Qualitative comparative analysis vis-à-vis regression

Studies in Comparative International Development

Volumn 40, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 3-26

  Seawright, Jason ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ELECTION; METHODOLOGY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

EID: 27944506024     PISSN: 00393606     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF02686284     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Aldrich, J. H., and Nelson, F. D. 1984. Linear Probability, Logit and Probit Models. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
2. Bartolini, S. 2000. The Political Mobilization of the European Left, 1860-1980: The Class Cleavage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. Collier, D., and Adcock, R. 1999. "Democracy and Dichotomies: A Pragmatic Approach to Choices about Concepts." Annual Review of Political Science 2: 537-65.
4. Collier, D., Brady, H. E., and Seawright, J. 2004. "Sources of Leverage in Causal Inference." In H. E. Brady and D. Collier, eds., Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
5. Coppedge, M. 1998. "The Dynamic Diversity of Latin American Party Systems." Party Politics 4: 547-68.
6. Franzese, R. J. 2003. "Quantitative Empirical Methods and Context Conditionality." CP: Newsletter of the Comparative Politics Organized Section of the American Political Science Association 14(1): 20-24.
7. Freedman, D. A. 2000. "From Association to Causation: Some Remarks on the History of Statistics." Statistical Science 14(3): 243-58.
8. George, A. L. 1979. "Case Studies and Theory Development: The Method of Structured, Focused Comparison." In P.G. Lauren, ed., Diplomacy: New Approaches in History, Theory, and Policy. New York: The Free Press.
9. Hailperin, T. 1986. Boole's Logic and Probability: A Critical Exposition from the Standpoint of Contemporary Algebra, Logic, and Probability Theory. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
10. Humphreys, P., and Freedman, D. A. 1996. "The Grand Leap." British Journal of the Philosophy of Science 47, 113-23.
11. Kennedy, P. 1998. A Guide to Econometrics. Cambridge: MIT Press.
12. Kitschelt, H. 1994. The Transformation of European Social Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13. Leamer, E. E. 1983. "Let's Take the Con Out of Econometrics." American Economics Review 73: 31-43.
14. Levitsky, S. 2003. Transforming Labor-Based Parties in Latin America: Argentine Peronism in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15. Levitsky, S., and Way, L. 1998. "Between a Shock and a Hard Place: The Dynamics of Labor-Backed Adjustment in Poland and Argentina." Comparative Politics, 821-12523.
16. Murillo, M. V. 2001. Labor Unions, Partisan Coalitions, and Market Reforms in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press:
17. Przeworski, A., and Sprague, J. 1986. Paper Stones: A History of Electoral Socialism. Chicago: University of Chicago.
18. Ragin, C. C. 1987. The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. Berkeley: University of California.
19. Ragin, C. C. 2000. Fuzzy-Set Social Science. Chicago: University of Chicago.
20. Rihoux, B., and Ragin, C. C. 2004. On the use, misuse, and good use of QCA: State of the art and prospects.
21. Stigler, S. 1986. The History of Statistics: The Measurement of Uncertainty before 1900. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
22. Stokes, S. C. 2001. Mandates and Democracy: Neoliberalism by Surprise in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23. World Bank. 2003. World Development Indicators Online. http:// devdata.worldbank.org/dataonline/.