A Randomized Multicenter Clinical Trial of Ultrathin Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty (DSAEK) versus DSAEK

Ophthalmology

Volumn 123, Issue 11, 2016, Pages 2276-2284

  Dickman, Mor M ^a   Kruit, Pieter J ^b   Remeijer, Lies ^c   van Rooij, Jeroen ^c   Van der Lelij, Allegonda ^d   Wijdh, Robert H J ^e   van den Biggelaar, Frank J H M ^a   Berendschot, Tos T J M ^a   Nuijts, Rudy M M A ^a  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b Euro Skin Bank   (Netherlands)

^c ROTTERDAM EYE HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^d UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^e UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; CELL DENSITY; CENTRAL CORNEAL THICKNESS; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEA DISEASE; DESCEMET STRIPPING ENDOTHELIAL KERATOPLASTY; ENDOTHELIAL DYSFUNCTION; ENDOTHELIUM CELL; EYE REFRACTION; GRAFT FAILURE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MULTICENTER STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PERFORATION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; ULTRATHIN DESCEMET STRIPPING ENDOTHELIAL KERATOPLASTY; VISUAL ACUITY; CLINICAL TRIAL; CORNEA ENDOTHELIUM; DONOR; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FUCHS' ENDOTHELIAL DYSTROPHY; GRAFT SURVIVAL; MALE; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; PROCEDURES; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; TRANSPLANTATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; DESCEMET STRIPPING ENDOTHELIAL KERATOPLASTY; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; ENDOTHELIUM, CORNEAL; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; FUCHS' ENDOTHELIAL DYSTROPHY; GRAFT SURVIVAL; HUMANS; MALE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TISSUE DONORS; TOMOGRAPHY, OPTICAL COHERENCE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 84994840312     PISSN: 01616420     EISSN: 15494713     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.07.036     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (37)

1. 1 Park, C.Y., Lee, J.K., Gore, P.K., Lim, C.Y., Chuck, R.S., Keratoplasty in the United States: A 10-Year Review from 2005 through 2014. Ophthalmology 122 (2015), 2432–2442.
2. 2 Lee, W.B., Jacobs, D.S., Musch, D.C., Kaufman, S.C., et al. Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty: safety and outcomes: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology 116 (2009), 1818–1830.
3. 3 Neff, K.D., Biber, J.M., Holland, E.J., Comparison of central corneal graft thickness to visual acuity outcomes in endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea 30 (2011), 388–391.
4. 4 Daoud, Y.J., Munro, A.D., Delmonte, D.D., et al. Effect of cornea donor graft thickness on the outcome of Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty surgery. Am J Ophthalmol 156 (2013), 860–866.e861.
5. 5 Dickman, M.M., Cheng, Y.Y., Berendschot, T.T., van den Biggelaar, F.J., Nuijts, R.M., Effects of graft thickness and asymmetry on visual gain and aberrations after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. JAMA Ophthalmol 131 (2013), 737–744.
6. 6 Maier, A.K., Gundlach, E., Klamann, M.K., et al. [Influence of donor lamella thickness on visual acuity after Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK)]. Ophthalmologe 111 (2014), 128–134.
7. 7 Terry, M.A., Straiko, M.D., Goshe, J.M., Li, J.Y., Davis-Boozer, D., Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty: the tenuous relationship between donor thickness and postoperative vision. Ophthalmology 119 (2012), 1988–1996.
8. 8 Van Cleynenbreugel, H., Remeijer, L., Hillenaar, T., Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty: effect of intraoperative lenticule thickness on visual outcome and endothelial cell density. Cornea 30 (2011), 1195–1200.
9. 9 Wisse, R.P., Achterberg, J.A., Van der Lelij, A., DSAEK: practical approach to choose the microkeratome head on the basis of donor cornea pachymetry. Cornea 33 (2014), 230–234.
10. 10 Busin, M., Madi, S., Santorum, P., Scorcia, V., Beltz, J., Ultrathin Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty with the microkeratome double-pass technique: two-year outcomes. Ophthalmology 120 (2013), 1186–1194.
11. 11 Wacker, K., Bourne, W.M., Patel, S.V., Effect of graft thickness on visual acuity after Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Ophthalmol 163 (2016), 18–28.
12. 12 Dickman, M.M., Kruit, P.J., van den Biggelaar, F.J., Berendschot, T.T., Nuijts, R.M., Single-pass dissection of ultrathin organ-cultured endothelial lamellae using an innovative microkeratome system. Cornea 35 (2016), 100–104.
13. 13 Dickman, M.M., van Maris, M.P., van Marion, F.W., et al. Surface metrology and 3-dimensional confocal profiling of femtosecond laser and mechanically dissected ultrathin endothelial lamellae. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 55 (2014), 5183–5190.
14. 14 Pels, E., Schuchard, Y., Organ-culture preservation of human corneas. Doc Ophthalmol 56 (1983), 147–153.
15. 15 McCarey, B.E., Edelhauser, H.F., Lynn, M.J., Review of corneal endothelial specular microscopy for FDA clinical trials of refractive procedures, surgical devices, and new intraocular drugs and solutions. Cornea 27 (2008), 1–16.
16. 16 Dieleman, M., Wubbels, R.J., van Kooten-Noordzij, M., de Waard, P.W., Single perioperative subconjunctival steroid depot versus postoperative steroid eyedrops to prevent intraocular inflammation and macular edema after cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 37 (2011), 1589–1597.
17. 17 Benjamini, Y., Hochberg, Y., Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J Roy Statist Soc Ser B (Methodological) 57 (1995), 289–300.
18. 18 Moher, D., Schulz, K.F., Altman, D.G., The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials. Lancet 357 (2001), 1191–1194.
19. 19 Patel, S.V., Baratz, K.H., Hodge, D.O., Maguire, L.J., McLaren, J.W., The effect of corneal light scatter on vision after Descemet stripping with endothelial keratoplasty. Arch Ophthalmol 127 (2009), 153–160.
20. 20 Rudolph, M., Laaser, K., Bachmann, B.O., Cursiefen, C., Epstein, D., Kruse, F.E., Corneal higher-order aberrations after Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Ophthalmology 119 (2012), 528–535.
21. 21 van der Meulen, I.J., Patel, S.V., Lapid-Gortzak, R., Nieuwendaal, C.P., McLaren, J.W., van den Berg, T.J., Quality of vision in patients with Fuchs endothelial dystrophy and after Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty. Arch Ophthalmol 129 (2011), 1537–1542.
22. 22 Busin, M., Albe, E., Does thickness matter: ultrathin Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 25 (2014), 312–318.
23. 23 Li, J.Y., Terry, M.A., Goshe, J., Davis-Boozer, D., Shamie, N., Three-year visual acuity outcomes after Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Ophthalmology 119 (2012), 1126–1129.
24. 24 Wacker, K., Baratz, K.H., Maguire, L.J., McLaren, J.W., Patel, S.V., Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty for Fuchs' endothelial corneal dystrophy: five-year results of a prospective study. Ophthalmology 123 (2016), 154–160.
25. 25 Van Den Berg, T.J., Van Rijn, L.J., Michael, R., et al. Straylight effects with aging and lens extraction. Am J Ophthalmol 144 (2007), 358–363.
26. 26 van den Biggelaar, F.J., Cheng, Y.Y., Nuijts, R.M., et al. Economic evaluation of endothelial keratoplasty techniques and penetrating keratoplasty in the Netherlands. Am J Ophthalmol 154 (2012), 272–281.e272.
27. 27 Dupps, W.J. Jr., Qian, Y., Meisler, D.M., Multivariate model of refractive shift in Descemet-stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. J Cataract Refract Surg 34 (2008), 578–584.
28. 28 Kymionis, G.D., Kontadakis, G.A., Yoo, S.H., DSAEK graft evaluation using C: P ratio. Ophthalmology, 117, 2010, 639 author reply 639–640.
29. 29 Ham, L., Dapena, I., Moutsouris, K., et al. Refractive change and stability after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Effect of corneal dehydration-induced hyperopic shift on intraocular lens power calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg 37 (2011), 1455–1464.
30. 30 Price, M.O., Bidros, M., Gorovoy, M., et al. Effect of incision width on graft survival and endothelial cell loss after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea 29 (2010), 523–527.
31. 31 Price, M.O., Price, F.W. Jr., Endothelial cell loss after Descemet stripping with endothelial keratoplasty influencing factors and 2-year trend. Ophthalmology 115 (2008), 857–865.
32. 32 Price, M.O., Fairchild, K.M., Price, D.A., Price, F.W. Jr., Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty five-year graft survival and endothelial cell loss. Ophthalmology 118 (2011), 725–729.
33. 33 Lass, J.H., Szczotka-Flynn, L.B., Ayala, A.R., et al. Cornea preservation time study: methods and potential impact on the cornea donor pool in the United States. Cornea 34 (2015), 601–608.
34. 34 Anshu, A., Price, M.O., Tan, D.T., Price, F.W. Jr., Endothelial keratoplasty: a revolution in evolution. Surv Ophthalmol 57 (2012), 236–252.
35. 35 Busin, M., Patel, A.K., Scorcia, V., Ponzin, D., Microkeratome-assisted preparation of ultrathin grafts for Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 53 (2012), 521–524.
36. 36 Coster, D.J., Lowe, M.T., Keane, M.C., Williams, K.A., Australian Corneal Graft Registry C. A comparison of lamellar and penetrating keratoplasty outcomes: a registry study. Ophthalmology 121 (2014), 979–987.
37. 37 Greenrod, E.B., Jones, M.N., Kaye, S., et al. Center and surgeon effect on outcomes of endothelial keratoplasty versus penetrating keratoplasty in the United Kingdom. Am J Ophthalmol 158 (2014), 957–966.