Performance measurement: From philosophy to practice

International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management

Volumn 53, Issue 8, 2004, Pages 726-737

  Tangen, Stefan ^a  

^a ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Activity based costs; Balanced scorecard; Performance management systems; Performance measures

Indexed keywords

EID: 84993043320     PISSN: 17410401     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/17410400410569134     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Bernolak, I. (1997), “Effective measurement and successful elements of company productivity: the basis of competitiveness and world prosperity”, International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 52, pp. 203-13.
2. Bitichi, U.S. (1994), “Measuring your way to profit”, Management Decision, Vol. 32 No. 6, pp. 16-24.
3. Crawford, K. and Cox, J. (1990), “Designing performance measurement systems for just in time operations”, International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 28 No. 11, pp. 2025-36.
4. Cross, K.F. and Lynch, R.L. (1992), “For good measure”, CMA Magazine, April, pp. 20-3.
5. Fisher, T.J. (1990), “Business productivity measurement using standard cost accounting information”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 10 No. 8, pp. 61-9.
6. Fry, T.D. (1995), “Japanese manufacturing performance criteria”, International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 33 No. 4.
7. Ghalayini, A.M., Noble, J.S. and Crowe, T.J. (1997), “An integrated dynamic performance measurement system for improving manufacturing competitiveness”, International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 48, pp. 207-25.
8. Goldratt, E. (1990), Theory of Constraints, North River Press, Croton-on-Hudson, NY.
9. Hill, T. (1995), Manufacturing Strategy: The Strategic Management of the Manufacturing Function, 2nd ed., Macmillan, London.
10. Jackson, M. (2000), “An analysis of flexible and reconfigurable production systems”, Dissertation No. 640, Linköping University, Linköping.
11. Jagdev, H., Bradley, P. and Molloy, O. (1997), “A QFD based performance measurement tool”, Computers in Industry, Vol. 33, pp. 357-66.
12. Johnson, H.T. and Kaplan, R.S. (1987), Relevance Lost: The Rise and Fall of Management Accounting, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
13. Kaplan, R.S. and Cooper, R. (1998), Cost and Effect: Using Integrated Cost Systems to Drive Profitability and Performance, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
14. Kaplan, R.S. and Norton, D.P. (1992), “The balanced scorecard – measures that drive performance”, Harvard Business Review, January-February, pp. 71-9.
15. Maskell, B. (1991), Performance Measurement for World Class Manufacturing: A Model for American Companies, Productivity Press, Cambridge, MA.
16. Medori, D. and Steeple, D. (2000), “A framework for auditing and enhancing performance measurement systems”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 20 No. 5, pp. 520-33.
17. Moore, R. and Scheinkopf, L. (1998), Theory of Constraints and Lean Manufacturing: Friends or Foes?, Chesapeake Consulting, Severna Park, MD.
18. Moseng, B. and Bredrup, H. (1993), “A methodology for industrial studies of productivity performance”, Production Planning and Control, Vol. 4 No. 3, pp. 198-206.
19. Neely, A., Adams, C. and Crowe, P. (2001), “The performance prism in practice”, Measuring Business Excellence, Vol. 5 No. 2, pp. 6-12.
20. Neely, A., Gregory, M. and Platts, K. (1995), “Performance measurement system design: a literature review and research agenda”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 15 No. 4, pp. 80-116.
21. Neely, A., Mills, J., Platts, K., Gregory, M. and Richards, H. (1994), “Mapping measures and activities: a practical tool for assessing measurement systems”, Proceedings of the 1st International Conference of the European Operations Management Association, Manufacturing Engineering Group, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, pp. 313-18.
22. Neely, A., Mills, J., Platts, K., Richards, H. and Bourne, M. (2000), “Performance measurement system design: developing and testing a process-based approach”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 20 No. 10, pp. 1119-45.
23. Neely, A., Richards, H., Mills, J., Platts, K. and Bourne, M. (1997), “Designing performance measures: a structured approach”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 17 No. 11, pp. 1131-52.
24. Ross, S.A., Westerfield, R.W. and Jaffe, J.F. (1993), Corporate Finance, 3rd ed., Irwin, Burr Ridge, IL.
25. Sink, D.S. and Tuttle, T.C. (1989), Planning and Measurement in Your Organisation of the Future, Ch. 5, Industrial Engineering and Management Press, Norcross, GA, pp. 170-84.
26. Skinner, W. (1986), “The productivity paradox”, Harvard Business Review, July-August, pp. 55-9.
27. Tangen, S. (2002a), “A theoretical foundation for productivity measurement and improvement of automatic assembly systems”, Licentiate thesis, The Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm.
28. Tangen, S. (2002b), “RATOC: a simple method for productivity improvement in robot workcells based on the theory of constraints”, Proceedings of the 33rd International Symposium on Robotics (ISR2002), Stockholm, October 7-10.
29. Tangen, S. (2003), “An overview of frequently used performance measures”, Work Study, Vol. 52 No. 7, pp. 347-54.
30. Toni, A. and Tonchia, S. (2001), “Performance measurement systems – models, characteristics and measures”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 21 No. 1/2, pp. 46-70.
31. White, G. (1996), “A survey and taxonomy of strategy-related performance measures for manufacturing”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 16 No. 3, pp. 42-61.