Modeling causal irrelevance in evaluations of configurational comparative methods

Sociological Methodology

Volumn 46, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 345-357

  Thiem, Alrik ^a   Baumgartner, Michael ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GENEVA   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Causal inference; Configurational comparative methods; Confirmation bias; Method evaluation; Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA); Simulations

Indexed keywords

EID: 84994827759     PISSN: 00811750     EISSN: 14679531     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0081175016654736     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Baumgartner, Michael. 2008. “Regularity Theories Reassessed.” Philosophia 36(3): 327–54.
2. Baumgartner, Michael. 2015. “Parsimony and Causality.” Quality and Quantity 49(2): 839–56.
3. Baumgartner, Michael, and Alrik Thiem. 2015a. “Model Ambiguities in Configurational Comparative Research.” Sociological Methods and Research. Retrieved June 8, 2016 (http://smr.sagepub.com/content/early/2015/10/22/0049124115610351).
4. Baumgartner, Michael, and Alrik Thiem. 2015b. “Often Trusted but Never (Properly) Tested: Evaluating Qualitative Comparative Analysis.” Presented at the 12th Conference of the European Sociological Association, August 25–28, Czech Technical University, Prague, Czech Republic.
5. Bowers, Jake. 2014. “Comment: Method Games—A Proposal for Assessing and Learning about Methods.” Sociological Methodology 44(1):112–17.
6. Britt, David W., Samantha T. Risinger, Virginia Miller, Mary K. Mans, Eric L. Krivchenia, and Mark I. Evans. 2000. “Determinants of Parental Decisions after the Prenatal Diagnosis of Down Syndrome: Bringing in Context.” American Journal of Medical Genetics 93(5):410–16.
7. Cragun, Deborah, Rita D. DeBate, Susan T. Vadaparampil, Julie Baldwin, Heather Hampel, and Tuya Pal. 2014. “Comparing Universal Lynch Syndrome Tumorscreening Programs to Evaluate Associations between Implementation Strategies and Patient Follow-through.” Genetics in Medicine 16(10):773–82.
8. Cronqvist, Lasse, and Dirk Berg-Schlosser. 2009. “Multi-value QCA (mvQCA).” Pp. 69–86 in Configurational Comparative Methods: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques, edited by Benoît Rihoux and Charles C. Ragin. London: Sage Ltd.
9. Duşa, Adrian, and Alrik Thiem. 2014. “QCA: A Package for Qualitative Comparative Analysis, R Package Version 1.1-4.”
10. Duşa, Adrian, and Alrik Thiem. 2015. “Enhancing the Minimization of Boolean and Multivalue Output Functions with eQMC.” Journal of Mathematical Sociology 39(2):92–108.
11. Dy, Sydney M., Pushkal Garg, Dorothy Nyberg, Patricia B. Dawson, Peter J. Pronovost, Laura Morlock, Haya Rubin, and Albert W. Wu. 2005. “Critical Pathway Effectiveness: Assessing the Impact of Patient, Hospital Care, and Pathway Characteristics Using Qualitative Comparative Analysis.” Health Services Research 40(2):499–516.
12. Fiss, Peer C., Axel Marx, and Benoît Rihoux. 2014. “Comment: Getting QCA Right.” Sociological Methodology 44(1):95–100.
13. Glaesser, Judith, and Barry Cooper. 2014. “Exploring the Consequences of a Recalibration of Causal Conditions When Assessing Sufficiency with Fuzzy Set QCA.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 17(4):387–401.
14. Hug, Simon. 2013. “Qualitative Comparative Analysis: How Inductive Use and Measurement Error Lead to Problematic Inference.” Political Analysis 21(2):252–65.
15. Kaminsky, Jessica A., and Amy N. Javernick-Will. 2014. “The Internal Social Sustainability of Sanitation Infrastructure.” Environmental Science and Technology 48(17):10028–35.
16. Krogslund, Chris, Donghyun D. Choi, and Mathias Poertner. 2015. “Fuzzy Sets on Shaky Ground: Parameter Sensitivity and Confirmation Bias in fsQCA.” Political Analysis 23(1):21–41.
17. Lucas, Samuel R., and Alisa Szatrowski. 2014. “Qualitative Comparative Analysis in Critical Perspective.” Sociological Methodology 44(1):1–79.
18. Mackie, John L. 1965. “Causes and Conditions.” American Philosophical Quarterly 2(4):245–64.
19. Mackie, John L. 1974. The Cement of the Universe: A Study of Causation. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
20. Pearl, Judea. 2009. Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference. 2nd ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
21. Ragin, Charles C. 1987. The Comparative Method: Moving beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. Berkeley: University of California Press.
22. Ragin, Charles C. 2000. Fuzzy-set Social Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
23. Ragin, Charles C. 2008. Redesigning Social Inquiry: Fuzzy Sets and Beyond. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
24. Robinson, Brian E., Margaret B. Holland, and Lisa Naughton-Treves. 2014. “Does Secure Land Tenure Save Forests? A Meta-analysis of the Relationship between Land Tenure and Tropical Deforestation.” Global Environmental Change 29:281–93.
25. Schneider, Carsten Q., and Claudius Wagemann. 2012. Set-theoretic Methods for the Social Sciences: A Guide to Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
26. Seawright, Jason. 2005. “Qualitative Comparative Analysis vis-à-vis Regression.” Studies in Comparative International Development 40(1):3–26.
27. Seawright, Jason. 2014. “Comment: Limited Diversity and the Unreliability of QCA.” Sociological Methodology 44(1):118–21.
28. Skaaning, Svend-Erik. 2011. “Assessing the Robustness of Crisp-set and Fuzzy-set QCA Results.” Sociological Methods and Research 40(2):391–408.
29. Spirtes, Peter, Clark N. Glymour, and Richard Scheines. 2000. Causation, Prediction, and Search. 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
30. Srinivasan, V., E. F. Lambin, S. M. Gorelick, B. H. Thompson, and S. Rozelle. 2012. “The Nature and Causes of the Global Water Crisis: Syndromes from a Metaanalysis of Coupled Human-water Studies.” Water Resources Research 48(10): W10516.
31. Thiem, Alrik. 2013. “Clearly Crisp, and Not Fuzzy: A Reassessment of the (Putative) Pitfalls of Multi-value QCA.” Field Methods 25(2):197–207.
32. Thiem, Alrik. 2014a. “Membership Function Sensitivity of Descriptive Statistics in Fuzzyset Relations.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 17(6):625–42.
33. Thiem, Alrik. 2014b. “Mill’s Methods, Induction and Case Sensitivity in Qualitative Comparative Analysis: A Comment on Hug (2013).” Qualitative and Multi-Method Research 12(2):19–24.
34. Thiem, Alrik. 2014c. “Navigating the Complexities of Qualitative Comparative Analysis: Case Numbers, Necessity Relations, and Model Ambiguities.” Evaluation Review 38(6):487–513.
35. Thiem, Alrik. 2014d. “Unifying Configurational Comparative Methods: Generalized-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis.” Sociological Methods and Research 43(2):313–37.
36. Thiem, Alrik. 2015a. “Parameters of Fit and Intermediate Solutions in Multi-value Qualitative Comparative Analysis.” Quality and Quantity 49(2):657–74.
37. Thiem, Alrik. 2015b. “Using Qualitative Comparative Analysis for Identifying Causal Chains in Configurational Data: A Methodological Commentary on Baumgartner and Epple (2014).” Sociological Methods and Research 44(4):723–36.
38. Thiem, Alrik. 2016. “QCApro: Professional Functionality for Performing and Evaluating Qualitative Comparative Analysis, R Package Version 1.1-0.” Retrieved June 8, 2016 (http://www.alrik-thiem.net/software/).
39. Thiem, Alrik, and Michael Baumgartner. 2016. “Back to Square One: A Reply to Munck, Paine, and Schneider.” Comparative Political Studies 49(6):801–6.
40. Thiem, Alrik, Michael Baumgartner, and Damien Bol. 2016. “Still Lost in Translation! A Correction of Three Misunderstandings between Configurational Comparativists and Regressional Analysts.” Comparative Political Studies 49(6):742–74.
41. Thiem, Alrik, and Adrian Duşa. 2013a. “Boolean Minimization in Social Science Research: A Review of Current Software for Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA).” Social Science Computer Review 31(4):505–21.
42. Thiem, Alrik, and Adrian Duşa. 2013b. “QCA: A Package for Qualitative Comparative Analysis.” R Journal 5(1):87–97.
43. Thiem, Alrik, Reto Spöhel, and Adrian Duşa. 2016. “Enhancing Sensitivity Diagnostics for Qualitative Comparative Analysis: A Combinatorial Approach.” Political Analysis 24(1):104–20.