Talking to Students: Metadiscourse in Introductory Coursebooks

English for Specific Purposes

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 3-26

  Hyland, Ken ^a  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0347807681     PISSN: 08894906     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0889-4906(97)00025-2     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Arnaudet, M., & Barrett, M. (1984). Approaches to academic reading and writing. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
2. Ballard, B., & Clanchy, J. (1991). Assessment by misconception: cultural influences and intellectual traditions. In L. Hamp-Lyons (Ed.), Assessing second language writing in academic contexts (pp. 19-35). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
3. Bartholomae, D. (1986). Inventing the university. Journal of Basic Writing, 5, 4-23.
4. Barton, E. (1995). Contrastive and non-constrastive connectives. Written Communication, 12, 219-239.
5. Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1987). The psychology of written composition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6. Berkenkotter, C., & Huckin, T. (1993). Rethinking genre from a socio-cognitive perspective. Written Communication, 10(4), 475-509.
7. Berkenkotter, C., Huckin, T., & Ackerman, J. (1991). Social context and socially constructed texts: The initiation of a graduate student into a writing research community. In C. Bazerman, & J. Paradis (Eds.), Textual dynamics of the professions (pp. 191-215). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
8. Cheng, X., & Steffensen, M. (1996). Metadiscourse: a technique for improving student writing. Research in the Teaching of English, 30(2), 149-181.
9. Crismore, A. (1989). Talking with readers: metadiscourse as rhetorical act. New York: Peter Lang.
10. Crismore, A., & Farnsworth, R. (1990). Mr. Darwin and his readers: exploring interpersonal metadiscourse as a dimension of ethos. Rhetoric Review, 8(1), 91-112.
11. Crismore, A., Markkanen, R., & Steffensen, M. (1993). Metadiscourse in persuasive writing: a study of texts written by American and Finnish university students. Written Communication, 10(1), 39-71.
12. Currie, P., & Cray, E. (1987). Strictly academic: a reading and writing text. New York: Newbury House.
13. Gebhardt, R. (1993). Scholarship, promotion and tenure in composition studies. College Composition and Communication, 44, 439-442.
14. Halliday, M., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
15. Hewings, A. (1990). Aspects of the language of economics textbooks. In A. Dudley-Evans, & W. Henderson (Eds.), The language of economics: the analysis of economic discourse (pp. 109-127) ELT Documents 134. London: Modern English Publications.
16. Hyland, K. (1996). Talking to the academy: forms of hedging in science research articles. Written Communication, 13(2), 251-281.
17. Hyland, K. (1996). Writing without conviction? Hedging in science research articles. Applied Linguistics, 17(4), 433-454.
18. Hyland, K. (1997). Scientific claims and community values: articulating an academic culture. Language and Communication, 16(1), 19-32.
19. Hyland, K. (1997b, in press). Exploring corporate rhetoric: metadiscourse in the Chairman's letter. Journal of Business Communication.
20. Hyland, K. (1997c, in press). Persuasion and context: the pragmatics of academic metadiscourse. Journal of Pragmatics.
21. Johns, A. (1993). Written argumentation for real audiences: suggestions for teacher research and classroom practice. TESOL Quarterly, 27(1), 75-90.
22. Jordan, R.R. (1990). Academic Writing Course. London: Collins.
23. Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory life: the social construction of scientific facts. Beverly Hills: Sage.
24. Leki, I., & Carson, J. (1994). Students' perceptions of EAP writing instruction and writing needs across the disciplines. TESOL Quarterly, 28(1), 81-101.
25. Love, A. (1993). Lexico-grammatical features of geology textbooks: process and product revisited. English for Specific Purposes, 12, 197-218.
26. Mauranen, A. (1993). Contrastive ESP rhetoric: metatext in Finnish-English economics texts. English for Specific Purposes, 12, 3-22.
27. McEverdy, M., & Wyatt, P. (1990). Assignment writing: developing communication skills. Melbourne: Nelson.
28. Myers, G. (1991). Lexical cohesion and specialised knowledge in science and popular science texts. Discourse Processes, 14, 1-26.
29. Myers, G. (1992). Textbooks and the sociology of scientific knowledge. English for Specific Purposes, 11, 3-17.
30. Park, D. (1986). Analysing audiences. College Composition and Communication, 37(4), 478-488.
31. Redd-Boyd, T., & Slater, W. (1989). The effects of audience specification on under-graduates' attitudes, strategies and writing. Research in the Teaching of English, 23, 77-103.
32. Schiffrin, D. (1980). Metatalk: organisational and evaluative brackets in discourse. Sociological Inquiry: Language and social interaction, 50, 199-236.
33. Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: CUP.
34. Swales, J. (1995). The role of the textbook in EAP writing research. English for Specific Purposes, 14, 3-18.
35. Tadros, A. (1985). Prediction in text, Discourse analysis monograph No 10. University of Birmingham.
36. Thomas, S., & Hawes, T. (1994). Reporting verbs in medical journal articles. English for Specific Purposes, 13(2), 129-148.
37. Valero-Garces, C. (1996). Contrastive ESP rhetoric: metatext in Spanish-English economics texts. English for Specific Purposes, 15(4), 279-294.
38. Van de Kopple, W. (1985). Some exploratory discourse on metadiscourse. College Composition and Communication, 36, 82-93.
39. Webber, P. (1994). The function of questions in different medical journal genres. English for Specific Purposes, 13, 257-268.
40. Williams, J. (1989). Style: ten lessons in clarity and grace (3rd ed.). Boston: Scott, Foresman.