Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty: Effect of intraoperative lenticule thickness on visual outcome and endothelial cell density

Cornea

Volumn 30, Issue 11, 2011, Pages 1195-1200

  Van Cleynenbreugel, Hugo ^a   Remeijer, Lies ^a   Hillenaar, Toine ^b  

^a ROTTERDAM EYE HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^b Rotterdam Ophthalmic Institute   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty; DSAEK; lenticule thickness; pachymetry

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BEST CORRECTIVE VISUAL ACUITY; CASE STUDY; CELL DENSITY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONGENITAL CORNEA DYSTROPHY; CORNEA THICKNESS; DESCEMET STRIPPING ENDOTHELIAL KERATOPLASTY; ENDOTHELIAL CELL DENSITY; ENDOTHELIUM CELL; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HUMAN TISSUE; KERATOPATHY; LENS; LENTICULE THICKNESS; MALE; ORGAN DONOR; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISUAL ACUITY;

ADULT; AGED; CELL COUNT; CORNEA; CORNEAL DISEASES; DESCEMET STRIPPING ENDOTHELIAL KERATOPLASTY; ENDOTHELIUM, CORNEAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; MALE; MICROSCOPY, ACOUSTIC; MIDDLE AGED; ORGAN SIZE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TISSUE DONORS; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 80053631356     PISSN: 02773740     EISSN: 15364798     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e31821821c7     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Price MO, Price FW Jr. Descemet's stripping with endothelial keratoplasty: Comparative outcomes with microkeratome-dissected and manually dissected donor tissue. Ophthalmology. 2006;113:1936-1942. (Pubitemid 44635703)
2. Gorovoy MS. Descemet-stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea. 2006;25:886-889. (Pubitemid 44763845)
3. Bahar I, Kaiserman I, McAllum P, et al. Comparison of posterior lamellar keratoplasty techniques to penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology. 2008; 115:1525-1533.
4. Armitage WJ, Dick AD, Bourne WM. Predicting endothelial cell loss and long-term corneal graft survival. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44: 3326-3331. (Pubitemid 36909766)
5. Price MO, Fairchild KM, Price DA, et al. Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty five-year graft survival and endothelial cell loss. Ophthalmology. 2011;118:725-729.
6. Dapena I, Ham L, Melles GR. Endothelial keratoplasty: DSEK/DSAEK or DMEK-the thinner the better̂ Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2009;20:299-307.
7. Di Pascuale MA, Prasher P, Schlecte C, et al. Corneal deturgescence after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty evaluated by Visante anterior segment optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009;148:32-37.
8. Jun B, Kuo AN, Afshari NA, et al. Refractive change after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty surgery and its correlation with graft thickness and diameter. Cornea. 2009;28:19-23.
9. Pels E, Schuchard Y. Organ-culture preservation of human corneas. Doc Ophthalmol. 1983;56:147-153. (Pubitemid 14199882)
10. Van Cleynenbreugel H, Hillenaar T, Remeijer L. Graft insertion during Descemet-stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty: Pulling the graft inward. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34:534-536. (Pubitemid 351417620)
11. Hillenaar T, Weenen C, Wubbels RJ, et al. Endothelial involvement in herpes simplex virus keratitis: An in vivo confocal microscopy study. Ophthalmology. 2009;116:2077-2086.
12. O'Brien PD, Lake DB, Saw VP, et al. Endothelial keratoplasty: Case selection in the learning curve. Cornea. 2008;27:1114-1118.
13. Price MO, Price FW. Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2007;18:290-294. (Pubitemid 46955294)
14. Price MO, Price FW Jr. Endothelial cell loss after Descemet stripping with endothelial keratoplasty influencing factors and 2-year trend. Ophthalmology. 2008 115 857-865 (Pubitemid 351602289)
15. Terry MA, Saad HA, Shamie N, et al. Endothelial keratoplasty: The influence of insertion techniques and incision size on donor endothelial survival. Cornea. 2009;28 24-31.
16. Price MO, Bidros M, Gorovoy M, et al. Effect of incision width on graft survival and endothelial cell loss after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea. 2010;29:523-527.
17. Thiel MA, Kaufmann C, Dedes W, et al. Predictability of microkeratomedependent flap thickness for DSAEK. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2009;226: 230-233.
18. PriceMO, Price FW Jr., Stoeger C, et al. Central thickness variation in precut DSAEK donor grafts. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34:1423-1424.
19. Pogorelov P, Cursiefen C, Bachmann BO, et al. Changes in donor corneal lenticule thickness after Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) with organ-cultured corneas. Br J Ophthalmol. 2009 93 825-829.
20. Chen ES, Terry MA, Shamie N, et al. Descemet-stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty: Six-month results in a prospective study of 100 eyes. Cornea. 2008;27:514-520.
21. Neff KD, Biber JM, Holland EJ. Comparison of central corneal graft thickness to visual acuity outcomes in endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea. 2011;30:388-391.
22. Prasher P, Muftuoglu O, Bowman RW, et al. Tandem scanning confocal microscopy of cornea after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Eye Contact Lens. 2009;35:196-202.
23. Lee JA, Djalilian AR, Riaz KM, et al. Clinical and histopathologic features of failed Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty grafts. Cornea. 2009;28:530-535.