechanism for regulating organelle structure and membrane traffic. Cell 67(3):601-616.
51. Guck J, et al. (2005) Optical deformability as an inherent cell marker for testing malignant transformation and metastatic competence. Biophys J 88(5):3689-3698.
52. Mandadapu KK, Govindjee S, Mofrad MRK (2008) On the cytoskeleton and soft glassy rheology. J Biomech 41(7):1467-1478.
53. Moeendarbary E, et al. (2013) The cytoplasm of living cells behaves as a poroelastic material. Nat Mater 12(3):253-261.
54. Ingber DE, Wang N, Stamenovic D (2014) Tensegrity, cellular biophysics, and the mechanics of living systems. Rep Prog Phys 77(4):046603.
55. Nakamura N, et al. (1995) Characterization of a cis-Golgi matrix protein, GM130. J Cell Biol 131(6 Pt 2):1715-1726.
56. Hendricks LC, McClanahan SL, McCaffery M, Palade GE, Farquhar MG (1992) Golgi proteins persist in the tubulovesicular remnants found in brefeldin A-treated pancreatic acinar cells. Eur J Cell Biol 58(2):202-213.
57. Tee YH, et al. (2015) Cellular chirality arising from the self-organization of the actin cytoskeleton. Nat Cell Biol 17(4):445-457.
58. Köster S, Weitz DA, Goldman RD, Aebi U, Herrmann H (2015) Intermediate filament mechanics in vitro and in the cell: From coiled coils to filaments, fibers and networks. Curr Opin Cell Biol 32:82-91.
59. Dupin I, Sakamoto Y, Etienne-Manneville S (2011) Cytoplasmic intermediate filaments mediate actin-driven positioning of the nucleus. J Cell Sci 124(Pt 6):865-872.
60. Gurland G, Gundersen GG (1995) Stable, detyrosinated microtubules function to localize vimentin intermediate filaments in fibroblasts. J Cell Biol 131(5):1275-1290.
61. Grady ME, Composto RJ, Eckmann DM (2016) Cell elasticity with altered cytoskeletal architectures across multiple cell types. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 61:197-207.
62. Gruenbaum Y, Aebi U (2014) Intermediate filaments: A dynamic network that controls cell mechanics. F1000Prime Rep 6(54):54.
63. Mizuno D, Tardin C, Schmidt CF, Mackintosh FC (2007) Nonequilibrium mechanics of active cytoskeletal networks. Science 315(5810):370-373.
64. Trepat X, et al. (2007) Universal physical responses to stretch in the living cell. Nature 447(7144):592-595.
65. Hale CM, Sun SX, Wirtz D (2009) Resolving the role of actoymyosin contractility in cell microrheology. PLoS One 4(9):e7054.