Future planning for benchmarking and ranking sustainable suppliers using goal programming and robust double frontiers DEA

Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment

Volumn 50, Issue , 2017, Pages 129-143

  Shabanpour, Hadi ^a   Yousefi, Saeed ^a   Farzipoor Saen, Reza ^a  

^a ISLAMIC AZAD UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

Author keywords

Benchmarking; Data envelopment analysis; Double frontiers; Efficiency evaluation; Goal programming; Robust DEA; Sustainable suppliers

Indexed keywords

BENCHMARKING; DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; EFFICIENCY; LINEAR PROGRAMMING; OPTIMIZATION;

DOUBLE FRONTIERS; EFFICIENCY EVALUATION; GOAL PROGRAMMING; ROBUST DEA; SUSTAINABLE SUPPLIERS;

MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION;

BENCHMARKING; DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; OPTIMIZATION; SUSTAINABILITY; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

EID: 84995514112     PISSN: 13619209     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.trd.2016.10.022     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Amindoust, A., Ahmed, S., Saghafinia, A., Bahreininejad, A., Sustainable supplier selection: a ranking model based on fuzzy inference system. Appl. Soft Comput. 12:6 (2012), 1668–1677.
2. Andersen, P., Petersen, N.C., A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis. Manage. Sci. 39:10 (1993), 1261–1264.
3. Azadi, M., Farzipoor Saen, R., Developing a new chance-constrained DEA model for suppliers selection in the presence of undesirable outputs. Int. J. Oper. Res. 13:11 (2012), 44–66.
4. Azadi, M., Jafarian, M., Farzipoor Saen, R., Mirhedayatian, S.M., A new fuzzy DEA model for evaluation of efficiency and effectiveness of suppliers in sustainable supply chain management context. Comput. Oper. Res. 54 (2015), 274–285.
5. Bai, C., Sarkis, J., Integrating sustainability into supplier selection with grey system and rough set methodologies. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 124:1 (2010), 252–264.
6. Banker, R., Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Manage. Sci. 30:9 (1984), 1078–1092.
7. Beamon, B.M., Environmental and sustainability ethics in supply chain management. Sci. Eng. Ethics 11:2 (2005), 221–234.
8. Ben-Tal, A., Nemirovski, A., Robust convex optimization. Math. Oper. Res. 23:4 (1998), 769–805.
9. Ben-Tal, A., Nemirovski, A., Robust solutions of uncertain linear programs. Oper. Res. Lett. 25:1 (1999), 1–13.
10. Ben-Tal, A., Nemirovski, A., Robust solutions of linear programming problems contaminated with uncertain data. Math. Program. 88:3 (2000), 411–421.
11. Bertsimas, D., Sim, M., Robust discrete optimization and network flows. Math. Program. Ser. B 98:1–3 (2003), 49–71.
12. Bertsimas, D., Sim, M., The price of robustness. Oper. Res. 52:1 (2004), 35–53.
13. Bertsimas, D., Sim, M., Tractable approximations to robust conic optimization problems. Math. Program. 107:1 (2006), 5–36.
14. Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., Ferguson, R.O., Optimal estimation of executive compensation by linear programming. Manage. Sci. 1:2 (1955), 138–151.
15. Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., Rhodes, E., Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2:6 (1978), 429–444.
16. Chow, W.S., Madu, C.N., Kuei, C.H., Min, H.L., Lin, C., Tseng, H., Supply chain management in the US and Taiwan: an empirical study. Omega 36:5 (2008), 665–679.
17. Dyllick, T., Hockerts, K., Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability. Bus. Strategy Environ. 11:2 (2002), 130–141.
18. El Ghaoui, L., Lebret, H., Robust solutions to least-squares problems with uncertain data. SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl. 18:4 (1997), 1035–1064.
19. Farzipoor Saen, R., Using super-efficiency analysis for ranking suppliers in the presence of volume discount offers. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manage. 38:8 (2008), 637–651.
20. Govindan, K., Khodaverdi, R., Jafarian, A., A fuzzy multi criteria approach for measuring sustainability performance of a supplier based on triple bottom line approach. J. Clean. Prod. 47 (2013), 345–354.
21. Kahraman, C., Cebeci, U., Ulukan, Z., Multi-criteria supplier selection using fuzzy AHP. Logist. Inform. Manage. Syst. 16:6 (2003), 382–394.
22. Kumar, A., Jain, V., Kumar, S.A., A comprehensive environment friendly approach for supplier selection. Omega 42:1 (2014), 109–123.
23. Liao, C.N., Kao, H.P., An integrated fuzzy TOPSIS and MCGP approach to supplier selection in supply chain management. Exp. Syst. Appl. 38:9 (2011), 10803–10811.
24. Likert, R., A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Arch. Psychol. 22:140 (1932), 1–55.
25. Muralidharan, C., Anantharaman, N., Deshmukh, S.G., A multi-criteria group decision-making model for supplier rating. J. Supply Chain Manage. 38:4 (2002), 22–33.
26. Noorizadeh, A., Mahdiloo, M., Farzipoor Saen, R., Evaluating relative value of customers via data envelopment analysis. J. Bus. Ind. Market. 27:7 (2013), 577–588.
27. Önüt, S., Kara, S.S., Işik, E., Long term supplier selection using a combined fuzzy MCDM approach: a case study for a telecommunication company. Exp. Syst. Appl. 36:2 (2009), 3887–3895.
28. Ordoobadi, S.M., Wang, S., A multiple perspectives approach to supplier selection. Ind. Manage. Data Syst. 111:4 (2011), 629–648.
29. Rashidi, K., Shabani, A., Farzipoor Saen, R., Using data envelopment analysis for estimating energy saving and undesirable output abatement: a case study in the Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) countries. J. Clean. Prod. 105 (2015), 241–252.
30. Ratan, S.R.A., Sekhari, A., Rahman, M., Sustainable supply chain management: state-of-the-art. International Conference on Software, Knowledge, Information Management and Applications, Paro, Bhutan, 2010.
31. Romero, C., A general structure of achievement function for a goal programming model. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 153:3 (2004), 675–686.
32. Sadjadi, S.J., Omrani, H., Data envelopment analysis with uncertain data: an application for Iranian electricity distribution companies. Energy Policy 36:11 (2008), 4247–4254.
33. Seuring, S., Müller, M., From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. J. Clean. Prod. 16:15 (2008), 1699–1710.
34. Sexton, T.R., Silkman, R.H., Hogan, A.J., Data envelopment analysis: critique and extensions. Silkman, R.H., (eds.) Measuring Efficiency: An Assessment of Data Envelopment Analysis, vol. 32(1), 1986, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, 73–105.
35. Shabani, A., Farzipoor Saen, R., Torabipour, S.M.R., A new benchmarking approach in cold chain. Appl. Math. Model. 36:1 (2012), 212–224.
36. Soyster, A.L., Convex programming with set-inclusive constraints and applications to inexact linear programming. Oper. Res. 21:5 (1973), 1154–1157.
37. Stewart, T.J., Goal directed benchmarking for organizational efficiency. Omega 38:6 (2010), 534–539.
38. 2 emission control? Examination by data envelopment analysis. Energy Policy 38:10 (2010), 5902–5911.
39. Tavana, M., Shabanpour, H., Yousefi, S., Farzipoor Saen, R., in press. A hybrid goal programming and dynamic data envelopment analysis framework for sustainable supplier evaluation. Neural Comput. Appl.
40. Tone, K., Tsutsui, M., Dynamic DEA: a slacks-based measure approach. Omega 38:3–4 (2010), 145–156.
41. Tone, K., Tsutsui, M., Dynamic DEA with network structure: a slacks-based measure approach. Omega 42:1 (2014), 124–131.
42. Weber, A., Current, J., Desai, A., An optimization approach to determining the number of vendors to employ. Int. J. Supply Chain Manage. 5:2 (2000), 90–98.
43. Wen, L., Xu, L., Wang, R., Sustainable supplier evaluation based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets group decision methods. J. Inform. Comput. Sci. 10:10 (2013), 3209–3220.
44. Wierzbicki, A.P., Reference point approaches. Gal, T., Stewart, T.J., Hanne, T., (eds.) Multicriteria Decision Making: Advances in MCDM Models, Algorithms, Theory, and Applications, 1999, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston Chapter 9.
45. Yahya, S., Kingsman, B., Vendor rating for an entrepreneur development programme: a case study using the analytic hierarchy process method. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 50:9 (1999), 916–930.
46. Yousefi, S., Shabanpour, H., Farzipoor Saen, R., Selecting the best supply chain by goal programming and network data envelopment analysis. RAIRO-Oper. Res. 49:3 (2015), 601–617.
47. Yousefi, S., Shabanpour, H., Farzipoor Saen, R., Faramarzi, G.R., Making an ideal decision making unit using virtual network data envelopment analysis approach. Int. J. Bus. Perform. Manage. 15:4 (2014), 316–328.
48. Zeydan, M., Çolpan, C., Çobanoğlu, C., A combined methodology for supplier selection and performance evaluation. Exp. Syst. Appl. 38:3 (2011), 2741–2751.
49. Zouggari, A., Benyoucef, L., Simulation based fuzzy TOPSIS approach for group multi-criteria supplier selection problem. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 25:3 (2012), 507–519.