Cell and tissue mechanics in cell migration

Experimental Cell Research

Volumn 319, Issue 16, 2013, Pages 2418-2423

  Lange, Janina R ^a   Fabry, Ben ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN NUREMBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Acto myosin interaction; Cell mechanics; Cell migration; Hill curve; Mechanotransduction; Tissue mechanics

Indexed keywords

ACTIN MYOSIN INTERACTION; ACTIN POLYMERIZATION; ADHERENT CELL; ANISOTROPY; BRAIN TISSUE; CELL ADHESION; CELL CULTURE; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL FUNCTION; CELL MIGRATION; CELL MOTION; CELL SHAPE; CELL SPREADING; CELL STRESS; CONNECTIVE TISSUE; ENDOCYTOSIS; EPITHELIAL MESENCHYMAL TRANSITION; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; FOCAL ADHESION; MECHANICAL STRESS; MECHANOTRANSDUCTION; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; MUSCLE CELL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN UNFOLDING; REVIEW; SHEAR STRESS; STEREOSPECIFICITY; VISCOSITY; YOUNG MODULUS;

EID: 84883552276     PISSN: 00144827     EISSN: 10902422     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2013.04.023     Document Type: Review

References (46)

1. Kollmannsberger P., Fabry B. Linear and nonlinear rheology of living cells. Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 2011, 41:75-97.
2. Wilson T.A. Time constants may be meaningless in exponentials fit to pressure relaxation data [letter]. J. Appl. Physiol. 1994, 77:1570-1571.
3. Hildebrandt J. Comparison of mathematical models for cat lung and viscoelastic balloon derived by Laplace transform methods from pressure-volume data. Bull. Math. Biophys. 1969, 31:651-667.
4. Fabry B., Maksym G.N., Butler J.P., Glogauer M., Navajas D., Fredberg J.J. Scaling the microrheology of living cells. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2001, 87:148102.
5. Stamenovic D., Rosenblatt N., Montoya-Zavala M., Matthews B.D., Hu S., Suki B., Wang N., Ingber D.E. Rheological behavior of living cells is timescale-dependent. Biophys. J. 2007, 93:L39-41.
6. Gefen A., Margulies S.S. Are in vivo and in situ brain tissues mechanically similar?. J. Biomech. 2004, 37:1339-1352.
7. Stolz M., Raiteri R., Daniels A.U., VanLandingham M.R., Baschong W., Aebi U. Dynamic elastic modulus of porcine articular cartilage determined at two different levels of tissue organization by indentation-type atomic force microscopy. Biophys. J. 2004, 86:3269-3283.
8. Zaman M.H., Trapani L.M., Siemeski A., Mackellar D., Gong H., Kamm R.D., Wells A., Lauffenburger D.A., Matsudaira P. Migration of tumor cells in 3D matrices is governed by matrix stiffness along with cell-matrix adhesion and proteolysis. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2006, 103:10889-10894.
9. Koch T.M., Muenster S., Bonakdar N., Buttler J.P., Fabry B. 3D traction forces in cancer cell invasion. PloS One 2012, 7:e33476.
10. Navajas D., Mijailovich S., Glass G.M., Stamenovic D., Fredberg J.J. Dynamic response of the isolated passive rat diaphragm strip. J. Appl. Physiol. 1992, 73:2681-2692.
11. Kawai M., Brandt P.W. Sinusoidal analysis: a high resolution method for correlating biochemical reactions with physiological processes in activated skeletal muscles of rabbit, frog and crayfish. J. Muscle Res. Cell Motil. 1980, 1:279-303.
12. Fredberg J.J., Jones K.A., Nathan M., Raboudi S., Prakash Y.S., Shore S.A., Butler J.P., Sieck G.C. Friction in airway smooth muscle: mechanism, latch, and implications in asthma. J. Appl. Physiol. 1996, 81:2703-2712.
13. McMahon T.A. Muscles, Reflexes, and Locomotion 1984, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
14. Wang N., Tolic-Norrelykke I.M., Chen J., Mijailovich S.M., Butler J.P., Fredberg J.J., Stamenovic D. Cell prestress. I. Stiffness and prestress are closely associated in adherent contractile cells. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2002, 282:C606-616.
15. Kollmannsberger P., Mierke C.T., Fabry B. Nonlinear viscoelasticity of adherent cells is controlled by cytoskeletal tension. Soft Matter 2011, 3127-3132.
16. Hill A.V. The heat of shortening and the dynamic constants of muscle. Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. B 1938, 126:136-195.
17. Huxley A.F. Muscle structure and theories of contraction. Prog. Biophys. Biophys. Chem. 1957, 7:255-318.
18. Mitrossilis D., Fouchard J., Guiroy A., Desprat N., Rodriguez N., Fabry B., Asnacios A. Single-cell response to stiffness exhibits muscle-like behavior. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2009, 106:18243-18248.
19. Discher D.E., Janmey P., Wang Y.L. Tissue cells feel and respond to the stiffness of their substrate. Science 2005, 310:1139-1143.
20. Pelham R.J., Wang Y. Cell locomotion and focal adhesions are regulated by substrate flexibility. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A 1997, 94:13661-13665.
21. Plotnikov S.V., Pasapera A.M., Sabass B., Waterman C.M. Force fluctuations within focal adhesions mediate ECM-rigidity sensing to guide directed cell migration. Cell 2012, 151:1513-1527.
22. Douezan S., Guevorkian K., Naouar R., Dufour S., Cuvelier D., Brochard-Wyart F. Spreading dynamics and wetting transition of cellular aggregates. Proc. Nat Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2011, 108:7315-7320.
23. Manning M.L., Foty R.A., Steinberg M.S., Schoetz E.M. Coaction of intercellular adhesion and cortical tension specifies tissue surface tension. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2010, 107:12517-12522.
24. DiMilla P.A., Barbee K., Lauffenburger D.A. Mathematical model for the effects of adhesion and mechanics on cell migration speed. Biophys. J. 1991, 60:15-37.
25. Metzner C., Raupach C., Paranhos Zitterbart D., Fabry B. Simple model of cytoskeletal fluctuations. Phys. Rev. E: Stat. Nonlinear Soft Matter Phys. 2007, 76. 021925-021921-021912.
26. Howard J. Mechanics of Motor Proteins and the Cytoskeleton 2001, Sinauer Associates Inc.
27. Sabass B., Gardel M.L., Waterman C.M., Schwarz U.S. High resolution traction force microscopy based on experimental and computational advances. Biophys. J. 2007, 94:207-220.
28. Mohl C., Kirchgessner N., Schafer C., Hoffmann B., Merkel R. Quantitative mapping of averaged focal adhesion dynamics in migrating cells by shape normalization. J. Cell. Sci. 2012, 125:155-165.
29. Trepat X., Wasserman M.R., Angelini T.E., Millet E., Weitz D.A., Butler J.P., Fredberg J.J. Physical forces during collective cell migration. Nat. Phys. 2009, 5:426-430.
30. Angelini T.E., Hannezo E., Trepat X., Marquez M., Fredberg J.J., Weitz D.A. Glass-like dynamics of collective cell migration. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2011, 108:4714-4719.
31. Anon E., Serra-Picamal X., Hersen P., Gauthier N.C., Sheetz M.P., Trepat X., Ladoux B. Cell crawling mediates collective cell migration to close undamaged epithelial gaps. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2012, 109:10891-10896.
32. Tambe D.T., Hardin C.C., Angelini T.E., Rajendran K., Park C.Y., Serra-Picamal X., Zhou E.H., Zaman M.H., Butler J.P., Weitz D.A., Fredberg J.J., Trepat X. Collective cell guidance by cooperative intercellular forces. Nat. Mater. 2011, 10:469-475.
33. Al-Kilani A., de Freitas O., Dufour S., Gallet F. Negative feedback from integrins to cadherins: a micromechanical study. Biophys. J. 2011, 101:336-344.
34. Serra-Picamal X., Conte V., Vincent R., Anon E., Tambe D.T., Bazellieres E., Buttler J.P., Fredberg J.J., Trepat X. Mechanical waves during tissue expansion. Nat. Phys. 2012, 8:628-634.
35. D. Tambe, H. C, F. J, T. X, Collective cell guidance by cooperative intercellular forces, Nature Precedings (2010).
36. Angelini T.E., Hannezo E., Trepat X., Fredberg J.J., Weitz D.A. Cell migration driven by cooperative substrate deformation patterns. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2010, 104:168104.
37. Basan M., Elgeti J., Hannezo E., Rappel W.J., Levine H. Alignment of cellular motility forces with tissue flow as a mechanism for efficient wound healing. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2013, 110:2452-2459.
38. Mertz A.F., Che Y., Banerjee S., Goldstein J.M., Rosowski K.A., Revilla S.F., Niessen C.M., Marchetti M.C., Dufresne E.R., Horsley V. Cadherin-based intercellular adhesions organize epithelial cell-matrix traction forces. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2012, 110:842-847.
39. Levental K.R., Yu H., Kass L., Lakins J.N., Egeblad M., Erler J.T., Fong S.F., Csiszar K., Giaccia A., Weninger W., Yamauchi M., Gasser D.L., Weaver V.M. Matrix crosslinking forces tumor progression by enhancing integrin signaling. Cell 2009, 139:891-906.
40. Paszek M.J., Zahir N., Johnson K.R., Lakins J.N., Rozenberg G.I., Gefen A., Reinhart-King C.A., Margulies S.S., Dembo M., Boettiger D., Hammer D.A., Weaver V.M. Tensional homeostasis and the malignant phenotype. Cancer Cell 2005, 8:241-254.
41. Plopper G.E., McNamee H.P., Dike L.E., Bojanowski K., Ingber D.E. Convergence of integrin and growth factor receptor signaling pathways within the focal adhesion complex. Mol. Biol. Cell 1995, 6:1349-1365.
42. Meyer C.J., Alenghat F.J., Rim P., Fong J.H., Fabry B., Ingber D.E. Mechanical control of cyclic AMP signalling and gene transcription through integrins. Nat. Cell Biol. 2000, 2:666-668.
43. Chen J., Fabry B., Schiffrin E.L., Wang N. Twisting integrin receptors increases endothelin-1 gene expression in endothelial cells. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2001, 280:C1475-1484.
44. Tse J.R., Engler A.J. Stiffness gradients mimicking in vivo tissue variation regulate mesenchymal stem cell fate. PLoS One 2011, 6:e15978.
45. Maloney J.M., Nikova D., Lautenschlager F., Clarke E., Langer R., Guck J., Van Vliet K.J. Mesenchymal stem cell mechanics from the attached to the suspended state. Biophys. J. 2010, 99:2479-2487.
46. Engler A.J., Sen S., Sweeney H.L., Discher D.E. Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell 2006, 126:677-689.