An integrated dynamic performance measurement system for improving manufacturing competitiveness

International Journal of Production Economics

Volumn 48, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 207-225

  Ghalayini, Alaa M ^a   Noble, James S ^a   Crowe, Thomas J ^a  

^a University of Missouri   (United States)

Author keywords

Integration; Performance measurement; Production operations; Traditional

Indexed keywords

COMPETITION; MANUFACTURE; PERFORMANCE; PERSONNEL; PRODUCTION; QUALITY CONTROL; STANDARDS;

INTEGRATED DYNAMIC PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT SYSTEM; PRODUCTION OPERATIONS; TRADITIONAL;

MANAGEMENT;

EID: 0031076668     PISSN: 09255273     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0925-5273(96)00093-X     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Kaplan, R.S., 1983. Measuring manufacturing performance: a new challenge for managerial accounting research. Acc. Rev., 58(4): 686-705.
2. Skinner, W., 1986. The productivity paradox. Har. Bus. Rev., 64: 55-59.
3. Johnson, H.T. and Kaplan, R.S., 1987. Relevance Lost - The Rise and Fall of Management Accounting. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
4. McNair, C.J., Mosconi, W. and Norris, T., 1989. Beyond the Bottom Line: Measuring World Class Performance. Dow Jones-Irwin, Homewood, IL.
5. Drucker, P.E., 1990. The emerging theory of manufacturing. Har. Bus. Rev., 68: 94-102.
6. Kaplan, R.S., 1990. Limitations of cost accounting in advanced manufacturing environments, in: R.S. Kaplan (Ed.), Measures for Manufacturing Excellence. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA, 91-126.
7. Eccles, R.G., 1991. The performance measurement manifesto. Har. Bus. Rev., 69: 131-137.
8. Plossl, G. W., 1991. Managing in the New World of Manufacturing: How Companies Can Improve Operations to Compete Globally. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
9. Fisher, J., 1992. Use of non-financial performance measures. J. Cost Mgmt., 6: 31-38.
10. Maskell, B.H., 1991. Performance Measurement for World Class Manufacturing: A Model for American Companies. Productivity Press, Cambridge, MA.
11. The Productivity Paradox. Special Report. 1988. Business Week, June 16, 100-108.
12. Hayes, R.H., Wheelwright, S.C. and Clark, K.B., 1988. Dynamic Manufacturing: Creating the Learning Organization. The Free Press, New York.
13. Dixon, J.R., Nanni, A.J. and Vollmann, T.E., 1990. The New Performance Challenge: Measuring Operations for World Class Competition. Dow Jones-Irwin, Homewood, IL.
14. Sink, D.S. and Smith, G.L., 1993. Performance linkages: understanding the role of planning, measurement and evaluation in large scale organizational change, in: Sumanth, Edosomwan, Poupart, and Sink (Eds.), Productivity and Quality Management Frontiers-IV. Institute of Industrial Engineering, Norcross, GA, pp. 500-511.
15. Nanni, A.J., Dixon, J.R. and Vollmann, T.E., 1990. Strategic control and performance measurement. J. Cost Mgmt., 4: 33-42.
16. Turnbull, G.K., Fisher, E.S., Peretic, E.M., John, R.H., Arnoldo, R.C. and Newborn, M., 1992. Improving manufacturing competitiveness through strategic analysis, in: J. A. Heim, and W.D. Compton (Eds.), Manufacturing Systems: Foundations of World-Class Practice. National Academy of Engineering, Washington, D.C., pp. 224-232.
17. Cross, K.F. and Lynch, R.L., 1988/89. The SMART way to define and sustain success. National Prod. Rev., 8(1): 23-33.
18. Kaplan, R.S. and Norton, D.P., 1992. The balanced scorecard - Measures that drive performance. Har. Bus. Rev., 70: 71-79.
19. Gregory, M.J., 1993. Integrated performance measurement: a review of current practice and emerging trends. Int. J. Prod. Econom., 30/31: 281-296.
20. Schneiderman, A.M., 1988. Setting quality goals. Quality Progress, 21: 51-75.
21. Noble, J.S. and LaHay, C.W., 1994. Cycle time modeling for process improvement teams, in: Proc. 1994 Institute of Industrial Engineers Research Conf., Atlanta, GA, pp. 372-377.