The Future of Cell Biology: Emerging Model Organisms

Trends in Cell Biology

Volumn 26, Issue 11, 2016, Pages 818-824

  Goldstein, Bob ^a   King, Nicole ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARABIDOPSIS; CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS; CYTOLOGY; DROSOPHILA; GENETIC MODEL; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESEARCH; REVIEW; TREE OF LIFE; ZEBRA; ANIMAL; ANIMAL MODEL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; EVOLUTION; HUMAN;

ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; CELL BIOLOGY; HUMANS; MODELS, ANIMAL; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MODELS, GENETIC;

EID: 84994810728     PISSN: 09628924     EISSN: 18793088     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tcb.2016.08.005     Document Type: Review

References (51)

1. 1 Blackburn, E.H., et al. Telomeres and telomerase: the path from maize, Tetrahymena and yeast to human cancer and aging. Nat. Med. 12 (2006), 1133–1138.
2. 2 Blackburn, E.H., Gall, J.G., A tandemly repeated sequence at the termini of the extrachromosomal ribosomal RNA genes in Tetrahymena. J. Mol. Biol. 120 (1978), 33–53.
3. 3 Sturtevant, A.H., Thomas Hunt Morgan, September 25, 1866–December 4, 1945. Biographical Memoirs 33 (1959), 283–325.
4. 4 Singer, E., Biologists Search for New Model Organisms. 2016, Quanta Magazine Published online July 26. https://www.quantamagazine.org/20160726-model-organisms/.
5. 5 Wilson, E.B., The Cell in Development and Heredity. 1925, Macmillan.
6. 6 Morgan, T.H., Embryology and Genetics. 1934, Columbia University Press.
7. 7 Horstadius, S., The mechanics of sea urchin development, studied by operative methods. Biol. Rev. 14 (1939), 132–179.
8. 8 Sullivan, W., The Institute for the Study of Non-Model Organisms and other fantasies. Mol. Biol. Cell 26 (2015), 387–389.
9. 9 Gladfelter, A.S., How nontraditional model systems can save us. Mol. Biol. Cell 26 (2015), 3687–3689.
10. 10 Liu, S., Trapnell, C., Single-cell transcriptome sequencing: recent advances and remaining challenges. F1000Research, 2016, 10.12688/f1000research.7223.1.
11. 11 Hashimshony, T., et al. CEL-Seq2: sensitive highly-multiplexed single-cell RNA-Seq. Genome Biol., 17, 2016, 77.
12. 12 Patel, N.H., et al. Expression of engrailed proteins in arthropods, annelids, and chordates. Cell 58 (1989), 955–968.
13. 13 Patel, N.H., et al. Pair-rule expression patterns of even-skipped are found in both short- and long-germ beetles. Nature 367 (1994), 429–434.
14. 14 Kelsh, R., et al. Homeotic gene expression in the locust Schistocerca: an antibody that detects conserved epitopes in Ultrabithorax and abdominal-A proteins. Dev. Genet. 15 (1994), 19–31.
15. 15 Panganiban, G., et al. The development of crustacean limbs and the evolution of arthropods. Science 270 (1995), 1363–1366.
16. 16 Davis, G.K., et al. Pax group III genes and the evolution of insect pair-rule patterning. Development 128 (2001), 3445–3458.
17. 17 Lukinavičius, G., et al. Fluorogenic probes for live-cell imaging of the cytoskeleton. Nat. Methods 11 (2014), 731–733.
18. 18 Tenlen, J.R., et al. RNA interference can be used to disrupt gene function in tardigrades. Dev. Genes Evol. 223 (2013), 171–181.
19. 19 Srivastava, M., et al. Whole-body acoel regeneration is controlled by Wnt and Bmp–Admp signaling. Curr. Biol. 24 (2014), 1107–1113.
20. 20 Woo, J.W., et al. DNA-free genome editing in plants with preassembled CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoproteins. Nat. Biotechnol. 33 (2015), 1162–1164.
21. 21 Gilles, A.F., et al. Efficient CRISPR-mediated gene targeting and transgene replacement in the beetle Tribolium castaneum. Development 142 (2015), 2832–2839.
22. 22 Martin, A., et al. CRISPR/Cas9 mutagenesis reveals versatile roles of hox genes in crustacean limb specification and evolution. Curr. Biol. 26 (2016), 14–26.
23. 23 Erkut, C., Kurzchalia, T.V., The C. elegans dauer larva as a paradigm to study metabolic suppression and desiccation tolerance. Planta 242 (2015), 389–396.
24. 24 Becquerel, P., La suspension de la vie au dessous de 1/20 K absolu par demagnetization adiabatique de l'alun de fer dans le vide les plus eléve. C. R. Hebd. Séances Acad. Sci. 231 (1950), 261–263.
25. 25 Jönsson, K.I., et al. Tardigrades survive exposure to space in low Earth orbit. Curr. Biol. 18 (2008), R729–R731.
26. 26 Rebecchi, L., et al. Tardigrade resistance to space effects: first results of experiments on the LIFE-TARSE mission on FOTON-M3 (September 2007). Astrobiology 9 (2009), 581–591.
27. 27 Weis, V.M., et al. Cell biology in model systems as the key to understanding corals. Trends Ecol. Evol. (Amst.) 23 (2008), 369–376.
28. 28 Gates, R.D., et al. Temperature stress causes host cell detachment in symbiotic cnidarians: implications for coral bleaching. Biol. Bull. 182 (1992), 324–332.
29. 29 Baumgarten, S., et al. The genome of Aiptasia, a sea anemone model for coral symbiosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 112 (2015), 11893–11898.
30. 30 Bieri, T., et al. Relative contributions of various cellular mechanisms to loss of algae during cnidarian bleaching. PLoS ONE, 11, 2016, e0152693.
31. 31 Tanaka, E.M., Reddien, P.W., The cellular basis for animal regeneration. Dev. Cell 21 (2011), 172–185.
32. 32 Gemberling, M., et al. The zebrafish as a model for complex tissue regeneration. Trends Genet. 29 (2013), 611–620.
33. 33 Elliott, S.A., Sánchez Alvarado, A., The history and enduring contributions of planarians to the study of animal regeneration. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Dev. Biol. 2 (2013), 301–326.
34. 34 Roberts-Galbraith, R.H., Newmark, P.A., On the organ trail: insights into organ regeneration in the planarian. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 32 (2015), 37–46.
35. 35 Schlacht, A., et al. Missing pieces of an ancient puzzle: evolution of the eukaryotic membrane-trafficking system. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol., 6, 2014, a016048.
36. 36 Richardson, E., et al. Evolutionary cell biology: functional insight from “endless forms most beautiful.” Mol. Biol. Cell 26 (2015), 4532–4538.
37. 37 Richter, D.J., King, N., The genomic and cellular foundations of animal origins. Annu. Rev. Genet. 47 (2013), 509–537.
38. 38 Morris, R.H., et al. Intertidal Invertebrates of California. 1980, Stanford University Press.
39. 39 Strathmann, M.F., Reproduction and Development of Marine Invertebrates of the Northern Pacific Coast. 1987, University of Washington Press.
40. 40 Brenner, S., et al. Sydney Brenner: a Life in Science. 2001, BioMed Central.
41. 41 Félix, M.-A., RNA interference in nematodes and the chance that favored Sydney Brenner. J. Biol., 7, 2008, 34.
42. 42 Gupta, B.P., et al. Genomics and biology of the nematode Caenorhabditis briggsae. 2007 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK19675/.
43. 43 Sommer, R.J., Streit, A., Comparative genetics and genomics of nematodes: genome structure, development, and lifestyle. Annu. Rev. Genet. 45 (2011), 1–20.
44. 44 Félix, M.-A., Barkoulas, M., Robustness and flexibility in nematode vulva development. Trends Genet. 28 (2012), 185–195.
45. 45 Gabriel, W.N., et al. The tardigrade Hypsibius dujardini, a new model for studying the evolution of development. Dev. Biol. 312 (2007), 545–559.
46. 46 Daub, J., et al. A survey of genes expressed in the tardigrade Hypsibius dujardini. 2003 http://xyala.cap.ed.ac.uk/research/tardigrades/tardibase.shtml.
47. 47 Altiero, T., Rebecchi, L., Rearing tardigrades: results and problems. Zool. Anz. 240 (2001), 217–221.
48. 48 Smith, F.W., et al. The compact body plan of tardigrades evolved by the loss of a large body region. Curr. Biol. 26 (2016), 224–229.
49. 49 Levin, T.C., King, N., Evidence for sex and recombination in the choanoflagellate Salpingoeca rosetta. Curr. Biol 23 (2013), 2176–2180.
50. 50 Levin, T.C., et al. The Rosetteless gene controls development in the choanoflagellate S. rosetta. Elife, 3, 2014, 10.7554/eLife.04070.
51. 51 Kohler, R.E., Lords of the fly: Drosophila Genetics and the Experimental Life. 1994, University of Chicago Press.