Reviewing dispute settlement at the World Trade Organization: A time to reconsider the role/s of compensation?

World Trade Review

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 31-67

  Davies, Arwel ^a  

^a SWANSEA UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84994748081     PISSN: 14747456     EISSN: 14753138     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1474745605002636     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. K. Bagwell, P.C. Mavroidis, and R.W. Staiger, ‘The Case for Tradable Remedies in WTO Dispute Settlement’, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 3314 (20 May 2004). http://ssrn.com/abstract=610359.
2. European Journal of International Law, 10(2) (1999)
3. American Journal of International Law, 96(4) (2002).
4. J. Pauwelyn, ‘Enforcement and Countermeasures in the WTO: Rules are Rules – Toward a More Collective Approach’, 94 American Journal of International Law, 335 (1997)
5. S. Charnovitz, ‘Rethinking WTO Trade Sanctions’, 95 American Journal of International Law, 792 (2001)
6. S. Charnovitz, ‘The WTO's Problematic “Last Resort” Against Noncompliance’ originally published in Aussenwirtschaft December 2002, with a revised version of 14 August 2003, published on www.worldtradelaw.net.
7. R.Z. Lawrence, Crimes and Punishments? Retaliation Under the WTO (2003, Institute for International Economics), at 18.
8. J. Pauwelyn, ‘WTO Victory on Steel Hides Deficiencies’, Jurist Legal Intelligence, 23 January 2004 http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/forum/Pauwelyn1.php
9. M. Bronckers and N. van den Broek, ‘Financial Compensation in the WTO: Improving the Remedies of WTO Dispute Settlement’, 8 Journal of International Economic Law, 101 (2005).
10. World Trade Review, 233 (2003)
11. B. O'Connor and M. Djordjevic, ‘Practical Aspects of Monetary Compensation: The US–Copyright Case’, 8 Journal of International Economic Law 127 (2005).
12. M. Matsushita, T.J. Schoenbaum and P.C. Mavroidis, The World Trade Organization: Law, Practice and Policy (Oxford University Press, 2002) at 143–154.
13. D. Shelton, ‘Righting Wrongs: Reparations in the Articles on State Responsibility’, 96 American Journal of International Law 833 at 835 (2002).
14. C.D. Gray, Judicial Remedies in International Law (1990, Oxford University Press), at 5.
15. K.K. Sim, ‘Rethinking the Mandatory/Discretionary Legislation Distinction in WTO Jurisprudence’, 2 World Trade Review, 33 (2003)
16. Y. Naiki, ‘The Mandatory Discretionary Doctrine in WTO Law The US–Section 301 Case and its Aftermath’, 7 Journal of International Economic Law, 23 (2004)
17. A. Davies ‘Mandatory and Discretionary Legislation in WTO Law: A Distinction Worth Preserving?’, 31 Legal Issues of Economic Integration, 185 (2004).
18. E.U. Petersmann, ‘The WTO Constitution and Human Rights’, 3 Journal of International Economic Law 19 (2000)
19. E.U. Petersmann, ‘Human rights and International Economic Law in the 21st Century: the Need to Clarify Their Interrelationships’, 4 Journal of International Economic Law, 3 (2001)
20. E.U. Petersmann, ‘Time for a United Nations “Global Compact” for Integrating Human Rights into the Law of Worldwide Organizations: Lessons from European Integration’, 13 European Journal of International Law 621 (2002)
21. P. Alston, ‘Resisting the Merger and Acquisition of Human Rights by Trade Law: A Reply to Petersmann’, 13 European Journal of International Law, 815 (2002)
22. R. Howse, ‘Human Rights in the WTO: Whose Rights, What Humanity? Comment on Petersmann’, 13 European Journal of International Law, 621 (2002).
23. Goh and Ziegler, ‘Retrospective Remedies in the WTO After Automotive Leather’ 6 JIEL (2003) 545.
24. P.C. Mavroidis, ‘Remedies in the WTO Legal System: Between a Rock and a Hard Place’ 11 European Journal of International Law, 763 (2000), at 789.
25. S. Arrowsmith, ‘The Character and Role of National Challenge Procedures under the Government Procurement Agreement’, 4 Public Procurement Law Review, 235 (2002).
26. R. Hudec, ‘Broadening the Scope of Remedies in WTO Dispute Settlement’, Originally published in F. Weiss & J. Wiers (eds), Improving WTO Dispute Settlement Procedures (Cameron May, 2000), at 345–376. Also available at http://www.worldtradelaw.net/articles.htm at 5–8.
27. C. Carmody, ‘Remedies and Conformity under the WTO Agreement ’, 5 Journal of International Economic Law, 307 (2002).
28. T. Cottier, ‘A Theory of Direct Effect’, in A.V. Bogandy, P. C. Mavroidis and Y. Mény (eds.), European Integration and International Co-ordination (Kluwer Law International, 2002), 99, at 121.
29. G.A. Zonnekeyn, ‘EC Liability for Non-Implementation of WTO Dispute Settlement Decisions – Are the Dice Cast?’, 7 Journal of International Economic Law, 483 (2004)
30. S. Griller, ‘Enforcement and Implementation of WTO Law in the European Union’, in F. Breuss, S. Griller and E. Vranes (eds.), The Banana Dispute. An Economic and Legal Analysis (Springer, 2003) 247
31. P. Eeckhout, ‘Judicial Enforcement of WTO Law in the European Union – Some Further Reflections’, 5 Journal of International Economic Law, 91 (2002)
32. N. van den Broek, ‘Legal Persuasion, Political Realism, and Legitimacy: The European Court's Recent Treatment of the Effect of WTO Agreements in the EC Legal Order’, 4 Journal of International Economic Law, 411 (2001)
33. S.N. Lester, ‘WTO Panel and the Appellate Body Interpretations of the WTO Agreement in US Law’, 35 Journal of World Trade, 521 (2001)
34. T. Cottier and K.N. Schefer, ‘The Relationship Between World Trade Organization Law, National Law and Regional Law’, 1 Journal of International Economic Law, 83 (1998).
35. J.H. Jackson, ‘Status of Treaties in Domestic Legal Systems: A Policy Analysis’, 86 American Journal of International Law, 310 (1992).
36. UN High Commissioner for Human Rights and by the International Labour Organization: Is it Relevant for WTO Law and Policy?’, 7 Journal of International Economic Law, 605 at 612 (2004)