Identifying partisan slant in news articles and twitter during political crises

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 10046 LNCS, Issue , 2016, Pages 257-272

  Karamshuk, Dmytro ^a   Lokot, Tetyana ^b   Pryymak, Oleksandr ^c   Sastry, Nishanth ^a  

^a KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b DUBLIN CITY UNIVERSITY   (Ireland)

^c FACEBOOK   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HIGH LEVEL LANGUAGES; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS; SOCIAL ASPECTS;

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING; NEWS ARTICLES; OPINION FORMATION; POLITICAL AGENDA; POLITICAL CRISIS; PUBLIC OPINIONS; SOCIAL MEDIA; TWITTER POSTS;

SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE);

EID: 84995403850     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-47880-7_16     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. An, J., Cha, M., Gummadi, K.P., Crowcroft, J., Quercia, D.: Visualizing media bias through Twitter. In: Sixth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (2012)
2. An, J., Cha, M., Gummadi, P.K., Crowcroft, J.: Media landscape in Twitter: a world of new conventions and political diversity. In: ICWSM (2011)
3. An, J., Quercia, D., Cha, M., Gummadi, K., Crowcroft, J.: Sharing political news: the balancing act of intimacy and socialization in selective exposure. EPJ Data Sci. 3(1), 1-21 (2014)
4. An, J., Quercia, D., Crowcroft, J.: Fragmented social media: a look into selective exposure to political news. In: Proceedings of World Wide Web Companion (2013)
5. An, J., Quercia, D., Crowcroft, J.: Partisan sharing: Facebook evidence and societal consequences. In: Proceedings of ACM COSN (2014)
6. Aragón, P., Volkovich, Y., Laniado, D., Kaltenbrunner, A.: When a movement becomes a party: computational assessment of new forms of political organization in social media. In: Tenth International AAAI Conference onWeb and Social Media (2016)
7. Boutet, A., Kim, H., Yoneki, E.:What’s in Twitter, I know what parties are popular and who you are supporting now! Soc. Netw. Anal. Min. 3(4), 1379-1391 (2013)
8. Brodersen, A., Scellato, S., Wattenhofer, M.: Youtube around the world: geographic popularity of videos. In: Proceedings of WWW (2012)
9. Chakraborty, A., Ghosh, S., Ganguly, N., Gummadi, K.P.: Dissemination biases of social media channels: on the topical coverage of socially shared news. In: Tenth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (2016)
10. Cohen, R., Ruths, D.: Classifying political orientation on Twitter: it’s not easy! In: ICWSM (2013)
11. Conover, M.D., Gonçalves, B., Ratkiewicz, J., Flammini, A., Menczer, F.: Predicting the political alignment of Twitter users. In: 2011 IEEE Third International Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust (PASSAT) and 2011 IEEE Third Inernational Conference on Social Computing (SocialCom), pp. 192-199. IEEE (2011)
12. Diuk, N.: Euromaidan: Ukraine’s self-organizing revolution. World Affairs 176(6), 9-16 (2014)
13. Goldstein, J.: The role of digital networked technologies in the Ukrainian orange revolution. Berkman Center Research Publication (2007)
14. González-Bailón, S., Borge-Holthoefer, J., Moreno, Y.: Broadcasters and hidden influentials in online protest diffusion. Am. Behav. Sci. (2013)
15. González-Bailón, S., et al.: The dynamics of protest recruitment through an online network. Sci. Rep. 1 (2011)
16. Hegelich, S., Janetzko, D.: Are social bots on twitter political actors? Empirical evidence from a Ukrainian social botnet. In: Tenth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (2016)
17. Howard, P.N.: The Digital Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy. Information Technology and Political Islam. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2010)
18. Mikolov, T., et al.: Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. In: NIPS (2013)
19. Mikolov, T., et al.: Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space. In: Proceedings of Workshop at ICLR (2013)
20. Oates, S., Lokot, T.: Twilight of the gods?: How the Internet challenged Russian television news frames in the winter protests of 2011-2012. In: International Association for Media and Communication Research Annual Conference (2013)
21. Onuch, O.: Euromaidan protests in Ukraine: social media versus social networks. Probl. Post-Communism 62, 1-19 (2015)
22. Papacharissi, Z., Chadwick, A.: The virtual sphere 2.0: the internet, the public sphere, and beyond. In: Routledge Handbook of Internet Politics, pp. 230-245 (2009)
23. Pennacchiotti, M., Popescu, A.M.: Democrats, republicans and starbucks afficionados: user classification in twitter. In: Proceedings of the 17th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 430-438. ACM (2011)
24. Pennacchiotti, M., Popescu, A.M.: A machine learning approach to Twitter user classification. In: ICWSM 2011, vol. 1, pp. 281-288 (2011)
25. Szostek, J.: The media battles of Ukraine’s Euromaidan. Digital Icons 11, 1-19 (2014)
26. Vijayaraghavan, P., Vosoughi, S., Roy, D.: Automatic detection and categorization of election-related tweets. arXiv preprint arXiv:1605.05150 (2016)
27. Zelinska, O.: Who were the protestors and what did they want? Demokratizatsiya 23(4), 379-400 (2015)
28. Zeng, L., Starbird, K., Spiro, E.S.: # unconfirmed: classifying rumor stance in crisis-related social media messages. In: Tenth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (2016)
29. Zhukov, Y.M., Baum, M.A.: Reporting bias and information warfare. In: International Studies Association Annual Convention (2016)