Data analysis and ‘theorizing as ideology’

Qualitative Research

Volumn 1, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 279-302

  Roulston, Kathryn ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

conversation analysis; data analysis; interview data; qualitative research; re analysing data

Indexed keywords

EID: 84993736044     PISSN: 14687941     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/146879410100100302     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Atkinson, P. (1990) The Ethnographic Imagination: Textual Construction of Reality. London: Routledge.
2. Baker, C.D. (1983) ‘A “second look” at interviews with adolescents’, Journal of Youth and Adolescence 12(6): 501-519.
3. Baker, C.D. (1991) ‘Reading the Texts of Reading Lessons’, Australian Journal of Reading 14(1): 5-20.
4. Baker, C.D. (1997 a) ‘Ethnomethodological studies of talk in educational settings’, in B. Davies and D. Corson (Eds) Encyclopedia of Language and Education, Vo1. 3: Oral Discourse and Education, pp. 43-52. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
5. Baker, C.D. (1997 b) ‘Membership categorisation and interview accounts’, in D. Silverman (Ed.) Qualitative Research: Theory, Method and Practice, pp. 130-143. London: Sage.
6. Baker, C.D. (1997 c) ‘Ticketing Rules: Categorisation and Moral Ordering in a School Staff Meeting’, in S. Hester and P. Eglin (Eds) Culture in Action: Studies in Membership Categorization Analysis, Vol. 4, pp. 77-98. Washington, DC: International Institute for Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis and University Press of America.
7. Baker, C.D. and Johnson, G. (1998) ‘Interview Talk as Professional Practice’, Language and Education 12(4): 229-242.
8. Baker, C.D. and Keogh, J. (1995) ‘Accounting for Achievement in Parent-Teacher Interviews’, Human Studies 18: 263-300.
9. Baker, C.D. and Keogh, J. (1997) ‘Mapping Moral Orders in Parent-Teacher Interviews’, in A. Marcarino (Ed.) Analisi della conversazione e prospettive di ricerca in etnometodologia, pp. 25-42. Urbino: Quattro Venti.
10. Bogdan, R.C. and Biklen, S.K. (1982) Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction to Theory and Methods. Toronto: Allyn and Bacon.
11. Briggs, C. (1986) Learning How to Ask: A Sociolinguistic Appraisal of the Role of the Interview in Social Science Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12. Connelly, F.M. and Clandinin, D.J. (1984) ‘Personal Practical Knowledge at Bay Street School: Ritual, Personal Philosophy and Image’, in R. Halkes and J.K. Olson (Eds) Teacher Thinking: A New Perspective on Persisting Problems in Education, pp. 134-148. Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets and Zeitlinger.
13. Foddy, W. (1993) Constructing Questions for Interviews and Questionnaires: Theory and Practice in Social Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. Garfinkel, H. (1967) Studies in Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
15. Goodwin, C. and Heritage, J. (1990) ‘Conversation Analysis’, Annual Review of Anthropology 19: 283-307.
16. Hargreaves, A. (1996) ‘Revisiting Voice’, Educational Researcher 25(1): 12-19.
17. Heap, J.L. (1997) ‘Conversation Analysis Methods in Researching Language and Education’, in N.H. Hornberger and D. Corson (Eds) Encyclopedia of Language in Education, Vo1. 8: Research Methods in Language and Education, pp. 217-225. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
18. Heritage, J. (1984) ‘A Change-of-State Token and Aspects of its Sequential Placement’, in J.M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (Eds) Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, pp. 299-345. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19. Heritage, J.C. and Watson, D.R. (1979) ‘Formulations as Conversational Objects’, in G. Psathas (Ed.) Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology, pp. 123-162. New York: Irvington.
20. Holstein, J.A. and Gubrium, J.F. (1994) ‘Phenomenology, Ethnomethodology, and Interpretive Practice’, in N.K. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln (Eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research, pp. 262-272. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21. Holstein, J.A. and Gubrium, J.F. (1997) ‘Active Iinterviewing’, in D. Silverman (Ed.) Qualitative Research: Theory, Method and Practice, pp. 113-129. London: Sage.
22. Holt, E. (2000) ‘Reporting and Reacting: Concurrent Responses to Reported Speech’, Research on Language and Social Interaction 33(4): 425-454.
23. Honan, E., Knobel, M., Baker, C. and Davies, B. (2000) ‘Producing Possible Hannahs: Theory and the Subject of Research’, Qualitative Inquiry 6(1): 9-32.
24. McHoul, A. (1978) ‘The Organization of Turns at Formal Talk in the Classroom’, Language in Society 7: 183-213.
25. MacLure, M. and Walker, B.M. (2000) ‘Disenchanted Evenings: The Social Organisation of Talk in Parent-Teacher Consultations in UK Secondary Schools’, British Journal of Sociology of Education 21(1): 5-25.
26. Mazeland, H. and ten Have, P. (1998) ‘Essential Tensions in (Semi-)Open Research Interview. http://www.pscw.uva.nl/emca/ET.htm.
27. Originally published in I. Maso and F. Wester (Eds) (1996) The Deliberate Dialogue: Qualitative Perspectives on the Interview, pp. 87-113. Brussels: VUB University Press.
28. Mehan, H. (1983) ‘The Role of Language and the Language of Role in Institutional Decision Making’, Language in Society 12: 187-211.
29. Mehan, H. (1985) ‘The Structure of Classroom Discourse’, in T.A. van Dijk (Ed.) Handbook of Discourse Analysis, Vo1. 3: Discourse and Dialogue, pp. 119-131. London: Academic Press.
30. Mehan, H. (1991) ‘The School's Work of Sorting Students’, in D. Boden and D.H. Zimmerman (Eds) Talk and Social Structure: Studies in Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis, pp. 71-90. Berkeley: University of California Press.
31. Merriam, S. (1988) Case Study Research in Education: A Qualitative Approach. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
32. Perrott, C. (1988) Classroom Talk and Pupil Learning: Guidelines for Educators. Sydney: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
33. Pomerantz, A. (1984) ‘Agreeing and Disagreeing with Assessments: Some Features of Preferred/Dispreferred Turn Shapes’, in J.M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (Eds) Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, pp. 57-101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34. Pomerantz, A. (1986) ‘Extreme Case Formulations: A Way of Legitimizing Claims’, Human Studies 9: 219-229.
35. Reid, J.-A. (1998) ‘New Times, New Ways? Methodological Problems in Researching the Nintendo Generation’, Australian Educational Researcher 25(3): 37-60.
36. Reid, J.-A., Kamler, B., Simpson, A. and Maclean, R. (1996) ‘Do You See What I See? Reading a Different Classroom Scene’, Qualitative Studies in Education 9(1): 87-108.
37. Roulston, K.J. (1992) ‘Working with Inaccurate Singers in the Elementary School: A Qualitative Study of Effective Teacher Action’, unpublished Master's thesis. Music Department, University of Calgary, Canada.
38. Roulston, K. (2001) ‘Investigating the “Cast of Characters” in a Cultural World’, in A. McHoul and M. Rapley (Eds) How to Analyse Talk in Institutional Settings: A Casebook of Methods. London: Continuum.
39. Roulston, K. and Mills, M. (2000) ‘Male Teachers in Feminised Teaching Areas: Marching to the Beat of the Men's Movement Drums?’, Oxford Review of Education 26(2): 221-237.
40. Sacks, H. (1992) Lectures on Conversation, 2 vols, ed. G. Jefferson. Oxford: Blackwell.
41. Sharrock, W. (1989) ‘Ethnomethodology’, The British Journal of Sociology 40: 657-677.
42. Silverman, D. (1987) Communication and Medical Practice: Social Relations in the Clinic. London: Sage.
43. Silverman, D. (1993 a) Interpreting Qualitative Data: Methods for Analysing Talk, Text, and Interaction. London: Sage.
44. Silverman, D. (1993 b) ‘The Machinery of Interaction: Remaking Social Science’ [Review of Lectures on Conversation], Sociological Review 41(4): 731-752.
45. Smith, D. (1974) ‘Theorizing as Ideology’, in R. Turner (Ed.) Ethnomethodology, pp. 41-44. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
46. Stake, R.E. (1995) The Art of Case Study Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
47. Verkuyten, M. (2000) ‘School Marks and Teachers’ Accountability to Colleagues’, Text 2(4): 252-472.
48. Wolf, M. (1992) A Thrice Told Tale: Feminism, Postmodernism and Ethnographic Responsibility. Stanford, CA, Stanford University Press.
49. Woolgar, S. (1988) ‘Ethnographic Research’, in S. Woolgar (Ed.) Knowledge and Reflexivity, pp. 14-34. London: Sage.