Membership function sensitivity of descriptive statistics in fuzzy-set relations

International Journal of Social Research Methodology

Volumn 17, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 625-642

  Thiem, Alrik ^a  

^a ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

fsQCA; fuzzy sets; QCA; robustness; sensitivity

Indexed keywords

EID: 84907878534     PISSN: 13645579     EISSN: 14645300     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13645579.2013.806118     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Banchoff, T. (1999). German identity and European integration. European Journal of International Relations, 5, 259– 289.
2. Bojadziev, G., & Bojadziev, M. (2007). Fuzzy logic for business, finance, and management (2nd ed.). Hackensack, NJ: World Scientific.
3. Civanlar, M. R., & Trussell, H. J. (1986). Constructing membership functions using statistical data. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 18(1), 1– 13.
4. Clark, T. D., Larson, J. M., Mordeson, J. N., Potter, J. D., & Wierman, M. J. (2008). Applying fuzzy mathematics to formal models in comparative politics. Berlin: Springer.
5. Cooper, B., & Glaesser, J. (2011a). Paradoxes and pitfalls in using fuzzy set QCA: Illustrations from a critical review of a study of educational inequality. Sociological Research Online, 16, 1– 14.
6. Cooper, B., & Glaesser, J. (2011b). Using case-based approaches to analyse large datasets: A comparison of Ragin’s fsQCA and fuzzy cluster analysis. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 14, 31– 48.
7. Cronqvist, L., & Berg-Schlosser, D. (2009). Multi-value QCA (mvQCA). In B. Rihoux, & C. C. Ragin (Eds.), Configurational comparative methods: Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and related techniques (pp. 69– 86). London: Sage.
8. Eliason, S. R., & Stryker, R. (2009). Goodness-of-fit tests and descriptive measures in fuzzy-set analysis. Sociological Methods & Research, 38, 102– 146.
9. Glaesser, J., Gott, R., Roberts, R., & Cooper, B. (2009). The roles of substantive and procedural understanding in open-ended science investigations: Using fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis to compare two different tasks. Research in Science Education, 39, 595– 624.
10. Goertz, G. (2006). Assessing the trivialness, relevance, and relative importance of necessary or sufficient conditions in social science. Studies in Comparative International Development, 41, 88– 109.
11. Klir, G. J., St. Clair, U. H., & Yuan, B. (1997). Fuzzy set theory: Foundations and applications. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
12. Koenig-Archibugi, M. (2004). Explaining government preferences for institutional change in EU foreign and security policy. International Organization, 58, 137– 174.
13. Kvist, J. (2006). Diversity, ideal types and fuzzy sets in comparative welfare state research. In B. Rihoux, & H. Grimm (Eds.), Innovative comparative methods for policy analysis (pp. 167– 184). New York, NY: Springer Science + Business Media.
14. Longest, K. C., & Vaisey, S. (2008). Fuzzy: A program for performing qualitative comparative analyses (QCA) in Stata. Stata Journal, 8, 79– 104.
15. Marcussen, M., Risse, T., Engelmann-Martin, D., & Roscher, H. J. K. K. (1999). Constructing Europe? The evolution of French, British and German nation state identities. Journal of European Public Policy, 6, 614– 633.
16. R Development Core Team (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
17. Ragin, C. C. (1987). The comparative method: Moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. Berkeley: University of California Press.
18. Ragin, C. C. (2000). Fuzzy-set social science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
19. Ragin, C. C. (2006). Set relations in social research: Evaluating their consistency and coverage. Political Analysis, 14, 291– 310.
20. Ragin, C. C. (2008). Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy sets and beyond. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
21. Ragin, C. C. (2009). Qualitative comparative analysis using fuzzy sets (fsQCA). In B. Rihoux, & C. C. Ragin (Eds.), Configurational comparative methods: Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and related techniques (pp. 87– 121). London: Sage.
22. Ragin, C. C., & Davey, S. (2009). fs/QCA: Fuzzy-set/qualitative comparative analysis (Version 2.5) [Computer program]. Tucson: Department of Sociology, University of Arizona.
23. Ragin, C. C., & Pennings, P. (2005). Fuzzy sets and social research. Sociological Methods & Research, 33, 423– 430.
24. Reichert, C., & Rubinson, C. (2013). KirqST (Version 2.09) [Computer program]. Houston, TX: University of Houston-Downtown.
25. Rihoux, B., & Ragin, C. C. (Eds.). (2009). Configurational comparative methods: Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and related techniques. London: Sage.
26. Samford, S. (2010). Averting ‘disruption and reversal’: Reassessing the logic of rapid trade reform in Latin America. Politics & Society, 38, 373– 407.
27. Schneider, C. Q., & Wagemann, C. (2010). Standards of good practice in qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and fuzzy-sets. Comparative Sociology, 9, 397– 418.
28. Schneider, C. Q., & Wagemann, C. (2012). Set-theoretic methods for the social sciences: A guide to qualitative comparative analysis (QCA). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29. Singpurwalla, N. D., Booker, J. M., Lindley, D. V., Laviolette, M., Zadeh, L. A., & Dempster, A. P. (2004). Membership functions and probability measures of fuzzy sets. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 99, 867– 889.
30. Skaaning, S.-E. (2011). Assessing the robustness of crisp-set and fuzzy-set QCA results. Sociological Methods & Research, 40, 391– 408.
31. Smithson, M. (2005). Fuzzy set inclusion: Linking fuzzy set methods with mainstream techniques. Sociological Methods & Research, 33, 431– 461.
32. Thiem, A. (2013). Clearly crisp, and not fuzzy: A reassessment of the (putative) pitfalls of multi-value QCA. Field Methods, 25, 197– 207.
33. Thiem, A., & Duşa, A. (2013a). QCA: A package for qualitative comparative analysis. The R Journal, 5(1), 1– 11.
34. Thiem, A., & Duşa, A. (2013b). Qualitative comparative analysis with R: A user’s guide. New York, NY: Springer.
35. Verkuilen, J. (2005). Assigning membership in a fuzzy set analysis. Sociological Methods & Research, 33, 462– 496.
36. Vink, M. P., & Vliet, O. V. (2009). Not quite crisp, not yet fuzzy? Assessing the potentials and pitfalls of multi-value QCA. Field Methods, 21, 265– 289.
37. Vink, M. P., & Vliet, O. V. (2013). Potentials and pitfalls of multi-value QCA: Response to Thiem. Field Methods, 25, 208– 213.
38. Vis, B. (2012). The comparative advantages of fsQCA and regression analysis for moderately large-N analyses. Sociological Methods & Research, 41, 168– 198.