Towards an alternative concept of privacy

Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 220-237

  Fuchs, Christian ^a  

^a UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Communication technologies; Critical political economy; Critical theory; Internet; Privacy

Indexed keywords

EID: 84993012715     PISSN: 1477996X     EISSN: 17588871     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/14779961111191039     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Allen, A. (1988), Uneasy Access, Rowman & Littlefield, Totowa, NJ.
2. Arendt, H. (1958), The Human Condition, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
3. Benn, S.I. (1971/1984), “Privacy, freedom, and respect for persons”, in Schoeman, F.D. (Ed.), Philosophical Dimensions of Privacy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 223-44.
4. Bennett, C. (2008), The Privacy Advocates, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
5. Bennett, C. and Raab, C. (2006), The Governance of Privacy, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
6. Bloustein, E.J. (1964/1984), “Privacy as an aspect of human dignity”, in Schoeman, F.D. (Ed.), Philosophical Dimensions of Privacy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 156-202.
7. Bok, S. (1983), Secrets: On the Ethics of Concealment and Revelation, Pantheon, New York, NY.
8. Burk, D.L. (2007), “Privacy and property in the global datasphere”, in Hongladarom, S. and Ess, C. (Eds), Technology Ethics: Cultural Perspectives, Idea Group Reference, Hershey, PA, pp. 94-107.
9. Capurro, R. (2005), “Privacy. An intercultural perspective”, Ethics and Information Technology, Vol. 7 No. 1, pp. 37-47.
10. Dussel, E. (2008), “The discovery of the category of surplus value”, in Musto, M. (Ed.), Karl Marx's Grundrisse: Foundations of the Critique of the Political Economy 150 Years Later, Routledge, New York, NY, pp. 67-78.
11. Engels, F. (1891), “The origin of the family, private property and the state”, Selected Works in One Volume: Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, Lawrence & Wishart, London, pp. 430-558.
12. Ess, C. (2005), “Lost in translation? Intercultural dialogues on privacy and information ethics”, Ethics and Information Technology, Vol. 7 No. 1, pp. 1-6.
13. Etzioni, A. (1999), The Limits of Privacy, Basic Books, New York, NY.
14. Fried, C. (1968/1984), “Privacy”, in Schoeman, F.D. (Ed.), Philosophical Dimensions of Privacy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 203-22.
15. Froomkin, A.M. (2000), “The death of privacy?”, Stanford Law Review, Vol. 52, pp. 1461-543.
16. Fuchs, C. (2003 a), “Some implications of Pierre Bourdieu's works for a theory of social self-organization”, European Journal of Social Theory, Vol. 6 No. 4, pp. 387-408.
17. Fuchs, C. (2003 b), “Structuration theory and self-organization”, Systemic Practice and Action Research, Vol. 16 No. 4, pp. 133-67.
18. Fuchs, C. (2011 a), “Critique of the political economy of web 2.0 surveillance”, in Fuchs, C., Boersma, K., Albrechtslund, A. and Sandoval, M. (Eds), Internet and Surveillance. The Challenges of Web 2.0 and Social Media, Routledge, New York, NY, pp. 31-70.
19. Fuchs, C. (2011 b), “The political economy of privacy on Facebook”, Television & New Media (in press).
20. Gandy, O. (2011), Coming to Terms with Chance, Ashgate, Farnham.
21. Gavison, R. (1980), “Privacy and the limits of law”, Yale Law Journal, Vol. 89 No. 3, pp. 421-71.
22. Gerstein, R.S. (1978/1984), “Intimacy and privacy”, in Schoeman, F.D. (Ed.), Philosophical Dimensions of Privacy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 265-71.
23. Giddens, A. (1984), The Constitution of Society, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
24. Gilliom, J. (2001), Overseers of the Poor, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
25. Gormley, K. (1992), “One hundred years of privacy”, Wisconsin Law Review, Vol. 1992, pp. 1335-441.
26. Habermas, J. (1987), The Theory of Communicative Action, Volume 2, Beacon Press, Boston, MA, p. 2.
27. Habermas, J. (1989), The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
28. Hongladarom, S. (2007), “Analysis and justification of privacy from a Buddhist perspective”, in Hongladarom, S. and Ess, C. (Eds), Technology Ethics: Cultural Perspectives, Ide Group Reference, Hershey, PA, pp. 108-22.
29. Introna, L.D. (2000), “Privacy and the computer. Why we need privacy in the information society”, in Baird, R.M., Ramsower, R. and Rosenbaum, S.E. (Eds), Cyberethics, Prometheus, Amherst, NY, pp. 188-99.
30. Lyon, D. (1994), The Rise of Surveillance Society. The Electronic Eye, Polity Press, Cambridge.
31. Lyon, D. (2001), Surveillance Society. Monitoring Everyday Life, Open University Press, Buckingham.
32. Lyon, D. (2007), Surveillance Studies: An Overview, Polity Press, Cambridge.
33. Macpherson, C.B. (1962), The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
34. Margulis, S. (2003 a), “On the status and contribution of Westin's and Altman's theories of privacy”, Journal of Social Issues, Vol. 59 No. 2, pp. 411-30.
35. Margulis, S. (2003 b), “Privacy as a social issue and behavioural concept”, Journal of Social Issues, Vol. 59 No. 2, pp. 243-62.
36. Marx, K. (1843 a), Critique of Hegel's Doctrine of the State. Early Writings, Penguin, London, pp. 57-198.
37. Marx, K. (1843 b), “On the Jewish question”, Writings of the Young Marx on Philosophy and Society, Hackett, Indianapolis, IN, pp. 216-48.
38. Marx, K. (1844), “Economic and philosophic manuscripts of 1844”, Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844 and the Communist Manifesto, Prometheus, Amherst, NY, pp. 13-168.
39. Marx, K. (1867), Capital, Volume I, Penguin, London.
40. Marx, K. and Engels, F. (1846), German Ideology, Prometheus, Amherst, NY.
41. Mill, J.S. (1965) in Mill, J.S. (Ed.), Principles of Political Economy, Volumes 2, University of Toronto Press, London.
42. Miller, A. (1971), The Assault on Privacy, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
43. Moor, J.H. (2000), “Toward a theory of privacy in the information age”, in Robert, M.B., Ramsower, R. and Rosenbaum, S.E. (Eds), Cyberethics, Prometheus, Amherst, NY, pp. 200-12.
44. Moore, B. (1984), Privacy. Studies in Social and Cultural History, M.E. Sharpe, Armonk, NY.
45. Negri, A. (1991), Marx beyond Marx, Pluto, London.
46. Nissenbaum, H. (2010), Privacy in Context, Stanford University Press, Standford, CA.
47. Nock, S. (1993), The Costs of Privacy: Surveillance and Reputation in America, De Gruyter, New York, NY.
48. Posner, R.A. (1978/1984), “An economic theory of privacy”, in Schoeman, F.D. (Ed.), Philosophical Dimensions of Privacy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 333-45.
49. Quinn, M. (2006), Ethics for the Information Age, Pearson, Boston, MA.
50. Rachel, J. (1975/1984), “Why privacy is important”, in Ferdinand, D.S. (Ed.), Philosophical Dimensions of Privacy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 290-9.
51. Rule, J.B. (2007), Privacy in Peril, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
52. Schoeman, F.D. (1984 a), “Privacy and intimate information”, in Schoeman, F.D. (Ed.), Philosophical Dimensions of Privacy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 403-18.
53. Schoeman, F.D. (1984 b), “Privacy: philosophical dimensions of the literature”, in Schoeman, F.D. (Ed.), Philosophical Dimensions of Privacy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 1-33.
54. Schoeman, F.D. (1992), Privacy and Social Freedom, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA.
55. Schultz, R.A. (2006), Contemporary Issues in Ethics and Information Technology, IRM Press, Hershey, PA.
56. Sewell, G. and Barker, J. (2007), “Neither good, nor bad, but dangerous: surveillance as an ethical paradox”, in Hier, S.P. and Greenberg, J. (Eds), The Surveillance Studies Reader, Open University Press, Maidenhead, pp. 354-67.
57. Shade, L.R. (2003), “Privacy”, in Jones, S. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of New Media, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 378-80.
58. Shils, E. (1966), “Privacy: its constitution and vicissitudes”, Law & Contemporary Problems, Vol. 31 No. 2, pp. 281-306.
59. Solove, D. (2004), “The digital person”, Technology and Privacy in the Information Age, New York University Press, New York, NY.
60. Solove, D.J. (2008), Understanding Privacy, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
61. Spinello, R. (2006), CyberEthics: Morality and Law in Cyberspace, Jones and Bartlett, Sudbury, MA.
62. Stahl, B.C. (2007), “Privacy and security as ideology”, IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, Spring, pp. 35-45.
63. Stalder, F. (2002), “Privacy is not the antidote to surveillance”, Surveillance & Society, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 120-4.
64. Tännsjö, T. (2010), Privatliv, Fri Tanke, Lidingö.
65. Tavani, H.T. (2008), “Informational privacy: concepts, theories, and controversies”, in Himma, K.E. and Tavani, H.T. (Eds), The Handbook of Information and Computer Ethics, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, pp. 131-64.
66. Wacks, R. (2010), Privacy. A Very Short Introduction, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
67. Warren, S. and Brandeis, L. (1890), “The right to privacy”, Harvard Law Review, Vol. 4 No. 5, pp. 193-220.
68. Wasserstrom, R.A. (1978/1984), “Privacy. Some arguments and assumptions”, in Schoeman, F.D. (Ed.), Philosophical Dimensions of Privacy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 317-32.
69. Westin, A. (1967), Privacy and Freedom, Altheneum, New York, NY.
70. Zureik, E. and Harling Stalker, L.L. (2010), “The cross-cultural study of privacy”, in Zureik, E., Harling Stalker, L.L., Smith, E., Lyon, D. and Chan, Y.E. (Eds), Surveillance, Privacy and The Globalization of Personal Information, McGill-Queen's University Press, Montreal, pp. 8-30.
71. Ess, C. (2009), Digital Media Ethics, Polity Press, Cambridge.
72. Marx, K. (1894), Capital, Volume III, Penguin, London.
73. Tavani, H.T. (2010), “Ethics and technology”, Controversies, Questions and Strategies for Ethical Computing, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.